外文翻譯---高層建筑及結構設計.docx

附錄： 畢業(yè)設計外文翻譯院 （系） 建筑工程學院 專 業(yè) 土 木 工 程 班 級 070710班 姓 名 張 波 學 號 070710317 導 師 周 雪 峰 2011年 4月15日英文：High-Rise Buildings and Structural DesignAbstract：It is difficult to define a high-rise building . One may say that a low-rise building ranges from 1 to 2 stories . A medium-rise building probably ranges between 3 or 4 stories up to 10 or 20 stories or more . Although the basic principles of vertical and horizontal subsystem design remain the same for low- , medium- , or high-rise buildings , when a building gets high the vertical subsystems become a controlling problem for two reasons . Higher vertical loads will require larger columns , walls , and shafts . But , more significantly , the overturning moment and the shear deflections produced by lateral forces are much larger and must be carefully provided for .Key Words：High-Rise Buildings Structural Design Framework Shear Seismic SystemIntroductionThe vertical subsystems in a high-rise building transmit accumulated gravity load from story to story , thus requiring larger column or wall sections to support such loading . In addition these same vertical subsystems must transmit lateral loads , such as wind or seismic loads , to the foundations. However , in contrast to vertical load , lateral load effects on buildings are not linear and increase rapidly with increase in height . For example under wind load , the overturning moment at the base of buildings varies approximately as the square of a buildings may vary as the fourth power of buildings height , other things being equal. Earthquake produces an even more pronounced effect.When the structure for a low-or medium-rise building is designed for dead and live load , it is almost an inherent property that the columns , walls , and stair or elevator shafts can carry most of the horizontal forces . The problem is primarily shear resistance . Moderate addition bracing for rigid frames in“short”buildings can easily be provided by filling certain panels ( or even all panels ) without increasing the sizes of the columns and girders otherwise required for vertical loads.Unfortunately , this is not is for high-rise buildings because the problem is primarily resistance to moment and deflection rather than shear alone . Special structural arrangements will often have to be made and additional structural material is always required for the columns , girders , walls , and slabs in order to made a high-rise buildings sufficiently resistant to much higher lateral deformations . As previously mentioned , the quantity of structural material required per square foot of floor of a high-rise buildings is in excess of that required for low-rise buildings . The vertical components carrying the gravity load , such as walls , columns , and shafts , will need to be strengthened over the full height of the buildings . But quantity of material required for resisting lateral forces is even more significant . With reinforced concrete , the quantity of material also increases as the number of stories increases . But here it should be noted that the increase in the weight of material added for gravity load is much more sizable than steel , whereas for wind load the increase for lateral force resistance is not that much more since the weight of a concrete buildings helps to resist overturn . On the other hand , the problem of design for earthquake forces . Additional mass in the upper floors will give rise to a greater overall lateral force under the of seismic effects . In the case of either concrete or steel design , there are certain basic principles for providing additional resistance to lateral to lateral forces and deflections in high-rise buildings without too much sacrifire in economy . 1、Increase the effective width of the moment-resisting subsystems . This is very useful because increasing the width will cut down the overturn force directly and will reduce deflection by the third power of the width increase , other things remaining cinstant . However , this does require that vertical components of the widened subsystem be suitably connected to actually gain this benefit.2、Design subsystems such that the components are made to interact in the most efficient manner . For example , use truss systems with chords and diagonals efficiently stressed , place reinforcing for walls at critical locations , and optimize stiffness ratios for rigid frames . 3、Increase the material in the most effective resisting components . For example , materials added in the lower floors to the flanges of columns and connecting girders will directly decrease the overall deflection and increase the moment resistance without contributing mass in the upper floors where the earthquake problem is aggravated . 