老師題源報(bào)精讀第三課配套筆記加_第1頁(yè)
老師題源報(bào)精讀第三課配套筆記加_第2頁(yè)
老師題源報(bào)精讀第三課配套筆記加_第3頁(yè)
老師題源報(bào)精讀第三課配套筆記加_第4頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩7頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

年3月)——P38Africanbusinessesarereluctantemployers.AgivenfirminSub-SaharanAfricatypicallyhas24%fewerpeopleonitsbooksthanequivalentfirmselsewhere,accordingtoarecentpaperfromtheCentreforGlobalDevelopment(CGD),athinkbasedinWashington,DC.Giventhelinksbetweenemploymentanddevelopment,economistswanttofigureoutthereasonsfortheThestudycalculatesthemissingjobsbycrunchinginformationon41,000formalbusinessesgloballyfromaWorldBanksurvey.ThedatacaptureonlyasliverofwhatactuallyhappensinAfrica:nineintenworkershaveaninformaljob.Shunnedbytheformalsector,workersturntobelow-the-radaremployment—toilingonfamilyfarmsorotherwisetheernment’sreach.ButabiginformalsectormakesitharderforAfricatoreducepoverty,evenwheneconomicgrowthisstrong.Increasesin eontheproductionsideoftheeconomytranslateweaklyintohigherwagesforworkers.IndeedtherelationshipbetweeneconomicgrowthandpovertyreductionweakerinAfricathananyotherdeveloSeveralfactorsexplainAfricanbosses’reluctancetotakeonnewworkers.Oneisthatfirmstendtobeyoungerthanelsewhere,butevenolderoneshavefeweremployees.Morebroadly,Africa’sbusinessclimatediscourageshiring.ernmentofficialsinsearchoftaxesandbribestendtochaselargefirms,ratherthansmallones,saysVijayaRamachandranofCGD,becausetheyareconsideredmorelikelytocoughup.ThemanagersofNigerienandLiberianfirmswithmorethan100employeesspend14%longerdealingwithernmentofficialsthansmallerpeers.ArecentstudyfromSouthAfricarevealedthatbossesthereweredesperatetododgetheattentionsofbureaucratsandthusavoidedtakingonnewworkers.Highunitlabourcostsarealsoculpable.EmployingpeopleinAfricashouldbecheap,giventhatmanyofitscountrieshaverock- elevels.YetinhalfofAfricancountrieslabourcostsarehigherthaninChinabecauseworkersarelessproductive.Theyarenearly80%higherinAfricathanthoseinothercountriesatsimilarlevelsof e.Thatlowerscompetitivenessandmakeshiringlesslikely.Economistsdisagreeaboutthepossiblecausesofthis.Redtapeandunionisationmayberesponsible,thoughonaverageindicatorsoflabour-marketregulationarenodifferentinAfricathanelsewhere.Nonethelesstherearehorrorstories.A2012reportonSouthAfrica,whichlaystheblameongreedyunions,calculatesthattheaverageemployeeatEskom,astateownedelectricityutility,earns40%moreintermsofpurchasing-powerparitythanaGermanprofessor.Africa’scommodity-drivenexportmodelsmaybeanothercauseoflowformalemployment.Four-fifthsofthecontinent’sexportrevenuesarefromcommodities.Thatcanleadtoovervaluedcurbstheirgrowthandthusdiscourageshiring.(Africa’sbiginflowsofaidalsocontributetohigherrealexchangeratesbecausetheyresultinupwardpressureonpricesforgoodsandservicesthatarenottradedinternationally.)Changinglabour-marketdynamicscouldexacerbatethejobproblem.Some250mpeopleareexpectedtojointheAfricanworkforcebetween2010and2050.Intheshorttermmanywillgointofarming,whichemploys65%oftheAfricanlabourforce.Theagriculturalsectorstrugglestocreateenoughjobs.Inthe1990sdonorslostinterestinusingtheiraiddollarsforagriculturalinvestment.Shame:betterfarmingtechniquescouldbringunproductivelandintouseandhelpAfricashiftintohigher-value-addedcrops.AccordingtoareportbyMcKinsey,aconsultingfirm,thatcouldcreate6mextrajobsbyButagriculturalimprovementcanalsofreeuplabourtoworkinmoreproductivesectors—ifthejobsareavailable.Africaisembracingstructuralreform:arecentreportfromtheWorldBankshowsthatofthe20economiesworldwidemakingthemostprogressinimprovingbusinessregulation,nineareinSub-SaharanAfrica.Withoutfurtherimprovement,employmentgrowthinAfrica’sformalsectorwillremaindepressinglyP19《英國(guó)在亞馬遜和eBay的非歐元區(qū)損失數(shù)千萬(wàn),罪魁在于?》P23《·的心愿單:提稅與貿(mào)易保護(hù)主What(1-2):Africanbusinessesare 