第七章效率市場(chǎng)證券投資學(xué)北大,楊云紅_第1頁
第七章效率市場(chǎng)證券投資學(xué)北大,楊云紅_第2頁
第七章效率市場(chǎng)證券投資學(xué)北大,楊云紅_第3頁
第七章效率市場(chǎng)證券投資學(xué)北大,楊云紅_第4頁
第七章效率市場(chǎng)證券投資學(xué)北大,楊云紅_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩80頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

第七章效率市場(chǎng)主要內(nèi)容效率市場(chǎng)的定義效率市場(chǎng)的實(shí)證結(jié)果證券市場(chǎng)中的幾種反?,F(xiàn)象行為金融MauriceKendall,Theanalysisofeconomictimeseries,PartI:Prices,JournaloftheRoyalstatisticalsociety96,1953.Hecouldidentifynopredictablepatternsinstockprices.1.Whyarenotstockpricespredictable?例子:一種模型預(yù)測(cè)股票價(jià)格三天后將從20元/股漲至23元/股Theforecastofafuturepriceincreasewillleadinsteadtoanimmediatepriceincreasethestockpricewillimmediatelyreflectthegoodnewsimplicitinthemodel’sforecast.例子:2001年10月21日晚,證監(jiān)會(huì)宣布暫停國(guó)有股減持例子:2002年4月5日宣布,從5月1日起交易傭金使用0.3%上限向下浮動(dòng)制。例子:中國(guó)人民銀行決定,從2004年10月29日起上調(diào)金融機(jī)構(gòu)存貸款基準(zhǔn)利率并放寬人民幣貸款利率浮動(dòng)區(qū)間和允許人民幣存款利率下浮。金融機(jī)構(gòu)一年期存款基準(zhǔn)利率上調(diào)0.27個(gè)百分點(diǎn),由現(xiàn)行的1.98%提高到2.25%,一年期貸款基準(zhǔn)利率上調(diào)0.27個(gè)百分點(diǎn),由現(xiàn)行的5.31%提高到5.58%。由于存在聰明的投資者的原因,任何能夠用來對(duì)股票價(jià)格作預(yù)測(cè)的信息已經(jīng)反映在股票的價(jià)格中。任何新信息,如果是可以預(yù)測(cè)的,則已經(jīng)反映在價(jià)格中;如果是不可預(yù)測(cè)的,則導(dǎo)致的股票價(jià)格變動(dòng)也是不可預(yù)測(cè)的,即隨機(jī)的信息導(dǎo)致隨機(jī)的股票價(jià)格變化。2.股票價(jià)格的隨機(jī)游走(randomwalk)股票價(jià)格的變動(dòng)服從隨機(jī)游走的形式。隨機(jī)游走的形式并不是說明市場(chǎng)是非理性的,而恰恰表明這是投資者真相尋求相關(guān)信息,以使得自己在別的投資者獲得這種信息之前買或者賣股票而獲得利潤(rùn)的結(jié)果。反之,如果股票價(jià)格不是隨機(jī)變動(dòng)而是可以預(yù)測(cè)的,則表明所有的相關(guān)信息并沒有完全反映在價(jià)格中,這表明市場(chǎng)是非有效的。股票價(jià)格反映了所有可得信息稱為有效性市場(chǎng)假設(shè)。有效資本市場(chǎng)指的是現(xiàn)時(shí)市場(chǎng)價(jià)格能夠反映可得信息的資本市場(chǎng),在這個(gè)市場(chǎng)中,不存在利用可得信息獲得超額利潤(rùn)的機(jī)會(huì)。資本市場(chǎng)的有效性這一概念對(duì)于金融投資者而言具有非常重要的意義。因?yàn)槭袌?chǎng)的有效性消除了許多可以提高收益的策略。MarketefficiencymeansPricesarecorrectTheyfullyreflectallavailableinformationPeopleuseallavailableinformationinformingexpectationsaboutfuturecashflows.Thediscountrateisrightfortherisknessofthecashflows.PricesreacttonewinformationquicklyandtotherightextentThereisnofreelunchTheonlywayyoucangethigherreturnsisbytakingonmoreriskThereisnoinformationouttherethatcanbeusedtoconstructstrategiesthatearnreturnshigherthanrequiredfortheirrisk.Whenwesay‘pricesarecorrect’,weareimplicitlystatementwhat‘correct’is(i.e.,weareassuminganassetpricingmodel)3.有效資本市場(chǎng)的描述例子:F-stopCameraCorporationisattemptingtodevelopacamerathatwilldoublethespeedoftheauto--focusingsystemnowavailable.在特定的價(jià)格下,持有股票的原因著名的光學(xué)專家加盟股價(jià)是否上漲股價(jià)上漲的原因股價(jià)上漲的時(shí)間一個(gè)市場(chǎng)對(duì)于一個(gè)信息集來說稱為有效的,如果不存在利用該信息獲得超額利潤(rùn)的機(jī)會(huì)。有效和非有效市場(chǎng)中價(jià)格對(duì)新信息的反應(yīng)股票價(jià)格

0宣布前(-)或者后(+)的天數(shù)過激反應(yīng)和回歸延遲反應(yīng)有效市場(chǎng)對(duì)新信息的反應(yīng)三種有效市場(chǎng)(efficientcapitalmarket)不同的信息集對(duì)證券價(jià)格產(chǎn)生影響的速度不一樣。為了處理不同的反應(yīng)速度,把信息集分成不同的類別。最常用的一種分類方法:過去價(jià)格的信息,可得的公共信息,所有信息。針對(duì)這三種信息集,有三種形式的有效市場(chǎng)的定義弱有效市場(chǎng)(theweakform)半強(qiáng)有效市場(chǎng)(thesemistrongform)強(qiáng)有效市場(chǎng)(strongform)弱有效市場(chǎng)定義:一個(gè)資本市場(chǎng)稱為弱有效的或者滿足弱有效形式,如果證券價(jià)格充分反應(yīng)了包含在歷史價(jià)格中的信息。弱形式有效通常表示成下面的數(shù)學(xué)形式

