Love is a fallacy文章結(jié)構(gòu)ppt課件

1、SUMMARY It is about a law student who tries to marry the girl after suitable re-education, but hes been too clever for his own good.1 RelationshipRaccoon coatpollyBurchDobie GilliswantBelongs toWant a wifeBelongs to2 Preface ：para 1-3 Sect 1 : para. 4 -59 Sect 2 : para 60 - 125 Sect 3 : para 126- 15

2、43 para 1-3 It is the authors note. 1. The authors idea about this story. 2. The authors idea about the purpose of this story.4 Sect 1 para. 4 -59 the bargain between the law student and his roommate over the exchange of the girl.5 1) p4 introduction of the narrator - protagonist 2) p5-21 introducti

3、on of the first antagonist - Petey Burch He downgrades his roommate, who has nothing upstairs and is thought dumb as an ox. 3) p22 - 27 introduction of he second antagonist - Polly Espy 4) p 28-40 sounding out / finding out the relationship between Petey and Polly. 5) p.40 -59 a deal over Polly6 Sec

4、t 2. para 60 - 125It vividly describes the incredibly tough project of making dumb Polly smart,and the seeming successthe teaching of 8 logical fallacies7 Sect 3 : para 126- 154The girl learns her lessons too well. She uses all the logical fallacies to fight back her teacher.8The whole story The wri

5、ter is satirizing a smug, self-conceited freshman in a law school The very beginning the narrator begins with all the beautiful words he can think of to praise himself at every conceivable opportunity - takes every opportunity to downgrade his roommate.9 As the story went on. -The narrator made a de

6、al with his roommate. -First date with Polly ,disappointed - Decided to teach her to think and to learn logic -After lessons, tried to changed relationship from academic to romantic10The climax -Polly refuses to go steady with the narrator because she has already promised to be Peteys girlfriend -Petey had a raccoon coat-big men were wearing 11 The ending. - Ironic -The narrator has got what he deserved. He has been too clever for his own good.12The purpose of the essay (according to the writer) to demonstrate that logic, far from bein