版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
NBERWORKINGPAPERSERIES
THEEFFECTOFMEDICAIDEXPANSIONONTHETAKE-UPOFDISABILITYBENEFITSBYRACEANDETHNICITY
BeckyStaiger
MadelineS.Helfer
JessicaVanParys
WorkingPaper31557
/papers/w31557
NATIONALBUREAUOFECONOMICRESEARCH
1050MassachusettsAvenue
Cambridge,MA02138
August2023
WethankNicoleMaestasandLaraShore-Shepardforhelpfulcommentsandsuggestions.TheresearchreportedhereinwasperformedpursuanttograntRDR18000003fromtheUSSocialSecurityAdministration(SSA)fundedaspartoftheRetirementandDisabilityResearchConsortium.TheviewsexpressedhereinarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheSSA,anyagencyoftheFederalGovernment,ortheNationalBureauof
EconomicResearch.
NBERworkingpapersarecirculatedfordiscussionandcommentpurposes.Theyhavenotbeenpeer-reviewedorbeensubjecttothereviewbytheNBERBoardofDirectorsthataccompaniesofficialNBERpublications.
?2023byBeckyStaiger,MadelineS.Helfer,andJessicaVanParys.Allrightsreserved.Shortsectionsoftext,nottoexceedtwoparagraphs,maybequotedwithoutexplicitpermissionprovidedthatfullcredit,including?notice,isgiventothesource.
TheEffectofMedicaidExpansionontheTake-upofDisabilityBenefitsbyRaceandEthnicityBeckyStaiger,MadelineS.Helfer,andJessicaVanParys
NBERWorkingPaperNo.31557
August2023
JELNo.I13,I14,J15,J22
ABSTRACT
Publicdisabilityprogramsprovidefinancialsupportto12millionworking-ageindividualsperyear,thoughnotalleligibleindividualstakeuptheseprograms.MixedevidenceexistsregardingtheimpactofMedicaideligibilityexpansiononprogramtake-up,andevenlessisknownabouttherelationshipbetweenMedicaidexpansionandracialandethnicdisparitiesintake-up.Using2009-2020CurrentPopulationSurvey(CPS)data,wecomparechangesinSupplementalSecurityIncome(SSI)andSocialSecurityDisabilityInsurance(SSDI)take-upamongpeoplewithdisabilitieslivinginMedicaidexpansionstates,comparedtopeoplewithdisabilitieslivinginnon-expansionstates,beforeandafterMedicaidexpansion.Wefurtherexploreheterogeneitybyrace/ethnicity.WefindthatMedicaidexpansionreducedSSItake-upamongWhiteandHispanicrespondentsby10%and21%,respectively,andincreasedSSDItake-upamongWhiteandBlackrespondentsby9%and11%,respectively.WefurtherfindthatMedicaidexpansionreducedtheprobabilitythatdisabledrespondentshademployer-sponsoredhealthinsurancebyapproximately8%,aneffectprimarilyobservedamongBlackandother-racerespondents,suggestingthatexpansionreducedjob-lockamongtheSSDI-eligible,contributingtotheobservedincreaseinSSDItake-up.
BeckyStaiger
JessicaVanParys
DivisionofHealthPolicy
DepartmentofEconomics
andManagement
HunterCollege
SchoolofPublicHealth
695ParkAvenue,HW1534
UniversityofCalifornia,
NewYork,NY10065
Berkeley
andNBER
2121BerkeleyWay#5424
Berkeley,CA94720
jessica.vanparys@
bstaiger@
MadelineS.Helfer
1050MassachusettsAvenue
Cambridge,MA02138
mshelfer@
Adataappendixisavailableat/data-appendix/w31557
2
1Introduction
Approximately7.5%oftheworking-agepopulationintheUnitedStateshasaself-reporteddisability(
BureauofLaborStatistics
,
2022
).TheSocialSecurityAdministration(SSA)administerstwo?nancialassistanceprogramsforpeoplewithdisabilities.SupplementalSecurityIncome(SSI)actsasasafetynetof“l(fā)astresort”tolow-incomepeoplewithdisabilitieswhohavelimitedemploymenthistory,whileSocialSecurityDisabilityInsurance(SSDI)providesbene?tstopeoplewithdisabilitieswhohavesigni?cantpriorworkhistory(atleast?veofthelasttenyears)(
SocialSecurityAdministration
,
2022b
).Thesepaymentsrepresentasigni?cantsafetynetagainstextremepovertyforthispopulation.
