為低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)大規(guī)模部署能源創(chuàng)新：私營部門的角色

1、Table of Contents HYPERLINK l _bookmark0 Introduction 1 HYPERLINK l _bookmark1 How Decarbonization, Decentralization, Digitalization HYPERLINK l _bookmark1 and New Players Are Changing the Power Industry 2 HYPERLINK l _bookmark2 Analysis: ENGIEs Strategy Toward a Low-Carbon Transition 5 HYPERLINK l

2、_bookmark2 The Role of Innovation in the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy 5 HYPERLINK l _bookmark2 Understanding Innovation in the Energy Context 5 HYPERLINK l _bookmark3 Innovative Technologies to Watch in the Energy Transition 8 HYPERLINK l _bookmark4 Where ENGIE is Headed 10 HYPERLINK l _bookma

3、rk5 Recommendations for ENGIE 13 HYPERLINK l _bookmark6 The Role of Policy and Regulation in Supporting Green Innovation 15 HYPERLINK l _bookmark7 Pricing Carbon 16 HYPERLINK l _bookmark8 Supporting Biofuels and Energy Efficiency 19 HYPERLINK l _bookmark9 Designing Policies for Hydrogen 21 HYPERLINK

4、 l _bookmark10 Recommendations for ENGIE 24 HYPERLINK l _bookmark10 Building and Enhancing Shareholder Support for the Transition 24 HYPERLINK l _bookmark11 Shareholder Interest in Environmental Investments 25 HYPERLINK l _bookmark12 Communicating Environmental Progress to Shareholders 26 HYPERLINK

5、l _bookmark13 Recommendations for ENGIE 28 HYPERLINK l _bookmark14 Analysis: Summary & Recommendations 30 HYPERLINK l _bookmark15 Interview Questions & Responses: Transcript 32 HYPERLINK l _bookmark16 Appendix 1. Sample Legislation to Spur Investment in US HYPERLINK l _bookmark16 Green Hydrogen Infr

6、astructure 48 HYPERLINK l _bookmark17 Appendix 2. ENGIE Event Announcement 50 HYPERLINK l _bookmark18 About the Authors 51 HYPERLINK l _bookmark19 About ENGIE 54Wind turbines at Biedesheim, Germany.Karsten WrthIntroductionby Nicola De BlasioSenior Fellow at Harvard Kennedy Schools Belfer Center;form

7、er Vice President, Head of R&D International Development at EniProviding secure, reliable, affordable energy that is needed to fuel prosperity for all without causing devastating environmental conse- quences is perhaps the greatest challenge of the 21st century. Over the coming decades, global energ

8、y systems will need to transition from an era which relied on fossil fuels to one more dependent on clean energy. This transition will not simply consist of replacing one energy source with another. Rather, it will affect the systems, networks, and partnerships that embody the energy industry as we

9、have known it forthe last century. Many of these changes will be driven by technological innovation, which in turn will impact the nature and value of exist- ing assets, supply chains, and regulatory and policy institutions. But innovation by itself is not the goal; the real objective is to deploy i

10、nno- vation at scale and bring the ensuing products and services to market in a secure, reliable, and affordable way.Academia, business, governments, and civil society are all searching for innovative solutions to actively decarbonize all energy systems and sectors, and yet todays pace of energy inn

11、ovation is simply not fast enough to meet the challenge. Why is this not happening more rap- idly? What needs to be done to speed up the innovation effort?Success is possible, but it will require close coordination of policy, technology, capital, and society. Partnerships between the public and priv

12、ate sector will be central to this effort and must be complemented by the ability to educate all stakeholders on the challenges and oppor- tunities inherent in the energy transition.By focusing on real-world energy companies and eliciting the perspec- tive of stakeholders, our goal is to uncover les

13、sons learned from the private sector and recommend new paths to lead in the transition toa low-carbon economy. What steps is your company taking to adaptand change in response to the climate crisis? What is the role of the private sector in meeting or exceeding the Paris Agreement targets? Where are

