版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
CENTERfor
GLOBALTAXPOLICY
TenthEdition
International
TaxCompetitivenessIndex2023
TableofContents
Introduction1
TheInternationalTaxCompetitivenessIndex1
2023Rankings2
Table1.TheInternationalTaxCompetitivenessIndex
3
NotableChangesfromLastYear4
Table2.ChangesfromLastYear
5
MethodologicalChanges6
CorporateTax6
IndividualTaxes6
CorporateIncomeTax7
CombinedTopMarginalCorporateIncomeTaxRate7
CostRecovery7
Table3.
CorporateTaxes8
TaxIncentivesandComplexity11
IndividualTaxes14
Table4.
IndividualTaxes15
TaxesonOrdinaryIncome16
Complexity18
CapitalGainsandDividendsTaxes18
ConsumptionTaxes20
ConsumptionTaxRate20
Table5.
ConsumptionTaxes21
ConsumptionTaxBase22
PropertyTaxes23
RealPropertyTaxes23
Table6.
PropertyTaxes24
WealthandEstateTaxes26
Capital,Wealth,andPropertyTaxesonBusinesses27
Cross-BorderTaxRules28
Table7.
Cross-BorderRules29
Territoriality30
WithholdingTaxes32
TaxTreatyNetwork33
Anti-AvoidanceRules33
CountryProfiles
36
Methodology5
6
TheCalculationoftheVariable,Subcategory,Category,andFinalScore5
6
CalculatingSubcategoryScores
57
CalculatingCategoryScores
57
CalculatingFinalScores
57
DistributionoftheFinalScores5
8
DataSources5
9
Appendix
60
AppendixTableA.CorporateTaxes
60
AppendixTableB.IncomeTaxes
62
AppendixTableC.ConsumptionTaxes
63
AppendixTableD.PropertyTaxes
64
AppendixTableE.Cross-BorderTaxRules
66
TAXFOUNDATION|1
Introduction
Thestructureofacountry’staxcodeisadeterminingfactorofitseconomicperformance.A
well-structuredtaxcodeiseasyfortaxpayerstocomplywithandcanpromoteeconomicdevelopmentwhileraisingsufficientrevenueforagovernment’spriorities.Incontrast,poorlystructuredtaxsystemscanbecostly,distorteconomicdecision-making,andharmdomesticeconomies.
Manycountrieshaverecognizedthisandhavereformedtheirtaxcodes.Overthepastfewdecades,marginaltaxratesoncorporateandindividualincomehavedeclinedsignificantlyacrosstheOrganisa-tionforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD).Now,mostOECDnationsraiseasignificantamountofrevenuefrombroad-basedtaxessuchaspayrolltaxesandvalue-addedtaxes(VAT).1
NotallrecentchangesintaxpolicyamongOECDcountrieshaveimprovedthestructureoftaxsys-
tems;somehavemadeanegativeimpact.ThoughsomecountriesliketheUnitedStatesandFrancehavereducedtheircorporateincometaxratesbyseveralpercentagepoints,others,likeColombia,
haveincreasedthem.CorporatetaxbaseimprovementshaveoccurredinPortugal,whilethecorporatetaxbasehasbeenmadelesscompetitiveinBelgium.TheUnitedStates,theUnitedKingdom,andChilearephasingouttemporaryimprovementstotheircorporatetaxbases.
TheCOVID-19pandemichasledmanycountriestoadopttemporarychangestotheirtaxsystems.
Facedwithrevenueshortfallsfromthedownturn,countrieswillneedtoconsiderhowtobeststructuretheirtaxsystemstofosterbothaneconomicrecoveryandraiserevenue.
ThevarietyofapproachestotaxationamongOECDcountriescreatesaneedtoevaluatethesesys-
temsrelativetoeachother.Forthatpurpose,wehavedevelopedtheInternationalTaxCompetitivenessIndex—arelativecomparisonofOECDcountries’taxsystemswithrespecttocompetitivenessand
neutrality.
TheInternationalTaxCompetitivenessIndex
TheInternationalTaxCompetitivenessIndex(ITCI)seekstomeasuretheextenttowhichacountry’staxsystemadherestotwoimportantaspectsoftaxpolicy:competitivenessandneutrality.
Acompetitivetaxcodeisonethatkeepsmarginaltaxrateslow.Intoday’sglobalizedworld,capitalishighlymobile.Businessescanchoosetoinvestinanynumberofcountriesthroughouttheworldtofindthehighestrateofreturn.Thismeansthatbusinesseswilllookforcountrieswithlowertaxratesoninvestmenttomaximizetheirafter-taxrateofreturn.Ifacountry’staxrateistoohigh,itwilldriveinvestmentelsewhere,leadingtoslowereconomicgrowth.Inaddition,highmarginaltaxratescan
impededomesticinvestmentandleadtotaxavoidance.
AccordingtoresearchfromtheOECD,corporatetaxesaremostharmfulforeconomicgrowth,with
personalincometaxesandconsumptiontaxesbeinglessharmful.Taxesonimmovablepropertyhavethesmallestimpactongrowth.2
1DanielBunnandCeciliaPerezWeigel,“SourcesofGovernmentRevenueintheOECD,”TaxFoundation,Feb.23,2023,
hhttttppss::////ttaaxxffoouunnddaattiioonn..oorrgg//ppuubblliiccaattiioonnss//
ssoouurrcceess--ooff--ggoovveerrnnmmeenntt--rreevveennuuee--iinn--tthhee--ooeeccdd//
.
2OrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD),“TaxandEconomicGrowth,”EconomicsDepartmentWorkingPaperNo.620,July11,2008.
2|INTERNATIONALTAXCOMPETITIVENESSINDEX
Separately,aneutraltaxcodeissimplyonethatseekstoraisethemostrevenuewiththefewesteco-nomicdistortions.Thismeansthatitdoesn’tfavorconsumptionoversaving,ashappenswithinvest-menttaxesandwealthtaxes.Italsomeansfewornotargetedtaxbreaksforspecificactivitiescarriedoutbybusinessesorindividuals.
Astaxlawsbecomemorecomplex,theyalsobecomelessneutral.If,intheory,thesametaxesapplytoallbusinessesandindividuals,buttherulesaresuchthatlargebusinessesorwealthyindividualscanchangetheirbehaviortogainataxadvantage,thisunderminestheneutralityofataxsystem.
Ataxcodethatiscompetitiveandneutralpromotessustainableeconomicgrowthandinvestmentwhileraisingsufficientrevenueforgovernmentpriorities.
Therearemanyfactorsunrelatedtotaxeswhichaffectacountry’seconomicperformance.Neverthe-less,taxesplayanimportantroleinthehealthofacountry’seconomy.
Tomeasurewhetheracountry’staxsystemisneutralandcompetitive,theITCIlooksatmorethan40taxpolicyvariables.Thesevariablesmeasurenotonlytheleveloftaxrates,butalsohowtaxesare
structured.TheIndexlooksatacountry’scorporatetaxes,individualincometaxes,consumptiontaxes,propertytaxes,andthetreatmentofprofitsearnedoverseas.TheITCIgivesacomprehensiveoverviewofhowdevelopedcountries’taxcodescompare,explainswhycertaintaxcodesstandoutasgoodorbadmodelsforreform,andprovidesimportantinsightintohowtothinkabouttaxpolicy.
Duetosomedatalimitations,recenttaxchangesinsomecountriesmaynotbereflectedinthisyear’sversionoftheInternationalTaxCompetitivenessIndex.
2023Rankings
Forthe10thyearinarow,EstoniahasthebesttaxcodeintheOECD.Itstopscoreisdrivenbyfour
positivefeaturesofitstaxsystem.First,ithasa20percenttaxrateoncorporateincomethatisonlyappliedtodistributedprofits.Second,ithasaflat20percenttaxonindividualincomethatdoesnotapplytopersonaldividendincome.Third,itspropertytaxappliesonlytothevalueofland,ratherthantothevalueofrealpropertyorcapital.Finally,ithasaterritorialtaxsystemthatexempts100percentofforeignprofitsearnedbydomesticcorporationsfromdomestictaxation,withfewrestrictions.
WhileEstonia’staxsystemisthemostcompetitiveintheOECD,theothertopcountries’taxsystems
receivehighscoresduetoexcellenceinoneormoreofthemajortaxcategories.Latvia,whichrecentlyadoptedtheEstoniansystemforcorporatetaxation,alsohasarelativelyefficientsystemfortaxing
laborincome.NewZealandhasarelativelyflat,low-rateindividualincometaxthatalsolargelyex-
emptscapitalgains(withacombinedtoprateof39percent),abroad-basedVAT,andleviesnotaxesoninheritance,propertytransfers,assets,orfinancialtransactions.Switzerlandhasarelativelylowcorporatetaxrate(19.7percent),alow,broad-basedconsumptiontax,andanindividualincometaxthatpartiallyexemptscapitalgainsfromtaxation.Luxembourghasabroad-basedconsumptiontaxandacompetitiveinternationaltaxsystem.
TAXFOUNDATION|3
Table1.2023InternationalTaxCompetitivenessIndexRankings
Country
OverallRank
OverallScore
CorporateTaxRank
IndividualTaxesRank
ConsumptionTaxesRank
PropertyTaxesRank
Cross-BorderTaxRulesRank
Estonia
1
100.0
2
1
15
1
11
Latvia
2
88.5
1
3
27
5
9
NewZealand
3
86.1
29
5
1
8
19
Switzerland
4
84.7
10
9
3
36
1
CzechRepublic
5
81.2
6
4
25
6
10
Luxembourg
6
78.9
23
21
7
14
5
Turkey
7
78.6
11
7
13
22
7
Israel
8
78.3
13
23
11
11
8
Lithuania
9
76.6
3
10
30
7
22
Australia
10
75.9
32
14
9
4
21
Hungary
11
75.0
4
6
38
23
3
SlovakRepublic
12
74.3
18
2
29
3
30
Sweden
13
73.3
8
20
21
10
13
Netherlands
14
70.6
25
19
16
21
4
Canada
15
69.8
24
24
8
25
15
Slovenia
16
66.6
7
13
31
24
18
Norway
17
66.6
14
27
23
15
12
Germany
18
66.6
31
35
14
12
6
Finland
19
66.5
9
25
24
19
20
Austria
20
65.3
20
30
17
16
16
UnitedStates
21
65.0
22
22
4
29
35
CostaRica
22
64.8
36
33
5
9
31
Korea
23
61.6
26
37
2
32
26
Japan
24
61.5
30
34
6
26
25
Greece
25
61.4
19
8
33
28
23
Mexico
26
60.1
27
28
12
2
38
Belgium
27
60.0
15
11
22
30
33
Ireland
28
58.9
5
31
34
17
34
Denmark
29
58.5
17
36
20
18
29
UnitedKingdom
30
56.1
28
26
35
35
2
Spain
31
55.8
33
17
19
37
17
Iceland
32
55.5
12
18
28
34
32
Poland
33
55.3
16
12
36
31
27
Portugal
34
52.1
37
29
26
20
28
Chile
35
50.5
35
38
10
13
37
France
36
49.1
34
32
32
33
14
Italy
37
48.4
21
16
37
38
24
Colombia3846.43815182736
4|INTERNATIONALTAXCOMPETITIVENESSINDEX
ColombiahastheleastcompetitivetaxsystemintheOECD.Ithasanetwealthtax,afinancialtransac-tiontax,andthehighestcorporateincometaxrateof35percent.Colombia’sVATcoverslessthan40percentoffinalconsumption,revealingbothpolicyandenforcementgaps.
Italyhasthesecond-leastcompetitivetaxsystemintheOECD.Ithasmultipledistortionarypropertytaxeswithseparateleviesonrealestatetransfers,estates,andfinancialtransactions,aswellasa
wealthtaxonselectedassets.Italy’srelativelyhighVATrateof22percentappliestothefifth-narrow-estconsumptiontaxbaseintheOECD.
CountriesthatrankpoorlyontheITCIoftenlevyrelativelyhighmarginaltaxratesoncorporateincomeorhavemultiplelayersoftaxrulesthatcontributetocomplexity.Thefivecountriesatthebottomoftherankingsallhavehigherthanaveragecombinedcorporatetaxrates.Irelandrankspoorlyonthe
ITCIdespiteitslowcorporatetaxrate.ThisisduetohighpersonalincomeanddividendtaxesandarelativelynarrowVATbase.Thefivelowest-rankingcountrieshaveunusuallyhighcorporateincome
taxrates,between25.825and35percent.Fouroutofthefivelowest-rankingcountrieshaveunusuallyhightopincometaxthresholds,at13to21timestheaverageincome.
NotableChangesfromLastYear3
Australia
Australiaintroducedapatentboxin2022.Aus-tralia’srankdecreasedfrom6thto10th.
Belgium
Belgiumlimitedcarryforwardsoflossesfrom
70percentto40percentofthetaxableamountexceedingEUR1millionin2023.Italsostrength-eneditscontrolledforeigncompany(CFC)rules.Belgium’srankdecreasedfrom22ndto27th.
Chile
Chilephasedouttemporaryfullexpensingfor
machinery,industrialbuildings,andintangible
assetsin2023.ItalsobroadeneditsVATbasein2022byeliminatingexemptions.Chile’srankfellfrom31stto35th.
France
Francehasbeenreducingitscorporateincometaxrateoverseveralyears,aprocesswhichcon-cludedin2022.Aspartofthisscheduledreduc-tion,Francedroppeditscombinedcorporaterate(includingasurtax)from28.41percentin2021to25.83percentin2022.ItsIndexrankremainedunchangedat36th.
Portugal
Priorto2023,companiescouldcarryforward
lossesofupto70percentoftaxableincomeforupto12years.Portugalnowallowsunlimitedcarryforwardsofupto65percentoftaxable
income.Portugal’srankrosefrom35thto34th.
Turkey
Turkeyreduceditscorporatetaxratefrom23percentin2022to20percentin2023.Turkey’srankrosefrom10thto7th.
3Lastyear’sscorespublishedinthisreportcandifferfrompreviouslypublishedrankingsduetobothmethodologicalchangesandcorrectionsmadetoprevi-ousyears’data.
TAXFOUNDATION|5
Table2.ChangesfromLastYear
Country
2022Rank
2022
Score
2023
Rank
2023
Score
ChangeinRankfrom2022to2023
ChangeinScorefrom2022to2023
Australia
6
78.6
10
75.9
-4
-2.7
Austria
17
67.4
20
65.3
-3
-2.0
Belgium
22
64.4
27
60.0
-5
-4.5
Canada
15
70.0
15
69.8
0
-0.2
Chile
31
57.6
35
50.5
-4
-7.1
Colombia
38
47.3
38
46.4
0
-0.9
CostaRica
23
63.5
22
64.8
1
1.3
CzechRepublic
5
81.8
5
81.2
0
-0.6
Denmark
29
58.5
29
58.5
0
0.0
Estonia
1
100.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
Finland
18
67.1
19
66.5
-1
-0.5
France
36
48.1
36
49.1
0
1.0
Germany
20
66.4
18
66.6
2
0.2
Greece
25
62.9
25
61.4
0
-1.5
Hungary
11
75.5
11
75.0
0
-0.5
Iceland
34
55.1
32
55.5
2
0.4
Ireland
30
58.2
28
58.9
2
0.7
Israel
8
78.0
8
78.3
0
0.3
Italy
37
47.4
37
48.4
0
1.0
Japan
26
62.8
24
61.5
2
-1.3
Korea
24
63.3
23
61.6
1
-1.7
Latvia
2
89.7
2
88.5
0
-1.2
Lithuania
9
76.7
9
76.6
0
-0.1
Luxembourg
7
78.2
6
78.9
1
0.7
Mexico
28
60.9
26
60.1
2
-0.7
Netherlands
14
71.0
14
70.6
0
-0.4
NewZealand
3
87.8
3
86.1
0
-1.7
Norway
16
68.5
17
66.6
-1
-1.9
Poland
33
55.3
33
55.3
0
0.0
Portugal
35
51.3
34
52.1
1
0.8
SlovakRepublic
12
73.9
12
74.3
0
0.4
Slovenia
19
66.7
16
66.6
3
0.0
Spain
32
56.5
31
55.8
1
-0.7
Sweden
13
73.7
13
73.3
0
-0.5
Switzerland
4
85.3
4
84.7
0
-0.6
Turkey
10
75.7
7
78.6
3
2.9
UnitedKingdom
27
61.7
30
56.1
-3
-5.6
UnitedStates2166.02165.00-1.0
6|INTERNATIONALTAXCOMPETITIVENESSINDEX
UnitedKingdomUnitedStates
TheUKphasedoutits130percentsuper-deduc-tionforplantsandequipmentintofullexpensing.Italsoincreasedthemaincorporateratefrom19percentin2022to25percentin2023,whilekeep-inga19percentreducedrateforsmallandmedi-um-sizedcompanies.TheUK’srankingdroppedfrom27thto30th.