1
Nearly29%oftheapproximately9.9millionSSDIrecipientsand25%oftheapproximately7.6millionSSIrecipientsderive90-100%oftheirpersonalincomefromSSDIorSSIbene?tpayments(
MesselandTrenkamp
,
2022
).Andyet,thereisevidencethatnotallindividualswhoareeligibleforSSIorSSDIenroll,ultimatelyleavingmoneyonthetable(
ElderandPowers
,
2004
).
Incompletetake-upofpublicprogramsisabroaderpolicypuzzle(
Currie
,
2004
).Amongawideportfolioofexistingworkseekingtoanswerthisquestion,somestudieshavedemonstratedthattake-upinonepublicprogramcanhavespillovere?ectsontake-upinanother(
HamandShore-Sheppard
,
2005
;
Schmidtetal.
,
2020
).Forexample,priorresearchhasdemonstratedthatMedicaidexpansiona?ectsoverallSSIandSSDItake-up,thoughresultsaremixed(
BurnsandDague
,
2017
;
ChatterjiandLi
,
2016
;
Maestasetal.
,
2014
;
Schmidtetal.
,
2020
;
Sonietal.
,
2017
).Somestudieshavedocumentedsmallbutsigni?cantdecreasesinSSIenrollmentfollowingtheA?ordableCareAct’s(ACA)Medicaidexpansion(
BurnsandDague
,
2017
;
Sonietal.
,
2017
),suggestingthatforsomeSSIenrolleeswhowishtoremainintheworkforce(andareunabletodosowhilereceivingSSI),becomingeligibleforMedicaidoutsideoftheSSIpathwaymayhavebeenamoreattractiveoption.OtherstudiesshownorelationshipbetweenMedicaidexpansionandSSIapplicationsorbene?treceipt(
ChatterjiandLi
,
2016
;
Schmidt
etal.
,
2020
).Likewise,somestudiesshowthatMedicaidexpansionincreasedSSDItake-upasmoreindividualsbecameeligibleforMedicaidcoverage(
Maestasetal.
,
2014
),whileotherstudies?ndno
1SupplementalSecurityIncome(SSI)providesanaveragemonthlystipendofapproximately$623.SocialSecurityDis-abilityInsurance(SSDI)providesaveragemonthlycashbene?tsofapproximately$1,358(
SocialSecurityAdministration
,
2022a
).
3
relationship(
Schmidtetal.
,
2020
).
Furthermore,verylittleresearchexploresdi?erencesinSSIandSSDItake-upbyraceorethnicity.Thisgapintheliteratureissigni?cantgiventhehigherratesofself-reporteddisabilityamongBlackindividualsrelativetonon-HispanicWhites(
Goodmanetal.
,
2017
),andtheubiquityofracialinequitiesinotherhealthdomains,includinglifeexpectancy(
CaseandDeaton
,
2021
;
Cullenetal.
,
2012
;
Dwyer-
Lindgrenetal.
,
2022
),underlyingchronichealthconditions(
AlexanderandCurrie
,
2017
;
Boustanand
Margo
,
2014
;
Hickenetal.
,
2014
;
McGuireandMiranda
,
2008
;
Moreno?etal.
,
2007
),andhealthcareaccess(
Brownetal.
,
2016
;
Dickmanetal.
,
2022
;
Johnstonetal.
,
2021
;
Mahajanetal.
,
2021
;
Shietal.
,
2014
).Muchofthisgapisduetoalackofdata,astheSSAstoppedcollectingraceinformationin2002(
Martin
,
2016
).Despitethislimitation,researchershaveusedsurveydatatoprovideevidencethatracial/ethnicminoritiesmakeupadisproportionateshareoftheSSIpopulation,withBlackandAmer-icanIndianandAlaskaNative(AIAN)AmericanstwiceaslikelytoenrollinSSIasWhiteindividuals(
MusumeciandOrgera
,
2021
).
ExistingresearchalsosuggeststhatBlack,Hispanic,andAIANrecipientsreporthigherlevelsofpovertyandsmallerbene?tpaymentsthannon-minorityrecipientsinSSIandSSDI,onaverage(
Hendley
andBilimoria
,
1999
;
Martin
,
2007
;
MartinandMurphy
,
2014
;
Smith-Kaprosyetal.
,
2012
;
Tamborini
etal.
,
2011
).Thoughrace/ethnicityisunlikelytobeacausaldeterminantofanyofthesedisparities,itcouldbeaproxyforsharedexperiencesandconditionsthatresultinsystematicallydistinctpatternsoftake-upandbene?treceipt(
HendleyandBilimoria
,
1999
;
Martin
,
2007
;
Smith-Kaprosyetal.
,
2012
).Afteradjustingforindividualcharacteristicssuchasincome,education,andgeography,racialdisparitiesintake-upmaypersist,andcouldre?ectabroadercontextofstructuralbiasandexclusionaryactionstowardsnon-whiteindividuals.Policiesthatexpandaccesstoothersafetynetprograms—suchasMedicaidexpansion—mayexacerbateormitigateracialandethnicdisparitiesindisabilityprogramreceipt(
Creedonetal.
,
2022
).
PrevailinghypothesesregardinghowMedicaidexpansiona?ectstake-upofSSIorSSDIamongeligi-bleindividualsoftenconsiderthefollowingtrade-o?sthatindividualsface.ToqualifyforSSIorSSDI,individualsmustmeetcertaindisabilitycriteriaandhaveearningsbelowasubstantialgainfulactivity(SGA)threshold.ExpandingincomethresholdsforMedicaideligibilityhastwodi?erenthypothetical
4
implicationsforSSIandSSDIparticipation.Forindividualswithdisabilitieswhoarenototherwiseeligibleforpublichealthinsuranceprograms,SSIreceipttriggersautomaticenrollmentintoMedicaidinmanystates,andthuscanactasapathwaytohealthinsurance(
SocialSecurityAdministration
,
2022b
).Therefore,MedicaidexpansioncouldtheoreticallyreduceSSItake-upamongpeoplewhocouldqualifyforMedicaidoutsideoftheSSIprogramandwhowouldpotentiallyprefertoremainintheworkforce.
Incontrast,SSDI-eligibleindividualsfaceadi?erenttrade-o?:forgohealthinsurancethroughtheiremployer(whichisoftenlinkedtofull-timeemployment)inordertomeettheSGAthresholdandbe(potentially)uninsuredforthetwo-yearperiodbetweenqualifyingforSSDIandobtainingMedicarecoverage;orcontinueworkingtomaintainemployersponsoredhealthinsurance,anexampleof“joblock”(
Maestasetal.
,
2014
).Inthesecases,MedicaidexpansioncouldincreaseSSDItake-upasaportionoftheeligiblepopulationwillqualifyforhealthinsuranceviaMedicaidduringtheirwaitingperiodforMedicare.Withrespecttothe“joblock”channel,theevidenceonhowMedicaidexpansiona?ectsemploymentismixed.
Halletal.
(
2017
)?ndthatMedicaidexpansionincreasedworkforceparticipationamongindividualswithdisabilitiesusingdatafromtheHealthReformMonitoringSurvey(
Halletal.
,
2017
),while
Ne’emanetal.
(
2022
)useCPSdataand?ndthatMedicaidexpansionhadnoe?ectontheemploymentstatusofindividualswithdisabilities.
Ourstudyhastwogoals.First,wequantifyracial/ethnicdisparitiesinSSI/SSDItake-uprates.Sec-ond,wedeterminewhetherexpandingaccesstoMedicaidcana?ectracial/ethnicdisparitiesinSSI/SSDItake-uprates.Weseekto?llthesegapsbyusingtheCurrentPopulationSurvey(CPS)from2009-2020,whichispurportedtoaccuratelyidentify84%(asopposedtotheAmericanCommunitySurveys’66%)oftheworking-ageSSIandSSDIrecipientsinthesurvey(
Burkhauseretal.
,
2014
).
Weuseadi?erence-in-di?erencesstrategytoestimatethecausale?ectofMedicaidexpansiononoverallSSIandSSDItake-up,aswellastake-upbyrace.We?ndthatSSItake-updecreasesforWhiteandHispanicrespondentswithdisabilities,whileSSDItake-upincreasesforWhiteandBlackrespondentswithdisabilitiesfollowingMedicaidexpansion.WeexplorethejoblockchannelbyshowingthatrespondentswithdisabilitiesarelesslikelytohavehealthinsurancethroughtheiremployerfollowingMedicaidexpansion,anindirectmeasureoflabormarketparticipationamongthelikelySSDI-eligiblerespondents.
