文本文稿分析lesson5-agree or disagree

1、議論文介紹段+核心段+結(jié)尾段輕松搞定6-6.52022/8/6To what extent do you agree or disagree?2022/8/62022/8/61. 我到底要贊同還是不贊同??！2. 要不哪邊好寫就寫哪邊吧！3. (寫了100詞以后)完蛋！寫不下去了！4. 要不把兩邊都寫了吧！5. 完蛋！我到底贊不贊同啊！6. 不管了，反正都討論到了！2022/8/62022/8/6三種可能的答案1. 一分為二地來(lái)看問(wèn)題（一般來(lái)說(shuō)是不贊同贊同部分贊同）2. completely disagree-2或3個(gè)不贊同(30%的可能性)3. totally agree -2或3個(gè)贊同 (幾

2、乎不考慮這個(gè)可能)2022/8/62022/8/6完全贊同的寫法并不常見，最主要的原因是考生不容易寫夠字?jǐn)?shù)。除此以外，官方出題的時(shí)候也經(jīng)常在題目里設(shè)定限定詞，這就導(dǎo)致完全贊同的寫法會(huì)顯得比較膚淺。但是，大家最好還是把完全贊同的邏輯藏在某個(gè)小角落，萬(wàn)一有時(shí)候能用到呢。2022/8/62022/8/61. 改寫觀點(diǎn)，然后表達(dá)完全贊同；2. 贊同理由-13. 贊同理由-24. 贊同理由-35. In conclusion, 重復(fù)自己的觀點(diǎn). 2022/8/62022/8/6Some people think that unpaid community service should be a comp

3、ulsory part of high school programmes (such as working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to young children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 2022/8/62022/8/62022/8/62022/8/6完全不贊同邏輯的使用比例比完全贊同稍多，這是因?yàn)橛械念}目讀起來(lái)簡(jiǎn)直喪心病狂。作為作者，完全找不到這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)合理的地方，所以就直接針對(duì)題目里的各個(gè)點(diǎn)進(jìn)行反駁就好。2022/8/6202

4、2/8/61. 改寫觀點(diǎn)，然后表達(dá)完全不贊同；2. 不贊同理由-13. 不贊同理由-24. 不贊同理由-35. In conclusion, 重復(fù)自己的觀點(diǎn). 2022/8/62022/8/6Some people believe that wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 2022/8/62022/8/6Some people argue that it is p

5、ointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of

6、 humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square met

7、re of land in order to feed or modate the worlds population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.2022/8/62022/8/6I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habit

8、ats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earths climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes

9、to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to pro

10、tect them2022/8/62022/8/6Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?2022/8/62022/8/61). It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit

11、 important sites and monuments. Personally, I completely disagree with this opinion.2). First of all, it is unfair to ask foreign tourists to pay more when visiting tourist attractions. They contribute a lot to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and se

12、rvices, including food, souvenirs, modation and travel. The governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidize important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them. 2022/8/62022/8/63). Secondly, if travelers realized that they would have to pay

13、 more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Pauls

14、Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the nations cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings.4). Finally, c

15、harging foreign tourists differently may cause trouble. It takes extra time to distinguish local residents from foreigners and this can be very difficult when people dont have any identification with them. As a consequence, there may be chaos at the ticket office. 5). In conclusion, I believe that e

16、very effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents. . 2022/8/62022/8/6Individuals can do nothing to change society. New developments can be only brought about by governments and large institutions. To what extent

17、 do you agree or disagree? . 2022/8/62022/8/6Opinions are divided on whether it is possible for individuals to make changes to society. I believe there are many examples of individual scientists, inventors or even political activists who have made significant contributions which have benefited their

18、 societies or mankind in general. Therefore, I completely disagree with the given statement. One field in which individuals have made positive changes is that of science, examples of which are medicine and electricity. With regard to the former, a British scientists called Sir Alexander Fleming acci

19、dentally discovered penicillin when he noticed that bacteria could not survive near certain fungi. This discovery, the first antibiotic, has saved millions of lives. As far as electricity is concerned, perhaps the greatest scientist of all was Nicola Tesla, without whose inventions in this field we

