《傲慢與偏見》與《簡愛》中女主角的性格分析

AThesisSubmittedinPartialFulfillmentoftheRequirementsfortheDegreeofBachelorofArtse].3.2.TheDifferenceoftheCharacter3.2.1.TheDifferenceoftheFamilyBackgroundJaneEyre,shealwaysthoughtthatsheisprettyflat,lowstatus,poor,insignificant,onlywithadull,austerelife,likewildflowersandweeds,noonetoclimb,tofendforthemselves.Buttheflamesoflovebetweenherandhermaster.Atfirstsheburiedlovedeepinherheart.Intea,lunchandeveningwalk,sheasfaraspossible,calm,butwhenalone,sheopenedthegateofmemory,theygetalongwiththesceneofaclearreappearance,intoxicatedinthedeephappiness.ShetriedmanytimestotestthemarriageofMr.RochesterandMissIngram,andMr.RochesterpretendedtobeintimatewithMissIngram.Theytesteachotherandexamineeachother,infact,theyhavealreadyinthesoultogether.Mr.Rochester'sunforgettableloveforJane,"Isometimeshaveastrangefeelingforyou-especially,likenow,whenyoucomenearme,somewhereundermyleftrib,thereseemstobeachordwithasimilarstringinthesameplaceasyourlittlebody,anditistightlyclosedandcannotbesolved.Ifthechoppystraitsand200ofmilesoflandhaveseparatedusfar,atthattime,myheartwouldbleedtothewomanwhopleasesmeonlybyappearances,whenIfindthattheyhaveneithersoulnorconscience-whentheyshowmemediocrity,superficiality,andperhapslowenergy,vulgarity,anddryness,Iamatotaldemon.ButIamalwaysgentleandfaithfultoBrighteyes,eloquenttongues,thesouloffire,andthegentleandsteady,docileandsteadfastcharacterthatcanbendandnotbebroken.T3.2.2.TheDifferenceoftheCulturalLevelhewordstouchedbothJaneandthereader.Butjustwhentwopeopleareabouttogetmarried,anunexpectedthinghappenedsuddenly,becauseJaneEyrelearnedthatRochesteractuallyhadawife-eventhoughthewifeisamadman,hasbeenRochesterhidingatThornfieldformanyyears.JaneEyrefinallydecidedtoleaveRochester,tofindtherealhappinessoftheirown.ShecametoSwampHillunderafortuitouscoincidence,revealingDiana,MaryandSt.John.Finallyshefoundthatthethreewerehercousins,heraunt'schildren,JaneEyre,whohadinheritedheruncle'sinheritanceandbecamerich.ButshefinallydecidedtogobacktoRochester.Butaftershehadgone,ThornfieldHallwasburnttoashesbyRochester'smadwife.WhenJaneEyrefoundRochester,hewasblind,butthetwoeventuallylivedtogetherandhadhappiness.3.2.3.TheDifferenceoftheLifeExperienceFewpeoplewillbelikeJaneforloveforthepersonalityofabandonall,andnohesitation.JustlikeElizabeth,shewillrefuseDarcyforavarietyofreasons,andJaneEyreshowsusisakindofsimplification,isakindofreturntosimplicity,isapursuitofthehearttopaythefeeling,isaButherofthesimplefeelings,itislikeaglassoficewater,purifytheheartsofeveryreader,butalsoarousethereaders,especiallythefemalereadersresonate.4.ConclusionWiththereformandopening-upofChinaandthecontinuouscollisionoftheworldeconomy,thecommunicationbetweenculturesisbecomingmoreandmoreclose.Withtheimprovementofeconomiclevel,peoplehavebecomemoreandmorehighdemandforlife,moreandmorepeopleurgentlyneedtoenterthespiritualneedsfrommaterialneeds.People'sdemandforliteraryworksextendsfromdomestictoabroad."