人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇與實(shí)踐-

人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇與實(shí)踐—一、本文概述Overviewofthisarticle本文旨在全面探討和研究中國(guó)人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇與實(shí)踐過(guò)程。自新中國(guó)成立以來(lái)，人民陪審員制度在司法體系中占據(jù)了重要的地位，它不僅是司法民主化的重要體現(xiàn)，也是公眾參與司法的重要途徑。然而，隨著社會(huì)的快速發(fā)展和法制建設(shè)的深入推進(jìn)，人民陪審員制度也面臨著一些新的挑戰(zhàn)和問(wèn)題。因此，本文將從歷史與現(xiàn)實(shí)相結(jié)合的角度，深入剖析人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇背景、發(fā)展歷程、現(xiàn)狀和問(wèn)題，并提出相應(yīng)的完善建議。ThisarticleaimstocomprehensivelyexploreandstudytherecoveryandpracticalprocessoftheChinesepeople'sjurysystem.SincetheestablishmentofNewChina,thepeople'sjurysystemhasplayedanimportantroleinthejudicialsystem.Itisnotonlyanimportantmanifestationofjudicialdemocratization,butalsoanimportantwayforthepublictoparticipateinthejudiciary.However,withtherapiddevelopmentofsocietyandthedeepeningoflegalconstruction,thepeople'sjurysystemisalsofacingsomenewchallengesandproblems.Therefore,thisarticlewillanalyzeindepththebackground,developmentprocess,currentsituation,andproblemsofthepeople'sjurysystemfromtheperspectiveofcombininghistoryandreality,andproposecorrespondingimprovementsuggestions.文章首先回顧了人民陪審員制度的發(fā)展歷程，分析了其在不同歷史時(shí)期的角色和作用。接著，文章重點(diǎn)探討了人民陪審員制度在當(dāng)前的復(fù)蘇情況，包括復(fù)蘇的背景、過(guò)程和現(xiàn)狀。在此基礎(chǔ)上，文章進(jìn)一步分析了人民陪審員制度在實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)作情況，包括其參與案件的類型、審判程序、權(quán)利義務(wù)等方面。文章也指出了人民陪審員制度在實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題和挑戰(zhàn)，如選任機(jī)制、培訓(xùn)機(jī)制、履職保障等方面的不足。Thearticlefirstreviewsthedevelopmentprocessofthepeople'sjurysystemandanalyzesitsroleandroleindifferenthistoricalperiods.Next,thearticlefocusesonexploringthecurrentrecoverysituationofthepeople'sjurysystem,includingthebackground,process,andcurrentsituationoftherecovery.Onthisbasis,thearticlefurtheranalyzestheoperationofthepeople'sjurysysteminpractice,includingthetypesofcasesitparticipatesin,trialprocedures,rightsandobligations,andotheraspects.Thearticlealsopointsouttheproblemsandchallengesthatexistinthepracticeofthepeople'sjurysystem,suchastheshortcomingsintheselectionmechanism,trainingmechanism,andperformanceguarantee.文章提出了完善人民陪審員制度的建議。這些建議包括優(yōu)化選任機(jī)制、加強(qiáng)培訓(xùn)和管理、完善履職保障等方面。通過(guò)這些措施的實(shí)施，可以進(jìn)一步提升人民陪審員制度的效能和影響力，推動(dòng)司法民主化進(jìn)程的不斷深入。本文也希望通過(guò)深入研究和探討人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇與實(shí)踐，為相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的學(xué)者和實(shí)踐者提供有益的參考和借鑒。Thearticleproposessuggestionsforimprovingthesystemofpeople'sjurors.Thesesuggestionsincludeoptimizingtheselectionmechanism,strengtheningtrainingandmanagement,andimprovingjobperformanceguarantees.Throughtheimplementationofthesemeasures,theefficiencyandinfluenceofthepeople'sjurysystemcanbefurtherimproved,andtheprocessofjudicialdemocratizationcanbecontinuouslydeepened.Thisarticlealsohopestoprovideusefulreferencesandinsightsforscholarsandpractitionersinrelatedfieldsthroughin-depthresearchandexplorationoftherecoveryandpracticeofthepeople'sjurysystem.二、人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇背景Thebackgroundoftherevivalofthepeople'sjurysystem隨著我國(guó)社會(huì)主義法治建設(shè)的不斷推進(jìn)和公民法律意識(shí)的逐漸提高，人民陪審員制度作為中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義司法制度的重要組成部分，逐漸受到社會(huì)各界的廣泛關(guān)注和重視。在歷經(jīng)一段時(shí)間的沉寂與調(diào)整后，人民陪審員制度在新時(shí)代背景下迎來(lái)了復(fù)蘇的契機(jī)。WiththecontinuouspromotionofsocialistruleoflawconstructioninChinaandthegradualimprovementofcitizens'legalawareness,thepeople'sjurysystem,asanimportantcomponentofthesocialistjudicialsystemwithChinesecharacteristics,hasgraduallyreceivedwidespreadattentionandimportancefromallsectorsofsociety.Afteraperiodofsilenceandadjustment,thepeople'sjurysystemhasusheredinarevivalopportunityinthecontextofthenewera.這一復(fù)蘇背景主要基于以下幾點(diǎn)原因：司法民主化、群眾化的需求日益強(qiáng)烈。人民陪審員制度作為連接法院與群眾的橋梁，能夠增強(qiáng)司法的透明度和公信力，滿足人民群眾對(duì)司法公正、公開(kāi)、公平的期待。