20、might not have the safe system of distributing electricity by alternating current that we have today. Among his other inventions were radio waves which are used to broadcast TV and radio, and of course wifi. 2022/8/62022/8/6Apart from science, a number of political activists have also made significa

21、nt contributions to their societies, and have helped to win freedom for their people. Perhaps the most famous of these was Mahatma Gandhi, an Indian lawyer who helped to win independence for his nation from the British with his unique style of peaceful protest, which was later an inspiration to othe

22、r leaders in the 20th century. For example, in the US, a black civil rights leader called Martin Luther King acknowledged the influence of Gandhi. Kings passionate style and non-violent protests against segregation helped to bring about political change for black people in that country. In conclusio

23、n, the scientists, inventors, and activists mentioned above show clearly that individuals can contribute greatly to their societies, so it is not true that they cannot change society. 2022/8/62022/8/6覆蓋更全面的一分為二邏輯一分為二的邏輯最常出現(xiàn)，這是因?yàn)閮蓚€(gè)原因。首先，這種寫法能充分保障字?jǐn)?shù)；其次，這種構(gòu)思能體現(xiàn)你對(duì)所給觀點(diǎn)的全面認(rèn)識(shí)。類似discuss both views的寫作邏輯，我們?cè)谶@

24、里也會(huì)采取先弱后強(qiáng)的寫作順序。但是，在這個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)中，弱的部分一定要控制字?jǐn)?shù)，畢竟考官更想看到你對(duì)自己偏向部分的解釋和論證。2022/8/62022/8/6覆蓋更全面的一分為二邏輯1. 改寫陳述題目觀點(diǎn)。I disagree/agree/partially agree with this opinion(有可能在這兒就停下) because I believe that 一句話寫出你的清晰觀點(diǎn)；2. One the one hand, there could be two reasons why (這里有n種方法引出前半部分) -這個(gè)段落盡可能字?jǐn)?shù)少一些3. On the other hand,

25、however, I would argue that開始強(qiáng)調(diào)自己的想法。包括：找到題目觀點(diǎn)的不合理之處，夸張的地方，不足的地方，未考慮到的地方；4. In conclusion, 重復(fù)自己的觀點(diǎn)和看法。2022/8/62022/8/6覆蓋更全面的一分為二邏輯1. 改寫陳述題目觀點(diǎn)。I disagree/agree/partially agree with this opinion(有可能在這兒就停下) because I believe that 一句話寫出你的清晰觀點(diǎn)；2. Advocates/Opponents of the given opinion believe that .這個(gè)段

26、落盡可能字?jǐn)?shù)少一些3. However, I would argue that 開始強(qiáng)調(diào)自己的想法。包括：找到題目觀點(diǎn)的不合理之處，夸張的地方，不足的地方，未考慮到的地方；4. In conclusion, 重復(fù)自己的觀點(diǎn)和看法。2022/8/62022/8/6有人認(rèn)為不應(yīng)該繼續(xù)進(jìn)行太空探索，因?yàn)榛ㄙM(fèi)巨大并且地球問(wèn)題還沒(méi)解決。1. 改寫+I disagree with this opinion because I believe that 太空探索的回報(bào)大于成本。2. On the one hand, there could be two reasons why some people wan

27、t the government to stop space exploration. Firstly, it is undeniable that space projects have always been incredibly money-consuming. Launching of satellites, building of space ships and maintenance of facilities are conducted at a cost of billions of dollars each year. At the same time, a certain

28、proportion of people on the earth have been suffering hunger, plague and environmental pollution for decades. 3. On the other hand, however, I believe all the money spent on space exploration can be justified for two reasons. One is that the benefits brought by exploring the universe are too valuabl

29、e to be measured with money. (展開) Furthermore, exploring the universe helps to discover solutions to earth. (展開) 4. In conclusion, 我不贊同這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)2022/8/62022/8/6有人認(rèn)為應(yīng)該禁止媒體暴力來(lái)減少犯罪。1. 改寫 + I partially agree with this opinion and I believe that 青少年應(yīng)該遠(yuǎn)離媒體暴力, 但它不應(yīng)該被完全禁止。 2. On the one hand, the obvious argumen