5
Therestofthepaperproceedsasfollows.Section
2
discussesthedata.Section
3
introducesourempiricalstrategy.WepresentresultsinSection
4
,andconcludeinSection
5
.
2Data
TheCurrentPopulationSurvey(CPS)istheprimarydatasourceforlaborforcestatisticsintheUS,surveying60,000to90,000householdsannuallyvia?eldandtelephoneinterviews.Thesurveysamplesnon-institutionalizedindividualswhoare15yearsorolder,anditdoesnotoversampleminoritypopulations(incontrasttotheAmericanCommunitySurvey(ACS),whichisoftenusedinanalysesofdisabilityprogramtake-up).Eachobservationthusrepresentsahouseholdmemberofthesurveyedresidenceaged15orolder.WeusetheAnnualSocialandEconomicSupplement(ASEC)samplefrom2009to2020,whichincludes2,314,863respondent-years.SincetheASECasksaboutSSI,SSDI,andMedicaidenrollmentretrospectively(referringtothepreviouscalendaryear),welaggedsurveyyearsby1,andthusourstudyperiodis2008-2019.Weadditionallyrestrictedoursampletoworking-agerespondentsbetweentheagesof18and64yearsanddroppedrespondentswithahouseholdincomeabovethe90thpercentileofthesample.
Amongotherrespondentcharacteristics,theASECreportsraceandethnicity,householdincome,employment,earnings,SSIandSSDIparticipation,Medicaidenrollment,insurancestatus,andself-reporteddisability.Whiletherearemultiplequestionsaimedatassessingwhetherarespondenthasadisability,weseektoidentifyrespondentswhomostclosely?tthede?nitionofhavingadisabilityusedbytheSSAasqualifyingforSSIorSSDI.Speci?cally,theSSAde?nesqualifyingindividualsasthoseunable“toengageinanysubstantialgainfulactivitybecauseofamedicallydeterminablephysicalormentaldisability(ies)thatiseitherexpectedtoresultindeathorhaslastedorisexpectedtolastforacontinuousperiodofatleast12months”(
SocialSecurityAdministration
,
2023
).
Priorresearchsuggeststhatpreviousstrategiesusedtoidentifypeoplewithdisabilitieswhomaypotentiallybeeligiblefordisabilityprograms(suchasSSIandSSDI)mayhavebeeninsu?cient(
Burkhauseretal.
,
2014
).Forexample,onestudydemonstratesthatonly63.3%ofSSDIandSSIrecipientswerecorrectlyidenti?edintheCPSdatawhenusingacommon“six-questionsequence”ap-proach.Speci?cally,thisapproachcharacterizesindividualsashavingadisabilityiftheyrespondin
6
thea?rmativetoanyofsixquestions(6Q)intheCPSassessinghearing,vision,cognitive,ambulatory,self-care,andmobilitydi?culties(
forDiseaseControlandPrevention
,
2019
).However,combiningthissix-questionsequenceapproachwithanotherquestionregardingtherespondent’sabilitytowork(suchthattherespondentwillbecharacterizedashavingoneormoredisabilitywhenansweringa?rmativelytoanyofthesesevenquestions)hasbeenproposedasmoreappropriate.
2
Usingthisseven-questionsequencede?nition,wecharacterize158,078(11.38%)ofallworking-ageCPSrespondentsashavingoneormoredisability.Notably,thisisverysimilartothe11.6%identi?edinthepaperthatproposesthismethodology(
Burkhauseretal.
,
2014
).Inadditionalanalyses,weshowthatourresultsarerobusttousingonlythesix-questionsequencetoidentifytherelevantsample.