14、 there opportunities for leadership? As part of the new Global Energy Tech- nology Innovation (GETI) initiative at Harvard Kennedy Schools Belfer Center we asked these and other questions of industry leaders around the world.In the spring of 2020, I convened the inaugural student study group “Energy

15、 Innovation and the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy: Advis- ing Fortune 500 Companies.” This report, part one of a broader series of interactions with leaders in energy and innovation and Harvard students, dives into these issues through the lens of a multinational utility. We pres- ent the insig

16、hts of ENGIEs Executive VP Shankar Krishnamoorthy, who is leading the companys strategy and innovation efforts, and provide thestudy group participants advice on how ENGIE could continue its low-car- bon transition into the future.How Decarbonization, Decentralization, Digitalization and New Players

17、 Are Changing the Power IndustryNo one really knows how fast the transition to a low-carbon economy will move, but one thing is certainelectricity is at the heart of this transformational change, with power demand increasing in the build- ing, transportation, and industrial sectors. This growth is c

18、reating new challenges and opportunities for how to meet demand while addressing climate change and accelerating the transition to a low-carbon economy. Technological innovation will be key to driving the deep decarbonization of energy intensive sectors such as power, mobility, buildings, and indus-

19、try; and where direct electrification is not feasible, green synthetic fuels or hydrogen produced from renewable electricity have the potential to tackle “hard-to-abate” sectors.The power industry has been experiencing a disruption of unprecedented scope and speed in the way electricity is generated

20、 and in the associatedbusiness models. In a way, much of the industry was caught unprepared by the move from large fossil fuel powered plants to distributed renewable generation and by the need to manage revenue downturns, while meet- ing the demands of environmental and technology conscious consume

21、rs. These rapidly emerging trends of decarbonization, decentralization and digitalization require fundamental changes to the structure of the energysystem as we know it and the design of appropriate market structures iden- tifying cross-cutting benefits and costs, to recognize the full value of all

22、generation options.If this were not enough, the power industry is also facing a new competi- tive threatthe entrance of traditional oil and gas companies (IOCs) into power markets. Historically, IOCs had considered a move into electricity as a step too far, with the sector seen as oversupplied and h

23、ighly politicized.However, the recent decision by Shell and others to sell electricity directly to retail customers is yet another example of how quickly the sector is changing. Why are IOCs entering the electricity markets?The need to address climate change and play a role in the transition to a lo

24、w-carbon future is one obvious reason, but there are many more, includ- ing the state of the energy landscape. Global markets are flush with natural gas and at the same time we are seeing record investments in new supplies of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Like all commodities, natural gas goes throug

25、h cycles. However, this is more than just cyclical behaviormarkets are facing a downward super cyclewhere record oversupply coincides with record investments in new supply. This was a challenge even before the COVID-19 pandemic, which has also drastically reduced demand. In a buyers market, it is lo

26、gical to try to get closer to final customers, estab-lishing long-term agreements to reduce risk. An integration along the value chain also gives IOCs access to new business areas such as smart mobility, connected home services and/or demand side response. For traditional utilities and retailers, wh

27、ose business models are already under pressure, this represents a dangerous competitive threat.In this context of increasing competition, technology innovation will be even more critical for both incumbents and new players, not only as a means to gain a competitive advantage but also to accelerate t

28、he transitionto a low-carbon economy at scale. Success is possible, but to achieve it, technological innovation must be complemented by:Redesigning policy and regulatory frameworks: Advance and reform regulation to enable full integration of distributed energy resources, spur innovation, and define

29、new roles for distribution network operators and end-consumers as active market partic- ipants. Define clear and stable decarbonization targets. Design market structures identifying cross-cutting benefits and costs, to recognize the full value of all generation optionsa key step in reaching decarbon