4、Arrange to have the greater part of vertical loads be carried directly on the primary moment-resisting components . This will help stabilize the buildings against tensile overturning forces by precompressing the major overturn-resisting components . 5、The local shear in each story can be best resisted by strategic placement if solid walls or the use of diagonal members in a vertical subsystem . Resisting these shears solely by vertical members in bending is usually less economical , since achieving sufficient bending resistance in the columns and connecting girders will require more material and construction energy than using walls or diagonal members . 6、Sufficient horizontal diaphragm action should be provided floor . This will help to bring the various resisting elements to work together instead of separately . 7、Create mega-frames by joining large vertical and horizontal components such as two or more elevator shafts at multistory intervals with a heavy floor subsystems , or by use of very deep girder trusses . Remember that all high-rise buildings are essentially vertical cantilevers which are supported at the ground . When the above principles are judiciously applied , structurally desirable schemes can be obtained by walls , cores , rigid frames, tubular construction , and other vertical subsystems to achieve horizontal strength and rigidity . Some of these applications will now be described in subsequent sections in the following . Shear-Wall Systems When shear walls are compatible with other functional requirements , they can be economically utilized to resist lateral forces in high-rise buildings . For example , apartment buildings naturally require many separation walls . When some of these are designed to be solid , they can act as shear walls to resist lateral forces and to carry the vertical load as well . For buildings up to some 20storise , the use of shear walls is common . If given sufficient length ,such walls can economically resist lateral forces up to 30 to 40 stories or more . However , shear walls can resist lateral load only the plane of the walls ( i.e.not in a diretion perpendicular to them ) . Therefore ,it is always necessary to provide shear walls in two perpendicular directions can be at least in sufficient orientation so that lateral force in any direction can be resisted . In addition , that wall layout should reflect consideration of any torsional effect . In design progress , two or more shear walls can be connected to from L-shaped or channel-shaped subsystems . Indeed , internal shear walls can be connected to from a rectangular shaft that will resist lateral forces very efficiently . If all external shear walls are continuously connected , then the whole buildings acts as a tube , and is excellent Shear-Wall Systems resisting lateral loads and torsion . Whereas concrete shear walls are generally of solid type with openings when necessary , steel shear walls are usually made of trusses . These trusses can have single diagonals , “X”diagonals , or“K”arrangements . A trussed wall will have its members act essentially in direct tension or compression under the action of view , and they offer some opportunity and deflection-limitation point of view , and they offer some opportunity for penetration between members . Of course , the inclined members of trusses must be suitable placed so as not to interfere with requirements for windows and for circulation service penetrations though these walls . As stated above , the walls of elevator , staircase ,and utility shafts form natural tubes and are commonly employed to resist both vertical and lateral forces . Since these shafts are normally rectangular or circular in cross-section , they can offer an efficient means for resisting moments and shear in all directions due to tube structural action . But a problem in the design of these shafts is provided sufficient strength around door openings and other penetrations through these elements . For reinforced concrete construction , special steel reinforcements are placed around such opening .In steel construction , heavier and more rigid connections are required to resist racking at the openings . In many high-rise buildings , a combination of walls and shafts can offer excellent resistance to lateral forces when they are suitably located ant connected to one another . It is also desirable that the stiffness offered these subsystems be more-or-less symmertrical in all directions .Rigid-Frame Systems In the design of architectural buildings , rigid-frame systems for resisting vertical and