gre考試備考時間不夠該如何給寫作減負

gre考試備考時間不夠該怎樣給寫作“減負”一共有多少題目gre寫作有一個特點，也是我們應(yīng)當(dāng)利用的特點：它的題庫是完整公然的。我們最后在上碰到的題目會直接從題庫中抽取而出，不會做任何改變。所以，理論上講，只需我們提早準(zhǔn)備好全部題目，

GRE寫作的高分是絕對能保障的，這一點和

GRE的語文和數(shù)學(xué)都不同樣。看完題庫以后，大家應(yīng)當(dāng)意氣消沉了。不用數(shù)了，

Issue

部分題目：

152道。Argument

題目：177道。這樣的“天文數(shù)字”，仿佛讓我們無從下手，可是真的有這么多道題目嗎不是的

!仔細的同學(xué)應(yīng)當(dāng)會發(fā)現(xiàn)，無論是

Issue

仍是

Argument，有好多題目的題干是高度相像甚至是完整同樣的，重復(fù)率幾乎為

50%。這樣一來，

Issue

部分我們需要準(zhǔn)備的題目數(shù)目就變?yōu)榱耍?/p>

152/2=76，Argument

部分我們需要準(zhǔn)備的題目數(shù)目就變?yōu)榱耍?/p>

177/2≈89。題庫直接減小了一半。但即使這樣，

gre

考試題目數(shù)目仍是好多，有沒有方法再減少一些呢

?要減負，就減負得狠一些gre

考生們自己在準(zhǔn)備時，簡單墮入一個對題目的錯誤分類方式

(或說是不高效的分類方式)：Issue

依據(jù)“領(lǐng)域

(即藝術(shù)、治、科技、教育等

)”分類，

Argument

依據(jù)“經(jīng)典邏輯錯誤(臆造因果，錯誤類比等

)”分類。這樣的分類方式合用于老

GRE，假如考生依舊依據(jù)這樣的分類方式，很有可能就會墮入誤區(qū)。那么，新

GRE的題目分類方式應(yīng)當(dāng)是依據(jù)什么呢

?一個詞，Instruction。Instruction又叫Direction，中文意思是“詳細性指令”或“寫作要求”。題當(dāng)今面這段斜體字就是Instruction。以前有同學(xué)跟我們反應(yīng)說：“以前認為每道題目下邊的這個斜體字都是同樣的，所以根本不看”不看

Instruction

的結(jié)果很沉重，

ETS明確說，假如不依據(jù)

Instruction

，最高分不會超過三分。而Issue中間一共有6種Instruction，Argument中間一共有4種對我們行文都有不同的要求。這樣看來，在面對新GRE時，我們應(yīng)當(dāng)依據(jù)