30、ization targets an optimizing cost, while guaran- teeing security of supply.Deploying enabling infrastructure: Define clear market-wide rules around ownership and cost-recovery of physical assets, decarbonization targets, data ownership and cybersecurity. This will reduce the risk of stranded assets

31、, allow planning security, and provide needed legal protections.Redefining customer experience: Incorporate the new reality of a digital, customer-empowered, interactive electricity system. Simplify and tailor services.Embracing new business and public-private partnership (PPP) models: Pursue new re

32、venue sources from innovative distribution and retail services. Shift from asset-intensive business modelsto service provider platforms. Spur innovation and the ability to educate all stakeholders on the challenges and opportunitiesinherent in the energy transition. Bolster clean energy solutions by

33、 de-risking investments and lowering the cost of capital.Analysis: ENGIEs Strategy Toward a Low-Carbon Transitionby Zul Kapadia, Abigail Mayer, Johanna Schiele, and Rees Sweeney-TaylorThe Role of Innovation in the Transition to A Low-Carbon EconomyInnovation will be critical in the transition to a l

34、ow-carbon economy. Meeting the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement requires reworking our existing energy infrastructure, but it is easier said than done. Rethinking energy systems hinges on reconciling the interests of many existing stake- holders: investors, banks, governments, energy companies,

35、and consumers. Developing and fostering new ideas is the first step toward illuminating the frontiers of what is possible.Our discussion with Shankar Krishnamoorthy drives this concept of innovation. We begin by trying to understand what innovation is, why it matters, and how to support it. We then

36、provide a breakdown of innova- tive technologies that Krishnamoorthy sees as critical for the transition to a low-carbon economy. Next, we investigate how ENGIE commercializes innovative technologies in the context of current initiatives and projects. We conclude by offering recommendations designed

37、 to build on and accel- erate ENGIEs innovation efforts.Understanding Innovation in the Energy ContextThe meaning of innovation is inherently nebulous. In the energy context, it can be a new approach to providing a service, the creation of a new product, a novel development for previously inaccessib

38、le markets, or an altogether revolutionary technology. Innovation diverges from what came before and charts a new path into unknown territory. At its core, it is theseed of opportunity. We agree with Krishnamoorthys view that innovation matters because it offers a mindsetthe notion that something or

39、iginal can be donefull of possibility to those working toward a low-carbon energy future.To illustrate the impact innovation can have in the energy sector, Krishna- moorthy recalls the success story of renewables. Just in the last decade, for example, the price of solar has dropped by a factor of fi

40、ve, whereas global installed capacity has grown by a factor of 10 to about 540 GW.1 Although solar and wind are intermittent and provide less than 10 percent of global power generation,2 the speed and scale of their penetration is heartening for those who are working to address climate change and ac

41、celerate the needed energy transition.Figure 2.Renewables Costs (USD/KWh) over Cumulative Deployment (MW). Sources: IRENA Renewable Cost and Auctions Databases; GWEC, 2017; WindEurope 2017, Make Consulting 2017 and SolarPowerEurope 2017.IRENA (2019), “Renewable Capacity Statistics.”IEA (2019), “Worl

42、d Energy Outlook.”Innovation is, however, a difficult endeavor. It requires countless iterations and even then, is likely to result in failure. Some studies put the failure rate of new products and technologies at a staggering 95 percent.3 Moreover, innovating is expensive, so cost considerations be

43、come central to the pro- cess as well.Krishnamoorthy recommends collaboration as a key strategy to foster innovation and help share the associated risks and costs. His example of gasoline stations illustrates how many companies can benefit from working together in developing a standard technology. I

44、n such endeavors, the initial development costs are shared, hence there are more resources available to try different technological solutions, and if successful there are significant positive network effects.4 While we agree that this approach is helpful, we also believe it is important to dwell on

45、the dynamic of such cooperative agreements. How are they formed? Is it mostly organic? Does the imple- mentation pace match the urgency of the climate crisis? Is there a diversity of perspectives and issues being considered? How can we meaningfully track and accelerate such efforts? Properly fosteri