+Expectedreturn+Randomerror這里隨機(jī)誤差項(xiàng)的均值為0,且不同時(shí)間的隨機(jī)誤差項(xiàng)是不相關(guān)的。弱形式有效性是最弱類型的有效性。股票價(jià)格的歷史數(shù)據(jù)是可以免費(fèi)得到的,如果這些數(shù)據(jù)里包含有用的數(shù)據(jù),則所有的投資者都會(huì)利用它,導(dǎo)致價(jià)格調(diào)整,最后,這些數(shù)據(jù)失去價(jià)值?!畉echnical’analysisusingpastpricepatternswillnotproduceprofits.如果一個(gè)市場(chǎng)是弱有效的,考慮一個(gè)交易策略如果某股票的價(jià)格連續(xù)漲三天,就買進(jìn)該股票;如果股票的價(jià)格連續(xù)降三天,就賣出股票。問題:這個(gè)策略能否賺錢。FairlyconvincedthatmarketsareweakformefficientBut,newevidence(i.e.,momentum)haschallengedthis.半強(qiáng)形式有效市場(chǎng)定義:一個(gè)市場(chǎng)是半強(qiáng)形式有效的,如果價(jià)格反應(yīng)了所有公共可得的信息。這些信息包括:歷史價(jià)格數(shù)據(jù)、與公司生產(chǎn)有關(guān)的基本數(shù)據(jù)、管理的質(zhì)量、資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表、專利情況、收益預(yù)測(cè)、會(huì)計(jì)處理‘fundamental’analysis(e.g.sortingthroughincomestatements)willnotproduceprofits.Ex.Formingportfoliosonaccountingratios,balancesheet,orincomestatementinformationwillnotgenerateabnormalprofits.NoevidenceofabnormalreturnsafterapublicannouncementProfessionalmoneymanagersdonotoutperformthemarketMarketseemtobesemi-strongefficientBut,B/MandE/Pstrategiesstillchallengethis.(mayberisk,maybenot)強(qiáng)形式有效市場(chǎng)定義:一個(gè)市場(chǎng)是強(qiáng)有效的,如果價(jià)格反應(yīng)了所有的信息,不管是公共的還是私有的。InsidertradingwillnotproduceprofitsEx.Knowingamergerisgoingtotakeplacebeforeitisannouncedpublicly.Althoughillegal,thereisevidencethatpricesmovebeforeannouncements,suggestinginsidertradestakeplaceInsidertradingappearsprofitable,indicatingmarketsarenotstrongformefficient.But,theseprofitsareshortlived,suggestingthemarketmaybeclosetoefficient.強(qiáng)形式有效性半強(qiáng)形式有效性弱形式有效性說明三種有效性的例子:總是在股價(jià)上漲后賣出股票,能賺到錢投資者在一家公司宣布增加收益后買該公司股票,能賺到錢知道采礦公司是否開采到了金子的內(nèi)部消息后買該公司股票,能賺到錢4.Howcanwetellifmarketsareinefficient?Lookforstock-pickingstrategiesbasedonsomepastinformationwhichhaveearnedhighreturnswithlittlerisk.Unfortunately,wecanneverbesureofinefficiency.Itisalwayspossiblethatwearenotmeasuringriskproperly,i.e.,wedonotknowwhattherightdiscountrateisThisisthe‘Jointhypothesisproblem’5.Whywouldweexpectmarketstobeefficient?theforcesofarbitragesmartinvestorsexploitthemispricinginsecuritiesuntilitdisappearsToshowthatmarketsareineffcient,needtoshowthatpeoplemakeerrorsinsettingpricesthatarbitragefailstoeliminatetheseerrors一些例子GrossmanandStiglitz的結(jié)果不同市場(chǎng)的有效性不同:中國(guó)和美國(guó)的股市小股票和大股票的有效性不同RandomWalksandEfficientMarketsitisoftenthoughtthatefficientmarketspricesmoverandomlythisisnotnecessarilytrueStrictlyspeaking,weshouldcharacterizestockpriceasfollowingasubmartingale,meainngthattheexpectedchangeinthepricecanbepositive,presumablyascompensationforthetimevalueofthemoneyandsystematicrisk.Moreover,theexpectedreturnmaychangeovertimeasriskfactorschange.returnsaremean-revertingifthediscountrateforanassetdoesnotchangeovertime,thenitistruethatefficientmarketsrandomwalke.g.overshorttimeframes,returnsshouldlookrandom6.Evidenceformarketefficiencystockpricesappeartomoverandomlynewinformationappearstobequicklyincorporatedintopricese.g.announcementofatakeoverdoan‘eventstudy’tolookatthestockpricereactiontothenewsaverageovermanycompaniesProfessionalmoneymanagersdonotclearlybeatthemarketonaverage.7.EvidenceagainstmarketefficiencydidthevalueoftheU.S.economyreallydrop20%inOctober1987?thevolumeoftradingonstockexchangesistoohightobeconsistentwithrationalinvestorsthevolatilityofthemarketistoohigh(