Respondentsreporttheirraceandethnicityasoneofsixcategories:White,Black,Asian,AmericanIndianorAlaskaNative(AIAN),Hispanic,orOther.WhilerespondentsintheCPScanreportmul-tipleracesandethnicities,wede?netheWhite,Black,Asian,AIAN,andHispanicraceidenti?ersforrespondentswhoidentifyastherespectiveracealone,andcapturerespondentswhoreportmultipleraceidentitiesintheOtherraceidenti?er.Allreportedracesarenon-Hispanicunlessotherwisespeci?ed.SSIreceiptisidenti?edforrespondentswhoreportSSIincomeinthepreviouscalendaryear,andwholisttheprimaryreasonforeligibilityasadisability.SSDIreceiptisidenti?edforrespondentswhoreportSocialSecurityincomeinthepreviouscalendaryearandlisttheprimaryreasonforeligibilityasadisability.Medicaidcoverageisidenti?edforrespondentswhoreportbeingcoveredbyMedicaidinthepreviouscalendaryear.Employer-basedhealthinsuranceisidenti?edforallrespondentswhoreportbeingthepolicyholderforemployer-sponsoredgrouphealthinsurancewithinthepastcalendaryear.Variablesforcurrentmaritalstatus,bachelor’seducation,homeownership,statepovertyrates,andresidenceinanon-metropolitanareaarealsoidenti?edfromthesample.
Ourstudycomparesdi?erentialchangesinSSIandSSDItake-upamongCPSrespondentsinstatesthatexpandedMedicaidin2014(“expansionstates”)tostatesthatneverexpandedMedicaid(“non-expansionstates”).Inoursample,wecharacterize26statesasexpandingin2014(Arkansas,California,
Colorado,Connecticut,Delaware,WashingtonD.C.,Hawaii,Illinois,Iowa,Kentucky,Maryland,Mas-
2Thisadditionalsurveyquestionisasfollows:“Atanytimeinthepreviousyear,didanyoneinthehouseholdhaveadisabilityorhealthproblemwhichpreventedthemfromworking,evenforashorttime,orwhichlimitedtheworktheycoulddo?”
7
sachusetts,Michigan,Minnesota,Nevada,NewHampshire,NewJersey,NewMexico,NewYork,NorthDakota,Ohio,Oregon,RhodeIsland,Vermont,Washington,WestVirginia)and17statesthatneverexpandedMedicaidduringourstudyperiod(Alabama,Florida,Georgia,Indiana,Kansas,Mississippi,Missouri,Nebraska,NorthCarolina,Oklahoma,SouthCarolina,SouthDakota,Tennessee,Texas,Utah,Wisconsin,Wyoming).WechecktherobustnessofourresultsagainsttheinclusionofthesixstatesthatexpandedMedicaidafter2014.Speci?cally,fourstatesexpandedin2015(Alaska,Arizona,In-diana,Pennsylvania),andtwostatesexpandedin2016(Louisiana,Montana).
3
Weprefertoexcludethesestatesfromthemainanalysistomaximizethepotentialpost-periodofourtreatmentgroup,andtohaveoneclearly-de?nedpreandpostperiod(relativeto2014)forbothexpansionandnever-expansionstates.
4
ThereareseveralkeyCPSdataqualityconcerns.First,whiletheCPSsurveysrespondentsfromall50USstatesandWashington,D.C.,largesamplingerrorsforsmallerstatesarepossible(
Martin
,
2016
).Inaddition,smallsamplesizesmayleadustoestimateresultswithlargestandarderrors.Second,somedataerrorshavebeenreportedforindividualsolderthan65(
Martin
,
2016
);however,wefocusexclusivelyonrespondentsaged18to64yearsold.Third,respondentsmayconfuseSSIandSSDIreceiptintheirresponse,orfailtoreportbene?ts,whichisalsoaconcernintheACS(
Martin
,
2016
).Fourth,CPSunder-reportsSSDIrecipientsandsigni?cantlyunder-reportsSSIrecipients,thoughthisissueexistsintheACSaswell,andtheACSdoesnotclarifywhatmakesrespondentseligibleforSSI/SSDI(
Martin
,
2016
).Wediscussunder-reportingimplicationsbelow.Despitetheselimitations,webelievethattheCPSisthebestavailabledatasetforthepurposesofourstudy.
3EmpiricalStrategy
We?rstcompareunadjustedratesofSSIandSSDItake-upacrossnon-expansionandexpansionstates,beforeandafterMedicaidexpansionin2014.Theunadjustedcomparisonoftake-uprates
providesadescriptiveoverviewthathelpscontextualizeouradjustedresults.Wethenformalizethese
3Twostates—VirginiaandMaine—expandedMedicaidin2019.However,wedonotincludethesestatesinouranalysisgiventheirinsu?cientpost-expansionperiod.
4Notethatduetothedatalagdescribedabove,datafromtheexpansionyear(i.e.year0inouranalysis)isobtainedfromthe2015survey.