TheU.S.phasedoutfullexpensingforplantsandequipment.Italsodecreaseditsimplicitresearchanddevelopment(R&D)subsidyratefrom6.75percentto2.75percentbecauseR&Dcostscannolongerbeexpensed.TheR&DsubsidyratefortheU.S.isthelowestvalueintheOECD.TheU.S.rankremainedat21st.
MethodologicalChanges
Eachyear,wereviewtheIndex’sdataandmethodologytoimprovehowitmeasuresbothcompetitive-nessandneutrality.Thisyear,wehavechangedthewaytheIndextreatscorporatetaxesandindividualtaxes.
Wehaveappliedeachchangetoprioryearstoallowconsistentcomparisonacrossyears.Datafor
allyearsusingthecurrentmethodologyisaccessibleintheGitHubrepositoryfortheIndex,4anda
descriptionofhowtheIndexiscalculatedisprovidedintheAppendixofthisreport.PrioreditionsoftheIndex,however,arenotcomparabletotheresultsinthis2023editionduetothesemethodologicalchanges.
CorporateTax
Thesurtaxratesoncorporateincomehavebeenreplacedbydummiesindicatingtheexistenceofsur-taxesoncorporateincome.Thesurtaxrateisintegratedintothecombinedcorporateincometaxrate.Previously,includingsurtaxrateschallengedinterpretationsincemanysurtaxeswereonlyleviedonashareofthecorporateincome.
IndividualTaxes
Thesurtaxrateonpersonalincomehasbeenreplacedbyadummyvariableindicatingtheexistenceofsurtaxesonpersonalincome.Thesurtaxrateisincludedinthecombinedtoppersonalincometaxrate,ifapplicable.
Duringtheproductionofthisyear’sreport,theOECDtableonTopPersonalIncomeTaxRates(TableI.7)wastemporarilydisabledduetoerrorsinthedata.Wetookapreviousversionofthattableandmademanualcorrectionsusingothersources.Socialsecuritytaxesareincludedwhenthesearen’tphasedoutbeforethetopthresholdorthecombinedrateishigherthanthetoprate.
4TaxFoundation,“InternationalTaxCompetitivenessIndex,”
hhttttppss::////ggiitthhuubb..ccoomm//TTaaxxFFoouunnddaattiioonn//iinntteerrnnaattiioonnaall--ttaaxx--ccoommppeettiittiivveenneessss--iinnddeexx
.
TAXFOUNDATION|7
CorporateIncomeTax
Thecorporateincometaxisadirecttaxontheprofitsofacorporation.AllOECDcountrieslevyataxoncorporateprofits,butthetaxratesandbasesvarysignificantlyacrosscountries.Corporateincometaxesreducetheafter-taxrateofreturnoncorporateinvestment.Thisincreasesthecostofcapital,
whichleadstolowerlevelsofinvestmentandeconomicoutput.Additionally,thecorporatetaxcanleadtolowerwagesforworkers,lowerreturnsforinvestors,andhigherpricesforconsumers.
Althoughthecorporateincometaxhasarelativelysignificantimpactonacountry’seconomy,itraisesarelativelylowamountoftaxrevenueformostgovernments—theOECDaveragewas9.8percentoftotalrevenuesin2021.5
TheITCIbreaksthecorporateincometaxcategoryintothreesubcategories.Table3displayseachcountry’sCorporateIncomeTaxcategoryrankandscorealongwiththeranksandscoresofthesub-categories,namely,thecorporaterate,costrecovery,andincentivesandcomplexity.
CombinedTopMarginalCorporateIncomeTaxRate
Thetopmarginalcorporateincometaxratemeasurestherateatwhicheachadditionaldollaroftax-ableprofitistaxed.Highmarginalcorporatetaxratestendtodiscouragecapitalformationandthussloweconomicgrowth.6CountrieswithhighertopmarginalcorporateincometaxratesthantheOECDaveragereceivelowerscoresthanthosewithlower,morecompetitiverates.
Colombialeviesthehighesttopcombinedcorporateincometaxrate,at35percent,followedbyPor-tugal(31.5percent)andAustralia,CostaRica,andMexico(allat30percent).ThelowesttopmarginalcorporateincometaxrateintheOECDisfoundinHungary,at9percent,followedbyIreland(12.5per-cent)andLithuania(15percent).TheOECDaveragecombinedcorporateincometaxrateis23.6
percentfor2023.7
CostRecovery
Businessprofitsaregenerallydeterminedasrevenue(whatabusinessmakesinsales)minuscosts(thecostofdoingbusiness).Thecorporateincometaxisintendedtobeataxontheseprofits.Thus,itisimportantthatataxcodeproperlydefineswhatconstitutestaxableincome.Ifataxcodedoesnotallowbusinessestoaccountforallthecostsofdoingbusiness,itwillinflateabusiness’taxableincomeandthusitstaxbill.Thisincreasesthecostofcapital,leadingtoslowerinvestmentandeco-nomicgrowth.
5
6
7
DanielBunnandCeciliaPerezWeigel,“SourcesofGovernmentRevenueintheOECD.”
OECD,“TaxPolicyReformandEconomicGrowth,”O(jiān)ECDTaxPolicyStudies,No.20,Nov.3,2010,
hhttttppss::////ooeeccdd..oorrgg//ccttpp//ttaaxx--ppoolliiccyy//ttaaxx--ppoolliiccyy--rreeffoorrmm--aanndd--eeccoo--
nnoommiicc--ggrroowwtthh--99778899226644009911008855--eenn..hhttmm
.
OECD,“OECDTaxDatabase,TableII.1–Statutorycorporateincometaxrate,”updatedApril2023,
hhttttppss::////ssttaattss..ooeeccdd..oorrgg//iinnddeexx..aassppxx??DDaattaaSSeettCCooddee==TTaabbllee__IIII11
.