Shiller,1982).why?whyaretheresomanymutualfunds?thereareinvestmentstrategieswhichappeartohaveearnedhigheraveragereturnsthanisconsistentwiththeirriskThesearesocalled‘marketanomalies’suggeststhatnewinformationisnotalwaysimmediatelyincorporatedintopricesThisevidencereferstoweak/semi-strongversionsofmarketefficiencyHowaboutstrong-formefficiency?canyoumakemoneyusinginside,non-publicinformation?YES!stockpricesoftenmoveinadvanceofimportantcompanyannouncementsfromrecordsofinsidertrades,wefindthattheymakemoneyonaverageBUT:it'sillegalforcompanyinsiders(orpeopletippedbythem)totransactbasedonmaterialnon-publicinformationHowaboutinstitutionalinvestors?Wementionedmoneymanagersdonotexhibitabnormalperformanceonaverage,butmaybesomelocaladvantage.8.ThemarketanomaliesAnomaliescanbethoughtofasinvestmentstrategieswhichseemtoearnhighreturnswithoutbeingveryriskyThestrategiesarenormallybasedonsomefirmcharacteristic:sizeofthefirmitsprice-earningsratioRecipe:formaportfoliobasedonobservablecharacteristics,andmeasureitsreturnsovertimedoesthestrategygivehighreturnsonaverage?Whylookataveragereturns?IFYES:thestrategymayberiskyandthehighaveragereturnsarejustfaircompensationforthatriskhowdowemeasurerisk?(seebelow)ifriskdoesnotexplainthehighreturns,isitevidenceofmarketinefficiency?itmaybespurious,theresultofdata-miningifyoutrymanystrategies,someofthemwilldogreatinhistoricaldatadoesn'ttellyouanythingaboutfutureperformancepoorriskmeasurementfrictionstotradingandexploitingtheanomaly(bid-askspread,transactionscosts,liquidity,taxes,etc.)Measuringtheriskofastrategystandarddeviationdownsideriskdoesthestrategysometimesperformverypoorly?betalooksatstrategy'spayoffrelativetothemarket'spayoffahighcovarianceisunattractive(risky)lookatcovarianceofstrategy'spayoffwithvariableslikeGNPgrowth(factormodels)astrategywhichdoeswellingoodstatesoftheworldandpoorlyinbadstatesisriskyNote:evenifnoneoftheaboveturnupameasureofrisk,efficientmarketsenthusiastswillsay:theriskispresent,butjusthasn'tsurfacedwithinthesampleanalyzedOR:we'rejustnotlookingattherightmeasureofriskSmallvs.LargestocksSmallstockshaveoutperformedlargestocksbyabout12%ayearover1929-1979timeperiodShouldwebuylotsofsmallstocks?DependsonwhethertheyareriskiersmallstockshavehigherstandarddeviationsandbetasbutnothighenoughtoexplaintheirreturnsSo,smallstocksmaybemispricedBUT:althoughsmallstockreturnsarehigh,thismayonlybebasedonafewextraordinaryyearsWemaybemissingsomedimensionofriskTheJanuaryEffectMuchofthesmallfirmeffectseemstooccurinJanuaryMuchofsmallfirmpremiumoccursinfirstfivedaysofJanuaryoftenexplainedbytax-losssellinghowever,effectiswidespreadininternationalmarketsalso,evenwhenthere'snocapitalgainstaxand,therestillseemstobeasizeeffectaftercontrollingforthis.IfthepositiveJanuaryeffectisamanifestationofbuyingpressure,itshouldbematchedbyasymmetricnegativeDecembereffect.maynotaccordwithefficientmarketswhydon'tpeoplebuyinDecemberinanticipation?andthepredictableJanuaryeffectfliesinthefaceofefficientmarkettheory.‘Windowdressing'byinstitutionalinvestorsinfusionofcapitalatbeginningofyearOverreactionstudiessomestudiessuggestthatthereareinefficienciesduetopeopleoverreactingtoinformation(1)LosersandWinners----Longtermreversal

