![CCONMDPSatellite2009Devine分子分型骨髓移植【可編輯的文檔】_第1頁(yè)](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view2/M01/1C/17/wKhkFmY0UOyAQLRyAAKVT-h9i58069.jpg)
![CCONMDPSatellite2009Devine分子分型骨髓移植【可編輯的文檔】_第2頁(yè)](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view2/M01/1C/17/wKhkFmY0UOyAQLRyAAKVT-h9i580692.jpg)
![CCONMDPSatellite2009Devine分子分型骨髓移植【可編輯的文檔】_第3頁(yè)](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view2/M01/1C/17/wKhkFmY0UOyAQLRyAAKVT-h9i580693.jpg)
![CCONMDPSatellite2009Devine分子分型骨髓移植【可編輯的文檔】_第4頁(yè)](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view2/M01/1C/17/wKhkFmY0UOyAQLRyAAKVT-h9i580694.jpg)
![CCONMDPSatellite2009Devine分子分型骨髓移植【可編輯的文檔】_第5頁(yè)](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view2/M01/1C/17/wKhkFmY0UOyAQLRyAAKVT-h9i580695.jpg)
版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
AboutTheseSlidesOurthankstothepresenterswhogavepermissiontoincludetheiroriginaldataUsersareencouragedtousetheseslidesintheirownnoncommercialpresentations,butweaskthatcontentandattributionnotbechanged.UsersareaskedtohonorthisintentTheseslidesmaynotbepublishedorpostedonlinewithoutpermissionfromClinicalCareOptionsDisclaimer
ThematerialspublishedontheClinicalCareOptionsWebsitereflecttheviewsoftheauthorsofthe
CCOmaterial,notthoseofClinicalCareOptions,LLC,theCMEproviders,orthecompaniesprovidingeducationalgrants.ThematerialsmaydiscussusesanddosagesfortherapeuticproductsthathavenotbeenapprovedbytheUnitedStatesFoodandDrugAdministration.Aqualifiedhealthcareprofessionalshouldbeconsultedbeforeusinganytherapeuticproductdiscussed.Readersshouldverifyallinformationanddatabeforetreatingpatientsorusinganytherapiesdescribedinthesematerials.CurrentStateofAMLTherapyExcludingtheroughly20-30%ofgoodriskpatients,40-90%ofyoungerpatients(age18-59)achievingremissionaredestinedtorelapseCurrentStateofAMLTherapyExcludingtheroughly20-30%ofgoodriskpatients,40-90%ofyoungerpatients(age18-59)achievingremissionaredestinedtorelapseAllbutaveryselectsubsetofolderAMLpatients(>60)willdieduetorelapsedorrefractorydiseasePrognostic/predictivefactorsinAMLFactorCommentAgeMajorimpactatdiagnosisWBCContinuousvariablePriortherapyorMDS?KaryotypemaybemoreimportantExtramedullarydiseaseVariableDay14blastcountHigherpercentageworse#cyclesofinductionOnebetterthantwoCytogenetic/molecularprofileMajorImpactatdiagnosisGeneexpressionprofileCanfurthersubdividepatientsMicroRNAexpressionNeedsvalidationbyothergroupsGenesequencingFutureapplicationMRDdetectionatCR??;seemslikeitshouldbeusefulPrognostic/predictivefactorsinAMLFactorCommentBasisforTransplantrecommendation?AgeMajorimpactatdiagnosisYesWBCContinuousvariableNotsolelyPriortherapy?KaryotypemaybemoreimportantNotsolelyExtramedullarydiseaseVariableNotsolelyDay14blastcountHigherpercentageworseRarely#cyclesofinductionOnebetterthantwoRarelyCytogenetic/molecularprofileMajorImpactatdiagnosisYesGeneexpressionprofileCanfurthersubdividepatientsNotyetMicroRNAexpressionNeedsvalidationbyothergroupsNotyetGenesequencingFutureapplicationNotyetMRDdetectionatCR??;seemslikeitshouldbeusefulPossiblyforcytogenetics/FISHD?hnerK,etal.Haematologica2008;93:976-982.Reproducedwithpermission.
