貧富差距的利弊英文_第1頁(yè)
貧富差距的利弊英文_第2頁(yè)
貧富差距的利弊英文_第3頁(yè)
貧富差距的利弊英文_第4頁(yè)
貧富差距的利弊英文_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩5頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、貧富差距的利弊英文 教材 貧富差距的利弊The advantages and disadvantages of the gap between rich and poor貧富差能激發(fā)民眾上進(jìn)積極性嗎 , 有利方認(rèn)為 : 社會(huì)貧富差,就象是自然界中的水位差或電勢(shì)差,差距越大流速越快,社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展也越快,因?yàn)檫@能最大程度激發(fā)人的趨利之心及勞動(dòng)積極性,這點(diǎn)也可從現(xiàn)實(shí)中得到佐證,如世界上經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展最快的國(guó)通常是貧富差距最大的國(guó)家。1, the gap between rich and poor can inspire people upward enthusiasm? There are always

2、think: social gap between rich and poor, as is the potential difference in nature or water level, the bigger the gap flow more quickly, the social and economic development faster, because it can greatly stimulate people benefit heart and enthusiasm, it can also be obtained from the reality, such as

3、the world economic development the fastest country usually is the nations largest gap between rich and poor.不利方認(rèn)為 : 在社會(huì)制度不存在公平缺失前題下形成的貧富差是合理的,其已能起到最大化提高人們勞動(dòng)積極性的效果,這就象是一場(chǎng)公平的奧林匹克比賽。而由缺失公平的社會(huì)制度所造成的貧富差,只會(huì)起到阻礙社會(huì)有序發(fā)展的負(fù)作用。不合理的貧富差不但不能激發(fā)人們的勞動(dòng)積極性,反只會(huì)激起人們對(duì)財(cái)富的偏激性而表現(xiàn)不擇手段,象千萬學(xué)子爭(zhēng)考落取率幾有千分之幾的公務(wù)員,數(shù)十教授爭(zhēng)當(dāng)一處級(jí)官員的現(xiàn)象,沒人想去勤

4、勞創(chuàng)業(yè),都想當(dāng)官爭(zhēng)做天子腳下市民。還有就是社會(huì)犯罪率的上升及社會(huì)穩(wěn)定性的下降,也會(huì)緊隨貧富差的提高和下降。而“有利方”的一些例證更是荒謬,如象水位差論,社會(huì)要想實(shí)現(xiàn)持續(xù)發(fā)展,是不能將水( 資源 ) 提到高處一下子倒掉的,這會(huì)斷流,而不能實(shí)現(xiàn)細(xì)水長(zhǎng)流。至于說經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展越快的國(guó)家,貧富差擴(kuò)大也越快,是有這么一個(gè)現(xiàn)象,但世界上最落后、最混亂的國(guó)家也是貧富差最大的國(guó)家,這( 最快 ) 可用“最后的瘋狂”來做解釋是最恰當(dāng)不過的。Dont always think: in the social system does not exist between the rich and the poor form

5、a lack of fairness premise difference is reasonable, it has to maximize people labor enthusiasm, this is like a fair Olympic games. Poverty caused by the lack of fair social system difference, only plays a negative role to hinder social development. The unreasonable gap between rich and poor will no

6、t be able to stimulate peoples labor enthusiasm, anti will only provoke the extreme wealth and use unscrupulous divisive tactics, like thousands of students test for fall take rate a few thousandths of civil servants, dozens of professor to be a level officials phenomenon, no one wantto diligence en

7、trepreneurship, all wants to be to become the emperorat the foot of the public. There is a rise in social stability and social crime rate dropped, the gap between rich and poor will immediately raise and fall. Some examples with Lee is even more absurd, such as water level difference theory, society

8、 to achieve sustainable development, is the water cannot be mentioned above (resources) of a sudden fall, it will stop, but cant realize the long. As for faster economic development of countries, the gap between rich and poor to expand quickly, there is such a phenomenon, but the most backward, the

9、worlds most troubled countries and the gap between rich and poor countries with the largest, this (fastest) available final crazy to do the interpretation is the most appropriate.貧富差能有利提高本國(guó)商品世界競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力、促進(jìn)社會(huì)新技術(shù)開發(fā)發(fā)展嗎 , 有利方認(rèn)為 : 貧富差讓部分人處以相對(duì)貧困階層,這樣可以給社會(huì)提供大量廉價(jià)勞動(dòng)力,如共同富裕,那苦差的勞動(dòng)誰去做啊,所以貧富差是一國(guó)商品在世界上具有強(qiáng)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。同時(shí),讓一部人富

