回復(fù)英文論文編輯部的修改意見

1、文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持回復(fù)英文論文編輯部的修改意見Response to Editor and Reviewer.,Ph.D. ProfessorLaboratory of Plant Nutrition andEcological Environment Research,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan, 430070,E-mail: Jun 10, 2009RE: HAZMAT-D-09-00655Dear Editor ，We would like to thank the editor for giv

2、ing us a chance to resubmit the paper, and also thank the reviewers for giving us constructive suggestions which would help us both in English and in depth to improve the quality of the paper. Here we submit a new version of our manuscript with the titlesuggestions.”",which has been modified ac

3、cording to the reviewersEfforts were also made to correct the mistakes and improve the English of the manuscript. We mark all the changes in red in the revised manuscript.Sincerely yours, .,Ph.D. Professorcomments.The following is a point-to- point response to the two reviewers文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可

4、編輯.歡迎下載支持Reviewer #1:General comments:Reviewer #1: The paper presents an interesting experimental investigation to assess the photocatalytic degradation of polyethylene plastic with goethite under UVirradiation. The research work is clearly presented but the conclusions, the introduction and other p

5、arts of the paper relate the results obtained with unjustified claims about the impact of the work.In addition, the background information provided in the introduction part needs significant enrichment. In particular:Answer: Thank you for the comments on the paper. We have revised the manuscript as

6、suggested since we consider that some sentences or descriptions in the Conclusion part are not so accurate based on the results.Page 3, line 46: recycling is not availableEven though a large amount of agricultural plastic waste in burnt or buried in the fields, some quantities of specific categories

7、 of good quality agricultural plastic waste are recycled in several countries while research efforts and projects are in progress to improve the corresponding percentage. The authors should refer to the corresponding recent literature.Answer:Yes. Your opinions inspired us and we revised the manuscri

8、pt accordingly. In the revised paper, the sentence“ Recycling is notavailable for economy,” was changed to “ In order to reduce costs, thethickness of application agriculture films in some regions in China is less than 0.005 mmresult in diffcult to recycle, And because the process of recycling is ex

9、pensive and time-consuming, only a small percentage of the agricultural plastic waste is currently recycled at the end of cultivation in China 4” (Page 3 line 49-52).Page 3, line 76: biodegradable and photodegradable文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持There are developments in the area of biodegradable m

10、aterials that indicate the opposite. Concerning photodegradable materials, they are not considered to represent a solution as they have not been proven to be biodegradable. The authors should refer to the corresponding recent literature.Answer: Thank you for reminding us the improper description on

11、the study. We have the improper parts revised accordingly and hope that this new manuscript will be convincing ( Page 3 line 52-55).Page 4, line 65: find an eco- friendlyThe best eco-friendly disposal for agricultural plastic waste is recycling and for non-recyclable materials, energy recovery. Degr

12、ading materials produced from fossil sources is not an eco-friendly disposal! The authors should refer to the corresponding recent literature.Answer: Thank the reviewer for the commenst . We ve recognized that some of the descriptions in the previous copy were really not so accurate and a little bit

13、 arbitrary due to our poor English level and the study on recent literature.After consulting more references, we therefore revised paperto be more reasonable and convincing.Page 4, line 66: to carbon dioxide and waterConversion of fossil oil based materials into carbon dioxide and water is much wors

14、e than converting renewable-based materials into carbon dioxide and waterAnswer: Thank t he reviewer for the comments. We ve recognized that this description in the previous copy were not accurate, due to our poor study on recent literature. The sentence “ it is very important to find an eco-friendl

15、y disposal of plastic waste where they degrade to carbon dioxide and water under the sunlight irradiation without producing toxic byproducts. ” has been deleted.Page 6, line 112: volatile products文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持Define the products.Answer: We have defined the volatile products in Page

16、 6 line 124-125.Page 9, line 185: eco- friendly disposalThe claims of the authors that this technique is an eco-friendly one are not justified. The conclusions and other parts of the paper need to be rewritten and limit the scope of the presented research work to the technical objectives without der

17、iving unjustified general conclusions and claims about the impact of this work.Answer: Thank the reviewer for the comments. We ve recognized that this description in the previous copy were not accurate. The sentence“ Thedevelopment of this kind of composite polymer can lead to an eco-friendly dispos

18、al of polymer wastes. ” was changed to “ The present paper intends to study goethite as photocatalytst for degradating plastic. Further attention could be focused on the application of the technique. ” (Page9 line 192-194). Reviewer #3:1. Title and abstract should indicate that the work has been don

19、e with PE-Goethite composite film.Answer: Your suggestion is greatly appreciated. We agree and therefore change the title to: Solid-phase photocatalytic degradation of polyethylene goethite composite film under UV-light irradiation.2. Please revise the first paragraph of 'Introduction'. It i

20、s difficult to understand. In general, the language of the paper should be revisited.Answer: The Introduction part has been rewritten both in contents and in English. Weparticularly revised somesentences since they are not correct or so confusing.3. Materials and methods - Details of the chemicals t

