國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 第三章_第1頁(yè)
國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 第三章_第2頁(yè)
國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 第三章_第3頁(yè)
國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 第三章_第4頁(yè)
國(guó)際商務(wù)談判 第三章_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩108頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

Chapter3

Preparation

“SorryMr.Smith,asyouraccountant,Ihaven’tpreparedforthisnegotiation.”I. CollectingInformation

“Itwouldbeabsolutelydisastrousforustogointonegotiationnotknowinginadvancewhattheothersidewasgoingtopropose"

---HenryKissinger

基辛格

(FormerUSSecretaryofState)

Summitmeeting

最高首腦峰會(huì)

Knowledgeispowerandthemoreknowledgeonesideisabletoaccumulateabouttheother,thebetterchancethatsidehasforvictory.Withoutinformationweriskourproposals beingaimless,possibly landinganywhereWithinformationwehaveanincreased likelihoodourproposals willhitthebullseye1. Functions

Negotiationinformationreferstoalltheobjectivedescriptionoftheconditions,circumstances,specificationsthatcloselyrelatedtonegotiationactivities.Basistosetforthnegotiationstrategies.TocontroltheprocessofnegotiationNegotiationinformationisthemediaofcommunicationbetweenthetwoparties.2. Maincontentsofinformationgathering

Qualificationandcreditstatusstatusquo:theexistingstateofaffairs現(xiàn)狀annualturnover年?duì)I業(yè)額word-of-mouth口碑fixedassets固定資產(chǎn)currentassets流動(dòng)資產(chǎn)cashflow現(xiàn)金流量operatingcapability經(jīng)營(yíng)能力contributionratios投資/出資比重(2)Negotiationrepresentatives①TypesofthemerchantCASE:Aneatfreak②DeadlinesCASE:Tradefair③Knowtheotherparty’sdegreeoftrustonus④ Toevaluateyourcounterpart’sactualpowerinnegotiation.Importanceofthecontentsofthedeal.Degreeofsatisfaction.CompetitiveenvironmentintwopartiesInformationgatheringofacertainindustry/line.ReputationsandinfluencesTheirreactionstotimingTacticsandstrategiesinnegotiation.SourcesofPowerinNegotiationsa.Legitimatepower合法力(Video2,14:44)TitlesinfluencepeopleTogetmorecontrol,youshouldmakepeoplecometoyoutonegotiatethantodobusinessintheirterritoryPositioning定位inthemarketplace,anykindofpositioninggivesyoulegitimatepowerinnegotiation.“YoudowhatIsaybecauseI’mtheboss-that’swhy!”“Likeitornot-that’sthelaw.”b.Rewardpower獎(jiǎng)賞力Anytimeyouperceivesomeoneisabletorewardyou,youhavegiventhemthepowertointimidate恫嚇you.---thisfeeingisentirelysubjective.Youarethebestinthebusiness,theycan’tdoanybetterthanyou.Ifyouarewillingtoputyourpersonalreputationandexpertiseonthelinetosolvethatbuyer’sproblems,theyarenotrewardingyou,youarerewardingthem.Whenyousurelybelievethatyouarerewardingthebuyernottheotherwayontheround,you’llfeelconfidentanddemandingallthebusiness.Theotherpartycanofcoursetrytouserewardpowertoinfluenceyou,butwhenyourecognizetherewardpower,theirabilityofcontrollingyougoesaway,andallowsyoumoreconfidenceinnegotiation.“Heboughthiswayin…”“Dowhateverhesays-you’llbegladyoudid.”c.Coercivepower[

