英語(yǔ)論文講解課件1

1、Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in NorwayBy Rune Dahl Fitja and Andrs Rodrguez-PoseWang Na 13120635Beijing Jiaotong University Firm collaboration and modes oRune Dahl FitjarBiographyOn 1 September 2013, I will be starting a new position as full Professor of Innovation Studies at theUniver

2、sity of Stavanger Business School. Currently, I am a senior research scientist at theInternational Research Institute of Stavanger(IRIS).Rune Dahl FitjarBiographyANDRS RODRGUEZ-POSEProfessor of Economic GeographyVice-President of the Regional Science Association InternationalEuropean Research Counci

3、l Advanced Grant HolderANDRS RODRGUEZ-POSEProfessorStructure4、Partner types and innovation outcomes3、Case description and data6、Conclusion1、IntroductionStructure2、The role of sources of Knowledge in innovation5、What difference does geographical proximity make?Structure4、Partner types 3、CasBackground

4、raise a questionWhile making a pioneering and important contribution to our knowledge, one of the potential downsides of Jensen et al.s analysis is that the classification of firms into four clusters according to the intensity of use of STI and DUI-modes of innovation by each firm creates a rather c

5、rude division which represents the variables of interest in the logistic regression analysis on which the key conclusions are based. This implies a significant loss of information about STI and DUI-modes of learning at the level of each firm.Backgroundraise a questionWhiSolutionsAim to make a contri

6、bution to this debate by analyzing to what extent STI and DUI-modes of innovation are related to firm level innovation in Norway. Sample use a specifically tailor-made survey of 1604 firms with more than ten employees in the five major Norwegian city-regions. The survey measures the different types

7、of interactions that these firms engage in. SolutionsAim to make a conText 1Text 2Text 3STIDUIResearch institutesuniversityConsultancy firmsWithin the supply chainoutside the supply chainsupplierscustomerscompetitorsInteraction TypesText 1Text 2Text 3STIDUIResearKnowledge & InnovationSTIScience, Tec

8、hnology and InnovationFor those placed in the STI camp, innovation in firms is the result of investments in R&D and S&T and interaction with centre producing new knowledge mainly research centre and universities, but also consultancies, scientific brokers and foundations for the diffusion of scienti

9、fic research which generate the codified and explicit knowledge which can be used by the firm to produce new innovations.Knowledge & InnovationSTIScieKnowledge & InnovationDUIDoing, Using and Interactinginnovation in the firm is mostly generated by the capacity of managers and employees to find solu

10、tions to existing problems and to respond to the challenges made by suppliers, customers, and the market.Knowledge & InnovationDUIDoinEmpirical AnalysisQuestions are whether and in which way different types of STI and DUI-partnerships and their geographical dimensions affect different types of innov

11、ations.Empirical AnalysisQuestions arCompany LogoPartner types and innovation outcomesCompany LoCompany LogoWhen Geographical Proximity is Considered Company LoConclusionEngagement with external agents is closely related to firm innovation and that both STI and DUI-modes of interaction matterDUI mod

12、es of interaction outside the supply-chain tend to be irrelevant for innovation, with frequent exchanges with competitors being associated with lower levels of innovationCollaboration with extra-regional agents is much more conducive to innovation than collaboration with local partners, especially w

13、ithin the DUI mode.ConclusionEngagement with exFor FutureOverall, this research provides a few answers but raises a whole raft of new questions regarding the role of clusters, tacit knowledge and policy in Norway.It also calls for more in-depth analyses of how collaborations by what are generally relatively small firms emerge with distant partners. Looking into these questions will give