30、t against media violence is that excessive exposure to super hero movies or CSI TV dramas may lead young viewers to believe that violence is a natural solution to various problems. Some people think that this influence will increase the incidence of violent crimes, like street fighting or armed robb

31、ery. Therefore, it is safe to say that young children and teenagers should not be allowed any access to such media content. 3. On the other hand, however, I believe that this influence is not as harmful to adults as to the younger generation. When adult viewers turn off the TV or walk out of the cin

32、ema, they will be back to reality where rational thinking dominates. (展開) 4. Furthermore, there is no proven evidence to show the connection between watching media violence and committing crimes. (展開) 5. In conclusion, 我部分贊同這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)2022/8/62022/8/6有人認(rèn)為金錢是幸福的唯一來(lái)源1. 改寫+I disagree with this opinion and I b

33、elieve that 金錢滿足人們的需求，但幸福并不僅僅來(lái)源于財(cái)富2. I accept that there is such a strong connection between happiness and money. Being rich enough to afford whatever one desires must produce a great sense of satisfaction. Also, if one is financially able to help others out of trouble, he or she must be happy about

34、 what they can do to make this world a better place. 3. However, admitting the importance of money is not the same as assuming that it is the only factor contributing to being happy. As a matter of fact, the definition of happiness varies greatly from person to person. (展開) 4. In conclusion, 我不贊同這個(gè)觀

35、點(diǎn)2022/8/62022/8/6When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree2022/8/62022/8/6Many people think that money is the key consideration when deciding on a career. Personally, I disagree with the idea because I believe that other factors are

36、equally important. On the one hand, it is true that money is necessary for people to meet their basic needs. We all need money to pay for housing, food, bills, health care, and education so most of us consider it a priority to at least earn a salary that allows us to cover these needs and have a rea

37、sonable quality of life. If people chose their jobs based on enjoyment or other nonfinancial factors, they might find it difficult to support themselves. Artists and musicians, for instance, are known for choosing a career path that they love, but that does not always provide them with enough money

38、to live comfortably and raise a family. 2022/8/62022/8/6On the other hand, I believe that other considerations are just as important as what we earn in our jobs. Firstly, personal relationships and the atmosphere in a workplace are extremely important when choosing a job. Having a good manager or fr

39、iendly colleagues, for example, can make a huge difference to workers levels of happiness and general quality of life. Secondly, many peoples feelings of job satisfaction come from their professional achievements, the skills they learn, and the position they reach, rather than the money they earn. F

40、inally, some people choose a career because they want to help others and contribute something positive to society. In conclusion, while salaries certainly affect peoples choice of profession, I do not believe that money outweighs all other motivators. 2022/8/62022/8/6前方高能！2022/8/62022/8/6一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)弱，很多很多強(qiáng)！

41、2022/8/62022/8/6In many places today, children start primary school at around the age of six or seven. However, some people suggest that they should start to go to school at an earlier age. I totally agree with this idea. While some people think this may be damaging to a childs development, or to a

42、childs relationship with his or her parents, in fact I believe that there are many advantages to having school experience at a young age. Firstly, a child will learn to interact with a lot of different people and some children learn to communicate very early because if this. They are generally more

43、confident and independent than children who stay at home with their parents and who are not used to strangers or new situations. Such children find their first day at school at the age of six very frightening and this may have a negative effect on how they learn. 2022/8/62022/8/6Another advantage of

44、 going to school at an early age is that children develop faster socially. They make friends and learn how to get on with other children of a similar age. This is often not possible at home because they are the only child, or because their brothers or sisters are older or younger. So overall, I beli

45、eve that attending school from a young age is good for most children, they still spend plenty of time at home with their parents, so they can benefit from both environments. 2022/8/62022/8/6練習(xí)題目Some people think that students should not be required to learn a foreign language at school if they have no talent in language. 2022/8/62022/8/62022/8/6是否贊同的介紹段最單純地?fù)Q詞改寫1). Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged m