版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
年3月)——P38Africanbusinessesarereluctantemployers.AgivenfirminSub-SaharanAfricatypicallyhas24%fewerpeopleonitsbooksthanequivalentfirmselsewhere,accordingtoarecentpaperfromtheCentreforGlobalDevelopment(CGD),athinkbasedinWashington,DC.Giventhelinksbetweenemploymentanddevelopment,economistswanttofigureoutthereasonsfortheThestudycalculatesthemissingjobsbycrunchinginformationon41,000formalbusinessesgloballyfromaWorldBanksurvey.ThedatacaptureonlyasliverofwhatactuallyhappensinAfrica:nineintenworkershaveaninformaljob.Shunnedbytheformalsector,workersturntobelow-the-radaremployment—toilingonfamilyfarmsorotherwisetheernment’sreach.ButabiginformalsectormakesitharderforAfricatoreducepoverty,evenwheneconomicgrowthisstrong.Increasesin eontheproductionsideoftheeconomytranslateweaklyintohigherwagesforworkers.IndeedtherelationshipbetweeneconomicgrowthandpovertyreductionweakerinAfricathananyotherdeveloSeveralfactorsexplainAfricanbosses’reluctancetotakeonnewworkers.Oneisthatfirmstendtobeyoungerthanelsewhere,butevenolderoneshavefeweremployees.Morebroadly,Africa’sbusinessclimatediscourageshiring.ernmentofficialsinsearchoftaxesandbribestendtochaselargefirms,ratherthansmallones,saysVijayaRamachandranofCGD,becausetheyareconsideredmorelikelytocoughup.ThemanagersofNigerienandLiberianfirmswithmorethan100employeesspend14%longerdealingwithernmentofficialsthansmallerpeers.ArecentstudyfromSouthAfricarevealedthatbossesthereweredesperatetododgetheattentionsofbureaucratsandthusavoidedtakingonnewworkers.Highunitlabourcostsarealsoculpable.EmployingpeopleinAfricashouldbecheap,giventhatmanyofitscountrieshaverock- elevels.YetinhalfofAfricancountrieslabourcostsarehigherthaninChinabecauseworkersarelessproductive.Theyarenearly80%higherinAfricathanthoseinothercountriesatsimilarlevelsof e.Thatlowerscompetitivenessandmakeshiringlesslikely.Economistsdisagreeaboutthepossiblecausesofthis.Redtapeandunionisationmayberesponsible,thoughonaverageindicatorsoflabour-marketregulationarenodifferentinAfricathanelsewhere.Nonethelesstherearehorrorstories.A2012reportonSouthAfrica,whichlaystheblameongreedyunions,calculatesthattheaverageemployeeatEskom,astateownedelectricityutility,earns40%moreintermsofpurchasing-powerparitythanaGermanprofessor.Africa’scommodity-drivenexportmodelsmaybeanothercauseoflowformalemployment.Four-fifthsofthecontinent’sexportrevenuesarefromcommodities.Thatcanleadtoovervaluedcurbstheirgrowthandthusdiscourageshiring.(Africa’sbiginflowsofaidalsocontributetohigherrealexchangeratesbecausetheyresultinupwardpressureonpricesforgoodsandservicesthatarenottradedinternationally.)Changinglabour-marketdynamicscouldexacerbatethejobproblem.Some250mpeopleareexpectedtojointheAfricanworkforcebetween2010and2050.Intheshorttermmanywillgointofarming,whichemploys65%oftheAfricanlabourforce.Theagriculturalsectorstrugglestocreateenoughjobs.Inthe1990sdonorslostinterestinusingtheiraiddollarsforagriculturalinvestment.Shame:betterfarmingtechniquescouldbringunproductivelandintouseandhelpAfricashiftintohigher-value-addedcrops.AccordingtoareportbyMcKinsey,aconsultingfirm,thatcouldcreate6mextrajobsbyButagriculturalimprovementcanalsofreeuplabourtoworkinmoreproductivesectors—ifthejobsareavailable.Africaisembracingstructuralreform:arecentreportfromtheWorldBankshowsthatofthe20economiesworldwidemakingthemostprogressinimprovingbusinessregulation,nineareinSub-SaharanAfrica.Withoutfurtherimprovement,employmentgrowthinAfrica’sformalsectorwillremaindepressinglyP19《英國在亞馬遜和eBay的非歐元區(qū)損失數(shù)千萬,罪魁在于?》P23《·的心愿單:提稅與貿易保護主What(1-2):Africanbusinessesare 4.export:overvalueexchange5.changinglabour-marketHow(8):furthertheCenterforGlobalDevelopmentTheCenterforGlobalDevelopment(CGD)isaU.S.nonprofitthinkbasedinWashington,D.C.thatfocusesoninternationalItwasfoundedinNovember2001byformerseniorU.S.officialEdwardW.Scott,directorofthePetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics,C.FredBergsten,andNancyBirdsall.Birdsall,theformerVice oftheInter-AmericanDevelopmentBankandformerDirectorofthePolicyResearchDepartmentattheWorldBank,becametheCenter'sfirst LawrenceSummerswasunanimouslyelectedinMarch2014bytheCGDBoardofDirectorstosucceedfoundingBoardChairEdwardScott,Jr.,onMay1,2014.CGDwasrankedthefourthmostprominentthinkintheinternationaldevelopmentspherebyUniversityofPennsylvania's"2013GlobalGoToThinkIndexReport".Recently,ForeignPolicyMagazine'sThink-IndexlistedCGDasoneofthetop15overallthink-intheUSA.CGD'sstatedmissionis"toreduceglobalpovertyandinequalitybyencouragingpolicychangeintheUnitedStatesandotherrichcountriesthroughrigorousresearchandactiveengagementwiththepolicycommunity.TheCenterconsidersitselftobea"thinkanddo",withanemphasisonproducingresearchthatischanneledintopracticalpolicyCGDiswellknownforleadingdebt-reliefprograms,specificallyinNigeriaandLiberia.CGDViceToddMossfirstproposedtheNigeriandebtbuy-back,whichresultedintheParisClubofrichnationsforgiving60%of$31billionofdebt.FormerCGDseniorfellowSteveRadeletadvisedLiberianEllenJohnsonSirleafandhersenioradvisorsondebtreliefandaidexchange foreign-exchangerate,forexrate,FXrateorAgio)betweentwocurrenciesistherateatwhichonecurrencywillbeexchangedforanother.Itisalsoregardedasthevalueofonecountry’scurrencyintermsofanothercurrency.Forexample,aninterbankexchangerateof119Japaneseyen(JPY,¥)totheUnitedStatesdollar(US$)meansthat¥119willbeexchangedforeachUS$1orthatUS$1willbeexchangedforeach¥119.Inthiscaseitissaidthatthepriceofadollarintermsofyenis¥119,orequivalentlythatthepriceofayenintermsofdollarsis$1/119.Exchangeratesaredeterminedintheforeignexchangemarket,whichisopentoawiderangeofdifferenttypesofbuyersandsellerswherecurrencytradingiscontinuous:24hoursadayexceptweekends,i.e.tradingfrom20:15GMTonSundayuntil22:00GMTFriday.Thespotexchangeratereferstothecurrentexchangerate.Theforwardexchangeratereferstoanexchangeratethatisquotedandtradedtodaybutfordeliveryandpaymentonaspecificfuturedate.第5篇-教育類(選自《與世界報道》2015年4月)——P191Theeconomicrecessionofthelate2000s,andthesloweconomicgrowththatfollowedit,havedrawnparticularattentiontothedecliningfortunesof eandworking-classmen,whowereparticularlyhardhitbytheseeconomictrends.Concernaboutthefateofnon-collegeeducatedmenhasledsome andauthorstofocusontheroleoftheK-12system.AuthorssuchasRichardWhitmire,ChristinaHoffSommersandPegTyrenotethat,onarangeofindicators,boysarestrugglingmoreinschoolthangirlsare.Boys’academicachievementinreadingtrailsthatofgirls.Boysaremorelikelytobesuspended,retainedingradeorplacedinspecialeducation.Theyarelesslikelytograduatefromhighschoolorenrollinandgraduatefromcollegethangirlsare.That’sthebadnews.Thegoodnewsisthatboys’academicachievementandeducationalattainmenthaveimprovedoverthepastdecade.Intheelementaryandmiddlegrades,boysareachievingathigherlevelsinreadingandmaththanatanytimesince1971.Andthepercentageofbothmenandwomenoverage25whoholdabachelor’sdegreeisalsoatarecordhigh.Nearlyadecadeago,Ireviewedthedataonboys’andachievementandeducationalattainmentandconcludedthatboysweren’tfallingbehind.Infact,boyswerengbetterthaneveronarangeofeducationalindicators.Butgirls’achievementwasimprovingfaster,causinggirlstopullaheadofboys.AnewreportfromtheBrookingsInstitution,releasedlastweek,largelyaffirmsthisysis.Italsofindssomethingnew:Boysarestartingtocatchup.From2004to2012,boysatallgradelevelsmadesignificantgainsinreading.Asaresult,boysarenarrowingthereadinggapintheelementarygrades.Whilehighschoolgirlstodayreadaboutaswellastheydidin1971,highschoolboystodaydobetterinreadingthantheydidintheearlyWhatshouldwemakeofAmongthevarietyofeducationalachievementgapsthatexistintheUnitedStates,gendergapsareuniquelyperplexing.Whenitcomestoachievementgapsbyrace,ethnicityandsocioeconomicstatus,weknowthatchildrenfromdifferentgroupsareraisedindifferentfamiliesandoftenattenddifferentschoolsthanpeersfromothergroups,andthatthesedifferencesinhomeandschoolexperiencesaccountforalargeportionoftheachievementgap.GendergapsareparticularlyvexingbecauseboysandgirlsareraisedinthesamefamiliesandattendthesameschoolsasoneThisleadstotwopossiblelinesofthinkingaboutgendergaps:Eithertheyrepresentinnatedifferencesinboys’andgirls’abilities,ortheyreflectbiasesinhowschoolsandfamiliestreatboysandgirlsthattranslateintodifferencesin Dogendergapsinreadingreflectinherentdifferencesinboys’andgirls’ability?Researchconsistentlyshowsthat,onaverage,womenperformmorestronglyintestsofverbalskillsthanmendo.Butit’snotclearifthisfindingreflectsnatureornurture.Thefactthatgendergapsfavoringgirlsinreadingexistacrossalldevelopedcountriesisapotentialpointinfavoroftheinnatedifferencetheory.Thehugevariationinthesizeofthesegapsacrosscountriesisnot.Moreover,asBrookingsreports,gendergapsinreadingdisappearinadulthood.Areschoolsbiasedagainstboys?HoffSommersconcludesthat“misguidedfeminism,”andeffortsschoolsputinplaceinthe1980sand90stoimproveeducationalequityforgirls,havehadanegativeimpactonboys’learning.Butthetiminghereisoff.Boys’achievementandother eshaven’tgottenworseduringtheperiodwhengirlshavemadeeducationalgains,they’vegottenbetter,ifnotasquicklyasthoseofgirls.Amoresubtleargumentisthatthewaypublicoperatetodayplacesboysatasystematicdisadvantaged,notbecauseofanyanimustowardsboys,butbecauseteachers,themajorityofwhomarewomen,makedecisionsaboutcurricularcontent,behaviormanagementandthestructureoftheschooldaythatignoreboys’interests,experiencesandtendencies.Thishasledtoeffortstomakeschoolmore“boyfriendly,”butmanyofthesestrategiesarebasedondubiousscience,andthereislittleevidenceontheireffectiveness.Differencesinaveragemaleandfemaleabilitiespaleincomparisontothevariationwithineachgroup.Asaresult,designingeducationalapproachesandinterventionsbasedongenderislikelytobefarlesseffectivethandesigningthembasedontheneedsofindividualstudents.Ateacherwhoisstrugglingtoimprovelearningforboysinherclasswillnotgetmuchhelpfromlearningaboutstructuraldifferencesinmaleandfemalebrains.Whatshereallyneedsareeffectivereadingcurricula,toolsfordiagnosingstudents’readingdifficultiesandresearch-basedinterventionsforstrugglingreaders.Shealsoneedstoolstohelpdifferentiateinstructiontostudentabilitiesandneeds.Andsheneedseffectivebehaviormanagementstrategies,aswellasresearch-basedapproachestohelpchildrendeveloptheirself-regulatoryskillsandabilitytofocus.Thesetoolswillhelpheraddressmanyoftheareasinwhichboyscommonlystruggle,butthey’llalsobenefitgirlswhofacesimilarchallenges.Andplentyofsquirmy,energeticlittlegirlsfacethesamestrugglescommonlyassociatedwithboysinschool.Iwasoneofthem.Wemayneverbeabletofullyunderstandandexplainthecausesofgendergapsinreading,butthatmightbeOK.Sometimes,treatingthesymptomisactuallymoreeffectivethant
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 食品衛(wèi)生防范條例
- 臨時網(wǎng)絡管理員合同
- 2025版跨境電商物流平臺入駐協(xié)議合同范本3篇
- 野生動物園保安員招聘合同
- 物業(yè)管理招投標交易費政策
- 商標一次性補償協(xié)議
- 公共廣場照明施工合作協(xié)議
- 船舶制造供貨施工合同范本
- 醫(yī)療器械維修聯(lián)盟協(xié)議
- 醫(yī)療設備召回政策與程序
- 2024年機動車檢測站質量手冊程序文件記錄表格合集(根據(jù)補充要求編制)
- 公司未來發(fā)展規(guī)劃及目標制定
- 食堂承包業(yè)績報告范文
- 2024年度餐飲店會員積分互換合同3篇
- 太陽耀斑預測研究-洞察分析
- 2024年01月11067知識產(chǎn)權法期末試題答案
- 化工企業(yè)銷售管理制度匯編
- 2025版國家開放大學法律事務??啤睹穹▽W(2)》期末紙質考試案例分析題庫
- 2024年全國各地化學中考試題匯編:酸和堿(含詳解)
- 廣東省深圳市2023-2024學年高一上學期期末英語試題(含答案)
- DB41T 2486-2023 叉車維護保養(yǎng)與自行檢查規(guī)范
評論
0/150
提交評論