我模板1、轉(zhuǎn)述原文錯(cuò)誤之處_第1頁(yè)
我模板1、轉(zhuǎn)述原文錯(cuò)誤之處_第2頁(yè)
免費(fèi)預(yù)覽已結(jié)束,剩余2頁(yè)可下載查看

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

開(kāi)頭Theconclusionsustainedintheargumentisthat .Toendorsetheconclusion,severalreasonsareprovidedinthearticle.ofall,theauthorassumesthat .Inaddition,theauthorpointsoutthat .Furthermore,theauthorreasonsthat .Atsight,theargumentappeartobesomewhatreasonable;closescrutinyoftheevidence,however,revealsthattheargumentsufferssomecriticalflawsseriouslyunderminingtheconclusionandaccordinglyisnotthoroughlywell-reasoned.Theargumentisnotconvincingforthefollowingrespects.結(jié)尾Inconclusion,theargumentlackscredibilitybecausetheevidencecitedintheysisdoesnotlendstrongsupporttowhattheauthorclaims.Tostrengthentheargument,theauthorwouldhavetoprovideevidencethat .Moreover,theaugerissupposedtodemonstratethat Onlywithmoreconvincingevidencewouldthisargumentmorethoroughandacceptable.中間段2、利用“”錯(cuò)3、舉例子錯(cuò)第一宗罪:Theauthorcommitsafallacyofcausaloversimplification.TheprocessofreasoningisthatbecauseAhappenedbeforeB,theformereventisresponsibleforthelatter.However,thefactthatAcoincideswithBdoesnotnecessarilyprovethatAexertedanimpactonB.Forexample,otherfactors,suchasX,YandZ,cancauseB.Thus,theargumentisfallaciousunlessthesepossiblecausalexplanationshavebeenconsideredandruledout.TheevidenceprovidedbytheauthorisinsufficienttosupporttheconclusionoftheargumentOneexampleis/Thestatisticsfromonlyafewrecentyearsarelogicallyunsoundedtoestablishageneralconclusion,unlessitcanbejustifiedthatA1isrepresentativeoftheentiregroupofA.HoweveritispossiblethatA的其他情況.Accordingly,infaceofsuchlimitedreasons,theclaimthat結(jié)論iscompleyunwarranted.第三宗罪:(basedonafalseogy橫向>TheargumentrestsontheassumptionthatAisapplicabletoBinallrespects.However,despiteseveralpointsofcomparisonbetweenAandB,theauthorfailstofocusonthesignificantdissimilaritybetweenthem.Forinstance,AB.Accordingly,becauseofthesedifferences,theauthorcannotreasonablydemonstratethat結(jié)論.第四宗罪:情況等同(allthingsareequal)<縱向>Theauthorcommitsthefallacyof“allthingsareequalTheeventthathappenedtwoyearsagoisnotasoundevidencetodrawaconclusionthat結(jié)論Theauthorassumeswithoutjustificationthatallbackgroundconditionshaveremainedthesameatdifferenttimesoratdifferentlocations.However,itisnotclarifiedinthisargumentwhetherthecurrentconditionsofAaresimilartotwoyearsago.非此即彼,二者選一(Either-Orchoice)Theauthorunfairlyimposesaneither-orchoiceonAandB.However,theargumentfailstoexplainwhyAandBaremutuallyexclusivealternativeswithoutaintermediate.Infact,consideringbothAandBtogetherperhapsproducebetterresults.Moreover,anidealresultsmightincludeacomplexofotherfactors,suchasCandD,whichprovidetheauthormuorechoicesbesideAandB.Thereby,themutuallyexclusivechoiceisnot第六宗罪:可疑(surveyisdoubtful)Thepollcitedbytheauthorissovagueastobenotinformative.Theclaimdoesnotindicatethedetailsofthesurvey,suchasedpeople,conductedtimeandcoveredlocations.Withnoinformationaboutthesedetails,itisimpossibletoevaluatethevalidityoftheresultsForexample,if5000 sweresurveyedbutonly5responded,theconclusionthat結(jié)論wouldbehighly.Becausetheauthoroffersnoevidencetoaccountforotherinterpretations,theresultsofthesurveyareworthlesstosupporttheconclusion.第:無(wú)理假設(shè)(gratuitousassumption)必要性TheauthorfalselyrestsonthegratuitousassumptionthatBisdeterminedbyA.AlthoughAisacrucialelementindecidingB,itishardlytoclaimthatAistheonlyorevennecessarilyrequiredfactor.Actually,therearesomeotherpotentialelements,suchasCandD,alsocanbetakenintoconsideration.Therefore,withoutaccountingforthesepossibledeterminants,theauthorcannotclaimthat.茶 Whether...(復(fù)述題目)...hasbeenaheatedcontroversyincontemporarysociety.Somepeopleinsistthat…,whileotherpeoplemaintainthat…Inmypointofview,…(自己的觀點(diǎn))...Ononehand,支持Ontheotherhand,Tosumontheotherhand,othersmaythinkHowever,inthefinal ysis,Iconcludethat….Inthefollowingdiscussion,Iwouldliketopresentevidencesfavouringtheformeroneandrefutingthelatterone/tosupportmypointofview.Intheplace,themostimportantreasonformyviewisthat。Forexample/Historyhasitthat例子Thereisnobetterexamplethanthistoillustratethestrength/weaknessof某方.---Inaddition,thereisanotherreasonformetochoosethisstatement/considerthisstatementtobewrong.Thereasonisnotfartoseek:原因2。Forinstance,例子2。---Ofcourse,itmaybetruethat自己觀點(diǎn)對(duì)立方的某些長(zhǎng)insomeconditions.However,thisalonedoesnotconstituteasufficientsupportto對(duì)立方的觀點(diǎn)。,WhentheadvantageanddisadvantageofXandYarecarefullycompared,themoststrikingconclusionisobvious.Giventhereasonsdiscussedabove,whichsometim

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論