21、o be furnished文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持.Answer: The reviewer and editor s suggestions have been adopted and the details of the chemicals has been shown in Page 4 line 79-83.4. Characterization are required for PE (Molecular weight, grade) and Goethite prepared (particle size, BET surface area,

22、 SEM-EDS and XRD) Answer: The reviewer and editor s suggestions have been adopted and the characterization for PE has been shown in Page 4 line 79. The Goethite prepared (particle size, BETsurface area, SEMand XRD)has been reported by Liao et al. (2007), We clarify that in the revised manuscript in

23、Page 5 line 91-93.5. A schematic diagram of the experimental set up to be givenAnswer: The reviewer and editor s suggestions have been adopted and a schematic diagram of the experimental has been given in Fig. 1 in the present paper. The original Fig. 1. was changed to Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.6. Results -

24、 A rate equation should be proposed from the time-weight data Answer: The reviewer and editor s suggestions have been adopted and the rate equation a schematic diagram of the experimental has been given in Table. 1in the present paper.7. A few data are required to show the influence of process param

25、eters such as goethite loading, intensity of UV radiation.Answer: Reviewer and editor s suggestions have been adopted and the influence of goethite loading has been shownin Fig. 2 in the present paper. And the influence of intensity of UV radiation has been shown in Fig. 3 in the present paper. The

26、original Fig. 2 was changed to Fig. 4 and The original Fig. 3 was changed to Fig. 5 in the present paper.8. Until other intermediates are isolated, upto Eqn.(7) (line 162) is sufficient.Answer: Reviewer and editor s suggestions have been adopted and We changed the Eqns as recommended. Eqs. (8)-(12)

27、are deleted and Eqn.(7)文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持was change to(CH2CH2)- + .OH - degradationproducts ” (Page 9 line184).9. Figure 3 and 4: 3 pairs are required, namely (i) Only PE film before and after irradiation, (ii) PE-Goethite film (0.4wt %) - before and after irradiation (iii) PE-Goethite

28、film (1.0 wt %) - before and after irradiation.Answer: Reviewer and editor s suggestions have been adopted and the original Fig. 3 and 4 was changed to Fig .5 in the present paper.10. Point 3 above is also applicable for SEMphotographs . Please rearrange and clearly mark the difference between the f

29、ilms before and after irradiation for both SEM and FTIR results.Answer: Thank the reviewer and editor s for the comments. During the revision of the paper, we did a supplementary experiment got somenew SEM photographs, which has been shown in Fig. 4 in the present paper. And The FTIR results has bee

30、n rearranged in Fig.5 in the present paper, respectively.11. It should be clearly mentioned in the conclusion that the degradation was more when goethite loading and intensity of light both were more Answer: The reviewer and editor s suggestions have been adopted and the conclusions has been changed

31、 in Page 9 line 192-198.1.Dear Prof. XXXX,Thank you very much for your letter and the comments from the referees about our paper submitted to XXXX (MS Number XXXX).Wehave checked the manuscript and revised it according to the comments. We submit here the revised manuscript as well as a list of chang

32、es.If you have any question about this paper, please don t hesitate to let文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持me know.Sincerely yours,Dr. XXXXResp*e to Reviewer 1:Thanks for your commentson our paper. Wehave revised our paper according to your comments:1. XXXXXXX2. XXXXXXX2)Dear Professor *,Re: An * Rota

33、ting Rigid-flexible Coupled System (No.: JSV-D-06-*)by *Many thanks for your email of 24 Jun 2006, regarding the revision and advice of the above paper in JSV. Overall the comments have been fair, encouraging and c*tructive. We have learned much from it.After carefully studying the reviewer comments

34、and your advice, we have made corresponding changes to the paper. Our resp*e of the comments is enclosed.文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持If you need any other information, please contact meimmediately by email. My email account is *, and Tel.is *, and Fax is +*.Yours sincerely,Detailed resp*e to revi

35、ewer s commentsand Asian Editor s adviceOverall the comments have been fair, encouraging and c*tructive. We have learned muchfrom i t. Although the reviewer s commentsare generally positive, we have carefully proofread the manuscript and edit it as following.(1) (2)3) ) (4) (5) (6)Besides the above

36、changes, we have corrected some expression errors.Thank you very much for the excellent and professional revision of our manuscript.3.文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持.The manuscript is revised submission (xxx xxxx ) with newline and page numbers in the text, some grammar and spelling errors had also

37、been corrected. Furthermore, the relevant regulati* had been made in the original manuscript according to the commentsof reviewers, and the major revised porti* were marked in red bold. We also responded point by point to each reviewer comments as listed below, along with a clear indication of the l

38、ocation of the revision.Hope these will make it more acceptable for publication.List of Major Changes:1) 2) 3) Resp*e to Reviewers:1) 2) 3) Resp*e to Reviewer XXWevery muchappreciate the careful reading of our manuscript and valuable suggesti* of the reviewer. We have carefully c*idered the comments