10、有,形成社會(huì)高端及奢侈商品的需求,從而會(huì)起到促進(jìn)社會(huì)高端奢侈商品產(chǎn)業(yè)及整個(gè)社會(huì)生產(chǎn)力的梯次發(fā)展。The gap between rich and poor can improve domestic commodities world competitiveness, promote social development new technology development? There are always think: the gap between rich and poor let some people a relatively poor, so that we can provide

11、 a lot of cheap labor, such as common prosperity, the hard labor who do ah, so the gap between rich and poor is a commodities has strongcompetitiveness in the world. At the same time, let a person rich, high-end and luxury goods form the social demand, which will serve to promote the development of

12、high-end luxury goods industry in society and the social productive forces.不利方認(rèn)為 : 通過犧牲勞動(dòng)者及低端產(chǎn)業(yè)( 特別是農(nóng)業(yè)) 應(yīng)有利益,在短期上看可提高本國(guó)商品的價(jià)格競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,增加些就業(yè),但從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)看,國(guó)家會(huì)陷入輸出的是真金白銀( 商品資源 ) 與血汗,犧牲的是戰(zhàn)略性產(chǎn)業(yè)。輸入的是可能引發(fā)國(guó)內(nèi)滯漲及隨時(shí)都在貶值的它國(guó)貨幣,導(dǎo)致國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的可持續(xù)性下降。另外貧富差也不能起到促進(jìn)社會(huì)高端產(chǎn)業(yè)功效,比如我國(guó)已是世界頭位奢侈品消費(fèi)國(guó)了,但國(guó)內(nèi)卻還未出現(xiàn)一類奢侈品世界頭位生產(chǎn)國(guó)的事實(shí),而富人們的奢侈消費(fèi)卻是我國(guó)資本外流、導(dǎo)致

13、國(guó)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)成本升的累贅。而國(guó)內(nèi)一些不需富人需求促進(jìn)的高端產(chǎn)業(yè)航天、軍工等產(chǎn)業(yè)倒是能蓬勃發(fā)展??傊?,成為高端商品消費(fèi)國(guó)決不是好事,能成為高端商品生產(chǎn)國(guó)是好事,這無需有個(gè)人需求市場(chǎng),其實(shí)集體有計(jì)劃的奢侈消費(fèi),象登月之類集體壯舉更有效。Dont always think: at the expense of labor and low-end industries (especially the agricultural) interest, in the short term can improve domestic goods price competitiveness, increase emp

14、loyment, but in the long run, the state will fall in output is real gold and silver(commodity resources) and sweat, sacrifice is a strategic industry.The input is likely to spark domestic stagnation and always in the devaluation of the currency, leading to the sustainable development of national eco

15、nomy decline. In addition to the gap between rich and poor is not to promote high-end industrial society effect, for example, China is the worlds first luxury consumption, there was not a kind of luxury world head producers fact, and the rich peoples luxury consumption is Chinas capital outflow, res

16、ulting in domestic production costs rise.And some domestic demand to promote without rich high-end industry, military, aerospace industry is thriving. In short, become the high-end consumer goods is not good, can become the high-end commodity producing countries is a good thing, it need not be the i

17、ndividual needs of the market, in fact, collective planned luxury consumption, such as the collective feat more effective.貧富差能增加社會(huì)就業(yè)率,利于社會(huì)穩(wěn)定嗎 , 有利方認(rèn)為 : 就業(yè)率是事關(guān)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的第一大事,而擴(kuò)大貧富差能增進(jìn)社會(huì)就業(yè),其機(jī)理就是貧富差能促進(jìn)社會(huì)商品生產(chǎn)或服務(wù)梯層化,從而最有利于擴(kuò)大社會(huì)就業(yè)崗位。相反,如社會(huì)很均富,人們所需的商品和服務(wù)層次都很類似,這不利社會(huì)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展及就業(yè)率。3, the gap between rich and poor can i

18、ncrease social employment rate, conducive to social stability? There are always think: the employment rate is the first event is related to social stability, and expand the gap between rich and poor can promote social employment, its mechanism is the gap between rich and poor can promote the social