k?u′?:siv

]威脅力,強(qiáng)迫力Anytimeyouperceivesomeoneisabletopunishyou,theyhavepowertointimidateyou.Oneofthestrongestpunishmentweknowisthepowertoembarrasspeople.Businessisnomorethannumbersgame.Thefeelingofrewardingorpunishingshouldgoaway,weshouldhavemoreconfidenceinnegotiating.“Shesaidshewouldjustsueme…”“Ifyoucontinuetomakethesemistakes-atveryleastitmeansademotion.”d.Reverentpower敬畏力Whenyouwanttoinfluencepeople,youshouldprojectconsistentvalues.表現(xiàn)一致的價(jià)值觀Youlikeandadmireconsistentbehaviorinyourcustomers,theylikeandadmiretheminyou.Ifyou’rewillingtotakeastandforyourprinciples,especiallyintheperiodofriskingfinancialloss,you’vebeentrustingtheotherperson,andthey’llloveyouforever.Whenyouprojectreverentpower,buyersnoticeit.Theywouldadmireandrespecttheconsistentsetofvalues,anditgivesyouinfluenceoverthem.e.Charismaticpower號(hào)召力(26:55)“Peoplewouldjuststopwhattheyweredoingandwatchhimandlistentohimanddotheirbesttosupportwhateverhewanteddone.”“Itwasscary.ButIgottomyfeetandsaid,‘Youmuststopthis.’Andhedid.”f.Expertisepower專業(yè)力Whenyouprojecttopeoplethatyouhavemoreexpertisethanthem,youdeveloppoweroverthem.“Sheisthemostimportantemployeehere-sheistheonlypersonwhoreallyknowshowthedatasystemworks.”“Idon’tcareifthere’sahiringfreeze.Getmesomeonewhoknowsaboutinteroperability.”Reverentpower,CharismaticpowerandExpertisepowerarethethreemostimportantpowersthatcancontrolthenegotiation.Reverentpower:“Iwon’tdoanythingthatisnotinyourbestinterestregardlessofthegaintome.”Charismaticpower:shehasalikablepersonality.Expertisepower:sheknewmoreaboutitthanhedid.g.Situationpower情景力Situationpoweristhepowerthatcomesfrombeingintherightplaceattheright

time.Acustomerisdesperatetoplaceanorderandyouaretheonlysourceof

supplyintheshortterm.Havinganeffectivenetworkandkeepingintouchwithwhatishappeningcanincreaseyoursituationpower.h.Informationpower信息力Withholdinformationcouldbefairlyintimidating,becausewehatepeoplewithholdinformationfromus.Don’tletthemdothistoyou.Realizethattheyarejusttryingtolowerdownyourconfidence.“Hewasabletogetustheinformationweneededaboutwhatourcompetitionisplanningforthenextyear.”“Youthinkyou’rebeingpaidfairly?Letmetellyouwhatothersaremaking.”i. BATNA-thebestalternativetoanegotiatedagreement達(dá)成協(xié)議的最佳替代方案“Theyhadallthetimeintheworldandlotsofothercustomers-theydidnotneedus.”“TheworstthatcanhappenisthatIwilljustgobackwhereIcamefrom.Imightevenlikethat.”(3)

Marketquotations①P58synthesis[

'sinθisis

]綜合Case:loan:貸款NetPresentValue(NPV)凈現(xiàn)值softloan(借款國(guó)可用本國(guó)軟貨幣償還的)軟貸款

②Consumptionneeds(consumers):consumerloyalty,whyconsumersareloyaltoacertainproduct?Reasons,motivations,theirplansandintentions?Wherethey’dliketobuy?Reactionstomarketingcampaigns,potentialneeds,rateofcoverageandmarketshareofaproduct,effectsfromcompetitions.CASE:Frenchcarvs.JapanesecarSeldomgrantloanstolocalbuyers.Ittookalongtimefordeliveryofspareparts. CitroenC4 HondaFit③Sales.(ifyouare)Seller:investigatethesalesofyourproductandsalesofthelikeproductsfromyourcompetitorsBuyer:salesvolumeinthepastyears,fluctuationinprices;itstrendinthelongrun;consumer’sneedsforthisproducts;theirrequirementsandcomments.④Informationoftheircompetitiveproducts:features,salesvolumes,prices, advertisingcampaigns,consumer’spreferencesandsoon.⑤Distributionchannel.CASE: Purchasingpatent. 1982,15-yearcompensationtrade 2.4millionMarks apatentexpiresin1989 1.3millionMarks(4)Lawsandcultures(P59)CASE: Machineswereboggeddowninmuddygroundduringrainyseason雨季.Howtogatherinformation?

Questioning(Video4:32:43)Relevantdepartmentsanddomesticconsultingcompanies美國(guó)科學(xué)情報(bào)研究所 路透社(4)Visitingallkindsoftradefairsinandabroad(5)Personnelandembassiesinforeigncountries(6)Materialspublishedorunpublished2.

