




已閱讀5頁,還剩3頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
The B.F. Goodrich-Rabobank Interest Rate Swap Motivations for Interest Rate Swaps1. Interest rate risk managementMatch the asset cash flow and maturity structure with the liability cash flow and maturity structure2. Arbitrage Profits based on comparative cost advantageCostApplesOrangesDoris20 cents 30 centsJeremy30 cents 50 cents -Doriss advantage10 cents20 centsComparative advantage = 20 10 = 10 cents per fruit Doris likes apples and Jeremy likes oranges. Doris would like to eat three apples a day. Jeremy would like to eat three oranges a dayWithout trading Doris must spend 60 cents a dayWithout trading Jeremy must spend $1.50 a day Doris and Jeremy do an Apple/Orange SwapDoris buys three oranges and Jeremy buys three apples. They swap their fruits. Doris spends 3 X 30 = 90 centsJeremy spends 3 X 30 =90 cents Jeremy pays 45 cents to Doris Doriss cost = 90 45 = 45 centsJeremys cost = 90 + 45 = $1.35 Both save 15 cents. Together they save 30 cents which is equal to the comparative advantage per fruit of 10 cents times 3 fruits. The Interest Rate SwapRabobanks Comparative Cost Advantage Fixed FloatingRabobank (AAA) 10.70LIBOR + 0.25%B.F. Goodrich (BBB-) 12.5%LIBOR + 0.5%-Rabobanks 1.8%0.25%advantageComparative advantage = 1.8% - 0.25% = 1.55% p.a. Rabobank needs floating rate financing to support its U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate loans.B.F. Goodrich needs fixed rate financing for long term to support its deteriorating financial condition. Who should borrow in which market?Cost of Financing Before the swap:Rabobank cost of financing = LIBOR +0.25%B.F. Goodrich cost of financing = 12.5%After the SwapRabobank cost of financing = 10.7% (interest to investors in Netherlands)+ (LIBOR - x) (swap payments to Morgan)- (10.7%)(swap payments received from Morgan)-= LIBOR - xB.F. Goodrich cost of financing = LIBOR +0.5% (interest to investors in the U.S.)+ 10.7% + F(swap payments plus fee to Morgan)- (LIBOR - x) (swap payments received from Morgan)-= 11.2% + F + x Swap Transaction SavingsRabobank savings = 0.25% + x 0B.F. Goodrich savings = 1.3% - F - x 0Morgans fee = F 0-Total = 1.55% = Comparative cost advantageMinimum and Maximum for x and Fx should be greater than -0.25% (otherwise no incentive for Rabobank)x should be less than 1.3% (otherwise no incentive for B.F. Goodrich and/or Morgan)F should be greater than zero (otherwise no incentive for Morgan)F should be less than 1.55% (otherwise no incentive for Rabobank and/or B.F. Goodrich)Hence, -0.25% x 1.3%And 0 F 1.55%Other Issues1. Default Risk2. The evolution of interest rate swaps3. Derivative exposure of firmsQuestions:Q1. What are the motivating reasons for the interest rate swap in the current case?Q2. Draw the swap diagram. Q3. Assuming hypo
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025婦產(chǎn)科醫(yī)療設(shè)備更新計(jì)劃
- 蘇教版語文教學(xué)質(zhì)量提升計(jì)劃
- 店鋪經(jīng)營合伙協(xié)議書
- 房屋出售包場協(xié)議書
- 戶外出游安全協(xié)議書
- 承包荒山合同協(xié)議書
- 廣東拆舊復(fù)墾協(xié)議書
- 房子首付貸款協(xié)議書
- 房屋產(chǎn)權(quán)債務(wù)協(xié)議書
- 房產(chǎn)指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)賣協(xié)議書
- 珠海住建局質(zhì)量問題防治脫落和開裂防治篇
- 職業(yè)暴露應(yīng)急預(yù)案演練
- 2024年秋江蘇開放大學(xué)文獻(xiàn)檢索與論文寫作參考范文一:行政管理專業(yè)
- 《電力市場概論》 課件 第五章 系統(tǒng)安全與輔助服務(wù)
- 《10000以內(nèi)數(shù)的讀、寫法》(教案)-二年級下冊數(shù)學(xué)人教版
- 2024年湖南省高考生物試卷真題(含答案解析)
- 秘書公文寫作范文
- 《民法典》2024年知識(shí)考試題庫(含答案)
- 《籃球原地雙手胸前傳接球》教案 (三篇)
- 旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)專業(yè)知識(shí)和實(shí)務(wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)師考試(中級)試卷及解答參考(2025年)
- 高中化學(xué)新課標(biāo)知識(shí)考試題庫大全(新版)
評論
0/150
提交評論