19、production of goods or services ladder layer, thus the most conducive to the expansion of social employment. On the contrary, if the society is very rich, level of goods and services needed by people are very similar, the adverse social development and employment.不利方認(rèn)為 : 貧富差雖能增加象“二奶、保鏢、天上人間 , ”等等職位和

20、行業(yè),但這些職業(yè)基本上對(duì)社會(huì)生產(chǎn)力的提升毫無貢獻(xiàn)甚至是反作用,這種純粹是為分配而就業(yè)的模式?jīng)]半點(diǎn)可取之處。的確,由個(gè)體生命有限性影響,完全由私人利益驅(qū)的社會(huì)生產(chǎn)會(huì)過分的傾向眼前和局部的利益,不能完全適應(yīng)社會(huì)全面和長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展需要及有效增加就業(yè),但這個(gè)問題完全可通過公平民主的集體規(guī)劃建設(shè)來得以改善,這樣既能增加社會(huì)就業(yè),又可提升社會(huì)生產(chǎn)力,而無任何不利影響。Dont always think: the gap between rich and poor could increase as a kept woman, bodyguard, immeasurably vast difference An

21、d so onjobs and industries, but these occupation basically no contribution to the promotion of social productivity and even counterproductive,this is purely for the allocation and employment mode no merit.Indeed, affected by the limited nature of individual life, completely by the private interest d

22、riven social production over the tendency of immediate and local interests, can not completely meet the needs of society and long-term development and increase employment, but this problem can be completely through the collective rule fair and democratic planning construction to improve, so as to in

23、crease employment, but also promote the social productive forces, without any adverse effects.總結(jié) :1. 平均并不公平,由個(gè)體差異及個(gè)體所經(jīng)歷的非社會(huì)所能操控的機(jī)遇所造成的貧富差距是合理的。但此外一切社會(huì)制度缺陷 ( 公平缺失 ) 所造成的社 會(huì)貧富差距則都屬不合理,也無有利社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展可言,如說這種貧富差會(huì)存在有什么有利的話,那也是暫短的表面現(xiàn)象,而只有社會(huì)公平能毫無隱患的解決社會(huì)一切矛盾和問題。Summary: 1.the average is not fair, non social expe

24、rienced by individual differences and individual can control the opportunity caused by the gap between the rich and the poor is reasonable. But in addition to all social system defects (lack of fairness) caused by the social gap between rich and poor, are not reasonable, no favorable social and econ

25、omic development at all, as the gap between rich and poor will have what interest, the surface that is short, and only social justice can not solve social contradictions and problems the problem.一個(gè)國(guó)家好比一個(gè)家庭,如果一個(gè)家庭有兩個(gè)孩子,一個(gè)穿金戴銀,另一個(gè)則衣不遮體,孩子們會(huì)怎么看待這個(gè)家庭, 這個(gè)家庭又該如何面對(duì)孩子,A country like a family, if a family wi

26、th two children, a wear gold and silver, another is in rags, the children will look at how this family? How to face the child in this family?由經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型帶來的貧富分化在所難免,我們既不能因其對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的巨大貢獻(xiàn)而忽略它對(duì)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定、公平存在的負(fù)面影響,也不能因其存在種種問題而全盤否定它的必要性和必然性。而是要求對(duì)貧富差距進(jìn)行“適度”的控制,以最大限度的抑制其可能對(duì)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定和社會(huì)公平的損害 .Brought by the economic devel

27、opment and social transformation of the polarization between the rich and the poor can hardly be avoided, we can not because of its great contribution to economic development while ignoring its negative impact on social stability, justice exists, not because of the various problems and negate the ne

28、cessity and inevitability of it. But for moderate to control the gap between the rich and the poor, to suppress the maximum possible damage to social stability and social fairness貧富差距越大,說明國(guó)家發(fā)展越不平衡,社會(huì)越不穩(wěn)定。但是有一個(gè)好處,那就是越窮的人越想富,富過的人都不想窮,對(duì)促進(jìn)社會(huì)發(fā)展有積極作用,但消極作用相對(duì)來說更明顯。比如阿富汗或伊朗。The gap between rich and poor is

29、bigger, the development is unbalanced, the society is unstable. But there is a benefit, that is the poorer the people want to be rich, rich people do not want to poor,plays a positive role in promoting social development, but the negative effect is more obvious. For example, Afghanistan or Iran.貧富差距越小,說明國(guó)家發(fā)展越平衡,社會(huì)越穩(wěn)定,制度更健全。

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論