金融學專業(yè)私募股權投資資料外文翻譯文獻

外文翻譯文獻金融學專業(yè)私募股權投資資料外文翻譯文獻外文題目：FinancialForeignDirectInvestment:TheRoleofPrivateEquityInvestmentsintheGlobalizationofFirmsfromEmergingMarkets原文：1.IntroductionInternationalbusinessandeconomicdevelopmentarecloselyrelated.Whenapplyingtoemergingmarkets,foreigndirectinvestment(FDI)anddevelopmenteconomicsaretwosidesofthesamecoin.IntermsoftheclassicalOLImodeloftheeconomicsofinternationalbusiness,themultinationalenterprises(MNE)bringsintoplaytheownershipadvantagewhilethegovernmentsofemergingmarketsbringintoplaythelocationadvantage(Dunning2000).Formostpart,theeconomicsandthestrategyofinternationalbusinessfocusedontheMNEwhileeconomicgeographyfromKoopman(1957)toKrugman(1991)andlater(aswellasdevelopmenteconomics)havefocusedonthecountryinwhichtheinvestmenttakesplace.Thispaperbringstogetherinternationalbusinessdevelopmenteconomicsandinternationaltradetogainbetterinsightsintoanimportantandfascinatingphenomenoninthearenaofinternationalbusiness–therecentgrowthofprivateequityinvestmentsinemergingmarkets.ThetremendousgrowthofprivateequityinvestmentsinemergingmarketsisevidentfromthedatapresentedinTable1.Thetotalwentupalmosttentimes,fromabout$3.5Btomorethan$33Bintheperiod2003-2006.EmergingAsialedtheemergingmarketswith$19.4Braisedin2006by93funds;aboutathirdofthemoneythatwasraisedbythesefundswenttoChinaandIndia.Themainargumentthatispresentedanddiscussedinthispaperisthatprivateequityinvestmentsinemergingmarketsisanotherexpressionofforeigndirectinvestment(FDI)wherefirmsfromthedevelopedcountriesexportspecificfactorsofproduction(theirownershipadvantage)tosmallcountriesandemergingmarkets(newlocations)asawaytogeneratevaluetoallstakeholders.Thefirmsinthedevelopedcountriesinthiscasearespecializedfinancialinstitutions(privateequityfunds)(Yoshikawaetal.2006)andthefactorofproductionthattheyexportishigh-risksectorspecificcapital.WedubbedthisformofFDIasfinancialforeigndirectinvestment(FFDI),buttheprocessandtherationalarethesameasintheclassicalFDIanalysis.FFDI(synonymous–butnotrestrictedto–forprivateequitythroughoutthispaper)isasubsetofFDIthatissolelydevoted–asthenameimplies–forinvestmentsinprivatefirmsinpurposeofgeneratinghighreturnon-investmentoverarelativelyshortperiod(5-7years).Theterm“short”isrelativeandincomparisonwiththetypicalinvestmentperiodsoftheinvestorsofprivateequityfunds(e.g.,pensionfunds,endowmentfundsandthelike).Attheextreme,i.e.,inventurecapitalinvestments,investorstakeintoaccountupfrontthatsomeoftheirinvestmentswillbewrittenoffattheprospectsthatfewwillgeneratereturnthatwillmorethancompensatethosesunkinvestments(hencethe“high-risk”referral).Sectorspecificcapitalisageneralphenomenon.Inmanyindustriessuchinvestmentismorethanmerefinancialinvestmentandisaugmentedbyspecificinformationthattheinvestormaypossesintheformofmanagerialexpertise,dealstructuringspecialty,networkingcapabilitiesandthelike.Inthecaseofthehigh-riskcapitalindustrythereisaneedtobridgethegapbetweentheriskperceptionoftheinvestmentprojectbytheentrepreneursorthe“insiders”andtheinvestors(mostoftenrisk-averseinvestors),the“outsiders”.Thisisaccomplishedbyacombinationofvalidationprocessesandscreeningmechanismsthatareengagedbytheprivateequityfunds.Inthisregardtheyactasfinancialandriskintermediaries(Coval/Thakor2005,provideananalyticalframeworkforthisapproach).Thevalueofthegeneralpartnersofprivateequityfundsdependsonthequalityoftheriskintermediationthattheyperformfortheirinvestors.Thismakesthemcredibleandreliableprocessorsofinformation.Table1:EmergingMarketsPrivateEquityFundsRaising,2003-2006(US$Millions)EmergingAsiaCEERussiaLathamSub-SaharaAfricaMiddle-EastAfricaMultipleRegionsTotal20032,200406417NA3501163,48920042,8001,777714NA5456186,454200515,4462,7111,2727911,9153,63025,765200619,3863,2722,6562,3532,9462,58033,193Source:EMPEA(EmergingMarketsPrivateEquityAssociation)2007.Thediscussionandtheanalysispresentedinthispaperdrawonthreedifferentbodiesofliterature;theliteratureoffinanceandgrowthfromdevelopmenteconomics,(Levine1997,2004),theliteratureoncomparativeadvantageinthediscussionofpatternsoftrade(Deardorff2004)andtheliteratureofimperfectcontractsinmicroeconomicsandinfinancialeconomics(Hart2001,Zingales2000).Financialforeigndirectinvestmentaspracticedbyprivateequityfundscanbeapowerfulcontributortoeconomicandbusinessgrowthinemergingmarkets.FFDIchangesthesceneofinternationalbusinessasitcontributestoachangeintherelationsbetweenfirmsindevelopedcountriesandfirmsintheemergingmarkets.TheuniquerelativelyshorttermnatureofaprivateequityinvestmentmakesitanappropriateinstrumentforthetransitionperiodthattheworldofinternationalbusinessisexperiencingregardingtheroleofemergingmarketsandtheroleofChinaandIndiainparticular.Thisissobecausetheshorttermnatureofprivateequityinvestmentsallowsfirmsinemergingmarketsforsufficienttimefortransferofinformationandlearningandyetallowthelocalstakeholderstoresumefullownershiponcetheprocessiscompleted.Therelationsbetweenthedevelopmenteconomicsliteratureonfinanceandgrowthandtheinternationalbusinessliteratureispresentedanddiscussedinthenextsectionofthepaper.Itisshownthatthetwobodiesofliteraturesarequiterelatedonceonepenetratesthespecificlingoemployedbyeachoneofthem.Theproblemsintheinstitutionalsettingandthelackofsufficientdevelopmentofthecapitalmarketsinmostemergingmarketsareovercomebycreatingspecificinternationalalliancesthatgeneratelocalcomparativeadvantage.Insectionthree,theconceptoflocalcomparativeadvantage(Deardorff2004)isusedforbetterunderstandingofFFDI.TheperfectandefficientfinancialmarketoftheModernTheoryofFinanceisreplacedbyasetofimperfectcontractsnegotiatedandrenegotiatedbetweendomesticfirmsinemergingmarketsandprivateequityfundsfromtheUSandothermajorcapitalmarkets.Thisissueisdiscussedandanalyzedinsectionfourofthepaper.Privateequityfundsdrewafairamountofcriticismlately.Thepotentialofprivateequityinvestmentinemergingmarketsisdiscussedinsectionfiveofthepaper.Theconclusionsofthestudyarebrieflydiscussedinsectionsix,thelastsectionofthepaper.2.Finance,GrowthandInternationalBusinessInasurveypaperontherelationsbetweenfinancialdevelopmentandeconomicgrowthLevine(1997)statesthat:“…thedevelopmentoffinancialmarketsandinstitutionsarecriticalandinextricablepartofthegrowthprocess”.Hecontinuesandsaysthat:“…financialdevelopmentisagoodpredictoroffutureratesofeconomicgrowth,capitalaccumulationandtechnologicalchange.Moreover,cross-country,casestudy,industry-andfirm-levelanalysesdocumentextensiveperiodswhenfinancialdevelopment-orthelackthereof-cruciallyaffectthespeedandthepatternofeconomicdevelopment”,(Levine1997,p.689).Levinemakestwootherimportantpoints;firstthatthediscussionoffinanceanddevelopmentstakesplaceoutsidethestate-contingentworldofArrow(1964)andDebreu(1959)andthediscussiontakesplaceinanincompleteworldwithimperfect(monopolistic)competition.Thesecondpointisthattherearethreemainresearchquestionsinthefieldoffinanceanddevelopmentthatneedsmoreattention.(1)Whydoesfinancialstructurechangeascountriesgrow?(2)Whydocountriesatsimilarstagesofeconomicdevelopmenthavedifferentlookingfinancialsystems?and(3)aretherelongtermeconomicgrowthadvantagestoadoptinglegalandpolicychangesthatcreateonetypeoffinancialsystemvis-à-visanother?ThethreeresearchquestionsraisedbyLevinedealwithdifferentaspectsofthelocationofforeigndirectinvestment.Inparticular,thethreeresearchquestionsdealwiththegapbetweenthepotentialofacertaincountry,orcountries,asasiteforaninternationalorientedinvestmentandtheactualinvestmentthathastakenplace.Thisisparticularlytruewheretheinvestmentfromthedevelopedcountriesisintheformofhigh-risksectorspecificcapitalsuchasprovidedbyprivateequityfunds.Thepotentialofsomecountriesinattractingprivateequityfundsisnotbeingfullyrealizedduetotheabsenceofanappropriatefinancialsystem.Awelldevelopedfinancialsystemisnecessarytoenhancetheimportofsectorspecific(high-risk)capital,anecessaryconditionforFFDI.Asthefinancialstructureofacountrychanges(asthecountrygrows),itissuggestedbyLevineinhisfirstquestionthatdifferenttypesofFDIcanbeaccommodated.ThedevelopmentofFDIinChinaisanevidenceofthisprocess.Yet,asitisproposedinLevine’ssecondquestion,thefinancialmarketsofcountrieswithsimilarrateofgrowthdevelopindifferentpaceandinadifferentway.Therearelong-termeconomicgrowthadvantagesofadoptingcertainpatternsofdevelopmentforthefinancialmarketofagivencountry.InmanycasesFDIandFFDIdodependonrelativelytransparentandenforceablecorporategovernance.Morck,Wolfenzon,andYeung(2005)demonstratedthateconomicentrenchmenthasahighpriceinforegonegrowthopportunities.Therearethreerelatedproblemsincreatingadomesticfinancialsystemforprivateequityandventurecapitalinvestments:Howtomobilizethetypeandthequantityofsavings(capital)appropriateforsuchinvestmentswheremostofthecapitalshouldbeimportedfromthemajorcapitalmarketsoftheworld?Howtogeneratecredibleinformationandtrust?Howtomonitormanagementandtoexertcorporatecontrol?Theonlyfeasiblewaytoaccommodateprivateequityandventurecapitalinvestmentsinemergingmarketsistoimportsectorspecifichigh-riskcapitalfromtheUSandothermajorcapitalmarkets.Thetermsectorspecificcapitalrecognizesthefactthatcapitalisnotaunifiedfactorofproduction(inthesamewaythattherearedifferenttypesoflabortherearedifferenttypesofcapital).High-risksectorspecificcapitalrelatestotheportfoliooftheinvestorsandtotherelationalcapitalofthespecificfinancialintermediaries(i.e.,theprivateequityfunds).Mostofthehigh-riskcapitalintheworldiscomingfromlargeinstitutionalinvestorsintheUSanditisapartoftheirassets’managementprogram.(AgoodexampleofhowsuchcapitalrelatestothetotalportfolioistheinvestmentpolicyofCALPERSthelargestpensionfundintheUS).Duetointernalandexternalregulations,financialinstitutionscannotmakeinvestmentunlessthereisanacceptableleveloftransparencyandcorporategovernanceinthecountrywherethemoneyisinvested.Whethersuchaprocessispossibleinagivendevelopingcountryandwhatarethechancesthatifimplementeditwillsucceedisaveryimportantquestion.Horii,Ohdoi,andYamamoto(2005)dealwiththisissue.Theyaddressthequestionwhysomedevelopingcountriesarelesssuccessfulthanothersinadoptingtechnologiesandmoreeffectivefinancialmarketstechniques.ToquoteHoriietal.(2005,p.2):“Afundamentalquestioniswhysomecountriesarestuckwithpoorperformanceeventhoughitresultsinprimitivefinancialmarketsandunproductivetechnologies”.Theyconcludethatinsomecasestheexpectedincreaseintheincomeinequalityduetothefinancialledtechnologicalchangesdeterspeoplefromadoptingfinancial,legal,andpoliticalreformsthatwillleadtofinancial,business,andeconomicdevelopment.Morck,Wolfenzon,andYeung(2005)providesomewhatdifferentanswer,alsofocusingonincomedistributionbutfromapointofviewofeconomicentrenchmentandrentseekingbehavior.Nowheretherelationshipbetweenfinance,growth,andinternationalbusinessismorepronouncedthanintheimpressivedevelopmentoftheprivateequityfundsdevotedforinvestmentinemergingmarkets.Table1presentsdataonthegrowthofprivateequityfundsraisedforinvestmentinemergingmarketsbyregions.Theamountsofmoneyraisedbyprivateequityfundsdedicatedforinvestmentsinemergingmarketswentuptremendouslyinthelastfiveyears.Moreimportantlysignificantamountswereinvestedtosupportdomesticcompaniesinemergingmarketstobecomemorecompetitiveintheglobalmarketsbyprovidingtheirownbrandsofproductstotheworld’sconsumers.LenovoisacaseinpointwhenamajorinvestmentbythreeAmericanprivateequityfunds(TexasPacificGroup,GeneralAtlantic,andNewbridgeCapital)wasmadeinaChinesecompanywiththepurposeofmakingLenovoaleadingcompetitorintheglobalmarket.