Majorcytogeneticsubgroupsofacutemyeloidleukemia(AML)(excludingacutepromyelocyticleukemia)andassociatedgenemutationsByrdJC,etal.Blood2002;100:4325-4336.ThisresearchwasoriginallypublishedinBlood.?2002theAmericanSocietyofHematology.CALGBDatabase:OutcomesinAMLPatients<60yearsofAgebasedonKaryotypeatDiagnosisBMTversusConventionaltherapyforAMLwithpoorriskcytogeneticsSWOG/ECOGTrialSlovakML,etal.Blood2000;96:4075-4083.ThisresearchwasoriginallypublishedinBlood.?2000theAmericanSocietyofHematology.BMTversusConventionaltherapyforAMLwithpoorriskcytogeneticsEORTC-LG/GIMEMASuciuS,etal.Blood.2003;102:1232-1240.ThisresearchwasoriginallypublishedinBlood.?2003theAmericanSocietyofHematology.CurrentRoleofAllograftsforAMLPatients<60yearsinCR1AdverseriskcytogeneticsMostagreeallograftappropriateconsolidationatleastupto55-60yearsofageCurrentRoleofAllograftsforAMLPatients<60yearsinCR1AdverseriskcytogeneticsMostagreeallograftappropriateconsolidationatleastupto55-60yearsofageFavorableriskcytogeneticsNoroleingeneralCurrentRoleofAllograftsforAMLPatients<60yearsinCR1AdverseriskcytogeneticsMostagreeallograftappropriateconsolidationatleastupto55-60yearsofageFavorableriskcytogeneticsNoroleingeneralIntermediateriskcytogeneticsThisiswhereitgetscomplicatedRecentmeta-analysessuggestbenefitCornellisonetal,Blood,2007Korethatal,JAMA,2009MolecularProfilesofCytogeneticallyNormalAMLD?hnerH,etal.Blood.2009Oct30.[Epubaheadofprint].ThisresearchwasoriginallypublishedinBlood.?2009theAmericanSocietyofHematology.HeterogeneitywithinCytogeneticallyNormalAMLCategoryGeneMutationPrognosticImpactNPM1FavorableinabsenceofFlt3ITDFlt3ITD/alleleratioUnfavorableFlt3TKDControversialCEBPAFavorableMLLPTDUnfavorableRasNeutralWT-1ControversialRunx1UnfavorableImpactofGeneExpressioninCytogeneticallyNormalAMLCategoryGeneImpactofOverexpressionBAALCUnfavorableERGUnfavorableMN1UnfavorableMir181FavorableMetzelerKH,etal.JClinOncol.2009;27:5031-5038.Reprintedwithpermission.?2009AmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology.AllrightsreservedHighexpressionofBAALC,ERG,orMN1predictsshorteroverallsurvivalincytogeneticallynormalacutemyeloidleukemiaRiskStratifyingAMLBasedonCytogenetic/MolecularProfileGeneticgroup SubsetsFavorable t(8;21)(q22;q22);RUNX1-RUNX1T1 inv(16)(p13.1q22)ort(16;16)(p13.1;q22);CBFB-MYH11 MutatedNPM1withoutFLT3-ITD(normalkaryotype) MutatedCEBPA(normalkaryotype)Intermediate-I MutatedNPM1andFLT3-ITD(normalkaryotype) WildtypeNPM1andFLT3-ITD(normalkaryotype) WildtypeNPM1withoutFLT3-ITD(normalkaryotype)Intermediate-II t(9;11)(p22;q23);MLLT3-MLL CytogeneticabnormalitiesnotclassifiedasfavorableoradverseAdverse inv(3)(q21q26.2)ort(3;3)(q21;q26.2);RPN1-EVI1 t(6;9)(p23;q34);DEK-NUP214 t(v;11)(v;q23);MLLrearranged -5ordel(5q);-7;abnl(17p); complexkaryotype;monosomalkaryotypeD?hnerH,etal.Blood.2009Oct30.[Epubaheadofprint]ThisresearchwasoriginallypublishedinBlood.?2009theAmericanSocietyofHematology.BMTversusConventionaltherapyforAMLwithnormalcytogeneticsSchlenkRF,etal.NewEnglJMed.2008;358:1909-1918.Reprintedwithpermission?2009MassachusettsMedicalSociety.KorethJ,etal.JAMA2009;301:2349-2361.Reproducedwithpermission.OverallSurvivalBenefitofAllogeneicSCTforAMLinFirstCompleteRemissionCurrentStateofAMLTherapyAllogeneicHCTisthesinglemosteffectivetherapycurrentlyavailableforthepreventionofrelapseAllogeneicHCTisstillapotentiallyriskytherapyandmanytreatingphysiciansremainreluctanttorecommendinCR1untilmortalityratescanbesubstantiallyloweredWhichpatientswithAMLlessthan60yearsofagecanreasonablybeconsideredforallogratinginfirstremission?Mostdecisionswouldbemadebasedoncytogenetic/molecularriskgroupAdverseriskkaryotype:mostwouldagreeOtherintermediateriskcytogeneticabnormalities:choiceslikelyindividualizedCytogeneticallynormalDecisionbasedonmolecularrisk?ShouldallFlt3ITDpatientsbeallografted?WhatrecommendationsshouldbemadeforFlt3ITDgroup?Shouldallofthesepatientsbereferredforallograft?Onwhatbasis?Whataboutpatientsalreadyenteredonclinictrial(e.g.CALGB10603/Intergroup)?ShouldthesepatientsbetakenoffaclinicaltrialofTKIforastandardofcareallograft?Acallforprospective,multi-centerallografttrialsinfirstremissionAMLbasedonriskforrelapseThiscannowbeaccomplishedbasedonstudiessuggestingnosignificantdifferenceinoverallsurvivalcomparingmatchedsiblingtomatchedunrelateddonortransplantsSimilarOutcomesinAMLregardlessofDonorSourceScheteligJ,etal.JClinOncol.2008;26:5183-5191.Reprintedwithpermission.?2008AmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology.AllrightsreservedLog-rankp-value<0.0001n=1735n=2621n=2184n=2234Acallforprospective,multi-centerallografttrialsinfirstremissionAMLbasedonriskforrelapseThiscannowbeaccomplishedbasedonstudiessuggestingnosignificantdifferenceinoverallsurvivalcomparingmatchedsiblingtomatchedunrelateddonortransplantsWhatwouldbethepossiblestudydesigns?Randomizationtotransplantorconventionaltreatmentafterdonoridentified?Upfrontdesigntotransplantallunfavorableriskpatientsinfirstremissionifdonoridentified?PossibleprospectiveAMLTransplanttrialdesignsRandomizationtotransplantorconventionaltreatmentafterdonoridentifiedWouldrequiresubstantialproportionofpatientshavingadonoridentifiedWhattypeofconditioningandGVHDprophylaxis?Istherereallyastandardapproach?Howmuchheterogeneityintransplantapproachcouldbetolerated?Whatwouldbethebestendpoint,consideringtheimpactofchronicGVHDonsurvivalandQOL?PossibleprospectiveAMLTransplanttrialdesignsUpfrontdesigntotransplantallunfavorableriskpatientsinfirstremissionifdonoridentifiedWoulditrequireHerculeanefforttogetpatientsriskstratified,HLA-typed,anddonorsidentifiedinatimelyfashion?Whatproportionofpatientswouldhavetomakeittotransplanttobeconsideredsuccessful?Shouldallpatientshaveonetypeoftransplantapproachorberandomized(Ph2)totwoormorepromisingstrategies?Whatwouldbethestudyendpoint?DFS,overallsurvival,GVHDfree/relapsefreesurvivalcomposite?Whatdefinesa“suitabledonor”allograftforahighriskAMLpatientinfirstremission?Matchedsibling:YesMatchedunrelateddonor:YesMismatchedunrelateddonor(KIRmismatched?)Cooleyetal,Blood,2009Mismatchedumbilicalcordblood?Gutmanetal,BBMT,2009Haploidenticalrelated?Perugiaapproach(exvivoT-celldepletion)Hopkinsapproach(invivoalloreactiveT-celldepletion)CooleyS,etal.Blood2009;113:726-732.ThisresearchwasoriginallypublishedinBlood.?2009theAmericanSocietyofHematology.TransplantationusingdonorswithKIRBhaplotypesimprovesoverallsurvivalCiceriF,etal.Blood2008;112:3574-3581.ThisresearchwasoriginallypublishedinBlood.?2008theAmericanSocietyofHematology.EBMTAnalysis:LeukemiaFreeSurvivalforAMLPatientsReceivingHaploidenitcalTransplantationaccordingtodiseasestageOutcomesofmyeloablativeumbilicalcordbloodtransplantsforAcuteleukemiainCRcomparedtounrelateddonorsGutmanJA,etal.BiolBloodMarrowTransplant.2009;15:1122-1129.Reproducedwithpermission.MajorissueswithallograftinginAMLGVHDopportunisticinfectionRegimenrelatedorgantoxicityProhibitsuseinolderpatientsand/orthosewithco-morbiditiesShouldreducedintensityregimensbeusedinyoungerpatients?RELAPSETacklingthemajorissuesinallograftingforAMLPreventinggraftversushostdiseaseSirolimusbasedapproaches(currentlysubjectofBMTCTNrandomizedtrial0402)ExvivoT-celldepletionJustcompletedBMTCTNPhase2studyinAMLCR1/2OtherselectiveT-celldepletiontrialsPostTransplantcyclophosphamideHopkins,Seattle,MDACCconsortiumstudyingPolyclonalandmonoclonalantibodiesATG,Campath,othersManyothersRelapserateandsurvivalafter
