托福寫作評分標準詳細解讀

經(jīng)典word整理文檔，僅參考，雙擊此處可刪除頁眉頁腳。本資料屬于網(wǎng)絡(luò)整理，如有侵權(quán)，請聯(lián)系刪除，謝謝！托福寫作評分標準詳細解讀托福寫作評分標準詳細解讀一托福寫作分為綜合寫作和獨立寫作托福寫作包括兩部分，需在50分鐘的時間內(nèi)完成。寫作時間為20分鐘?？忌紫刃枰喿x一篇學(xué)術(shù)篇章，閱讀的時間是32分鐘左觀點作文，總結(jié)并說明演講的內(nèi)容與閱讀中觀點的關(guān)系，在20分鐘的時間內(nèi)完成一篇150~225字的文章。題目的評分以回答的質(zhì)量、完整性和準確性為依據(jù)。在30分鐘內(nèi)完成一篇300字以上的文章。點擊查看詳情二托福寫作評分過程托福寫作評分包括機器評分以及人工評分兩部分。機器評分主要通過E-rater詞是否得當、以及單詞拼寫及大小寫是否準確等方面進行評分;一篇考生的文章會經(jīng)過兩臺機器評分。人工評分通過ETS兩位閱卷人給出分數(shù)。托福寫作原始分數(shù)為0-5分，考生得分分為三個如下圖所示GOOD(4.0-5.0)FAIR(2.5-3.5)__(1.0-2.0)，最終成績通過兩個科目的分數(shù)取平均分，再換算為30分制的分數(shù)。點擊查看詳情托福寫作怎么從5分換算成30分托福寫作分數(shù)換算方法)三托福寫作分數(shù)換算標準具體的換算標準如下：5分換算為30分，4.75換算為29分，4.5分換算為28分，4.25分換算為27分，4分換算為25分，3.75分換算為24分，3.50換算為22分，3.25分換算為21分，3分換算為20分，2.75分換算為18分，2.50分換算為17分，2.25分換算為15分，2分換算為14分，1.75分換算為12分，1.5分換算為11分，1.25分換算為10分，1分換算為8分。四托福寫作評分標準托福寫作5段段落內(nèi)句與句連接順暢，句式使用恰當，靈活，嫻熟用詞確切，得體。文章中有個別語法拼寫錯誤，但不影響內(nèi)容表達。托福寫作4分作文：文章切題，闡說基本充分，在某些細節(jié);量用詞不當和語法拼寫錯誤。托福寫作3分作文：文章切題，闡說尚可，展開不夠。段落句間連接基本順暢;有部分句法錯誤;用詞一般，有時不得體。詞性區(qū)分和拼寫等有若干錯誤。托福寫作2分作文：文章切題，段落組織基本合理，有邏輯句子框架結(jié)構(gòu)基本成立，但有許多語法錯誤，句間聯(lián)系不順暢，往往是不善于使用邏輯連詞，顯得幼稚，生硬。詞匯方面拼寫錯誤多，常有用詞不得體現(xiàn)象。托福寫作1分作文：文章切題。闡說沒有展開，只限于三言兩語地回答問題句子誤較多用詞不得體，拼寫錯誤多。托福寫作0子?？傮w印象是根本沒有寫作能力，英語水平太低，達不到一分標準，只能打最低分。托?？荚囎魑莫毩懽鞣段模盒W(xué)生應(yīng)多學(xué)科技嗎Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement:primaryschoolsshouldspendmoretimeonteachingyoungstudents(5-11yearsold)technology(likecomputer)thanteachingmusicandart.托福寫作范文參考:Thequestionof“whatisthemostimportantsubjectorskilltheelementaryschoolsshouldteach?”hasneverfailedtoattractattentionfromeducators,schooladministratorsandevenpoliticiansespeciallywhenitcomestosubjectsliketechnology,ormusicandart.Somearguethatschoolshouldspendmoretimeteachingtechnologythanmusicandart.Personally,Iamnotinfavorofthispositionbasedonthefollowingreasons.Admittedly,withtheadventofinternetandstate-of-artgadgetslikelaptop,tablets,beingabletousecomputersskillfullyisbeingconsideredasavaluablequality.However,earlyexposuretocomputersandotherkindsoftechnologicalproductsmightbringlotsofrisksandproblemstokids’futuredevelopment.RecentlyresearchbyNationalSocietyofPsychiatristsshowsthatexposuretocomputersatanearlyageleadstoaddictiontocomputerswhentheygrowolderandobviouslyspendingtoomuchtimeinfrontofthecomputercanposeathreattokids’health,tobemorespecific,itleadstoneckproblems,nearsightedness,backacheandevenchildhoodobesity.Moreover,insteadofgettingaddictedtoplayingon-linegamesandwatchingmeaninglessvideos,kidsshouldhavespentmoretimefocusingontheiracademicstudy,orevenlearninghowtoappreciateartworkormusic.Indeed,spendingmoretimelearningartandmusicnotonlybenefitsthekids,butalsoitisconducivethecommunityaswhole.Firstoff,learningartandmusicatanearlyagehelpstodevelopcreativityandmakethekidsmoreimaginative.Actually,lotsofscientificresearchinthepsychologicalfieldshowsthatearlyexposuretoartandmusicnotonlyboostsacademicachievementbutalsopromotescreativity,self-confidenceandschoolpride;kidswhospendmoretimeinlearningartandmusicenduphavinghigherthinkingandreasoningskillsthankidswhodon’t.Additionally,spendingmoretimeteachingkidsmusicandartcancanbenefitthewholecommunity.Musicandartareaveryimportantpartofpeople’slives.Theyarenecessaryforpeopletoexpresstheiremotions,likehappiness,sorrow,andevenangerregardlessofculturalbackground,ethnicity,ageandevengentle.Itisveryurgenttospendmoretimeteachingkidsknowledgeaboutartandmusicsincetheybringchange,facilitateinnovationandhelptounitethecommunity.Theyarethereminderofthepastandmakeroftomorrow,theyalsohelptoconveyideasanddifferentperspectives.Moreimportantly,artandmusichavegreatculturalsignificance,bylearningartandmusickidswillhaveastrongsenseofculturalidentityandsenseofbelongingtocommunity,eventuallythetraditionalvaluesandculturecanbepasseddowntotheyoungergeneration.Toconclude,itismoreadvisabletospendmoretimeteachingkidsartandmusicthantechnologysincenotonlycanartandmusicbenefittheindividualkidbutalsoitbenefitsthecommunityasawhole.