醫(yī)學(xué)英語(yǔ)資料.doc

基因單詞A腺苷脫氨酶缺乏癥 adenosine deaminase deficiency (ADA)腺病毒 adenovirusAlagille綜合征 Alagille syndrome等位基因 allele氨基酸 amino acids動(dòng)物模型 animal model抗體 antibody凋亡 apoptosis路-巴綜合征 ataxia-telangiectasia常染色體顯性 autosomal dominant常染色體 autosomeB細(xì)菌人工染色體 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)堿基對(duì) base pair先天缺陷 birth defect骨髓移植 bone marrow transplantationC癌 cancer后選基因 candidate gene癌 carcinomacDNA文庫(kù) cDNA library細(xì)胞 cell染色體 chromosome克隆 cloning密碼 codon天生的 congenital重疊群 contig囊性纖維化 cystic fibrosis細(xì)胞遺傳圖 cytogenetic mapD缺失 deletion脫氧核糖核酸 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)糖尿病 diabetes mellitus二倍體 diploidDNA復(fù)制 DNA replicationDNA測(cè)序 DNA sequencing顯性的 dominant雙螺旋 double helix復(fù)制 duplicationE電泳 electrophoresisEllis - van Creveld syndrome酶 enzyme外顯子 exonF家族性地中海熱 familial Mediterranean fever熒光原位雜交 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)脆性X染色體綜合征 Fragile X syndromeG基因 gene基因擴(kuò)增 gene amplification基因表達(dá) gene expression基因圖譜 gene mapping基因庫(kù) gene pool基因治療 gene therapy基因轉(zhuǎn)移 gene transfer遺傳密碼 genetic code (ATGC)遺傳咨詢 genetic counseling遺傳圖 genetic map遺傳標(biāo)記 genetic marker遺傳病篩查 genetic screening基因組 genome基因型 genotype種系 germ lineH單倍體 haploidhaploinsufficiency造血干細(xì)胞 hematopoietic stem cell血友病 hemophilia雜合子 heterozygous高度保守序列 highly conserved sequenceHirschsprung病 Hirschsprungs disease純合子 homozygous人工染色體 human artificial chromosome (HAC)人類(lèi)基因組計(jì)劃 Human Genome Project人類(lèi)免疫缺陷病毒 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/獲得性免疫缺陷綜合征 acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)Huntington舞蹈病 Huntingtons disease雜交 hybridizationI免疫治療 immunotherapy原位雜交 in situ hybridization繼承的 inherited插入 insertion知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) intellectual property rightsK敲除 knockoutL白血病 leukemia庫(kù) library鍵、連接 linkage部位、場(chǎng)所 locus優(yōu)勢(shì)對(duì)數(shù)評(píng)分 LOD score淋巴M畸形 malformation描圖 mapping標(biāo)記 marker黑色素瘤 melanoma孟德?tīng)?Mendel, Johann (Gregor)孟德?tīng)栠z傳 Mendelian inheritance信使RNA messenger RNA (mRNA)分裂中期 metaphase微陣技術(shù) microarray technology線立體DNA mitochondrial DNA單體性 monosomy小鼠模型 mouse model多發(fā)性內(nèi)分泌瘤病 multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 (MEN1)突變 mutationN神經(jīng)纖維瘤病 neurofibromatosis尼曼-皮克病 Niemann-Pick disease, type C (NPC)non-directivenessRNA印記 Northern blot核苷酸 nucleotide神經(jīng)核 nucleus細(xì)胞 lymphocyteO寡核苷酸 oligo癌基因 oncogenePp53Parkinson病 Parkinsons disease專(zhuān)利權(quán) patent血系/譜系 pedigree表型 phenotype物理圖譜 physical map多指畸形/多趾畸形 polydactyly聚合酶鏈反應(yīng) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)多態(tài)性 polymorphism定位克隆 positional cloning原發(fā)性免疫缺陷 primary immunodeficiency引物 primer原核 pronucleus前列腺癌 prostate cancer蛋白 proteinR隱性 recessive逆轉(zhuǎn)錄病毒 retrovirus核糖核酸 ribonucleic acid (RNA)核糖體 ribosomerisk communicationS序列標(biāo)記位點(diǎn) sequence-tagged site (STS)聯(lián)合免疫缺陷 severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)性染色體 sex chromosome伴性的 sex-linked體細(xì)胞 somatic cellsDNA印記 Southern blot光譜核型 spectral karyotype (SKY)替代 substitution自殺基因 suicide gene綜合征 syndromeT技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓 technology transfer轉(zhuǎn)基因的 transgenic易位 translocation三體型 trisomy腫瘤抑制基因 tumor suppressor geneV載體 vectorW蛋白質(zhì)印記 Western blotWolfram綜合征 Wolfram syndromeY酵母人工染色體 yeast artificial chromosome (YAC)Low-Fat Diet Does Not Cut Health Risks, Study FindsBy GINA KOLATAThe largest study ever to ask whether a low-fat diet reduces the risk of getting cancer or heart disease has found that the diet has no effect.The $415 million federal study involved nearly 49,000 women ages 50 to 79 who were followed for eight years. In the end, those assigned to a low-fat diet had the same rates of breast cancer, colon cancer, heart attacks and strokes as those who ate whatever they pleased, researchers are reporting today.These studies are revolutionary, said Dr. Jules Hirsch, physician in chief emeritus at Rockefeller University in New York City, who has spent a lifetime studying the effects of diets on weight and health. They should put a stop to this era of thinking that we have all the information we need to change the whole national diet and make everybody healthy.The study, published in todays issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association, was not just an ordinary study, said Dr. Michael Thun, who directs epidemiological research for the American Cancer Society. It was so large and so expensive, Dr. Thun said, that it was the Rolls-Royce of studies. As such, he added, it is likely to be the final word.We usually have only one shot at a very large-scale trial on a particular issue, he said.The results, the study investigators agreed, do not justify recommending low-fat diets to the public to reduce their heart disease and cancer risk. Given the lack of benefit found in the study, many medical researchers said that the best dietary advice, for now, was to follow federal guidelines for healthy eating, with less saturated and trans fats, more grains, and more fruits and vegetables.Not everyone was convinced. Some, like Dr. Dean Ornish, a longtime promoter of low-fat diets and president of the Preventive Medicine Research Institute in Sausalito, Calif., said that the women did not reduce their fat to low enough levels or eat enough fruits and vegetables, and that the study, even at eight years, did not give the diets enough time.Others said that diet could still make a difference, at least with heart disease, if people were to eat the so-called Mediterranean diet, low in saturated fats like butter and high in oils like olive oil. The women in the study reduced all kinds of fat.The diets studied had an antique patina, said Dr. Peter Libby, a cardiologist and professor at Harvard Medical School. These days, Dr. Libby said, most people have moved on from the idea of controlling total fat to the idea that people should eat different kinds of fat.But the Mediterranean diet has not been subjected to a study of this scope, researchers said.And Barbara V. Howard, an epidemiologist at MedStar Research Institute, a nonprofit hospital group, and a principle investigator in the study, said people should realize that diet alone was not enough to stay healthy.We are not going to reverse any of the chronic diseases in this country by changing the composition of the diet, Dr. Howard said. People are always thinking its what they ate. They are not looking at how much they ate or that they smoke or that they are sedentary.Except for not smoking, the advice for a healthy lifestyle is based largely on indirect evidence, Dr. Howard said, but most medical researchers agree that it makes sense to eat well, control weight and get regular exercise.That is also what the cancer society recommends. Dr. Thun, who described the studys results as completely null over the eight-year follow-up for both cancers and heart disease, said his group had no plans to suggest that low-fat diets were going to protect against cancer.Others cautioned against being too certain that a particular diet would markedly improve health, and said that whether someone developed a chronic disease might not be entirely under their control genetics also plays a role.David A. Freedman, a statistician at the University of California, Berkeley, who is not connected with the study but has written books on the design and analysis of clinical trials, said the results should be taken seriously.The studies were well designed, Dr. Freedman said, and the investigators tried to confirm popular hypotheses about the protective effect of diet against three major diseases in women.But, he added, the diet studied here turned out not to be protective after all.The study was part of the Womens Health Initiative of the National Institutes of Health, the same program that showed that hormone therapy after menopause might have more risks than benefitsIn this case, the study addressed a tricky problem. For decades, many scientists have said, and many members of the public have believed, that what people eat the composition of the diet determines how likely they are to get a chronic disease. But that has been hard to prove. Studies of dietary fiber and colon cancer failed to find that fiber was protective, and studies of vitamins thought to protect against cancer failed to show an effect.Many cancer researchers have questioned large parts of the diet-cancer hypothesis, but it has kept a hold on the public imagination. Nothing fascinates the American public so much