data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/934ba/934ba4c8e0b5b1af3c8c7b2b3fa59e219b664722" alt="怎樣招聘老麥2_第1頁(yè)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7ee8/d7ee84bd10effecca95ec6ed83fa8ff4cb1ac6ca" alt="怎樣招聘老麥2_第2頁(yè)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a206/8a2061165c60f90c4c39a2c056ada8ab092ed90f" alt="怎樣招聘老麥2_第3頁(yè)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dead/7dead8570cf392057b3f0f19c7e83d18fc365ffa" alt="怎樣招聘老麥2_第4頁(yè)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e588a/e588a396aaf4fc4f4babfe79d9b0c66bfb59ca20" alt="怎樣招聘老麥2_第5頁(yè)"
版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
NC-ZZG001-103198Shimp-RC.pptMcKinseyCaseInterviewWorkshopFUQUASCHOOLOFBUSINESSOctober31TODAY’STOPICSCaseinterviewoverviewPurposeTypesSuggestedapproachSuccessfulproblem-solving2RESUMEANDCASEINTERVIEWS–WHATFIRMSARELOOKINGFORFromyourresumeWorkexperienceAdvancementfasterthannormSelectionbysuperiorstoleadimportantprojects/specialrecognitionEvidenceofleadershipandteamworkEducationAcademicexcellenceSignificantleadershiprolesPersonalinitiativeOutsideinterestsAthletic/culturalachievementsCommunityactivitiesDrive/perseveranceFromthecaseApproachGenuineinterestinsolvingcomplexproblemsStructured,logicalapproachCuriosity,creativityLogical,probingquestionsSynthesisandconclusionsSkillsComfortwithambiguity/poiseunderpressureBroadfunctionalskillsAnalyticalrigorQuantitative,numericalagilityPracticalityJudgment,commonsenseBusinessacumen/instinctClear,logicalcommunicationEvidenceofExcellenceProblemSolvingAbility3TYPESOFCASESBusinesscases“WhatwilltheimpactofindustryconsolidationbeoncompanyX?”“ShouldcompanyXenter/exitanew/oldmarket?”“HowshouldcompanyXreacttoanewentrant?”“ShouldcompanyXaddcapacity?”Estimationcases“HowbigwouldtheIvyGardensapartmentcomplexhavetobeforeveryoneonEarthtolivethere?”“WhatisthesizeoftheskateboardmarketintheU.S.?”“WhatdoyouthinkannualresidentialrealestatecommissionsareinAtlanta?”ResponsesshoulddemonstrateBigpictureperspectiveAbilitytostructureBroadfunctionalskillsComfortwithdetails,analysisResponsesshoulddemonstrateComfortwithambiguityAbilitytostructureFacilitywithnumbersPoise4...buttherearewronganswersIgnoringorforgettingimportantfactsNotrecognizingthatsomematerialmaybeextraneousDefendingimpracticalsolutionsForcefittingaframeworkthatjustdoesnotworkThereisnorightanswerThegoalistodemonstrate“howyouthink”WHATTOREMEMBERWHENAPPROACHINGACASE5SUGGESTEDAPPROACHFORCASESWhattodoListentointroduction–donotthinkaheadtoyouranswersAsk1-2clarifyingquestions,ifnecessary;takeafewnotesifyoulike;donotexpecteverypieceofdatatobeavailableOrganizeyourthoughtsandstructuretheproblemPickonebranchtoprobe,develophypotheses,askforafewrelevantfacts,defend/refinehypothesesbasedonnewinformation,probefurther,anddescribeimplicationsyouseePickanotherbranchandcontinue(Makesureyouareprioritizingyourresponses)Putitalltogether:trytoanswertheoverallquestion(bigpicture)withareasonable,actionableconclusionReviewwhatyouknowClarifywhatyoudonotunderstandSolidifyandtenderrecommendationWhatnottodoPlay20questionsAssume1frameworkfitsallCover1issuewithoutmentioningandprioritizingallkeyissuesDigyourheelsinHidefromthedetails(orthenumbers)GetfrustratedConductapostmortemintheinterview6FIVEEASYSTEPSTOBULLET-PROOFPROBLEMSOLVINGStep1StatetheproblemStep2DisaggregatetheissuesStep3Eliminateall
