0212作文體驗(yàn)課-講義argument-weichenedu_第1頁
0212作文體驗(yàn)課-講義argument-weichenedu_第2頁
0212作文體驗(yàn)課-講義argument-weichenedu_第3頁
0212作文體驗(yàn)課-講義argument-weichenedu_第4頁
0212作文體驗(yàn)課-講義argument-weichenedu_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩50頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

真日程ArgumentIssue課程 ysis30’demoDay yzean真第一部分:如何理解第一部分:如何理解對(duì)象是論證過程而非結(jié)試看一篇老GArcticdeerliveonislandsinCanada'sarcticregions.Theysearchforfoodbymovin ericefromislandtoislandduringthecourseoftheyear.Theirhabitatislimitedtoareaswarmenoughtosustaintheplantsonwhichtheyfeedandcoldenough,atleastsomeoftheyear,fortheicetocovertheseaseparatingtheislands,allowingthedeertotraveloverit.Unfortuna y,accordingtoreportsfromlocalhunters,thedeerpopulationsaredeclining.Sincethesereportscoincidewithrecentglobalwarmingtrendsthathavecausedtheseaicetomelt,wecanconcludethatthepurporteddeclineindeerpopulationsistheresultofthedeer'sbeingunabletofollowtheirage-oldmigrationpatternsacrossthefrozensea.試看一篇老GInthiseditorialinawildlifejournal,theauthorattributesthedeclineinarcticdeerpopulationtotheglobalwarming,whichpreventsdeerfromfollowingtheirlong-heldmigrationpatternsacrossthefrozensea.Tosubstantiatehishypothesis,reportsfromlocalhunterarecitedtoprovethedeclineofdeerpopulation.Quiteconvincingthoughitmayappeartobeatfirstglance,theauthor’sargumentsuffersfromseverallogicalflaws,whichrenderhisconclusioncomple ywrong.…試看一篇老GFirstly,theallegationofdecreasingdeerpopulationismerelybasedonthereportfromlocalhunters,whocannotbetrustedsincehunterscannotcoverthewholearcticregion,andthusbeunabletoprovideaccurated oncerningdeerpopulation.Itisobviousthatdeerhaveintentionallyavoidedcontactwithhuntersinordertosurvive.Insuchcases,hunterswouldhavenaturallyobservedlessdeerwhilethewholepopulationremainsthesameorevenrise.Hence,theauthor’sconclusionregardingdeerpopulationiswrongbecausehuntersareincapableofprovidingaccurateinformation.…問題在哪里摘自Youarenotbeingaskedtodiscusswhetherthestatementsintheargumentaretrueoraccurate.Youarenotbeingaskedtoagreeordisagreewiththepositionstated.Youarenotbeingaskedtoexpressyourownviewsonthesubjectbeingdiscussed(asyouwereintheIssuetask).如何理解怎么依據(jù)具體題目要怎么辦?新G自帶了Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatspecificevidenceisneededtoevaluatetheargumentandexplainhowtheevidencewouldweakenorstrengthentheargument.按照instruction改動(dòng)后的結(jié)果Inthisargument,theauthorcitesreportsfromlocalhuntersasevidenceforthedeclineofthearcticdeerpopulations,andsubsequentlyattributesthisdeclinetoglobalwarming,whichallegedlypreventsdeerfromfollowingtheirlong-heldmigrationpatternsacrossthefrozensea.Althoughtheargumentseemsplausibleatfirstglance,therearecertainissuesinthelinesofreasoningthatneedtobeaddressed.Additionalevidenceisnecessaryforaneffectiveevaluationofits…按照instruction改動(dòng)后的結(jié)果Firstly,theauthorassertsadecreaseinthedeerpopulationsmerelybasedonreportsfromlocalhunters.However,suchreportsmaynotserveasaconvincingindicator,sincethedeermighthaveintentionallyavoidedcontactwithhuntersinordertosurvivehunting.Therefore,morepersuasiveevidencemustbepresentedforabetterevaluationofthepopulations.…按照instruction改動(dòng)后的結(jié)果…Forexample,ascientificstudysurveyingtheentireareacouldoffermuchstrongerevidenceforthechangeindeerpopulations.Iftheresultsofthestudyshowthattheoverallpopulationsareindeedonthedecline,itwillbejustifiablefortheargumenttofurtherdiscussthereasonsforit.Ontheotherhand,iftheresultsevidenceconstantorevenincreasingpopulations,thediscussionofreasonsforthedeclineinpopulationsintheargumentwillberenderedgroundless.如何理解具體題目要求考Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatspecificevidenceisneededtoevaluatetheargumentandexplainhowtheevidencewouldweakenorstrengthentheargument.考 →增強(qiáng) →削考慮作者假Writearesponseinwhichyouexaminethestatedand/orunstatedassumptionsoftheargument.Besuretoexplainhowtheargumentdependsontheassumptionsandwhattheimplicationsareiftheassumptionsproveunwarranted.考慮作者假我們不關(guān)心作者的結(jié)論是否正確,我們只關(guān)注作者在論證:做出了哪些假這些假設(shè)如何為結(jié)論和推當(dāng)假設(shè)被駁倒時(shí)結(jié)論會(huì)有什么影考慮其他解Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscussoneormorealternativeexplanationsthatcouldrivaltheproposedexplanationandexplainhowyourexplanation(s)canplausiblyaccountforthefactspresentedintheargument.為什么會(huì)是這三個(gè)視Evidence1+evidence2+↓+certain↓+certainassumptionsWritearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatquestionswouldneedtobeansweredinordertodecidewhetherthepredictionandtheargumentonwhichitisbasedarereasonable.Besuretoexplainhowtheanswerstothesequestionswouldhelptoevaluatethe有什么可以問Evidence1+evidence2+↓+certain↓+certainassumptionsEvidence1+evidence2+↓+certain↓+certainassumptions第二部分:行第二部分:

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論