8
comparisonsinadi?erence-in-di?erencesdesign:wecomparechangesintheprobabilitythatrespondentswithdisabilitiesreportreceivingMedicaid,SSI,and/orSSDIinexpansionstatescomparedtonon-expansionstates,beforeandafterexpansion.Speci?cally,weestimatethee?ectofMedicaidexpansionontheprobabilitythatY=1forrespondentilivinginstatesinyeartusingthefollowingmodel:
P(Yist=1)=β1{Expansion}s*{Post}t+?Xit+6s+6t+"ist(1)
where{Expansion}sisanindicatorthatthestateexpandedMedicaid;{Post}tisanindicatorforthepost-period(de?nedasyearsgreaterthanorequalto2014);Xitisavectorofrespondentcharacteristics(raceindicators,maritalstatus,homeownershipstatus,bachelor’sdegree,andnon-metropolitanresidency,andstatepovertyrate)thatmaybecorrelatedwithtake-up;and6sand6tarestateandyear?xede?ects,respectively,tocontrolforanyseculartrendsintake-up."ististheerrorterm,andweclusterstandarderrorsatthestatelevel.Wedroptheyearofexpansionsinceitisa“transitional”year,whereastatemayonlyhaveexpandedMedicaidaccessforpartoftheyear.SinceYistisbinary,weestimateEquation
1
asalinearprobabilitymodel.
β1isthecoe?cientofinterest;itrepresentsanestimateofhowMedicaidexpansiona?ectstheaverageprobabilityofMedicaid/SSI/SSDItake-up,dependingonmodel(Yist).Next,weestimateheterogeneoustreatmente?ectsbyrace/ethnicity.Speci?cally,weinteract{Expansion}s*{Post}twithindicatorvariablesforallracecategories:{White}i,{Black}i,{Hispanic}i,{Asian}i,{AIAN}i,{Other}i.Then,thetripleinteractiontermon{Expansion}s*{Post}t*{Black}i,forexample,canbeinterpretedasthee?ectofMedicaidexpansionontake-upamongBlackrespondentslivinginexpansionstates,relativetoBlackrespondentslivinginnon-expansionstates(withanalogousinterpretationsforeachrace).
Tobenchmarkthee?ectofMedicaidexpansionrelativetoexistingracialdisparitiesintake-upprobabilities,wereportthecoe?cientsassociatedwitheachraceindicator(omittingWhiteasthecomparisongroup).Forexample,thecoe?cienton{Black}icanbeinterpretedastheaveragetake-uprateofBlackrespondentsrelativetoWhiterespondents,intheabsenceofMedicaidexpansion.Comparingthesecoe?cientstothecoe?cientsonthetripleinteractiontermallowsustoevaluatewhetherMedicaidexpansionclosedorexacerbatedanyexistinggapsintake-upbetweenWhiteand
9
non-Whiterespondents.
Thevalidityofourempiricalapproachinidentifyingthecausale?ectofMedicaidexpansionontake-upreliesonanassumptionthat,but-fortheexpansion,take-uptrendsinexpansionandnon-expansionstateswouldhavebeensimilar.Whilethisisnotdirectlytestable,wecantestforthepresenceofdi?erentialtrendsintake-uppriortotheexpansion.Wedothisusinganeventstudyinwhicheventtimeismeasuredasyearsfrom2014.Weestimatethesamemodelasinourmaindi?erence-in-di?erencesspeci?cation,butweinteractindicatorsforyearsrelativeto2014withanindicatorforwhetherthestateexpandedMedicaid,andwithindicatorsforrespondentrace/ethnicity.Becauseoftherelativelysmallsamplesize,weexpectthismodeltogeneratelesspreciselyestimatedcoe?cients.However,anadditionaladvantageofthisapproachisthatitallowsustoevaluatewhetherMedicaidexpansion’se?ectsonSSI/SSDItake-upchangeinmagnitudeorsigni?canceovertime.
4Results
Table
1
reportsdi?erencesinthecharacteristicsofrespondentswithdisabilitiesinoursamplebe-tweenexpansionandnon-expansionstatesinthepre-expansionperiod.Ofthe30,138respondentsreportinginnon-expansionstatespriortoexpansion,16.6%receivedSSI,26.8%receivedSSDI,and32.1%wereenrolledinMedicaid.Ofthe49,007respondentsinexpansionstatesinthepre-expansionperiod,18.3%,23.5%,37.7%receivedSSI,SSDI,andMedicaidpriortotheexpansion,respectively.Whilenon-expansionandexpansionstatesreportsimilaraverageageandsharemale,respondentsinnon-expansionstatesweremorelikelytobeBlack(7.7percentagepointdi?erence),andlesslikelytobeWhite,Asian,orHispanic(3.1,2.4,and2.6percentagepointdi?erence,respectively).Respondentslivinginnon-expansionstateswerealsomorelikelytoownahome(7.7percentagepointdi?erence)andmorelikelytobelivinginanon-metroarea(8.5percentagepointdi?erence).Therearesmallerdi?erencesinmarriagerates,bachelor’seducation,andpovertyrates.Theseimbalancesmotivateourdi?erence-in-di?erencesandeventstudyapproaches.
Figure
1
Panel(a)reportsdi?erencesintheprevalenceofdisabilitybyrace,whileFigure
1
Panel(b)reportsSSIandSSDIreceiptamongrespondentswithdisabilitiesbyrace.WeobservethehighestratesofdisabilityamongAIANrespondents(21%),followedbyBlackandOther(16.9%and16.6%,
10
respectively).Wecharacterize13%ofWhite,9%ofHispanic,and6%ofAsianrespondentsashavingadisability.
Inpanel(b),thebluebarsreportthepercentofworking-agerespondentswithdisabilitieswhoreceiveSSI.Theredbarsreportthepercentofworking-agerespondentswithdisabilitieswhoreceiveSSDI.BlackandAIANrespondentshadthehighestratesofSSIreceipt(26%and24%,respectively),whileWhiteandAsianrespondentshadthelowestratesofSSIreceipt(15%and13%,respectively).Black,White,andAIANracerespondentsreportedthehighestratesofSSDIreceipt(27%,25%,and22%respectively).TherateofSSIreceiptishigherthanSSDIreceiptforAIANandHispanicrespondents,althoughratesarerelativelycloseforBlackandAsianrespondentsaswell,re?ectingunderlyingdi?erencesinprogramenrollmentforpeoplewithdisabilitiesbyrace.
Figure
1
providesadditionalevidenceonchangesinSSIandSSDItake-upovertime.Speci?cally,Figure
1
plotssmoothedmeansofoverallunadjustedtake-upofthesetwoprogramsseparatelyinexpansionandnon-expansionstatesacrossourstudyperiod.
5
Panel(a)showsincreasingSSItake-upleadingupto2014forbothnon-expansionandexpansionstates,withgenerallylowertake-upratesinnon-expansionstatesversusexpansionstates.After2014,SSItake-upamongexpansionstatesbeginstodecline,whiletake-upinnon-expansionstatesbecomesrelativelystable.
Panel(b)showsincreasingSSDItake-upamongourstudypopulationforbothexpansionandnon-expansionstatesinmostyearspriorto2014,withgreatertake-upinnon-expan
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年度數(shù)據(jù)中心冷卻系統(tǒng)搭建與優(yōu)化合同4篇
- 施工安全協(xié)議書范本
- 2025年度智慧城市地下車庫車位租賃及物業(yè)管理服務(wù)協(xié)議4篇
- 2025年度影視作品版權(quán)代理合同4篇
- 2025年度智能新能源汽車銷售與合作協(xié)議4篇
- 2025年度市政設(shè)施清雪維護工程承包協(xié)議書4篇
- 2024鉆探行業(yè)勞動協(xié)議固定格式范本
- 2024版游泳館租賃合同
- 2024版公司離職流程與責任劃分合同版B版
- 2025年度研發(fā)中心廠房租賃合作協(xié)議書3篇
- GB/T 37238-2018篡改(污損)文件鑒定技術(shù)規(guī)范
- 普通高中地理課程標準簡介(湘教版)
- 河道治理工程監(jiān)理通知單、回復單范本
- 超分子化學簡介課件
- 高二下學期英語閱讀提升練習(一)
- 易制爆化學品合法用途說明
- 【PPT】壓力性損傷預防敷料選擇和剪裁技巧
- 大氣喜慶迎新元旦晚會PPT背景
- DB13(J)∕T 242-2019 鋼絲網(wǎng)架復合保溫板應(yīng)用技術(shù)規(guī)程
- 心電圖中的pan-tompkins算法介紹
- 羊絨性能對織物起球的影響
評論
0/150
提交評論