怎樣招聘老麥2_第1頁(yè)
怎樣招聘老麥2_第2頁(yè)
怎樣招聘老麥2_第3頁(yè)
怎樣招聘老麥2_第4頁(yè)
怎樣招聘老麥2_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩15頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

NC-ZZG001-103198Shimp-RC.pptMcKinseyCaseInterviewWorkshopFUQUASCHOOLOFBUSINESSOctober31TODAY’STOPICSCaseinterviewoverviewPurposeTypesSuggestedapproachSuccessfulproblem-solving2RESUMEANDCASEINTERVIEWS–WHATFIRMSARELOOKINGFORFromyourresumeWorkexperienceAdvancementfasterthannormSelectionbysuperiorstoleadimportantprojects/specialrecognitionEvidenceofleadershipandteamworkEducationAcademicexcellenceSignificantleadershiprolesPersonalinitiativeOutsideinterestsAthletic/culturalachievementsCommunityactivitiesDrive/perseveranceFromthecaseApproachGenuineinterestinsolvingcomplexproblemsStructured,logicalapproachCuriosity,creativityLogical,probingquestionsSynthesisandconclusionsSkillsComfortwithambiguity/poiseunderpressureBroadfunctionalskillsAnalyticalrigorQuantitative,numericalagilityPracticalityJudgment,commonsenseBusinessacumen/instinctClear,logicalcommunicationEvidenceofExcellenceProblemSolvingAbility3TYPESOFCASESBusinesscases“WhatwilltheimpactofindustryconsolidationbeoncompanyX?”“ShouldcompanyXenter/exitanew/oldmarket?”“HowshouldcompanyXreacttoanewentrant?”“ShouldcompanyXaddcapacity?”Estimationcases“HowbigwouldtheIvyGardensapartmentcomplexhavetobeforeveryoneonEarthtolivethere?”“WhatisthesizeoftheskateboardmarketintheU.S.?”“WhatdoyouthinkannualresidentialrealestatecommissionsareinAtlanta?”ResponsesshoulddemonstrateBigpictureperspectiveAbilitytostructureBroadfunctionalskillsComfortwithdetails,analysisResponsesshoulddemonstrateComfortwithambiguityAbilitytostructureFacilitywithnumbersPoise4...buttherearewronganswersIgnoringorforgettingimportantfactsNotrecognizingthatsomematerialmaybeextraneousDefendingimpracticalsolutionsForcefittingaframeworkthatjustdoesnotworkThereisnorightanswerThegoalistodemonstrate“howyouthink”WHATTOREMEMBERWHENAPPROACHINGACASE5SUGGESTEDAPPROACHFORCASESWhattodoListentointroduction–donotthinkaheadtoyouranswersAsk1-2clarifyingquestions,ifnecessary;takeafewnotesifyoulike;donotexpecteverypieceofdatatobeavailableOrganizeyourthoughtsandstructuretheproblemPickonebranchtoprobe,develophypotheses,askforafewrelevantfacts,defend/refinehypothesesbasedonnewinformation,probefurther,anddescribeimplicationsyouseePickanotherbranchandcontinue(Makesureyouareprioritizingyourresponses)Putitalltogether:trytoanswertheoverallquestion(bigpicture)withareasonable,actionableconclusionReviewwhatyouknowClarifywhatyoudonotunderstandSolidifyandtenderrecommendationWhatnottodoPlay20questionsAssume1frameworkfitsallCover1issuewithoutmentioningandprioritizingallkeyissuesDigyourheelsinHidefromthedetails(orthenumbers)GetfrustratedConductapostmortemintheinterview6FIVEEASYSTEPSTOBULLET-PROOFPROBLEMSOLVINGStep1StatetheproblemStep2DisaggregatetheissuesStep3Eliminateall

non-keyissuesStep4Conductcriticalanalyses,porpoisebetweendataandhypothesesStep5Synthesizefindingsandbuildargument?7ClearstatementofproblemtobesolvedorissuetoberesolvedSTEP1:STATETHEPROBLEMLEMCharacteristicsofagoodproblemstatementAleadingquestionorfirmhypothesisSpecificnotgeneralNotastatementoffactornon-disputableassertionActionableFocusesonwhatthedecisionmakerneedstomoveforward?InterviewerstatestheproblemProblemhasbeenclearlystated,andyouunderstanditProblemhasNOTbeenclearlystated,oryoudon’tunderstanditYoumustclearlyunderstandtheproblemParaphrasetheproblemtomakesureyouhaveitrightAskquestionstoclarifytheissueStep2.Youareresponsibleforensuringtheclarityoftheproblem8STEP2:DISAGGREGATETHEISSUESWhyuselogictrees?1. TobreakaproblemintocomponentpartssothatProblem-solvingworkcanbedividedintointellectuallymanageablepiecesPrioritiescanbesetamongthepartsResponsibilitiescanbeallocatedtoindividuals2. ToensurethattheintegrityoftheproblemsolvingismaintainedSolvingthepartswillreallysolvetheproblemThepartsaremutuallyexclusiveandcollectivelyexhaustive(i.e.,nooverlaps,nogaps)SubissueSubissueSubissueSubissueSubissueSubissueIssues/hypothesisNo.1Issues/hypothesisNo.2Issues/hypothesisNo.3ProblemstatementSuggestions

