考研英語長(zhǎng)篇連載：閱讀真題命題思路透析(10)

1、考研英語長(zhǎng)篇連載：閱讀真題命題思路透析(10)1997年P(guān)assage 1 It was 3:45 in the morning when the vote was finally taken. After six months of arguing and final 16 hours of hot parliamentary debates, Australias Northern Territory became the first legal authority in the world to allow doctors to take the lives of incurably i

2、ll patients who wish to die. The measure passed by the convincing vote of 15 to 10. Almost immediately word flashed on the Internet and was picked up, half a world away, by John Hofsess, executive director of the Right to Die Society of Canada. He sent it on via the groups on line service, Death NET

3、. Says Hofsess: “We posted bulletins all day long, because of course this isnt just something that happened in Australia. Its world history.” The full import may take a while to sink in. The NT Rights of the Terminally III law has left physicians and citizens alike trying to deal with its moral and

4、practical implications. Some have breathed sighs of relief, others, including churches, right to life groups and the Australian Medical Association, bitterly attacked the bill and the haste of its passage. But the tide is unlikely to turn back. In Australia where an aging population, life extending

5、technology and changing community attitudes have all played their part other states are going to consider making a similar law to deal with euthanasia. In the US and Canada, where the right to die movement is gathering strength, observers are waiting for the dominoes to start falling. Under the new

6、Northern Territory law, an adult patient can request death probably by a deadly injection or pill to put an end to suffering. The patient must be diagnosed as terminally ill by two doctors. After a “cooling off” period of seven days, the patient can sign a certificate of request. After 48 hours the

7、wish for death can be met. For Lloyd Nickson, a 54 year old Darwin resident suffering from lung cancer, the NT Rights of Terminally III law means he can get on with living without the haunting fear of his suffering: a terrifying death from his breathing condition. “Im not afraid of dying from a spir

8、itual point of view, but what I was afraid of was how Id go, because Ive watched people die in the hospital fighting for oxygen and clawing at their masks,” he says.54. The authors attitude towards euthanasia seems to be that of _.A oppositionB suspicionC approvalD indifference答案 C解題思路從全文總體看來，作者雖然一直

9、沒有直接表示自己的態(tài)度，但三段中他引用的例子，如第一段中“John Hofsess”的話和最后一段中“Lloyd Nickson”的例子都是贊成安樂死的。第二段中雖然指出存在反對(duì)的聲音，但該段中間作者“But the tide is unlikely to turn back”（但是安樂死這一潮流已無法逆轉(zhuǎn)）一句話筆鋒一轉(zhuǎn)，指出這種潮流已經(jīng)不可逆轉(zhuǎn)，因此可見作者自己也是持支持態(tài)度的，正確答案為C。題目譯文54. The authors attitude towards euthanasia seems to be that of _.A oppositionB suspicionC appro

10、valD indifference作者對(duì)于安樂死的態(tài)度看起來是 。A反對(duì)B懷疑C贊成D漠不關(guān)心1997年P(guān)assage 5 Much of the language used to describe monetary policy, such as “steering the economy to a soft landing” or “a touch on the brakes”, makes it sound like a precise science. Nothing could be further from the truth. The link between interest

11、rates and inflation is uncertain. And there are long, variable lags before policy changes have any effect on the economy. Hence the analogy that likens the conduct of monetary policy to driving a car with a blackened windscreen, a cracked rear view mirror and a faulty steering wheel. Given all these

12、 disadvantages, central bankers seem to have had much to boast about of late. Average inflation in the big seven industrial economies fell to a mere 2.3% last year, close to its lowest level in 30 years, before rising slightly to 2.5% this July. This is a long way below the double digit rates which

13、many countries experienced in the 1970s and early 1980s. It is also less than most forecasters had predicted. In late 1994 the panel of economists which The Economist polls each month said that Americas inflation rate would average 3.5% in 1995. In fact, it fell to 2.6% in August, and expected to av

