Going Green How Green Buildings Affect Property Values綠色綠色建筑將如何影響房地產(chǎn)價值_第1頁
Going Green How Green Buildings Affect Property Values綠色綠色建筑將如何影響房地產(chǎn)價值_第2頁
Going Green How Green Buildings Affect Property Values綠色綠色建筑將如何影響房地產(chǎn)價值_第3頁
Going Green How Green Buildings Affect Property Values綠色綠色建筑將如何影響房地產(chǎn)價值_第4頁
Going Green How Green Buildings Affect Property Values綠色綠色建筑將如何影響房地產(chǎn)價值_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩26頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

GoingGreen:HowGreenBuildingsAffectPropertyValues

BallardLibraryinSeattle.Astate-of-the-artgreenbuildingwhichmakesuseofasodroof,daylighting,andtranslucentthin-filmsolarcollectors.ItislistedintheAmericanInstituteofArchitecture'stoptengreenbuildings.

Whatis“Green”?Nosingledefinitioninthecontextofgreenbuildings.“Green”fluctuatesbetweenprofessionsArchitectsanddesignerstendtoreference“green”basedonabuilding’smaterialsanddesignOwnersanddevelopersfocusmoreonbuildingsystemsandoperationsDefinitionshouldinclude:buildingsand/orbuildingattributesthatcontainsustainableandhighperformance:designfeaturesbuildingmaterials efficientsystemsoperatingprotocolsTheGreenMovementRobertWatson,ScientistforNRDC(NaturalResourceDefenseCouncil)ChairedthefirstLEEDGreenBuildingRatingSystemMeetingforUSGBCEarly1990’stoutedthebenefitsof“Green”Buildings“Green”Buildingconceptsweremostlyignoreduntilearly2000’sClimateChangeandGlobalWarmingInitiallyconcernedwithpublicbuildingsThePremiseforGoingGreenU.S.DeptofEnergyandU.S.DeptofTransportationestimatesbuildingsaccountfor39%ofallenergyuseintheU.S.MorethanindustrialandtransportationTheUnitedStatesGreenBuildingCouncil(USGBC)claimsthatU.S.buildingsaccountfor:65%ofelectricityconsumption36%ofenergyuse30%ofgreenhousegasemissions(GHG)30%ofrawmaterialsuse30%ofwasteoutput12%ofpotablewaterconsumptionPremiseforGoingGreen(cont.)ManyU.S.municipalitieshavepassedordinancesrequiringpublicbuildingstoachieveminimumLEEDcertification22Statesandmorethan50municipalgovernmentshavepassedlegislationmandatingLEEDcertifiedpublicbuildings. greenbuildingrequirementsintobuildingcodes.December2007–SanFranciscochangeditsbuildingcodetorequireallbuildingstobeLEEDcertifiedCityofDallas:RequiresGreen4/08–DallasCityCouncilpassesnewconstructionrequirementtoreduceenvironmentalimpact;DallasbecomesoneofthefirstmajorU.S.citiestopasscomprehensivebuildingstandardforbothresidentialandcommercialconstructionPhase1,beginningin2009,commercialprojectsover50,000squarefeet,phase1requiresbuildingstomeet85percentofthepointsrequiredundertheappropriateLEEDratingsystemforacertifiedlevelPhase2,beginningin2011,requiresallcommercialprojectstobeLEEDcertifiable(orothersimilaraccreditedrating)undertheappropriateLEEDratingsystem.CertifyingGreenManyorganizationsglobally–someforprofit,butmostareanon-profitaccreditationstructureUSGBC,GreenGlobes,EnergyStar–DominatetheU.S.marketplaceInternationally–GBC,GreenStarandBREEAM(BuildingResearchEstablishmentEnvironmentalAssessmentMethod)CertifyingGreen(Cont.)LEED(LeadershipinEnergyandEnvironmentalDesign)isthemostrecognizedcertificationintheU.S.EnergyStarestablishedbyEPADistinctdifferencesbetweenthetwoprogramsGreenwithoutcertification MandatoryCostComplexityofcertificationLEEDCertificationTheUSGBCintroducedtheLEEDRatingSystemin1998ContinuingtodevelopandupdatecertificationcriteriabasedonapointsystemTherearefourlevelsofsustainabilityundertheLEEDratingsystemwhichare:

LEEDCertified:

26-32pointsor>37%ofmax.

LEEDCertifiedSilverLevel:

33-38pointsor>47%ofmax.

LEEDCertifiedGoldLevel:

39-51pointsor>56%ofmax.

