20xxGRE寫作技巧：邏輯問題分析論證

20xxGRE寫作技巧：邏輯問題分析論證

20xxGRE寫作技巧：邏輯問題分析論證

導(dǎo)語：為了各位考生可以更好地備考，特為大家收集整理了20xxGRE寫作技巧：邏輯問題分析論證，希望對各位有所幫助，詳情如下，僅供參考。

邏輯問題分析論證句式

1Theargumentfailstoruleoutthepossibilitythatawriterengageinbothtypesofwritingaswellasothertypes.

2.Themerefactthatticketsalesinrecentyearsforscreenplay-basedmovieshaveexceededthoseforbook-basedmoviesisinsufficientevidencetoconcludethatwritingscreenplaysnowprovidesgreaterfinancialopportunityforwriters.

3Itispossiblethatfeespaidbymoviestudiosforscreenplayswilldecreaseinthefuturerelativetothoseforbookrights.

4.Inanyevent，theadvertisementprovidesnojustificationforthemutuallyexclusivechoicethatitimposesonthewriter.

5.Theargumentsimplyequatessuccesswithmovieticketsales，whichisunwarranted.

6.Theauthorassumesthatphysicalcapabilitiesaretheonlyattributesnecessarytooperateamotorvehicle.

7.Moreover，theauthorprovidesnoevidencethattherealismofcolorphotographyisthereasonforitspredominance.

8.Thisassumptionpresentsafalsedilemma，sincethetwomediaarenotnecessarilymutuallyexclusivealternatives.

9.Commonsensetellsusthataphotographercansucceedbyworkinginbothmedia.11.ThemajorproblemwiththeargumentisthatthestatedsimilaritiesbetweenCompanyAandBareinsufficienttosupporttheconclusionthatCompanyAwillsufferafatesimilartoCompanyBs.

10.Consequently，themerefactthatCompanyAholdsalargeshareofthevideogamehardwareandsoftwaremarketdoesnotsupporttheclaimthatCompanyAwillalsofail.

11.Thus，theauthorunfairlyassumesthathighlyratedpublictelevisionprogramsarenecessarilywidelyviewed，orpopular.

12.Whilethismaybetrueinsomecases，itisequallypossiblethatonlycompanieswithproductsthatarealreadybestsellerscanaffordthehigheradratesthatpopularshowsdemand.

13.Admittedly，thevicepresidentsreasoninglinkingemployeebenefitswithcompanyprofitsseemsreasonableonthesurface.

14.Onecaninferfromthesurveysresultsthatafullonethirdoftherespondentsmayhaveviewedthecurrentbenefitspackageunfavorably.

15.Lackingmorespecificinformationabouthowtheseotheremployeesresponded，itisimpossibletoassessthereliabilityofthesurveysresultsortomakeaninformedrecommendation.

16.Itisunlikelythatthebriefoneweekperiodsundercomparisonarerepresentativeoflongertimeperiods.

17.Ifso，eventhough3percentmoreaccidentsoccurredafterthechange，theauthorsargumentthatchangingthespeedlimitincreasesdangerfordriverswouldbeseriouslyweakened.18.Inaddition，whileitistruethatmanyvoterschangetheirmindsseveraltimesbeforevoting，andthatsomeremainundecideduntilenteringthevotingbooth，thisisnottrueofeveryone.

19Moreover，theauthorfailstoconsiderandruleoutotherfactorsthatmightaccountforproportionaldecreasesinspendingonfood.

20.Withoutknowingtheextentandnatureofthedamageresultingfromthebadpublicityorthereasonfortheviolation，wecannotaccepttheauthorsconclusion.

21Theauthorsproposalisinconsistentwiththeauthorsconclusionabouttheconsequencesofadoptinganethicscode.

22.Tobeginwith，theauthorfailstoconsiderhealththreatsposedbyincineratingtrash.

23.Theauthorsconclusionthatswitchingtoincinerationwouldbemoresalutaryforpublichealthwouldbeseriouslyundermined.

24.However，thisisnotnecessarilythecase.

25.Theauthorsimplicitclaimthatincineratorsareeconomicallyadvantageoustolandfillsispoorlysupported.

26.Consequently，unlesstheauthorcandemonstratethatthecitywillincurexpensesthatarenotcoveredbytheincrea