14、erage only about 3% for the year as a whole. In Britain and Japan inflation is running half a percentage point below the rate predicted at the end of last year. This is no flash in the pan; over the past couple of years, inflation has been consistently lower than expected in Britain and America. Eco

15、nomists have been particularly surprised by favorable inflation figures in Britain and the United States, since conventional measures suggest that both economies, and especially Americas, have little productive slack. Americas capacity utilization, for example, his historically high levels earlier t

16、his year, and its jobless rate (5.6% in August) has fallen bellow most estimates of the natural rate of unemployment the rate below which inflation has taken off in the past. Why has inflation proved so mild? The most thrilling explanation is, unfortunately, a little defective. Some economists argue

17、 that powerful structural changes in the world have up ended the old economic models that were based upon the historical link between growth and inflation.70. The passage shows that the author is _ the present situation.Acritical ofBpuzzled byCdisappointed atDamazed at答案 D解題思路從總體上看來，本文主要討論的是經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)象中新的現(xiàn)

18、象、變化和趨勢(shì)。文中第一段第二、三句中指出“Nothing could be further from the truth. The link between interest rates and inflation is uncertain”（而事實(shí)并非如此。利率和通貨膨脹之間的關(guān)系并不是確定的），第三段第一句話指出“It is also less than most forecasters had predicted”（這樣的通脹率也低于許多預(yù)測(cè)家預(yù)測(cè)的數(shù)字），第四段第一句話指出“Economists have been particularly surprised by favorabl

19、e inflation figures in Britain and the United States”（尤其讓經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家感到驚訝的是，英美兩國(guó)的通脹率帶來了良性的結(jié)果），而最后一段總結(jié)到“powerful structural changes in the world have up ended the old economic models that were based upon the historical link between growth and inflation”（世界經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)強(qiáng)有力的變化已經(jīng)打破了那個(gè)以經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)和通貨膨脹的原有關(guān)聯(lián)為基礎(chǔ)的舊有經(jīng)濟(jì)模式）。從這些語句中都可以

20、判斷作者也是以非常驚奇的語氣來進(jìn)行描述的，因此正確答案為D。題目譯文70. The passage shows that the author is _ the present situation.Acritical ofBpuzzled byCdisappointed atDamazed at文章顯示了作者對(duì)目前形勢(shì)的態(tài)度是 。A批評(píng)B困惑C失望D驚奇1998年P(guān)assage 3 Science has long had an uneasy relationship with other aspects of culture. Think of Gallileos 17th century

21、trial for his rebelling belief before the Catholic Church or poet William Blakes harsh remarks against the mechanistic worldview of Isaac Newton. The schism between science and the humanities has, if anything, deepened in this century. Until recently, the scientific community was so powerful that it

22、 could afford to ignore its critics - but no longer. As funding for science has declined, scientists have attacked “antiscience” in several books, notably Higher Superstition, by Paul R.Gross, a biologist at the University of Verginia, and Norman Levitt, a mathematician at Rutgers University; and Th

23、e Demon Haunted World, by Car Sagan of Cornell University. Defenders of science have also voiced their concerns at meetings such as “The Flight from Science and Reason,” held in New York City in 1995, and “Science in the Age of (Mis)information,” which assembled last June near Buffalo. Antiscience c

24、learly means different things to different people. Gross and Levitt find fault primarily with sociologists, philosophers and other academics who have questioned sciences objectivity. Sagan is more concerned with those who believe in ghosts, creationism and other phenomena that contradict the scienti

25、fic worldview. A survey of news stories in 1996 reveals that the antiscience tag has been attached to many other groups as well, from authorities who advocated the elimination of the last remaining stocks of smallpox virus to Republicans who advocated decreased funding for basic research. Few would

26、dispute that the term applies to the Unabomber, those manifesto, published in 1995, scorns science and longs for return to a pretechnological utopia. But surely that does not mean environmentalists concerned about uncontrolled industrial growth are antiscience, as an essay in US News & World Report last May seemed to suggest. The environmentalists, inevitably, respond to such critics. The true enemies of science, argues Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University, a pioneer of environmental studies, are those who question the evidence supporting global wa