LEEDCertifiedPlatinumLevel:

52-69pointsor>75%ofmax.PointsateachlevelcanbeachievedinmanydifferentwaysLEEDCertification(cont.)BasedontheLEEDchecklist,theelementsofa“green”buildingare:SustainablesiteWaterefficiencyEnergyandatmosphereMaterialsandresourcesIndoorenvironmentalqualityInnovationanddesignprocessExamplesof“Green”ComponentsDaylightingEnergyManagementSystemsGreen“Veggie”andCoolRoofsRain/WastewaterrecyclingsystemsLowVolatileOrganicCompound(VOC)ConstructionMaterial/TechnologyAdvancementRecycled/SustainableProducts Sustainablelumber/woodproductsGreenComponentsTheColorofMoneyisGreenValuationIssuesRemembertofocuson“insidethedefinition”ofmarketvalueTripleBottomLine–Social,Environmental,EconomicBenefitsofGreenmaybe:RealizedbythecommunityRealizedbytheowner/userNon-MonetaryMonetaryIndirectDirectValuationIssues(cont.)LackofavailabledataManymarketshaveyettoseetheirfirstgreenbuildingFewsalesofgreenbuildingsRenewedfocusonbuildingdesign,materials,buildingsystems,operations(egrated)Estimatingobsolescenceinthepresenceoftheperformancecapabilitiesofgreenbuildingsandexistingnon-greenbuildings(functionalinutility)ValuationCluesThoroughlydescribeandunderstandsustainabilityattributesandcomponentsUseLEEDcriteriaasabasicorganizationalguideGatherasmuchinfoondesigndevelopmentprocessandtrade-offanalysisMeasureexpectationsofdevelopers,lenders,tenants,andinvestorsFocusonattributesthatmayhaveamaterialeffectuponpropertyperformance,revenue,operatingexpense,andrisk.RiskProfileofGreenBuildingsLowerexposuretoenergycostsandconsumablescostsincreaseGreaterconstructionanddeliveryrisksPatternoflease-upandabsorptionriskFewerpeersinthemarketplaceTenantretentionandturn-overrisk(longerterm?)Re-tenantingcosts(modularsystems)PatternofperiodiccapitalreplacementsReversionPriceLowerexposuretoobsolescenceTheApproachestoValueAllfactorsshouldbeviewedwithinthecontextofmarketvalueTheSalesApproach–likelytooweakatthistimeTheCostApproach- ReproductionorReplacement?OnnewconstructiongettheSpecSheetCommissioningReportmayrevealpoorlydesignedsystemsR.S.MeansproducesagreencoststudyAtthistime,reproductioncostmayprovemorerelevantLifeCycleCost(LCC)-formoffinancialanalysisthattakesintoaccountthetotalcostofabuildingoveritslifeTheApproachestoValue(cont.)TheIncomeApproach PropertyRevenueHowdoestherentalprofilematchagainstitscompsetEvidenceofpremiumsatothergreenbuildingsTakecaretoassurethatanypremiumsordiscountsareadequatelysupportedGrossvs.Net–Whogetsthebenefits?GreenLeaseClauses–typicallyprovidesequitablesharingofcostsandbenefitsTheApproachestoValue(cont.)TheIncomeApproachOperatingExpenses FindsourcesofinformationforsustainablefeaturesArchitect,engineer,energymodeler,greenconsultantBealerttoincludenotonlydifferencesinconsumption,butalsothedifferencesincapitalexpenses,specialmaintenance,andreplacementallowancesWatchforthehandlingofTI’s–LEEDinteriorRemembersomeincentivesexpireovertimeTheApproachestoValue(cont.)TheIncomeApproachOverallcaprateanddiscountrate(Greenv.NG)SafeRatecomponentisunchanged–basedonaltinvestmentManagementcomponentmaychangeRiskcomponentmaychangeLiquiditycomponentmaychangeConclusionstoValueGreenTheIncomeApproachAtthistime,theDiscountCashFlow(DCF)analysisispreferredoverDirectCapitalizationforgreenbuildingvaluationAddressedincomeandvaluechangesparametersinthecashflowforecast,notintherateWhatifyourjurisdictiondoesn’tworkwithDCF’s?

MarkBennett,ChairoftheNationalGreenBuildingFinanceandInvestmentForum

Commentstofurtherconsiderinvaluation:There'sabitofurgencynowthatthevalueofbuildingscouldbeaffectediftheyarenotLEED-certified”"Inlargepart,theywerereferringtoLEEDcertificationasacomponentinthedefinitionofaClassAofficebuilding,""Theybasicallysaid,'Ifyou'rebuildingtodaywithoutLEED,you'rebuildinginobsolescence.'"

TheCoStarStudy(WatchOut)TheCoStarStudyrepresentsitselfasthe“…firstsystematicstudy,asopposedtocasestudies,thataddressesquestionsonthebenefitsofinvestmentsinenergysavingsandenvironmentaldesign.”ConclusionsmostfrequentlycitedMarch2008were:LEEDbuildingssoldfor$171persquarefoot,or64%morethancomparablenon-LEEDbuildingsRentedfor$11.33persquarefoot,or36%morethannon-LEEDbuildings.Theseconclusionswerecommunicatedstrongly,withoutfurtherqualification,andwidelydisseminated.RefutingTheCoStarStudyMethodologyIssues:PeerBuildingSelectionvs.HedonicPricingModelLEEDBuildingAisnotthesameasLEEDBuildingBStatisticalsamplestoosmall(only77LEEDbuildingsused)TechnicalIssues:tobereliable,greenandnon-greencompswouldneedtobe:SimilarbuildingsinnearidenticallocationsappealingtothesamemarketsCoStarcompsupt

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論