務(wù)(A/D)Thegovernmentshouldofferinternetaccesstoallofcitizensatnocost.點睛簡單，思路也有很多。建議選擇不同意，即認為政府不應(yīng)該為民一方面會是成癮，進一步疏遠人際關(guān)系。寫作參考一:Withtheadventofinternet,peopleingrowingnumbersaregettingaddictedtologgingontotheinternetoutofvariouspurposes,whichhasarouseddeeplysocialconcern.Therefore,theissueofwhetherthebillsofusingtheInternetshouldbepaidbythegovernmentortheusersthemselveshasbeenopentodebate.Inmyopinion,itismorereasonabletorequiretheindividualstocoverthefeeofinternetusage,withthereasonsasfollows.Tobeginwith,theusersoftheinternetsaresupposedtopaythebillsinordertorelievethefinancialburdenofgovernment.Withthepopularizationoftheinternet,thenumberofpeoplegoingonlineeverydayhasincreasedtoalot,whichmeansthatthemoneyspentontheinternetistremendous.Suchalargesumofmoneycandonothingbutoccupyagreatpropotionofthegovernmentalexpenditure,thuscuttingdownontheinvestmentofgovernmentonothermorepressingfieldslikeimprovingthepublictransportationanderadicatingthepoverty.Bycontrast,ifthefeeofinternetusagecomesfromthewalletoftheindividual,thesituationwillbecometotallydifferent.Toillustrate,theabundantfinancialresourcesofgovernmentsavedbythispracticecanbetterfacilitatetheeconomicdevelopmentandrenderthelifeofthemassmoreconvenientandcomfortable.Inaddition,requiringtheindividualstopayforthebillofinternetaccesswillhelptoestablishbettersocialrelationshipbetweenpeople.Asiscommonsense,withthewideapplicationofelectronicdevicesboostedbyeasyaccesstotheinternet,peopleespeciallyyounstersareindulgedinthecyberorvirtualworldcreatedbythesocialnetworkandvariousAppsonthecellphone.Consequently,itisnotuncommontoobservethatwhenagroupofwhitecollarssitatatableinarestaurantwaitingfortheirmeals,theywatchthescreenoftheirsmartphonesinsteadofinteractingwiththeguysnearthem,whichgreatlyalienatesthebondbetweenthem.Inthiscase,thefreeuseofinternetwillaggravatethissituationtoalargeextent.However,ifthefeeoftheinternetusageiscoveredbytheindividualsinsteadofthegovernment,manypeoplewillbereducetheirtimespentinsurfingtheinternetinordertosavemoney.Asaresult,theface-to-facecommunicationwillbecomemorefrequentandthusthecloserandmoreintimaterelationshipbetweenpeoplewillbesetup.Factoringtheabovelistedreasons,itissafetoconcludethatthegovernmentshouldnotofferinternetaccesstoallofcitizensatnocost,inordertorelievefinancialburdenofthegovernmentandtobuildabetterrapportbetweenpeople.寫作參考二:Withtheadventoftheinformationage,internetandadvancedtechnologicalgadgetsarebecomingmoreandmoreaccessible,actuallytheyarenowasimportantasbasicnecessitiesinlifelikewatersupplyandelectricity.Whenitcomestothequestionofwhethergovernmentshouldprovidefreeinternetaccesstoallcitizens,personallyIaminfavorofthisinitiativebasedonthefollowingreasons.Admittedly,providingfreeinternetaccesstothepublicinschools,shoppingmalls,touristspotsandevenhouseholdsmightincursomefinancialburdentothecitysincethegovernmenthastoinvestintheinfrastructureandnetworksandevendedicatestaffmemberstomaintaintheoperation,however,itiswellworththeeffortandfinancialresourcetoprovidesuchservice.Firstoff,internetnowisanindispensablepartofpeople’slives,andwesimplycannotliveandworkwithoutit.Providingfreeinternetservicecanmakepeople’slivesmoreconvenientandbringefficiencytoworkingplaces.Forexample,collegestudentscanutilizeinternettosendemailstoinquireprofessorsaboutcertainissuesintheacademics,usedifferentkindsofonlineservicetoassisttheirstudy.Internetmakesitpossibleforprofessorstoinvolvemultimediainthetheirclassrooms,makingtheclassmoreinteractiveandengaging.Also,businessmencancapitalizeontheinternetandmonitorvariousdatalikemanagementcost,profit,assetandliability,ultimatelytheycanavoidcertainfinanciallossandmakemoreprofit.Generally,internetmakeslivesmoreconvenient,citizenscanuselocationbasedappstofindrestaurants,museums,sportscenters,etc.Apartfromthat,internetbringsamoreconnectedcommunityandfacilitatesinteractionbetweencitizensandbusinesses.Moreimportantly,aci