8|INTERNATIONALTAXCOMPETITIVENESSINDEX
Table3.CorporateTaxes
Country
OverallRank
Overall
Score
Rate
Rank
Rate
Score
Cost
Recovery
Rank
Cost
Recovery
Score
Incentives/
Complexity
Rank
Incentives/
Complexity
Score
Australia
32
48.4
34
33.0
18
45.9
22
72.4
Austria
20
62.6
19
52.1
7
55.0
25
67.3
Belgium
15
66.6
21
49.0
5
61.8
16
76.9
Canada
24
58.0
27
45.1
25
43.4
14
82.5
Chile
35
40.1
29
42.6
38
24.6
34
56.2
Colombia
38
31.7
38
17.1
35
34.7
28
65.7
CostaRica
36
39.2
34
33.0
37
29.4
29
65.5
CzechRepublic
6
75.6
4
68.1
23
44.7
6
91.7
Denmark
17
65.4
15
58.5
27
40.6
12
83.5
Estonia
2
98.6
8
64.9
1
100.0
3
95.3
Finland
9
74.2
8
64.9
28
40.3
2
99.8
France
34
46.3
26
46.3
12
49.4
38
34.0
Germany
31
50.9
33
33.2
8
50.8
18
73.2
Greece
19
64.2
15
58.5
34
35.5
11
86.8
Hungary
4
82.1
1
100.0
36
34.4
31
63.0
Iceland
12
67.2
8
64.9
21
45.0
24
70.4
Ireland
5
80.5
2
88.8
29
39.9
20
72.8
Israel
13
66.7
18
55.3
13
48.8
13
82.8
Italy
21
59.0
30
40.0
3
67.6
32
62.4
Japan
30
51.0
32
33.8
31
37.4
8
90.8
Korea
26
55.0
28
44.5
9
50.5
30
64.3
Latvia
1
100.0
8
64.9
1
100.0
1
100.0
Lithuania
3
84.3
3
80.9
4
64.6
26
66.6
Luxembourg
23
58.0
20
49.1
11
49.6
27
66.1
Mexico
27
53.5
34
33.0
26
42.3
5
93.7
Netherlands
25
57.6
25
46.4
16
47.1
17
73.6
NewZealand
29
52.5
31
39.4
33
35.5
10
87.2
Norway
14
66.6
15
58.5
30
38.8
9
89.9
Poland
16
66.0
4
68.1
14
48.4
35
55.7
Portugal
37
38.8
37
28.2
6
57.8
37
34.4
SlovakRepublic
18
65.1
14
61.7
22
44.7
23
70.5
Slovenia
7
75.4
4
68.1
24
44.6
7
91.2
Spain
33
48.3
21
49.0
32
37.2
36
52.2
Sweden
8
74.3
13
63.0
17
46.4
4
95.2
Switzerland
10
71.0
7
66.0
10
50.2
19
73.2
Turkey
11
69.2
8
64.9
15
48.1
21
72.5
UnitedKingdom
28
53.4
21
49.0
19
45.7
33
56.8
UnitedStates2258.42446.52045.5
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 課題申報(bào)參考:建構(gòu)自主知識(shí)體系視域下的檔案學(xué)術(shù)語革命研究
- 2025版委托擔(dān)保合同樣本:醫(yī)療器械注冊(cè)融資擔(dān)保協(xié)議6篇
- 2025版小學(xué)學(xué)生安全責(zé)任追究與保障協(xié)議15篇
- 二零二五版煤炭行業(yè)運(yùn)輸成本控制協(xié)議4篇
- 2025年貨運(yùn)從業(yè)資格證網(wǎng)上考核app
- 2025年度文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)合作合同4篇
- 個(gè)人住宅租賃合同模板(2024年修訂版)版B版
- 2025版?zhèn)€人小產(chǎn)權(quán)房屋買賣合同范本及操作指南4篇
- 2024物業(yè)公司提供住宅小區(qū)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)接入服務(wù)合同
- 2025版學(xué)校浴池?zé)崴?yīng)系統(tǒng)優(yōu)化承包合同3篇
- 南通市2025屆高三第一次調(diào)研測(cè)試(一模)地理試卷(含答案 )
- 2025年上海市閔行區(qū)中考數(shù)學(xué)一模試卷
- 2025中國人民保險(xiǎn)集團(tuán)校園招聘高頻重點(diǎn)提升(共500題)附帶答案詳解
- 重癥患者家屬溝通管理制度
- 法規(guī)解讀丨2024新版《突發(fā)事件應(yīng)對(duì)法》及其應(yīng)用案例
- IF鋼物理冶金原理與關(guān)鍵工藝技術(shù)1
- 小學(xué)二年級(jí)數(shù)學(xué)口算練習(xí)題1000道
- 化學(xué)-福建省龍巖市2024屆高三下學(xué)期三月教學(xué)質(zhì)量檢測(cè)(一模)試題和答案
- 凸優(yōu)化在經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與金融學(xué)中的應(yīng)用
- 家譜、宗譜頒譜慶典講話
- 高速公路收費(fèi)員培訓(xùn)課件
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論