PrideandPrejudice"and"JaneEyre"aretheworld'sclassicclassics,writersareJaneAustenandCharlotteBronte,arewell-knownBritishfemalewriters,theirworkshavebeenwidelycirculatedbylatergenerations,isavaluableassetinworldliterature,influencedbythelifetime,Mostoftheirworksarerelatedtotheemancipationofwomen,sowomenhavemanysimilaritiesintheirwritings,"PrideandPrejudice"inElizabethandJaneEyreinthetwoworksoftheclassicimage,theyhavetheirownideasaboutmoney,marriage,atthesametimetherearesimilaritiesanddifferencesinpersonality,Therefore,thestudyofthissubjectpaysattentiontothecomparativeanalysisbetweentheircharacters.Fromthepointofviewofreality,ElizabethBennetandJaneEyrereflectthesocialreality,femininestatusandfeminineconsciousnessoftheirtimesinsomeextent.Throughcomparisonandanalysisoftheirpersonalsplendor,whetheritisElizabethorJaneEyre,theirlifeprocessreflectsdifferentviewsofloveandfemaleconsciousness,Ithinkthatsuchtwodifferentconceptsandconsciousnessareworthyofourcontemporarypeopletoin-depthanalysis.Byanalyzingthem,wecanthinkofourownviewofloveandvalues.Bibliography[1]袁學敏.論女性自我救贖意識之覺醒——從《再生緣》到《傲慢與偏見》[J].攀枝花學院學報，2017，34（04）：47-53.[2]劉亞超.邊緣到中心——從《茶花女》、《簡愛》、《傲慢與偏見》看女權主義的發(fā)展[J].齊齊哈爾師范高等?？茖W校學報，2016（04）：25-27.[3]王彤.淺析簡?奧斯汀的《傲慢與偏見》[J].生物技術世界，2015（05）：163.[4]鐘瑜寧，張申艷.女性主義視角下的《簡愛》和《傲慢與偏見》[J].語文建設，2014（21）：60-61.[5]沈娟.從人物語言風格論電影《傲慢與偏見》[J].電影文學，2014（10）：80-81.[6]鮑丙琴.平行研究在比較紅學中的方法論意義[J].河南教育學院學報（哲學社會科學版），2013，32（06）：6-10.[7]周淑茹.論《傲慢與偏見》中的女性意識——從伊麗莎白拒婚談起[J].名作欣賞，2013（33）：73-75.[8]李素芬.從女性主義角度分析《簡?愛》對《傲慢與偏見》的超越[J].名作欣賞，2013（27）：43-44.[9]張越.論《傲慢與偏見》與《簡?愛》中的紳士形象[J].南昌教育學院學報，2013，28（07）：25-26.[10]程永艷，湯建民.科學計量學視野下的《傲慢與偏見》研究——一個案例性的探究[J].浙江科技學院學報，2013，25（02）：81-87.[11]鄭奎娥.解讀簡?奧斯丁《傲慢與偏見》婚戀觀思想的應有視角[J].才智，2013（08）：232.[12]賴慈蕓.埋名異鄉(xiāng)五十載——大陸譯作在臺灣[J].東方翻譯，2013（01）：49-58.[13]魏庭圓.《簡?愛》與《傲慢與偏見》中兩個叛逆角色之比較[J].群文天地，2012（24）：60.[14]吳穎，廖紅燕.論英語頭韻修辭的特點及翻譯——以《傲慢與偏見》為例[J].湖北第二師范學院學報，2012，29（11）：114-116+120.[15]劉云靜.18—19世紀英國女性意識的覺醒及其邊緣化特性——以奧斯汀的《傲慢與偏見》為例[J].山西師大學報（社會科學版），2012，39（04）：133-135.[16]高玉秋.居住空間的意象蘊含——《傲慢與偏見》和《簡?愛》的相關語境[J].外國問題研究，2012（02）：75-78.[17]韓欣華.《傲慢與偏見》，從小說到電影[J].電影文學，2012（11）：72-73.[18]陳惠君.論女性主義的彰顯與不足——兼評《傲慢與偏見》、《簡愛》、《德伯家的苔絲》[J].湖北經濟學院學報（人文社會科學版），2012，9（04）：117-118.[19]張霞，周盛.女性意識的發(fā)展和超越——再讀《傲慢與偏見》和《簡?愛》[J].長春理工大學學報（社會科學版），2012，25（02）：85-86.[20]劉潔，田建國.簡?奧斯丁與夏?勃朗特的女性主義比較研究以《傲慢與偏見》和《簡?愛》為例[J].西北工業(yè)大學學報（社會科學版），2011，31（03）：35-39.[21]Brownstein,RachelM.1994.IronyandAuthority:NewCasebooksSenseandSensibilityandPrideandPrejudice.NewYork:St.Martin'sPress,Inc.[22]Copeland,Edward&McMaster,Juliet.2001.JaneAusten.Shanghai:ShanghaiForeignLanguageEducationPress.[23]Davis,Philip.2007.TheIrctorians.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandReseaxchPress.[24]Deborah,L.Madsen.2006.FeministTheoryandLiteraryPractice.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress.[25]Gang,Zhu.2001.TwentiethCenturyWesternCriticalTheories.Shanghai:ShanghaiForeignLanguageEducationPress.[26]Gilbert,Sandra.2000.CriticalConditio