non-keyissuesStep4Conductcriticalanalyses,porpoisebetweendataandhypothesesStep5Synthesizefindingsandbuildargument?7ClearstatementofproblemtobesolvedorissuetoberesolvedSTEP1:STATETHEPROBLEMLEMCharacteristicsofagoodproblemstatementAleadingquestionorfirmhypothesisSpecificnotgeneralNotastatementoffactornon-disputableassertionActionableFocusesonwhatthedecisionmakerneedstomoveforward?InterviewerstatestheproblemProblemhasbeenclearlystated,andyouunderstanditProblemhasNOTbeenclearlystated,oryoudon’tunderstanditYoumustclearlyunderstandtheproblemParaphrasetheproblemtomakesureyouhaveitrightAskquestionstoclarifytheissueStep2.Youareresponsibleforensuringtheclarityoftheproblem8STEP2:DISAGGREGATETHEISSUESWhyuselogictrees?1. TobreakaproblemintocomponentpartssothatProblem-solvingworkcanbedividedintointellectuallymanageablepiecesPrioritiescanbesetamongthepartsResponsibilitiescanbeallocatedtoindividuals2. ToensurethattheintegrityoftheproblemsolvingismaintainedSolvingthepartswillreallysolvetheproblemThepartsaremutuallyexclusiveandcollectivelyexhaustive(i.e.,nooverlaps,nogaps)SubissueSubissueSubissueSubissueSubissueSubissueIssues/hypothesisNo.1Issues/hypothesisNo.2Issues/hypothesisNo.3ProblemstatementSuggestions
-Describeyourapproachtotheinterviewerasyouproceed.Don’tassumetheyknowwhatyouarethinking!-Stateyourhypothesesascrisplyaspossible.-Onlyuseframeworksiftheyareappropriate-don’tforcefit.-Theideasareimportant,nottheframework.“Ithinkweshouldlookatthepowerofbuyersandindustrycompetitiveness”isbetterthan“I’dliketoapplypartofthePorterFiveForcesframework”.9STEP3:ELIMINATEALLNON-KEYISSUESWhyFirststepinconstant,interactiverefinementprocessFocusesyoureffortonwhatismostimportantDo’s&Don’tsAlwaysaskyourself“sowhat”...butalsoaskyourselfwhatyoumighthavemissedTelltheinterviewerwhatyouarecuttingandwhyProblemstatementIssue1Issue2Issue3Issue410STEP4:CONDUCTCRITICALANALYSISDo’sBehypothesis-drivenandendproducts-oriented“Porpoise”frequentlybetweenhypothesisanddataKeeptheanalysesassimpleas
youcan.Besuspiciousofhugelinearprogramsandtheirilk.DoorderofmagnitudeestimatesbeforeyoustartdetailedanalysesUse80/20andback-of-envelopethinkingDonotbeafraidtobecreativeDon’tsDonotjust““runthenumbers””–askyourself““whatquestionamItryingtoanswer?”DonotchaseyourtailDoyoureallyneedtocalculatetheWACC?Don’’tmisstheforestforthetrees.Bewareof““polishingdirt”Lookforbreakthroughthinking11STEP5:SYNTHESIZEFINDINGSANDBUILDARGUMENTComplicationSituationResolutionUsesituation,complication,resolutionformatPyramidstructureordecisiontreeMainassertionSupportingdataSupportingdataSupportingdataSupportingdataQuestionSub-assertionSub-assertionQuestionQuestionYesAction1NoAction2YesAction3NoAction4and/orStatetheconditionsatpointofproblemFleshoutbarrierstoimprovingsituationLayoutpossiblesolutionpath12APPENDIX:INTERVIEWINGWITHMCKINSEY13FORMATFOR30MINUTEFIRSTROUNDINTERVIEWMinutes15-2055-10Resume-relatedquestionsandQ&AIntroductionCaseFirstroundOncampusTwo30minutecase/resumeinterviewsSecondroundTwo30minuteinterviewsGenerallybothcaseinterviewsThirdroundInanoffice~five30-45minuteinterviews3-5casesXIIVIIII14WHATWEARELOOKINGFORProblemsolvingIntellectualcapacityCreativityPracticalapproachandbusinessjudgmentQuantitativecomfortPersonalimpactPresenceEmpathyDrive/AspirationDriveforexcellenceEnergylevel/perseveranceLeadershipPersonalinitiativeEntrepreneurshipMcKinseyprofile15RESUMERELATEDQUESTIONSFocusedQuestions“Describeasituationinwhichyou’veledaprojecttosuccess?””“Whatstrengthsandweaknesseswouldyourteammatesrecognizeinyourworkabilities?”“Describeasituationinwhichyou’vehadtoovercomeobstaclestoreachadesiredoutcome.”Why?EvidenceofexcellencePersonalgrowthplanLogicalcareerplanDepthofpreparationforinterviewOpenEndedQuestions“Tellmeaboutyourself.””“WhydidyouchooseDarden?””Why?ClearunderstandingofpersonalsellingpointsAbilitytoclearlycommunicateinastructuredway16NC-ZZG001-103198Shimp-RC.pptINTERVIEWINGSTYLESFORCASESFromoneextreme…DetailedintroductionSpecificproblemtobesolvedAfewstarterfactsLotsmorefactsavailable,ifaskedConversationalfeelthroughouttheinterviewWhy?TestanalyticalabilityTestabilitytosortoutkeyfactsandstayfocussed…totheotherBriefintroductionVerybroaddescriptionofproblem(e.g.poorperformance)Few,ifany,factsavailable‘Whatdoyouthink”responsestomostquestionsWhy?Testoverallproblemstructuring,hypothesisgeneratingabilityTestforcreativityandbusinessinstinctLookforcomfortwithambiguity17NC-ZZG001-103198Shimp-RC.pptIMPROVINGCASEPERFORMANCEIndirectlythroughclassesPolicyStrategicframeworksBusinessinstinctIndustrystructureEconomics/financeVariablevs.fixedcoststructuresEvaluatinginvestmentopportunities(ROI,Cos
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 二零二五年度水上樂(lè)園游泳館場(chǎng)地租賃與水上樂(lè)園配套設(shè)施租賃協(xié)議
- 2025年度老舊小區(qū)外墻改造工程安全責(zé)任合同
- 二零二五年度國(guó)際貿(mào)易信用證業(yè)務(wù)代理及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理協(xié)議
- 海洋漁業(yè)資源保護(hù)與海產(chǎn)品銷售一體化合同
- 二零二五年度企業(yè)用工協(xié)議與勞動(dòng)權(quán)益保障與員工激勵(lì)機(jī)制合同
- 二零二五年度廠房裝修施工安全責(zé)任與綠色施工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)協(xié)議書(shū)
- 2025年度酒店與旅游紀(jì)念品店合作經(jīng)營(yíng)合同
- 二零二五年度籃球活動(dòng)參與者免責(zé)責(zé)任協(xié)議
- 二零二五年度汽車美容店員工勞動(dòng)爭(zhēng)議解決合同模板
- 二零二五年度農(nóng)村房屋贈(zèng)與合同附農(nóng)業(yè)保險(xiǎn)合作協(xié)議
- 雞場(chǎng)規(guī)劃與建設(shè)完整版資料課件
- 經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)彈性理論課件
- 公司員工獎(jiǎng)懲制度流程
- 星巴克案例分析-星巴克成功之道
- 把未來(lái)點(diǎn)亮歌詞打印版
- 危險(xiǎn)化學(xué)品建設(shè)項(xiàng)目竣工驗(yàn)收?qǐng)?bào)告
- 國(guó)家中醫(yī)藥管理局第3批24個(gè)專業(yè)104個(gè)病種中醫(yī)診療方案
- 婦產(chǎn)科學(xué)(第9版)第三章 女性生殖系統(tǒng)生理
- LY/T 2241-2014森林生態(tài)系統(tǒng)生物多樣性監(jiān)測(cè)與評(píng)估規(guī)范
- GB/T 9086-2007用于色度和光度測(cè)量的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)白板
- 2023年山東力明科技職業(yè)學(xué)院高職單招(數(shù)學(xué))試題庫(kù)含答案解析
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論