T-celldepletioninAMLCR1AversaF,etal.JClinOncol.1999;17:1545-1550.Reprintedwithpermission.?1999AmericanSocietyofClinicalOncology.AllrightsreservedMSKCCpublishedandunpublishedBMTCTN0303:Multi-CenterTrialforAMLinCR1orCR2Age18-60Conditioningregimen:HyperfractionatedTBI(TBI)125cGy/fxat8-20cGy/minute:totaldose1375cGyover4days (-9through–6)Thiotepa5mg/kgfortwodays(-5and–4)ATGat2.5mg/kgonday–4Cytoxanat60mg/kgondays–3and–2CD34selectedG-CSFmobilizedPBonday0NopharmacologicalGVHDprophylaxisBMTCTN0303:PatientCharacteristics47patientsenrolled;44transplanted3patientswithdrewconsent(2)orprogressed(1)priortotransplantAge:mean46(21-59)Gender;M=16;F=28KPS100%:1790%:1780%:870%2Remissionstatus:CR1:37;CR2:7Poorriskkaryotype/molecularprofile:14/37CR1(38%)DevineSM,etal.ASH2009.Abstract655.OutcomesofAMLpatientsaged60orgreaterenteredonCALGBTrialsFaragS,etal.Blood.2006;108:63-73.ThisresearchwasoriginallypublishedinBlood.?2006theAmericanSocietyofHematology.CALGB100103
Background
Resultsinbestgrouparestillpoor(n=276)
CR1 Age60-75 Receivefirstconsolidationonrandomizedtrial2-yearDFS24%3-yearDFS17%InitialresultssuggestthatRICallograftsarefeasibleinolderpatientswithAMLHegenbartatal,JCO2006Wongetal,Blood,2005ManyothergroupsBut…..virtuallyallofthepublishedstudiesareretrospective,highlyheterogeneous,orlackastandardizedapproach.Fewifanyhaveaskedaspecificquestioninaspecificpatientpopulation
CALGBTrialinAMLCR1Age>60Thefludarabine/busulfanregimenwaschosenin2003basedonthescantamountofavailabledataatthetimeCALGB100103
InitialStatisticalDesignPrimaryEndpoint:2yearDFSAimforimprovementfrom20to40%Trialwouldrequire36patientsInitialestimate:shouldtake~36monthstocompleteenrollmentPoorInitialAccrualto
CALGB100103:Why?TrialActivationDate:1/15/04ModificationstoCALGB100103MadenotethatSWOGtrialinthispatientpopulationwasclosedduetopooraccrualFormedProtocolteamwithBMTCTNandjoinedofficiallybyCTNinJune2006(BecameCALGB100103/CTN0502)ProtocolTeamDecisions:Addedvolunteerunrelateddonors(10/10)AddedrabbitATG(forallpatients)RemovedDLIfromprotocolLoweredDFSgoalto35%at2yearsIncreasedtargetaccrualgoalto61patients
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2024-2025學(xué)年高中政治課時(shí)分層作業(yè)9訂立合同有學(xué)問(wèn)含解析新人教版選修5
- 2024-2025學(xué)年高中數(shù)學(xué)課時(shí)分層作業(yè)4平面的基本性質(zhì)含解析蘇教版必修2
- 2024年高中政治第一單元生活與消費(fèi)第1課第1框揭開貨幣的神秘面紗作業(yè)含解析新人教版必修1
- 2024年高考化學(xué)精準(zhǔn)押題練第13題化學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)基礎(chǔ)含解析
- 2024-2025學(xué)年高中物理第五章6向心力練習(xí)含解析新人教版必修2
- 檢驗(yàn)工作人員年終總結(jié)
- 大學(xué)暑期社會(huì)實(shí)踐個(gè)人總結(jié)
- 外科護(hù)士工作計(jì)劃報(bào)告
- 魯人版道德與法治七年級(jí)下冊(cè)15.2《生命最寶貴》聽課評(píng)課記錄
- 東入合作協(xié)議書
- 視頻監(jiān)控系統(tǒng)工程施工組織設(shè)計(jì)方案
- 食堂食材配送采購(gòu) 投標(biāo)方案(技術(shù)方案)
- 全國(guó)助殘日關(guān)注殘疾人主題班會(huì)課件
- 工會(huì)工作制度匯編
- 液壓動(dòng)力元件-柱塞泵課件講解
- 2022年版 義務(wù)教育《數(shù)學(xué)》課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
- (正式版)JBT 2603-2024 電動(dòng)懸掛起重機(jī)
- 口腔醫(yī)學(xué)美學(xué)口腔攝影
- JBT 6697-2023 農(nóng)林拖拉機(jī)和機(jī)械 電氣設(shè)備 基本技術(shù)規(guī)范 (正式版)
- 人教版五年級(jí)上冊(cè)數(shù)學(xué)脫式計(jì)算100題及答案
- 大學(xué)美育課件:外國(guó)藝術(shù)美
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論