譯文：金融類對外直接投資：私募股權投資在新興市場全球化企業(yè)中的角色一、簡介國際商業(yè)和經(jīng)濟發(fā)展密切相關。當應用到新興市場時，對外直接投資（FDI）和經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展是一個問題的兩個方面。就國際商務經(jīng)濟傳統(tǒng)的OLI模型而言，多國企業(yè)（跨國公司）帶來發(fā)揮所有權優(yōu)勢而新興市場的政府發(fā)揮區(qū)位優(yōu)勢（鄧寧2000年）。對于大部分，經(jīng)濟學和國際經(jīng)營戰(zhàn)略的重點是跨國公司，而經(jīng)濟地理從庫普曼（1957）到克魯格曼（1991年），后來（還是經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展）重點在于一個能夠發(fā)生投資的國家。本文匯集了國際業(yè)務的發(fā)展經(jīng)濟學和國際貿(mào)易在國際商業(yè)領域里對一個重要的并具有極大吸引力的現(xiàn)象獲得更好的見解——私人股權投資在新興市場近年的增長。從表1中的數(shù)據(jù)可以呈現(xiàn)出在新興市場的私人股權投資的巨大增長是顯而易見的。在2003-2006年期間，從約3.5b美元到多于33B美元，總計上升了近十倍。亞洲新興市場在2006年引導新興市場以93基金籌集19.4B美元，相關的基金所籌集的三分之一的資金是流向中國和印度。本文提出并探討的主要論點是，新興市場的私人股本投資是對外直接投資（FDI）的另一種表現(xiàn)地方，公司從發(fā)達國家出口產(chǎn)品的具體因素（其所有權優(yōu)勢）到達小國家和新興市場（新地點），作為對所有利益相關者創(chuàng)造價值的一種途徑。在這種情況下這種公司在發(fā)達國家就是專門的金融機構（私募基金）（吉川等人。2006年）和產(chǎn)品因素即他們的出口是高風險行業(yè)的特定資本。我們稱這種對外直接投資是金融類對外直接投資（FFDI）的形式，但過程和理性在經(jīng)典的對外直接投資分析中是相同的。FFDI（同義——但不局限于——貫穿整個文件的私募股權）是對外直接投資僅僅投入的一個子集，-顧名思義-在私人公司投資是為了在一個相對較短的時間(5-7年)內(nèi)獲得高投資回報的目的。所謂“短”是相對的，而且與私募基金（如養(yǎng)老基金，捐贈基金等）的投資者典型的投資期相比較。在極端情況下，例如，在風險資本投資中，投資者考慮到預付賬目，它們的較少產(chǎn)生回報的部分投資將被寫入計劃中，，以更多補償那些虧本投資（因此推薦“高風險”）。特定行業(yè)的資本是一種普遍的現(xiàn)象。在許多行業(yè)，例如投資不僅僅是金融投資，還是增加了具體的信息使得投資者可以具備管理經(jīng)驗，交易結構設計專業(yè)化，具有網(wǎng)絡功能之類的形式。以高風險資本業(yè)為例需要縮小企業(yè)家或行內(nèi)人和投資者（通常是風險厭惡的投資者）及行外人在投資項目中的風險認知差距。這是通過所從事的私募基金流程的驗證和篩選機制的結合完成的。在這方面，他們（科瓦爾/Thakor2005年，為這一途徑提供了一個分析框架）成為了金融和風險中介機構。私人股權基金的普通合伙人的價值取決于他們?yōu)樗麄兊耐顿Y者履行的風險中介的質量。這使它們的信息和處理能力是可靠的。表1：新興市場私募股權集資，2003-2006（百萬美元）亞洲新興市場中歐和東歐俄羅斯拉丁美洲撒哈拉以南非洲中東非洲多區(qū)域總計20032,200406417NA3501163,48920042,8001,777714NA5456186,454200515,4462,7111,2727911,9153,63025,765200619,3863,2722,6562,3532,9462,58033,193來源：EMPEA（新興市場私募股權協(xié)會）2007。這篇論文的討論和分析動用了三個不同機構的文獻；財政文獻和發(fā)展經(jīng)濟學的增長（萊文1997年，2004年），在討論貿(mào)易模式中具有比較優(yōu)勢的文獻（迪爾多夫2004年），在微觀經(jīng)濟學和金融經(jīng)濟學中存在不完善的合同的文獻（哈特2001年，津加萊斯2000年）。作為實行私募股權投資基金，金融類對外直接投資是經(jīng)濟和新興市場業(yè)務增長的強大貢獻者。FFDI改變了國際商業(yè)界，因為它改變了在新興市場與發(fā)達國家的公司之間的關系。獨特的相對短期性質的私人股權投資使其成為過渡期適當?shù)墓ぞ?，國際商業(yè)界正在經(jīng)歷有關新興市場的作用，特別是中國和印度的作用。之所以如此，是因為短期的私人股本投資允許公司在新興市場中有在哦夠時間轉讓信息和學習，一旦過程完成還允許當?shù)乩嫦嚓P者回復全部所有權。發(fā)展經(jīng)濟學文獻對金融和經(jīng)濟增長與國際商業(yè)文獻之間的關系在論文的下一節(jié)提出和討論。據(jù)文獻表明，一旦其中一個越過行情迅速增長，這兩個機構都相當相當相關。在機構設置問題和資本市場的缺乏充分發(fā)展在大多數(shù)新興市場通過創(chuàng)建特定的國際聯(lián)盟來克服，以產(chǎn)生局部相對的優(yōu)勢。在第三部分，地方比較優(yōu)勢的概念（迪爾多夫2004年）用于FFDI對更好地了解?，F(xiàn)代金融理論中完美和高效的金融市場在新興市場的國內(nèi)企業(yè)和美國私募投資基金以及其他主要資本市場被一種不確切的合同談判和重新談判設置所取代。這個問題在論文的第四節(jié)進行了討論和分析。私募基金最近引起了相當多的批評。私人股權投資在新興市場的潛力在論文的第五部分進行了討論。這項研究的結論在第六部分即論文的最后一節(jié)進行了簡要討論。二、財務，經(jīng)濟增長和國際商務在關于金融發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟增長的關系調(diào)查的文件中萊文（1997）指出：“...金融市場和機構的發(fā)展是成長過程中至關重要的和不可分