takeathreeyearperiodandrankstocksonthebasisoftheirperformanceoverthatperiodforma‘winner"portfolioofthetop10%best-performingstocksforma‘loser"portfolioofthebottom10%worst-performingstocksthisiscalledacontrarianstrategylookattheirreturnsoverthenextfewyearstheloserportfolioseemstooutperformthewinnerportfolio(DeBondtandThaler(1985))Twoexplanations:overreaction:thewinnersarefirmsthatpeoplehavebecometooexcitedaboutsubsequently,theyrealizethattheyweretoooptimisticpricefallsandreturnsarelowrisk:thelosersareriskierfirmstheirhigherreturnsarejustcompensationforriskbutlosersdonotappearriskieronstandardmeasuresofriskHowdoweaccountforrisk?VarianceUseregressionanalysisandapricingmodelCAPMFF3-factormodelExaminewhenthestrategyexhibitsthehighestandlowestpayoffs(i.e.,doesthestrategydowellwhenthemarketdoes?whenweareinthepeakofabusinesscycle?arecession?,etc.)Catastropherisk(2)ValueandGrowthformportfoliosofvaluestocksavaluestockisonewithlowpricerelativetosomemeasureoffundamentals,i.e.highbooktomarket(B/M)ratioscashflowtoprice(C/P)ratiosearningstoprice(E/P)ratiosalsoformportfoliosofgrowthstocks,i.e.withlowvaluesoftheseratiosWhygrowthvs.value?findthatvaluestocksdramaticallyoutperformgrowthstocksWhy?rational:Representsadistressfactorintheeconomy.Valuestocksaremorepronetothissourceofriskthangrowthstocks.higheraveragereturns.Valuestocksaretypically`fallenangels'irrational:Growthstocksare`glamorous'.Peopletendtowanttobuytheseandstampedetowardsthem,pushinguptheprice,anddepressingfuturereturns.Valuestockshavebeenneglected,causingtheirpricetofall,andexpectedreturnstorise.Thisisanoverreactionstory.Also,valuestocksdonotappearriskier,however.theydon'thavehighervariancetheydon'thavehighdownsiderisk(i.e.,donotunderperformoftenorbythatmuch)theydon'thavehigherbetastheydon'tunderperforminbadstatesoftheworldLakonishok,Shleifer,andVishny(1994)somaybeit'saninefficiency,drivenagainbyoverreactionPsychologicalfoundationsforoverreaction:representativenessheuristicsmallsamplebiasbutofcourse,itcouldstillberisk!TheFama-FrenchdebatesmallstocksandhighB/Mstocksearnreturnsthatarehigherthanisrequiredfortheirrisk,accordingtotheCAPMmeasureofrisktwopossibilities:smallstocksandhighB/MstocksaremispricedOR:theCAPMisn'tmeasuringriskproperlyFamaandFrench(1993)constructanewasset-pricingmodel,the‘’3-factormodel"whichmakessmallandhighB/Mstockslookriskierstartwiththemarketfactor,andaddtwonewfactors,F(small)(=SMB)andF(B/M)(=HML)theysupposedlytrackgoodandbadstatesoftheworldsmallstockshavehighcovariancewithF(small)highB/MstockshavehighcovariancewithF(B/M)theyareriskier!EvidenceinfavorofFF:Adjustingthelong-runcontrarianprofitsfoundbyDeBondtandThaler(1985)usingthe3-factormodel,theprofitsdisappear(i.e.,alpha=0.).pastlong-termlosersloadhigheronSMBandHMLthanpastwinners,eventhoughtheyhavethesamemarketbeta.long-termlosersmoreriskythanlong-termwinners.The3-factormodelcapturesahostofotheranomaliesaswell!EvidenceagainstFF:LSV(1994):HMLandotherbook-to-priceratiosperformwellinpoortimes.DanielandTitman(1997):characteristicsratherthanfactorloadingspriceassetsbettercontrolforsizeandB/Mcharacteristics,SMBandHMLnolongerexplainaveragereturnsex:twostockswithsamesizebutdifferentbetasonSMBhavethesameaveragereturn.twostockswithsamebetaonSMBbutdifferentsizeshavedifferentaveragereturns.DoesthisnecessarilyimplysizeandBE/MEareirrationalanomalies?No,couldproxyforsometrueunknownfactor,bettercapturedbythecharacteristic.Measurementofbetasarepronetoestimationerror,whichincreasesnoiseintherelationbetweenthebetasandaveragereturns.Underreactionstudiesotherstudiessuggestthatthereareinefficienciesduetopeopleunderreactingtoinformation(1)Momentumformportfoliosofstocksthatperformedverywellinrecentpast(`winners')i.e.overthepast3monthstooneyearsimilarly,formaportfolioof`loser'stocksthewinnersoutperformtheloserse.g.buythewinnersandselltheloserse.g.azero-costportfoliowhichbuyswinnersandsellslosersfromthepast6monthsearns12%(annually)overthenext6months!contrasttothemean-reversionresultsourceofinefficiency:underreactiontoinformation?Or,isitrisk?(2)EarningsAnnouncementsslowpriceresponsetoearningsannouncements(post-earningsannouncementdrift)eachquarter,rankstocksonthesizeofthesurpriseintheirearningsannouncement(surprise=actual-expected)formaportfolioofstockswithlargestpositivesurprises(portfolioA)andaportfolioofstockswiththelargestnegativesurprises(portfolioB)AoutperformsBisitrisk?beta,factormodeltypechecksdon'tfindanyover50quartersfrom1974-1986,strategyearnedpositiveabnormalreturns46timesManyexamplesofunderreactiontoinformation:tochangesindividendpolicystrategy:buycompaniesthathavejustannouncedadividendincrease;sellthosethathavejustannouncedacutindividendstorepurchasesofsharesstrategy:buycompaniesthathavejustannouncedasharerepurchasePsychologicalFoundationsforUnderreaction:conservatism,pessimismOtheranomaliesThenewissuespuzzleHotoffering

Iftheseanomaliesareinefficiencies,whydoesn'tarbitrageeliminatethem?inpractice,arbitrageislimiteddonothaveinfinitenumberofstocks,thereforethereissomerisksometimesthestrategycandoverypoorly,andyoulosealotofmoneymoneymanagersandindividualsmayhaveshorthorizons(duetoregularevaluationsorpsychologicalpreferences)amispricingcantakeawhiletocloseinfactitmaynotclosewithintheinvestor'shorizoninvestorwillrestrictthesizeofpositiontakentherecanbehightransactionsandtradingcostsduetoturnoverinthesestrategiesliquiditycanbelowattimeswhenyouneeditmostmonitoringcanbehighthereareshortsalesconstraintsMeasurementissues:Theseanomaliesaremarket-basedmeasurese.g.,theyincludepricesize,BE/ME,pastreturns(contrarianandmomentum),E/P,etc.,allcontainpriceinthem.soanythingmissedbythepricingmodelwillshowupinoneofthesevariablese.g.,appearsonbothsidesoftheregressionequationthiswasnotedbyBall(1978)andformalizedinBerk(1995)wemayneverknowifpickingupmispricingorinadequacyofpricingmodel.Dataminingtechniquesoffindinganomaliesareoftensubjecttothedataminingcritiqueifyoutryenoughvariables,somethingwilleventuallyappeartopredictreturnsbut,theforecastpowerofthisvariable

willbecompletelyspurious(i.e.,itwon'tworkoutofsample)e.g.,generate100differentdataseriesofcompletelyrandomnumbersrunaregressionofactualstockreturnsoneachofthe100randomdataseries.someoftheregressionswillproducesignificantresults:doesthismeanyoucanmakemoney?NO!thedataminingcritiqueisverypowerful:bearitinmindwhenpeopletrytoimpressyouwithstrategiesthatworkedgreatinthepast.theyprobablywon'tworkinthefuture!ResponsetoDataMiningCritique:Manyoftheseanomaliesappearinother(international)markets(seeHawa

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論