46、ng innovation will be cru- cial if we are to meet the goals set out in the Paris Climate Agreement.Finally, when a successful innovative technology has been developed, we recognize that its value might range from being incremental to a disrup- tive game-changer. By understanding what innovation is,

47、the challenges it encounters, and how to foster it, we hope that we can better set our expec- tations for how the energy transition may unfold.In terms of key technologies needed for the transition, as Krishnamoorthy indicates, we agree that it is helpful to focus on those related to anthro- pogenic

48、 emissions. Energy-related emissions make up approximately 73 percent of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.5 On the one hand, this makes the energy industry a sector with huge transformational potential. On the other, the sector is characterized by long-term investments, makingNobel, C. (2011),

49、“Clay Christensens Milkshake Marketing” HBS Working Knowledge: Business Knowledge for Business Leaders HYPERLINK /item/clay-christensens-milkshake-marketing /item/clay-christensens-milkshake-market- HYPERLINK /item/clay-christensens-milkshake-marketing ing, accessed June 6, 2020.The network effect i

50、s a phenomenon whereby increased numbers of people or participants improve the value of a good or service.Ge, M. and Friedrich, J. (2020), “Four charts explain greenhouse gas emissions by country and sector” World Resources Institute HYPERLINK /blog/2020/02/greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-country-sector

51、 /blog/2020/02/greenhouse-gas-emissions- HYPERLINK /blog/2020/02/greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-country-sector by-country-sector, accessed June 11, 2020.changes of direction difficult and slow. This duality is at the heart of the question: what role will innovation play in the energy transition?Innovat

52、ive Technologies to Watch in the Energy TransitionIn this section, we dive into key technologies that will play a critical role in the transition, as outlined by Krishnamoorthy. These include renewables; short- and long-term storage; carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS); hydrogen; and bio

53、mass. We also provide an analysis of how the public sector can support their development and deployment, as well as how companies can access the needed capital.The path for a successful global transition is relatively clear, and supported by a large body of research and system costs modelling. On th

54、e demand side, energy efficiency is the backdrop for all low-carbon scenarios. With- out lower energy demand, the Paris climate goals will be hard to achieve under any transition scenario.6 On the supply side, emission efficiency improvements of fossil fuel-based technologies are insufficient to rea

55、ch meaningful reductions. Fortunately, independent of GHG-emission goals and demand projections, the least-cost power system is likely one based on large-scale renewables, in particular solar PV and wind,7 complemented with some gas peakers in the medium term, and green synthetic fuels and hydrogen

56、in the long run.Once more, renewables success story offers some context on the speed and impact that innovation can have on energy systems. Solar and onshore wind levelized cost of energy (LCOE) are already competitive with newly built coal or gas plants. In some cases, renewables are even cheaper t

57、han fully depreciated fossil fuel assets.8 While the costs of fossil-fueled power plants have stagnated for decades and those of nuclear plants have esca- lated, LCOE for renewable energy continues to fall steeply.IEA (2016), “Energy Efficiency Market Report 2016.”MIT Energy Initiative (2011), “The

58、Future of the Electric Grid.”IRENA (2019), “Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018.”At the same time as renewables penetration increases, intermittency issues need to be addressed, together with the cost of the required grid improve- ments. This makes storage technologies a key part of the low-car

59、bon energy puzzle. In the area of short-term imbalances, grid-scale batteries, smart charging of electric vehicles, heat pumps and digitized demand-side response will be crucial. The successful implementation of these options also hinges on the digitalization of energy services. Addressing mid- and

60、long-term imbalances is more challenging and innovation will be key.Storage solutions that can bridge several days or weeks are unlikely to be feasible without liquid or gaseous fuels. Green hydrogen,9 ammonia, and synthetic fuels are potentially promising solutions.In more general terms, the succes