as the notion that what you eat rather than how much you eat affects your health, said Dr. Libby, the Harvard professor.The study found that women who were randomly assigned to follow a low-fat diet ate significantly less fat over the next eight years. But they had just as much breast and colon cancer and just as much heart disease. The women were not trying to lose weight, and their weights remained fairly steady. But their experiences with the diets allowed researchers to question some popular notions about diet and obesity.There is a common belief that Americans get fat because they eat too many carbohydrates. The idea is that a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet leads to weight gain, higher insulin and blood glucose levels, and more diabetes, even if the calories are the same as in a higher-fat diet. That did not happen here.Others have said the opposite: that low-fat diets enable people to lose weight naturally. But that belief was not supported by this study.As for heart disease risk factors, the only one affected was LDL cholesterol, which increases heart disease risk. The levels were slightly higher in women eating the higher-fat diet, but not high enough to make a noticeable difference in their risk of heart disease.Although all the study participants were women, the colon cancer and heart disease results should also apply to men, said Dr. Jacques Rossouw, the project officer for the Womens Health Initiative.Dr. Rossouw said the observational studies that led to the hypothesis about colon cancer and dietary fat included men and women. With heart disease, he said, researchers have found that women and men respond in the same way to dietary fat.The most recent study follows a smaller one, reported last year, on low-fat diets for women who had breast cancer. That study hinted that eating less fat might help prevent a recurrence. But the current study, asking if a low-fat diet could protect women from breast cancer in the first place, had findings that fell short of statistical significance, meaning they could have occurred by chance.Dr. Rossouw said he was still intrigued by the breast cancer data, even though it was not statistically significant. The women on low-fat diets had a 9 percent lower rate of breast cancer; the incidence was 42 per thousand per year in women in the low-fat diet group, compared with 45 per thousand per year in women consuming their regular diet.That could mean that fat in the diet may have a small effect, Dr. Rossouw said, perhaps in some subgroups of women or over a longer period of time. He added that the study investigators would continue to follow the women to see if the effect became more pronounced.While cancer researchers said they were disappointed by the results, heart disease researchers said they were not surprised that simply reducing total fat had no effect, because they had moved on from that hypothesis.Of course, Dr. Libby acknowledged, the latest advice, to follow a Mediterranean diet and get regular exercise, has never been tested in a large randomized clinical trial. If they did a study like that and it was negative, he said, then Id have to give up my cherished hypotheses for data.The low-fat diet was not easy to follow, said Dr. Rowan T. Chlebowski, a medical oncologist at Harbor-U.C.L.A. Medical Center and one of the studys principal investigators. Women were told to aim for a diet that had just 20 percent of its calories as fat, and most fell short.The diet they were told to follow is different than the way most people eat, Dr. Chlebowski said. It meant, for example, no butter on bread, no cream cheese on bagels, no oil in salad dressings.If a physician told a patient to eat less fat, that will do nothing, he said. If you send someone to a dietitian one time, that will do next to nothing. The women in the study had 18 sessions in small groups with a trained nutritionist in the first year and four sessions a year after that.In the first year, the women on the low-fat diets reduced the percentage of fat in their diet to 24 percent of daily calories, and by the end of the study their diets had 29 percent of their calories as fat. In the first year, the women in the control group were eating 35 percent of their calories as fat, and by