4.export:overvalueexchange5.changinglabour-marketHow(8):furthertheCenterforGlobalDevelopmentTheCenterforGlobalDevelopment(CGD)isaU.S.nonprofitthinkbasedinWashington,D.C.thatfocusesoninternationalItwasfoundedinNovember2001byformerseniorU.S.officialEdwardW.Scott,directorofthePetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics,C.FredBergsten,andNancyBirdsall.Birdsall,theformerVice oftheInter-AmericanDevelopmentBankandformerDirectorofthePolicyResearchDepartmentattheWorldBank,becametheCenter'sfirst LawrenceSummerswasunanimouslyelectedinMarch2014bytheCGDBoardofDirectorstosucceedfoundingBoardChairEdwardScott,Jr.,onMay1,2014.CGDwasrankedthefourthmostprominentthinkintheinternationaldevelopmentspherebyUniversityofPennsylvania's"2013GlobalGoToThinkIndexReport".Recently,ForeignPolicyMagazine'sThink-IndexlistedCGDasoneofthetop15overallthink-intheUSA.CGD'sstatedmissionis"toreduceglobalpovertyandinequalitybyencouragingpolicychangeintheUnitedStatesandotherrichcountriesthroughrigorousresearchandactiveengagementwiththepolicycommunity.TheCenterconsidersitselftobea"thinkanddo",withanemphasisonproducingresearchthatischanneledintopracticalpolicyCGDiswellknownforleadingdebt-reliefprograms,specificallyinNigeriaandLiberia.CGDViceToddMossfirstproposedtheNigeriandebtbuy-back,whichresultedintheParisClubofrichnationsforgiving60%of$31billionofdebt.FormerCGDseniorfellowSteveRadeletadvisedLiberianEllenJohnsonSirleafandhersenioradvisorsondebtreliefandaidexchange foreign-exchangerate,forexrate,FXrateorAgio)betweentwocurrenciesistherateatwhichonecurrencywillbeexchangedforanother.Itisalsoregardedasthevalueofonecountry’scurrencyintermsofanothercurrency.Forexample,aninterbankexchangerateof119Japaneseyen(JPY,¥)totheUnitedStatesdollar(US$)meansthat¥119willbeexchangedforeachUS$1orthatUS$1willbeexchangedforeach¥119.Inthiscaseitissaidthatthepriceofadollarintermsofyenis¥119,orequivalentlythatthepriceofayenintermsofdollarsis$1/119.Exchangeratesaredeterminedintheforeignexchangemarket,whichisopentoawiderangeofdifferenttypesofbuyersandsellerswherecurrencytradingiscontinuous:24hoursadayexceptweekends,i.e.tradingfrom20:15GMTonSundayuntil22:00GMTFriday.Thespotexchangeratereferstothecurrentexchangerate.Theforwardexchangeratereferstoanexchangeratethatisquotedandtradedtodaybutfordeliveryandpaymentonaspecificfuturedate.第5篇-教育類(lèi)(選自《與世界報(bào)道》2015年4月)——P191Theeconomicrecessionofthelate2000s,andthesloweconomicgrowththatfollowedit,havedrawnparticularattentiontothedecliningfortunesof eandworking-classmen,whowereparticularlyhardhitbytheseeconomictrends.Concernaboutthefateofnon-collegeeducatedmenhasledsome andauthorstofocusontheroleoftheK-12system.AuthorssuchasRichardWhitmire,ChristinaHoffSommersandPegTyrenotethat,onarangeofindicators,boysarestrugglingmoreinschoolthangirlsare.Boys’academicachievementinreadingtrailsthatofgirls.Boysaremorelikelytobesuspended,retainedingradeorplacedinspecialeducation.Theyarelesslikelytograduatefromhighschoolorenrollinandgraduatefromcollegethangirlsare.That’sthebadnews.Thegoodnewsisthatboys’academicachievementandeducationalattainmenthaveimprovedoverthepastdecade.Intheelementaryandmiddlegrades,boysareachievingathigherlevelsinreadingandmaththanatanytimesince1971.Andthepercentageofbothmenandwomenoverage25whoholdabachelor’sdegreeisalsoatarecordhigh.Nearlyadecadeago,Ireviewedthedataonboys’andachievementandeducationalattainmentandconcludedthatboysweren’tfallingbehind.Infact,boyswerengbetterthaneveronarangeofeducationalindicators.Butgirls’achievementwasimprovingfaster,causinggirlstopullaheadofboys.AnewreportfromtheBrookingsInstitution,releasedlastweek,largelyaffirmsthisysis.Italsofindssomethingnew:Boysarestartingtocatchup.From2004to2012,boysatallgradelevelsmadesignificantgainsinreading.Asaresult,boysarenarrowingthereadinggapintheelementarygrades.Whilehighschoolgirlstodayreadaboutaswellastheydidin1971,highschoolboystodaydobetterinreadingthantheydidintheearlyWhatshouldwemakeofAmongthevarietyofeducationalachievementgapsthatexistintheUnitedStates,gendergapsareuniquelyperplexing.Whenitcomestoachievementgapsbyrace,ethnicityandsocioeconomicstatus,weknowthatchildrenfromdifferentgroupsareraisedindifferentfamiliesandoftenattenddifferentschoolsthanpeersfromothergroups,andthatthesedifferencesinhomeandschoolexperiencesaccountforalargeportionoftheachievementgap.GendergapsareparticularlyvexingbecauseboysandgirlsareraisedinthesamefamiliesandattendthesameschoolsasoneThisleadstotwopossiblelinesofthinkingaboutgendergaps:Eithertheyrepresentinnatedifferencesinboys’andgirls’abilities,ortheyreflectbiasesinhowschoolsandfamiliestreatboysandgirlsthattranslateintodifferencesin Dogendergapsinreadingreflectinherentdifferencesinboys’andgirls’ability?Researchconsistentlyshowsthat,onaverage,womenperformmorestronglyintestsofverbalskillsthanmendo.Butit’snotclearifthisfindingreflectsnatureornurture.Thefactthatgendergapsfavoringgirlsinreadingexistacrossalldevelopedcountriesisapotentialpointinfavoroftheinnatedifferencetheory.Thehugevariationinthesizeofthesegapsacrosscountriesisnot.Moreover,asBrookingsreports,gendergapsinreadingdisappearinadulthood.Areschoolsbiasedagainstboys?HoffSommersconcludesthat“misguidedfeminism,”andeffortsschoolsputinplaceinthe1980sand90stoimproveeducationalequityforgirls,havehadanegativeimpactonboys’learning.Butthetiminghereisoff.Boys’achievementandother eshaven’tgottenworseduringtheperiodwhengirlshavemadeeducationalgains,they’vegottenbetter,ifnotasquicklyasthoseofgirls.Amoresubtleargumentisthatthewaypublicoperatetodayplacesboysatasystematicdisadvantaged,notbecauseofanyanimustowardsboys,butbecauseteachers,themajorityofwhomarewomen,makedecisionsaboutcurricularcontent,behaviormanagementandthestructureoftheschooldaythatignoreboys’interests,experiencesandtendencies.Thishasledtoeffortstomakeschoolmore“boyfriendly,”butmanyofthesestrategiesarebasedondubiousscience,andthereislittleevidenceontheireffectiveness.Differencesinaveragemaleandfemaleabilitiespaleincomparisontothevariationwithineachgroup.Asaresult,designingeducationalapproachesandinterventionsbasedongenderislikelytobefarlesseffectivethandesigningthembasedontheneedsofindividualstudents.Ateacherwhoisstrugglingtoimprovelearningforboysinherclasswillnotgetmuchhelpfromlearningaboutstructuraldifferencesinmaleandfemalebrains.Whatshereallyneedsareeffectivereadingcurricula,toolsfordiagnosingstudents’readingdifficultiesandresearch-basedinterventionsforstrugglingreaders.Shealsoneedstoolstohelpdifferentiateinstructiontostudentabilitiesandneeds.Andsheneedseffectivebehaviormanagementstrategies,aswellasresearch-basedapproachestohelpchildrendeveloptheirself-regulatoryskillsandabilitytofocus.Thesetoolswillhelpheraddressmanyoftheareasinwhichboyscommonlystruggle,butthey’llalsobenefitgirlswhofacesimilarchallenges.Andplentyofsquirmy,energeticlittlegirlsfacethesamestrugglescommonlyassociatedwithboysinschool.Iwasoneofthem.Wemayneverbeabletofullyunderstandandexplainthecausesofgendergapsinreading,butthatmightbeOK.Sometimes,treatingthesymptomisactuallymoreeffectivethant

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論