lateral loads have long been accepted as an important and standard means for designing building . They are employed for low-and medium means for designing buildings . They are employed for low- and medium up to high-rise building perhaps 70 or 100 stories high . When compared to shear-wall systems , these rigid frames both within and at the outside of a buildings . They also make use of the stiffness in beams and columns that are required for the buildings in any case , but the columns are made stronger when rigidly connected to resist the lateral as well as vertical forces though frame bending . Frequently , rigid frames will not be as stiff as shear-wall construction , and therefore may produce excessive deflections for the more slender high-rise buildings designs . But because of this flexibility , they are often considered as being more ductile and thus less susceptible to catastrophic earthquake failure when compared with ( some ) shear-wall designs . For example , if over stressing occurs at certain portions of a steel rigid frame ( i.e.,near the joint ) , ductility will allow the structure as a whole to deflect a little more , but it will by no means collapse even under a much larger force than expected on the structure . For this reason , rigid-frame construction is considered by some to be a “best”seismic-resisting type for high-rise steel buildings . On the other hand ,it is also unlikely that a well-designed share-wall system would collapse. In the case of concrete rigid frames ,there is a divergence of opinion . It true that if a concrete rigid frame is designed in the conventional manner , without special care to produce higher ductility , it will not be able to withstand a catastrophic earthquake that can produce forces several times lerger than the code design earthquake forces . Therefore , some believe that it may not have additional capacity possessed by steel rigid frames . But modern research and experience has indicated that concrete frames can be designed to be ductile , when sufficient stirrups and joinery reinforcement are designed in to the frame . Modern buildings codes have specifications for the so-called ductile concrete frames . However , at present , these codes often require excessive reinforcement at certain points in the frame so as to cause congestion and result in construction difficulties 。Even so , concrete frame design can be both effective and economical 。 Of course , it is also possible to combine rigid-frame construction with shear-wall systems in one buildings 。For example , the buildings geometry may be such that rigid frames can be used in one direction while shear walls may be used in the other direction。Above states is the high-rise construction ordinariest structural style. In the design process, should the economy practical choose the reasonable form as far as possible.高層建筑及結構設計摘要：高層建筑的定義很難確定。可以說1-2層的建筑物為低層建筑，中層建筑也許為3-4層至1020層的或者更多層數(shù)的建筑物。盡管在基本原理上，高層建筑的豎向和水平構件的設計同低層及多層建筑的設計沒什么區(qū)別，但當要使豎向構件的設計成為高層設計有兩個控制性的因素：首先，高層建筑需要較大的柱體、墻體和井筒；更重要的是側向力所產(chǎn)生的傾覆力矩和剪力變形要大的多，必要要有謹慎的設計來保證。關鍵詞： 高層建筑 結構設計 框架 剪力墻 抗震體系概 述高層建筑的豎向構件從上到下逐層對累積的重力和荷載進行傳遞，這就要有較大尺寸的柱體或者墻體來進行承載。此外，這些構件還要將風荷載及地震荷載等水平荷載傳給基礎。然而，水平荷載的分布不同于豎向荷載，它們是非線性的，并且沿著建筑物高度的增加而迅速地增加。例如，在其他條件都相同時，風荷載在建筑物底部引起的傾覆力矩隨建筑物高度近似地成平方規(guī)律變化，而在頂部的水平位移與其高度的四次方成正比。地震荷載產(chǎn)生的效應更為明顯。對于低層和多層建筑物結構設計只需考慮恒荷載和部分動荷載時，建筑物的柱、墻、樓梯或電梯等就自然能承受大部分水平力。所考慮的問題主要是抗剪問題。對于現(xiàn)代“短”建筑物里的鋼架系統(tǒng)支撐設計，如無特殊承載需要，無需加大柱和梁的尺寸，而通過增加規(guī)定尺寸的板（或甚至所有面板）就可以輕而易舉地實現(xiàn)。不幸的是，對于高層建筑首先要解決的不僅僅是抗剪問題，比其更重要的還有抵抗力矩和抵抗變形問題。高層建筑中的柱、梁、墻及板等經(jīng)常需要采用特殊的結構布置和特殊的材料，以抵抗相當高的側向荷載以及變形。如前所述，在高層建筑中每平方英尺建筑面積結構材料的用量要高于低層建筑。支撐重力荷載的豎向構件，如墻、柱及井筒，在沿建筑物整個高度方向上都應予以加強。用于抵抗側向荷載的材料數(shù)量要求更重要。對于鋼筋混凝土建筑，對材料的數(shù)量要求也隨著建筑物層數(shù)的增加而增加。在此應當注意的是，因混凝土材料質量增加而帶來的建筑物自重的增加，要比鋼結構增加得多，而為抵抗風荷載的能力而增加的材料用量卻不是那么多，因為混凝土自身的重量可以抵抗傾覆力矩。另一方面，混凝土建筑自重的增加，將會加大抗震設計的難度。在地震荷載作用下，上層樓體的附加質量的增加將會使整體側向荷載劇增。無論對于混凝土結構設計，或者對于鋼結構設計，下面這些基本的原則都有助于在不需要增加太多成本的前提下增強建筑物抵抗側向荷載的能力。1、 增加抗彎構件的有效寬度。由于當其他條件不變時，寬度的增加能夠直接減小扭矩，并以寬度增量的三次冪形式減小變形，因此這一措施非常實用。但是這項措施必須保證加寬后的豎向承重構件非常有效地連接才能收到切實利益。2、 在設計構件時，盡可能有效地使它們加強相互間的作用力。例如，可以采用具有有效應力狀態(tài)的弦桿和桁架體系；也可在墻的關鍵位置加置拉結鋼筋；以及最優(yōu)化鋼架的剛度比等措施。3、 增加最有效的抗彎構件的截面材料。例如，增加較低層柱以及連接大梁的翼緣截面，將可直接減少側向位移和增加抗彎能力，而不會加大上層樓面的質量，否則，地震問題將會（因樓層質量增加）被加劇。4、 通過設計安排使大部分豎向荷載，直接作用于主要的抗彎構件。這樣通過預壓主要的抗傾覆構件，可以使建筑物在傾覆拉力的作用下保持穩(wěn)定。5、 通過合理地放置實心墻體及在豎向構件中使用斜撐構件，可以有效地抵抗每層的局部剪力。但僅僅通過豎向構件進行抗剪是不經(jīng)濟的，因為使柱及梁有足夠的抗彎能力，比用墻或斜撐需要更多材料和施工工程量。6、 每層應加設充足的水平隔板。這樣就會使各種抗力構件更好地在相互作用，而不是單獨工作。7、 在中間轉換層通過大型豎向和水平構件及重樓板創(chuàng)建連接成大框架，或者采用深梁體系。應當注意的是，所有高層建筑的本質都是由地面支撐的懸臂結構。如何合理地運用上面所提到的原則，就可以利用合理地布置墻體、核心筒、框架、筒式結構和其他豎向結構分體系，使建筑物取得足夠的水平承載力和剛度。本文后面將對這些原理的應用做介紹。剪力墻結構當剪力墻能夠與其他功能需求兼容時，高層建筑中采用剪力墻可以經(jīng)濟地進行高層建筑的抗側向荷載設計。例如，住宅樓需要很多