Forming

theNegotiationTeamSelfTest

Toevaluateyourownmotivationstyle下面這些選項(xiàng)每個(gè)1分,加起來(lái)計(jì)算你的合作性分?jǐn)?shù) 1-C,2-B,3-A,4-C,5-B,6-A,7-A,8-C,9-A下面這些選項(xiàng)每個(gè)1分,加起來(lái)計(jì)算你的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性分?jǐn)?shù) 1-A,2-C,3-B,4-A,5-C,6-B,7-C,8-B,9-B下面這些選項(xiàng)每個(gè)1分,加起來(lái)計(jì)算你的自我性分?jǐn)?shù) 1-B,2-A,3-C,4-B,5-A,6-C,7-B,8-A,9-C3.2.0 WhoqualifiesasanegotiatorTypesofnegotiatorSharks:

Sharksbelievein scarcity Theymoveinforthe kill Strivingtogetas muchastheycan, regardlessofthecost.Basicnature:takeoverortradeoff(tochoosebetweenadesirableoranacceptabledeal)Characteristics:

a. atendencytousecrisestoconfusethe otherparty.

b. assumetheyalwayshavetheonly possiblesolutiontoanynegotiation.Ifyoufindyourselfnegotiatingwithashark ------constantlyonguard(2)Carp

Believeinscarcity. Believethatina negotiation,theycan neverbethewinners. Theyfocustheir effortsonnotlosing whattheycurrently have.Donotlikeanytypeofconfrontation.Responseinnegotiatingistogiveinorgetout.Ifyoufindyourselfnegotiatinglikeacarp ------concentrateonraisingyourlevelofaspiration(3)Dolphins

Idealnegotiator. Whendolphinsdo notgetwhatthey want,theyquickly andpreciselyalter theirbehaviorsin sometimesingenious wayinpursuitof whattheyareafter.Believeinbothpotentialscarcityandpotentialabundance.Ifonestrategyisnotsuccessful,dolphinsrespondwithotherpossibilities.Theywilltakeoverwhen: * Timeislimitedoraspecificoutcomeis crucial.

* Therelationshipwiththeotherpartyis oflittleimportanceandaspecific outcomeiscritical.

* Appropriateretaliationisnecessary.

Theywilltradeoffwhen:

* Timeisshort.

* Theissueistrivial.

* Theycarealotabouttherelationship withtheotherparty.

* Itbecomesapparentthattheotherparty willnotcooperate.

Theywillgiveinwhen:

* Theissueistrivialandtherelationshipis crucial.

* Itiswiseto“buytime.”

* Theydiscoverthattheyarewrong.

Theywillgetoutwhen:

* Theoutcomedoesnotmattermuch.

* Morepressingneedsexist.

* Theyneedtimetogathermore information.

* Theiremotionsneedtimetocool.

Dolphinshavefourkeycharacteristics:

Theyplayaninfiniteratherthanafinitegame.

Theyavoidunnecessaryconflictbycooperatingaslongastheotherpartydoeslikewise.

Theyrespondpromptlytoa“mean”movebyretaliatingproperly.

Whilequicktoretaliate,dolphinsarealsoquicktoforgive.

Summary: Unlikesharks,whospendthemajorityoftheirtimetryingtocontroltheircounterpartsandexpecttoconcludeanynegotiationwithadefinitewinnerandloser,dolphinsspendthemajorityoftheirtimebuildingtrustandrapport.Knowingthatnegotiationsareusuallymostsuccessfulwhenbothparties’needsaremet,theyconsidertheotherparty’sgoalsandfosteranatmosphereofcooperation.Andwhenonenegotiatingstrategyfails,theytryotherstrategiestoenhancethepossibilityofachievingawin/winoutcome.People’sreactionstodifferenttypesofnegotiatorsCategoriesofnegotiators:Sharps---Liars謊言操縱者(whowoulddoanythingthatisfavorabletothemselves)Sharps---Inastrongpositionbuthonest強(qiáng)勢(shì)但誠(chéng)實(shí)(verypowerfulnegotiatorsseldomtellliesbutreluctanttoconcede.)Dolphins---Friendlyandreasonable和藹可親并通情達(dá)理(whoarereadytoconcede)Carps---懦弱派Whoarereadytoconcedeandcompromiseregardlessoftheirownsacrifice61%ofpeoplereactlikesharps