-Describeyourapproachtotheinterviewerasyouproceed.Don’tassumetheyknowwhatyouarethinking!-Stateyourhypothesesascrisplyaspossible.-Onlyuseframeworksiftheyareappropriate-don’tforcefit.-Theideasareimportant,nottheframework.“Ithinkweshouldlookatthepowerofbuyersandindustrycompetitiveness”isbetterthan“I’dliketoapplypartofthePorterFiveForcesframework”.9STEP3:ELIMINATEALLNON-KEYISSUESWhyFirststepinconstant,interactiverefinementprocessFocusesyoureffortonwhatismostimportantDo’s&Don’tsAlwaysaskyourself“sowhat”...butalsoaskyourselfwhatyoumighthavemissedTelltheinterviewerwhatyouarecuttingandwhyProblemstatementIssue1Issue2Issue3Issue410STEP4:CONDUCTCRITICALANALYSISDo’sBehypothesis-drivenandendproducts-oriented“Porpoise”frequentlybetweenhypothesisanddataKeeptheanalysesassimpleas

youcan.Besuspiciousofhugelinearprogramsandtheirilk.DoorderofmagnitudeestimatesbeforeyoustartdetailedanalysesUse80/20andback-of-envelopethinkingDonotbeafraidtobecreativeDon’tsDonotjust““runthenumbers””–askyourself““whatquestionamItryingtoanswer?”DonotchaseyourtailDoyoureallyneedtocalculatetheWACC?Don’’tmisstheforestforthetrees.Bewareof““polishingdirt”Lookforbreakthroughthinking11STEP5:SYNTHESIZEFINDINGSANDBUILDARGUMENTComplicationSituationResolutionUsesituation,complication,resolutionformatPyramidstructureordecisiontreeMainassertionSupportingdataSupportingdataSupportingdataSupportingdataQuestionSub-assertionSub-assertionQuestionQuestionYesAction1NoAction2YesAction3NoAction4and/orStatetheconditionsatpointofproblemFleshoutbarrierstoimprovingsituationLayoutpossiblesolutionpath12APPENDIX:INTERVIEWINGWITHMCKINSEY13FORMATFOR30MINUTEFIRSTROUNDINTERVIEWMinutes15-2055-10Resume-relatedquestionsandQ&AIntroductionCaseFirstroundOncampusTwo30minutecase/resumeinterviewsSecondroundTwo30minuteinterviewsGenerallybothcaseinterviewsThirdroundInanoffice~five30-45minuteinterviews3-5casesXIIVIIII14WHATWEARELOOKINGFORProblemsolvingIntellectualcapacityCreativityPracticalapproachandbusinessjudgmentQuantitativecomfortPersonalimpactPresenceEmpathyDrive/AspirationDriveforexcellenceEnergylevel/perseveranceLeadershipPersonalinitiativeEntrepreneurshipMcKinseyprofile15RESUMERELATEDQUESTIONSFocusedQuestions“Describeasituationinwhichyou’veledaprojecttosuccess?””“Whatstrengthsandweaknesseswouldyourteammatesrecognizeinyourworkabilities?”“Describeasituationinwhichyou’vehadtoovercomeobstaclestoreachadesiredoutcome.”Why?EvidenceofexcellencePersonalgrowthplanLogicalcareerplanDepthofpreparationforinterviewOpenEndedQuestions“Tellmeaboutyourself.””“WhydidyouchooseDarden?””Why?ClearunderstandingofpersonalsellingpointsAbilitytoclearlycommunicateinastructuredway16NC-ZZG001-103198Shimp-RC.pptINTERVIEWINGSTYLESFORCASESFromoneextreme…DetailedintroductionSpecificproblemtobesolvedAfewstarterfactsLotsmorefactsavailable,ifaskedConversationalfeelthroughouttheinterviewWhy?TestanalyticalabilityTestabilitytosortoutkeyfactsandstayfocussed…totheotherBriefintroductionVerybroaddescriptionofproblem(e.g.poorperformance)Few,ifany,factsavailable‘Whatdoyouthink”responsestomostquestionsWhy?Testoverallproblemstructuring,hypothesisgeneratingabilityTestforcreativityandbusinessinstinctLookforcomfortwithambiguity17NC-ZZG001-103198Shimp-RC.pptIMPROVINGCASEPERFORMANCEIndirectlythroughclassesPolicyStrategicframeworksBusinessinstinctIndustrystructureEconomics/financeVariablevs.fixedcoststructuresEvaluatinginvestmentopportunities(ROI,Cos

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論