提單轉讓的法律效力探析,國際商法論文

提單轉讓的法律效力探析,國際商法論文本篇論文目錄導航：【題目】提單轉讓的法律效力探析【從提單本身性質和功能入手，并框定住研究的可轉讓提單的類型和方式，比擬分析一般債的轉移和票據流通，得出提單轉讓系介于兩者之間，具有一定的特殊性。第二部分筆者通過總結在運輸領域中提單轉讓中權利來源的理論問題，以為提單轉讓的權利來自于運輸合同的部分權利讓與，并由此對提單持有人和承運人之間在提單轉讓經過中轉讓的權利內容進行研究，進而分析提單轉讓的債權效力；在國際貨物貿易領域中，對于提單本身的物權憑證功能進行理論分析，并得出提單的物權憑證功能并沒有消失的結論，并進一步討論提單實際是代表的是對運輸合同項下貨物的占有權。第三部分從(鹿特丹規(guī)則〕對于該問題牽涉到的制度和規(guī)范的新發(fā)展和新變化著眼，對于運輸單證和電子運輸記錄制度、貨物控制權制度作出重點介紹，分析(鹿特丹規(guī)則〕項下的提單轉讓效力問題的變化。第四部分提出我們國家(海商法〕在修改時應建立完善的運輸單證轉讓制度，并有效借鑒和有選擇的采納(鹿特丹規(guī)則〕中對于運輸單證轉讓的問題的規(guī)定，最后為我們國家(海商法〕的修改提出幾點建議。本文關鍵詞語：提單轉讓的效力，鹿特丹規(guī)則，海商法修改AbstractDuringintheinternationalsalesofgoods,simplythetraditionalwaytotradehardlykeeppacewiththetimes,thenegotiationofthebillofladingisbeingwidelyused,throughlong-termtradinghabits,inordertoachievesalesofgoodsthoughthetransferofthebilloflading.Billofladingisatransportdocumentsinthefieldofinternationalcarriageofgoodsbysea,itsultimatepurposeistoservethetradebetter,becauseofthefunctionandattributesofthebilloflading,namelythereceiptofgoodsandtheprooftothecontractofcarriageofgoods,anddocumentoftitle,theyplayaveryimportantroleintheprocessoftransportationandtradeofgoods.Itmeansthenegotiabilityofthebillofladinggivevitalitytothebilloflading,thisthesisfocusesonthevalidityofthetransferofthebilloflading,namelystudyonthelegalconsequencestotherelatedpartieswhenthetransferofthebilloflading,theauthorfocusontheRotterdamrules,althoughtheconventiondoesnottakeeffectuntilnow,buttheauthorconsidersitsmodernityandadvancingandprospectiveisinconformitywiththeinternationaltrendofthelegislationofcarriageofgoodsbysea,andthedevelopmentandchangeoftheRotterdamrulesprovidesanewperspectivetostudythevalidityofthetransferofthebillofladingalso,suchaswhatisthedifferenceandconnectionintheRotterdamrulesbetweenthetransportdocumentandelectronictransportrecordsandthetraditionalbilloflading;whetherbillofladinghasbeenabandonedbytheshippingpracticeandwithdrewfromthehistoricalstageornot;IntheRotterdamruleswhetherthedocumentoftitleofthenegotiabletransportdocumentshavebeendisappearedornot,ifithasbeennotdisappeared,sohowtoreflectthevalidityofdocumentofthetitlewhenthetransferofthebilloflading;UndertheframeworkoftheRotterdamruleshowtodefineforthecarrier,theshipper,theholderofthebilloflading,whenthetransferofthebillofladinghowthelegalconsequencesforthepartiesabovementioned,whatscopeoftheirrespectiverightsandobligations.ThesystemofthetransferofrightintheRotterdamrulesmakesupportforthemodificationofmaritimelaw.Withtheseproblemsbycomparinganalysisandtextanalysis,inchapteronetheauthorcarriesonthepreliminarystudyfortheproblemofthevalidityofthetransferofthebilloflading,thisthesisstartsfromthefunctionsofbillofladingitself,andfromtheperspectiveandtypeofthenegotiablebilloflading,makeacomparativeanalysisbetweenthegeneraldebttransferandinstrumentnegotiation,itisconcludedthatthebillofladingtransfersystemisaparticularitysystembetweenthem.Thechaptertwotheauthorsummarizesthesourceofbillofladinginthetransferofrightsinthefieldoftransportofgoods,considerthatthetransferofrightofthebillofladingisfromthepartialassignmentofthecontract,andmakeresearchontherightcontentintheprocessoftransferofthebillofladingbetweentheholderofthebillofladingandthecarrier,andfurtheranalyzedonthevalidityofthetransferofbilloflading;Inthefieldofinternationaltradeofgoods,focusonthedocumentoftitleofthebillofladingitselfthroughtheoreticalanalysisandmakeaconclusionthatthedocumentoftitleofthebillofladingdidnotdisappear,andfurtherdiscussionofthebillofladingisactuallyrepresentsthepossessionofgoodsunderthecontractofcarriage.ThethirdpartfromtherespectiveoftheRotterdamrulesaboutthethenewdevelopmentandchangeofspecificationsfortheproblemsinvolved,especiallyfocusonthetransportdocumentsandelectronicrecordssystemandthegoodscontrolsystem,sothatmaketheanalysisundertheframeoftheRotterdamrulesabouttheeffectchangeofthetransferofthebilloflading.Thefourthpartwhenthemodifyingthemaritimelawweshallestablishthesystemofthetransferofthebilloflading,andtaketheeffectivereferenceandselectiveadoptionoftheRotterdamrulesforit,finallyputforwardsomesuggestionforthemodificationofmaritimelaw.KeyWords:TheValidityofTransferoftheBillofLading,TheRotterdamRules,ModificationofMaritimeLaw目錄內容摘要Abstract目錄一、引言〔一〕問題的提出〔二〕選題的背景和意義〔三〕研究方式方法和文章構造二、提單轉讓概述〔一〕可轉讓提單的類型和方式1.提單和運輸單證的關系3.提單轉讓的方式〔二〕提單的性質和含義1.提單的可轉讓性2.提單轉讓的含義〔1〕提單轉讓與債的轉移的比擬分析〔2〕提單轉讓與票據流通的比擬〔三〕提單的功能三、提單轉讓的屬性〔一〕提單功能屬性對提單轉讓效力的作用〔二〕提單轉讓的債權效力1.提單轉讓債權效力的理論學講2、提單轉讓對提單持有人的效力〔1〕提單持有人的權利〔2〕提單持有人的義務〔3〕提單轉讓對托運人的效力〔4〕提單轉讓對承運人的效力〔三〕提單轉讓的物權效力1.提單的物權憑證