49%ofpeoplereactlikesharps35%ofpeoplechoosetocooperate30%ofpeoplereactlikesharps64%ofpeoplechoosetocooperate40%ofpeoplereactlikesharps27%ofpeoplechoosetocooperateTheresultsshowthatPeopletakethestrong/toughormanipulativestrategieswhennegotiatingwithliarsorsharp-likenegotiators.Peoplereacttocarps-likenegotiatorsfromtheaspectoftheopportunism.2.Whatshouldanegotiatorknow---"T”Shape“-”:horizontalbroadtechnicalknowledge:a. Thepolicyandrelativelawsandregulationsb. Theproductionandthedemandandsupplyofacertainproductinandabroadc.

Pricelevelandit’strendd. Therequirementofthequalityandtechnicalstandard

e. Beawareoftherelatedinternationalconventionsandpracticesf.Lawsandregulationsinthecounterpart’scountry,includingbusinesslaw,lawoftechnologytransfer,provisionsforforeignexchangecontrol,etc.g.Otherrelatedbusinessitems,suchasthetrendinthemarketortheexchangerateh.Stilldifferentculturesanddifferentcustoms

(2)“︱”:specificknowledgeintheparticularindustry:a.Specifications,usages,functions,oftheproductsb.Potentialinthemarketsc.Theabilitytodealwithaffairesarousedinthenegotiationd.TheabilitytocommunicateinacertainforeignlanguageTostudyalltherelevantcompaniesinthecounterpart’scountryKnowyourcounterpart’scharacteristicsbeforethenegotiation“knowtheenemyandknowyourself,andyoucanfightahundredbattleswithnodangerofdefeat”

3. TheroleofachiefnegotiatorSelf-controlandkeeptheteamontrackUsethespecificationsofeachmemberThisisouraccountThisisMr.Smith,heisouraccount,hehasbeenworkingforourcompanyfor15years,hehastheauthoritytoexamineandgrantcreditsvalues $1,500,000.(3)

Dealwithpressure(4)Decisionmaker

The“NormandyLanding”onJune6,1944DwightD.EisenhowerAirWarrior空降兵(5)

Technicallyastute …“Fromcupsofjadethatglowwithwineofgrapesatnight…”“Leaders,likehungrylions,mustlieinwaitfortherighttime—andthen,whenitisright,pounce.”—J.RichardHackman“Agoodleaderislikerain,calmingtheocean.”3.2.2 ThestaffingofthenegotiationteamCEOofabiotechstart-up

“Strengthinnumbers”?Thekeytotakingateamapproachtonegotiationistounderstandthepsychologyofhowteamswork.Comparisonwithsolonegotiators. Negotiatingteamscancreatenew opportunitiesforintegrativesolutions.

teams

vs.teams

teams

vs.solonegotiators

solonegotiatorsvs.solonegotiators

Thepresenceofatleastoneteamatthebargainingtableledtohigherjointgains.(2) Morepowerfulandmoreadvantaged thansolonegotiatorsunderhighly stressfulsituation.Withgreaternumberscomesasenseasecurity.(3)“Ifteammembersdisagreeonthekeyissues...theyareunlikelytotakeadvantageoftheirdifferingskills.”Familiaritywithoneanotherallowsteammemberstosharedivergentinformationandengageintheconstructiveconflictnecessarytofindasolution.Teamscanbeaneffectivepresenceatthebargainingtable,onlyifthemembersareabletouncover,leverage,andefficientlycoordinatetheirdiverseabilities.Jigsawpuzzle拼圖2.Workingasateamcanbeparticularlybeneficialinthefollowingsituations:(1) Thenegotiationiscomplex,requiringadiversesetofknowledge,abilities,orexpertise.(2)Thenegotiationhasgreatpotentialforcreative,integrativesolutions.

(3)Youwanttodisplayyourstrengthtothe otherside,forexample,ininternational contextswhereteamsareexpected.