39、 and have revised the manuscript accordingly. The comments can be summarized as follows:1) XX2) XX文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持Detailed resp*es1) XX2) XX4.Dear editor XXWe have received the comments on our manuscript entitled“ XX” by XX.According to the commentsof the reviewers, we have revised ou

40、r manuscript. The revised manuscript and the detailed resp*es to the comments of the one reviewer are attached.Sincerely yours,XX5.Resp*e to Reviewer AReviewer A very kindly contacted me directly, and revealed himself to be Professor Dr. Hans-Georg Geissler of the University of Leipzig. I wrotehim a

41、 general resp*e to both reviews in January 2000, followed by these文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持resp*es to specific points, both his own, and those of the other reviewer .Resp*e to Specific PointsWhatfollows is a brief and cursory discussion of the various issues raised by yourself and the other re

42、viewer. If you should revise your judgment of the validity of the theory, these points will be addressed at greater length in a new version of the paper that I would resubmit to Psychological Review.Resp*e to Specific Points- Reviewer A:In part (1) of your critique the major complaint is that no the

43、ory is presented, which was discussed above. You continue "Regrettably, not much attention is drawn to specific differences between the chosen examples that would be necessary to pinpoint specificities of perception more precisely", and "if perceptual systems, as suggested, hler (Kind

44、eed act on the basis of HR, there must be manymore specific c*traints involved to ensure special 'veridicality' properties of the perceptual outcome", and "the difficult analytic problems of concrete modeling of perception are not even touched". The model as presented is not a

45、 model of vision or audition or any other particular modality, but is a general model to confront the alternative neural receptive field paradigm, although examples from visual perception are used to exemplify the principles discussed. The more specific visual model was submitted elsewhere, in the O

46、rientational Harmonic model, where I showed how harmonic resonance accounts for specific visual illusory effects. As discussed above, the attempt here is to propose a general principle of neurocomputation, rather文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持than a specific model of visual, auditory, or any other s

47、pecific sensory modality. Again, what I am proposing is a paradigm rather than a theory, i.e. an alternative principle of neurocomputation with specific and unique properties, as an alternative to the neuron doctrine paradigm of the spatial receptive field. If this paper is eventually accepted forpu

48、blication, then I will resubmit my papers on visual illusory phenomena, referring to this paper to justify the use of the unconventional harmonic resonance mechanism.In part (2) (a) of your critique you say "it is not clarified whether the postulated properties of Gestalts actually follow from

49、this definition or partly derive from additional c*traints." and "I doubt that anyof the reviewed examples for HR can treat just the case of hler: (1961, p. 7) "Human experience in the phenomenological sense cannot yet be treated with our most reliable methods; andwhen dealing with it

50、, we maybe forced to form new concepts which at first, will often be a bit vague." Wolfgang Kthe dog cited to dem*trate 'emergence'. For this a hierarchy relation is needed." The principle of emergence in Gestalt theory is a very difficult concept to express in unambiguous terms, a

51、nd the dog picture was presented to illustrate this rather elusive concept with a concrete example. I do not suggest that HR as proposed in this paper can address the dog picture as such, since this is specifically a visualproblem, and the HR model as presented is not a visual model. Rather, I propo

52、se that the feature detection paradigm cannot in principle handle this kind of ambiguity, because the local features do not individually contain the information necessary to distinguish significant from insignificant edges. The solution of the HRapproach to visual ambiguity is explained in the paper

53、 in the section on "Recognition by Reification" (p. 15-17) in which I propose that recognition is not simply a matter of文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持.the identification of features in the input, i.e. by the "lighting up"of a higher level feature node, but it involves a simultan

54、eous abstraction and reification, in which the higher level feature node reifies itsparticular pattern back at the input level, modulated by the exact patternof the input. I appeal to the reader to see the reified form of the dogas perceived edges and surfaces that are not present in the input stimu

55、lus, as evidence for this reification in perception, which appears at the same time that the recognition occurs. The remarkable property of this reification is that the dog appears not as an image of a canonical, orprototypical dog, but as a dog percept that is warped to the exact posture and config

56、uration allowed by the input, as observed in the subjectiveexperience of the dog picture. This explanation is subject to yourcriticism in your general comments, that "the author dem*trates more insight than explicitly stated in assumpti* and drawn conclusi*".I can only say that, in Kuhn

57、9;s words, sometimes it is only personal and inarticulate aesthetic c*iderati* that can be used to make the case.In the words of Wolfgang K?hler: (1961, p. 7)"Humanexperience in the phenomenological sense cannot yet be treated with our most reliable methods; and when dealing with it, we may be

58、forced to form new concepts which at first, will often be a bit vague."Wolfgang K?hler (K?hler 1923 p. 64)"Natural sciences continually advance explanatory hyptotheses, whichcannot be verified by direct observation at the time when they are formedSomenor for a long time thereafter. Of such a kind were Ampere's theory of magnetism, the kinetic theory of gases, the electronic theory, the hypothesis of atomic disinte gration in the theory of radioactivity.文檔來源為:從網(wǎng)絡(luò)收集整理.word 版本可編輯.歡迎下載支持of these assumpti* have since been verified by direct