InstructionInstruction

，每一種來對題這樣一來，我們需要準(zhǔn)備的題目的類型數(shù)目即為：

Issue6

道，Argument4

道。加在一同是10道題目，是本來總題目數(shù)目的3%。這個減負力度，夠狠了吧。假如只有一周了，練幾篇這個問題也真是把我們上了死路。但還剩一周才來看作文的同學(xué)其實也不在少量。在這樣的時間節(jié)點上，由于Argument的套路性更強，模板也更好用，所以更好拿分，我們會告訴大家：“保Argument，爭Issue”。即把重點放在Argument上邊，而Issue部分只需要理解寫作重點，實在沒有時間就能夠不做全文練習(xí)了。這樣一來，我們面對GRE寫作，最少應(yīng)當(dāng)練——4篇。題目："petitionisultimatelyrebeneficialthandetrimentaltosociety."歸根結(jié)底，競爭關(guān)于是利多弊少。正文：Darwinsuggestedthattheprocessofevolutionisonebasedonpetition.Thisdeadlypetitionweedsouttheweakandonlythefittestofthespeciessurvives.Humans,beingtheproductofmillionsofyearsofevolution,arebynature,petitivebeings.Yet,humansarealsosocialbeings.Likethebeesinthehive,wearenotverysuccessfullivingpletelyonourown.Weneedtocooperatewithotherindividualsforoursurvival.Thus,aconflictensues,betweenourinnatepetitiveness,andourneedtocooperate.Thereareprosandconsassociatedwithboth.However,itismybeliefthatoverall,petition,isredetrimentalthanbeneficialtohumansociety.First,letustrytoidentifywhythereispetitioninthefirstplace.Inanenvironmentabundantwithresources,wheresupplyoutstripsdemand,thereisverylittleneedfortheinhabitantstofightwitheachotheroverthem.Thisisnotthecaseonplanetearth.Resourcesarelimited,andthereisconstantjostlingtogettothefrontoftheueuetogetacuirethem.Forexample,thousandsofprospectivestudentsapplytogainentrancetotopuversitiesaroundtheworld,butthereareonlyahandfulofplacesinthoseuversities.Thus,thereispetitiontogetintotothesehallowedinstXXtionsofhigherlearng.Fromautilitarianperspective,petitionisagoodthing.Inevolutionitisresnsiblefortheeliminationof"weak"genes.Inthebusinessenvironment,itgetsridoftheweakerplayers.Inlitics,itweedsoutunpularcandidates.Inacademia,itgetsridofweakstudents.Furtherre,petitionleadstoselfimprovement.Businesseswillstrivetoofferbetterproductsandservicesatlesserprices.Theconsumerreapsrichrewardsfromthispetitivespirit.liticiansstrivetodotheutstforthepeople,sotheywouldgetreelected.Studentsexcelintherestudies,tryingtooutdoeachother.Thus,ostensibly,petitionisresnsibleforthebettermentofthesocietyasaXXle.However,thisisjustthesuperficialview.Underththesuce,petition,ineveryaspect,isslowlyeatingawayattheveryfabricofthesociety.Whileitistruetosaythatpetitionincorrateworldhasbroughtgreatbenefitstotheconsumer,thesocietyas"MissedAhere"XXleisplayingagreatpriceforit.stbusinessesareexploitingcheaplabourinthethirdworldtomaximisetheirprofits.TherearethousandsofsweatshopsrunbywellknownwesterncorrationsincountrieslikeIndonesia,BangladeshandChina.Peopleareforcedtoworkinsualidconditions,often16hoursaday.TheyareluckytorXXiveadollaradayfortherelabours.Thementagovernmentinanyofthesecountriestrytoimprovetheworkingconditionsoftheemployees,thesemultinationalgiantsfleethecountry,oftenleingXXlemutiecingfinancialn.Thecorrationsareawarethatthereareplentyofotherlabourmarketsthatcouldbeexploitedwithgayabandon.Thatisjustthehumancost.Whatabouttheenvironmentalcosts?petitionhasforcedmanycorrationsto"streamline"theiroperations.Environmentalstandardsarenormallythefirstvictimsofthis"streamline"process.Asigficantauntofenvironmentalllutionandlanddegradationhasbeenblamedonindustry,yetthefactorieskeepproducingreandre.Thousandsofitemsgounsoldeachyearduetopetition.Onlyafractionofthismerndiseisrecycled.Therestgoestothealreadyoverflowinglandfills.GRE寫作題目：Muchoftheinformationthatpeopleassumeisfactualactuallyturnsouttobeinaccurate.Thus，anypiXXofinformationreferredtoasa‘fact’shouldbemistrustedsinceitmaywellbeprovenfalseinthefuture.大部分人們認為是事實的信息結(jié)果實質(zhì)上都是不正確的。所以，任何據(jù)稱是事實的信息都應(yīng)當(dāng)被懷疑，由于它在未來很可能會被證明為是錯誤的。GRE寫作范文：ShouldwebedoubtfultoalltheinformationathandsbXXusetherightnessofwhichisuncertain?Thespeakerclaimsso，Iconcedethatpeopleoftenmitvariousfallaciesinthecourseofcogzingthings

，howeverIfundamentallytakeexceptionofthearguer'sassertiontomistrusteveryfactwemightencounter.AndIwillsubstantiallydiscussmyviewsthereinafter.Tobeginwith，thespeakerseemstoimplicatethatafactwouldbeprovenfalseinthefutureundernumerousumstance.NeverthelessIprefertoarguerthatfactsnevernge.NomatterhowdidtheMedievalChurchandInuisitionpersecuteBruno，thefactneverngesthattheearthisfarfrombeingthXXnteroftheuverseasthereligioussovereignshadassumedorhopedfor，whilejustaminorparticleinit.Eually，nomatterhowEdisonhadtriedtoincitethepublicfearanddistrusttothealternativecurrentelectricity，thefactneverngesthatTeals’electricalsystemisvastlysuperiortohisdirectcurrentelectricalone，andwouldbeacceptedandappliedinlargerrange.However，whatdongearethehuman'sobjectiveinterpretationstofacts.Onepellingargumenttothisintisthat，duetothelimitationofhuman’sknowledgeandprehensivecapability，theytendtomakeinsufficientorevenfalseunderstandingtothecertainfact.Anaptillustrationisthengesofcogtiontodisease.Whileattheancienttime，ourprogetorsbelievedtheamanbeingapatientforthereasonthathehadconductcrimesoroffendedsomeghostsorspirits，thecontemrarypeoplehewellknowthatthevariesofpathogensarethebasiccausestoourdiseases，andthedefectsofourimmunesystemandsofortharealsothefactorsaswell.Anotherargumentforthengeofprehensiontofactisthatdifferentpeoplealwaysobserveandinterpretfromdifferentperspectives.ThoughtheRelativitytheoryisnotwellpliablewiththeuantumme，noonecallthegreatnessofbothEinsteinandBohr，bXXusetheirtheoriesarebasedondistinctviews，theformerfromthemacrocoandthelaterfromthemicroco.Notwithstandingtheforegoingreasonsforthathumantendtomakefallaciesduringthecauseofprehendingandcogzingfacts，thesereasonsshouldneverbetheexcusestodoubteveryconclusionwemightdrawfromfacts.Basedoncertainrationalinferenceandproperknowledgefundament，theconclusionswemakemightwellbejustifiable，ifnotpletelyright，tocertaindegree.Whatweneedtodoistoprotetheenterpriseofpursuingthebetteranswerandtrytousetheresultwehegettoapplication，inst