(4)Youwanttosignaltotheothersidethat youtakethenegotiationveryseriously, asinamerger合并oracquisition兼并.(5)Youtrustandrespectavailableteam members.(6)Youhavesufficienttimetoorganizeand coordinateateameffort.Creatingatrueteamrequirespreparation,coordinationandinternalnegotiation.Whenadealisveryimportant,youshouldspendatleasttwiceasmuchtimeonpreparationasyoudevotetothenegotiationitself.3.Betterteamworkthroughpreparation

Anewnegotiatingteam'spreparationphaseshouldincludethreecomponents:Discussthenegotiation’ssubstanceBeforeenteringintothenegotiation,theteammuststriveforcompleteunity.

CASE: AnAmericancoupleinMorocco,browsinginashop,wantingtobuyrugs.a. Beginyourpreparatorymeetingbybrainstormingalistofissuesthatyouwouldliketodiscussinthenegotiation

b. Prioritizetheissuesandconsiderpotentialtradeoffs.c. AgreeonyourBATNA達(dá)成協(xié)議的最佳替代方案(bestalternativetoanegotiatedagreement);yourreservationpoint底線,ortheworstoutcomeyouwillagreeto;andyouraspirationlevel期望值

orthebestoutcomeyoucanimagine.

d. Nowit'stimetoconsidertheotherside:toestimatetheirpriorities,theirBATNAS,reservationpoint,andaspirationlevel,etc. makealistofinformationthatyouwishedyouknew.Finally,agreeontheinformationyourteamiswillingtorevealtotheother sideandtheinformationthatmustneverberevealed.Remember,youcan’ttakeanythingbackonceit’sbeenspoken.(2)Assessskillsandroles---tofigureouthowtotakeadvantageofthediverseskillsofyourteammembers.Beginwithaskillsassessment.---Whatkindofknowledgeisrequired?Thenextstepistomatchskillswithessentialroles

(3)Planthenegotiationprocess Whatopeningoffershouldtheymake?Whenshouldtheymakethefirstconcession? Howmanyconcessionsshouldtheymake?4.OrganizationalstructurefornegotiatorsP.63 Consistsofleadingpersonnel, chiefnegotiator“Theleadertypically,thoughnotalways,servesastheteam'schiefnegotiator.” technicalpersonnel,businesspersonnel,lawpersonnel,translators,financialpersonnel,andpersonneltorecordminutes.

Thenegotiationteamshouldincludemembersineachofthefollowingarea:Commercial:responsibleforthenegotiationonprice,deliveryterms,andcommercialpolicyofrisktaking.Technical:responsiblefortheareaconcerningspecification,programandmethodsofwork(3)Financial:responsiblefortermsofpayment,creditinsurance,bondsandfinancialguarantees.(4)Legal:responsibleforcontractdocuments,termsandconditionsofcontractinsurance,legalinterpretation5.Howbigshouldtheteambe“Myruleofthumbisthatnoworkteamshouldhavemembershipinthedoubledigits,andmypreferredsizeissix.”—J.RichardHackman

3.3 Planning---Establishingobjectives

3.3.1 Gistofaplan

3.3.2 Establishingobjectivesortargets.

Maximumtarget,alsocalledtheoptimalexpectedtarget最優(yōu)期望目標(biāo)Seller: $700,000Buyer: $350,000(2)ActualneededtargetItisasecretinsideateamItisthelastlineofdefenseBroughtbytheotherpartySeller: $520,000Buyer: $500,000(3)Acceptabletarget.(therangethatallowsconcessions)Seller: $520,000-$500,000Buyer: $500,000-$520,000(4)Minimumtarget(ifnotachieved,thenegotiationwouldfalldownorcollapse)Seller: lessthan$500,000Buyer: higherthan$520,000MaximumtargetAcceptabletargetActualneededtargetMinimumtargetSeller: $700,000Buyer: $350,000Seller: $520,000Buyer: $500,000Seller: $520,000-$500,000Buyer: $500,000-$520,000Seller: lessthan$500,000Buyer: higherthan$520,000$500,000ANTBuyer$520,000ANTSeller$350,000MTBuyer$700,000MTSellerATorBargainrange3.3.3Negotiationstrategies3.3.4Agenda------Oneofthebestwaytoconfinethediscussiontoimportantmatters.1.RequirementConcisenessInparticularsFeasibility2. AdvantagesofagendaPointsouttheissuestobenegotiated.Helpsputthepartyinaframeofmindtomakeconcessions.Enablethenegotiatortoleadandcontrolthenegotiationconference.3.MainContentsinanAgendaDatePlaceContents a.Issueshavebeensettled b.Issuestobenegotiated(4)

Objectives.Priceobjectives: Ifitisassumedthattheoriginaltenderwassubmittedwithamarginonsalesof35%,thismightbebrokendownas:

Commercialoverheads 商業(yè)性開(kāi)支 15% profit利潤(rùn) 12.5% riskcontingency意外風(fēng)險(xiǎn) 5% Negotiatingmargin談判機(jī)動(dòng)幅度2.5% “Toachieveamarginof32.5%withinthevalidityperiodofthetenderandwithoutadditiontotherisksallowedforinthetender.” “在報(bào)盤(pán)有效期內(nèi),如無(wú)意外風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素,擬以32.5%的預(yù)期毛利率成交?!?Minimumacceptableterms各條款可接受的最低限度: Pricelevel:Maximumreductioninprofitafterconcessionofthenegotiatingmarginis5%ifthenegotiationsareconcludedwithintendervalidityperiod. Termsofpayment:Thebuyer’stermsofpaymentcanbeacceptedsubjecttocommercialoverheadsremainingunchanged. Delivery:Shorterdeliverycanbeacceptedifpenaltycontingencyretained.3.MainContentsinanAgenda(5)

Procedure(ordersofissues) a.1ststep _________ b.2ndstep_________Timearrangement: 3/5 entertainment

“Thetendervalidityexpireswithinonemonth.Extensionofvaliditywouldcostapproximately0.5%forthefirstmonthand1%permonthafterthat.Afterthreemonthsitwouldbenecessarytorequotesincedeliverycouldnolongerbemaintained.Aimshouldbetoconcludenegotiationsin2monthsatthemaximum.”(7) PersonnelTheagendashouldstatethenamesandjobtitlesoftheteammembers.Itshouldalsoindicateanydutiesperformedoutsideoftheirownfunction.

Teamleader: Mr.Jones.(Exportsalesmanager) Teammembers:Mr.Brown(Assistantmanager, systemengineering) Mr.Smith(AssistantLegalAdviser) Mr.Brownwillcoverallproductionaspectsinadditiontoengineeringandisresponsibleforobtainingdataandmaterialsfromtheproductionmanagerforthispurpose.(8)

GeneralRulesandDetailedRulesGeneralrules: theyareabidebybothpartiesincluding:centralideaofthenegotiation,especiallytopicofthefirstfound;Whatshouldbenegotiated,whatneedn’t?theirorders,Personnelarrangedfordifferentissues.Arrangementfordifferentroundandtotaltimeofthenegotiation.

Detailedrules:shouldbeconfidential,andappliedtothepartyitself,including:Tounifyallthemembers’documents,materials,information,etc,infaceoftheotherparty.Toestablishprobableissuesbroughtupbytheotherpartyandtheirreplies.Orders:whentoraiseaquestions,whatkindofquestion,toasktowhom,whoask,whosupplement,whentoshiftthetopicunderdiscussion,whotoshift,whentoaskforabreakTest

Youarenegotiatingamulti-billiondollarmergerandyourcounterpartfaxesyoutheproposedtermsandconditionsinanattempttogettheupper-handinthenegotiationsandsuggestsathree-hourmeetingtodiscusstheterms.Whatdoyoudo?Gothroughtheirproposalpointbypointandtrytodeterminetheirrationaleforincludingeachprovision.Developalistofconcernsinregardstotheprovisionstheyhaveincluded.c.Developanagendaforthescheduledmeeting.d.Comeupwithacounterproposalofyourown.e.Inordertosendamessageof"strength",immediatelysendareturnfaxindicatingthatthesuggestedmeetingtimeisnotconvenientforyouandsuggestanalternativemeetingtimewhereyouwillprovidethemwithacounterproposalofyourown.VI.Simulating

Negotiation“Ialwayspretendtobethe

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論