司法實(shí)踐中的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要。在案件類型日益復(fù)雜、專業(yè)性越來(lái)越強(qiáng)的背景下，人民陪審員制度能夠發(fā)揮其在案件審理中的獨(dú)特作用，為法官提供專業(yè)外的視角和群眾基礎(chǔ)的支持。國(guó)家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化的要求。人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇與實(shí)踐，有助于推動(dòng)司法制度的完善和創(chuàng)新，提升國(guó)家治理效能。Thisrecoverybackgroundismainlybasedonthefollowingreasons:theincreasingdemandforjudicialdemocratizationandpopularization.Thesystemofpeople'sjurors,asabridgeconnectingthecourtandthepublic,canenhancethetransparencyandcredibilityofthejudiciary,andmeettheexpectationsofthepeopleforjudicialfairness,openness,andimpartiality.Thepracticalneedsinjudicialpractice.Inthecontextofincreasinglycomplexcasetypesandstrongerprofessionalism,thepeople'sjurysystemcanplayitsuniqueroleincasetrials,providingjudgeswithaprofessionalperspectiveandsupportfromthemasses.Therequirementsformodernizingthenationalgovernancesystemandgovernancecapacity.Therevivalandpracticeofthepeople'sjurysystemwillhelppromotetheimprovementandinnovationofthejudicialsystem,andenhancetheefficiencyofnationalgovernance.因此，在新時(shí)代中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義的大背景下，人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇既是社會(huì)發(fā)展的必然趨勢(shì)，也是司法改革的重要內(nèi)容。通過(guò)深入研究和不斷完善人民陪審員制度，可以更好地發(fā)揮其在促進(jìn)司法公正、提升司法公信力、增強(qiáng)司法群眾基礎(chǔ)等方面的積極作用，為推進(jìn)全面依法治國(guó)、建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家作出新的更大貢獻(xiàn)。Therefore,inthecontextofsocialismwithChinesecharacteristicsinthenewera,therevivalofthepeople'sjurysystemisnotonlyaninevitabletrendinsocialdevelopment,butalsoanimportantcontentofjudicialreform.Throughin-depthresearchandcontinuousimprovementofthepeople'sjurysystem,itcanbetterplayitspositiveroleinpromotingjudicialfairness,enhancingjudicialcredibility,andenhancingthefoundationofthejudicialmasses,makingnewandgreatercontributionstopromotingcomprehensiveruleoflawandbuildingasocialistruleoflawcountry.三、人民陪審員制度的實(shí)踐探索ExplorationofthePracticeofthePeople'sJurySystem人民陪審員制度在中國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐中，經(jīng)歷了多次的變革與發(fā)展。近年來(lái)，隨著司法改革的深入推進(jìn)，人民陪審員制度也迎來(lái)了復(fù)蘇與實(shí)踐的新階段。在這一階段，各級(jí)法院積極探索，創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐，使得人民陪審員制度在司法實(shí)踐中發(fā)揮了越來(lái)越重要的作用。Thesystemofpeople'sjurorshasundergonemultiplechangesanddevelopmentsinChina'sjudicialpractice.Inrecentyears,withthedeepeningofjudicialreform,thepeople'sjurysystemhasalsoenteredanewstageofrecoveryandpractice.Atthisstage,courtsatalllevelsactivelyexploreandinnovatepractices,makingthesystemofpeople'sjurorsplayanincreasinglyimportantroleinjudicialpractice.在陪審員選任方面，各級(jí)法院注重選拔具有廣泛社會(huì)背景和專業(yè)知識(shí)的人員擔(dān)任陪審員，確保陪審員隊(duì)伍的多樣性和專業(yè)性。同時(shí)，加強(qiáng)陪審員培訓(xùn)，提升陪審員的法律素養(yǎng)和審判能力，使其能夠更好地履行陪審職責(zé)。Intermsoftheselectionofjurors,courtsatalllevelsfocusonselectingindividualswithbroadsocialbackgroundsandprofessionalknowledgetoserveasjurors,ensuringthediversityandprofessionalismofthejuryteam.Atthesametime,strengthenthetrainingofjurors,enhancetheirlegalliteracyandtrialability,andenablethemtobetterfulfilltheirjuryduties.在陪審員參與審判方面，各級(jí)法院積極探索陪審員參與案件審理的方式和機(jī)制。例如，在一些重大、疑難、復(fù)雜案件中，法院會(huì)邀請(qǐng)陪審員參與庭審，發(fā)揮其在事實(shí)認(rèn)定和法律適用方面的獨(dú)特作用。一些法院還嘗試開(kāi)展陪審員獨(dú)立審判案件的工作，進(jìn)一步發(fā)揮陪審員在司法審判中的積極作用。Intermsoftheparticipationofjurorsintrials,courtsatalllevelsactivelyexplorewaysandmechanismsforjurorstoparticipateincasetrials.Forexample,insomemajor,difficult,andcomplexcases,thecourtmayinvitejurorstoparticipateinthetrial,playingtheiruniqueroleinfactualdeterminationandlegalapplication.Somecourtshavealsoattemptedtocarryoutindependenttrialofcasesbyjurors,furtherleveragingtheactiveroleofjurorsinjudicialtrials.再次，在陪審員制度與其他司法制度的銜接方面，各級(jí)法院也進(jìn)行了積極的探索。例如，一些法院將陪審員制度與案件調(diào)解、社區(qū)矯正等司法制度相結(jié)合，形成了多元化的糾紛解決機(jī)制。這種銜接不僅提高了司法效率，也增強(qiáng)了司法裁判的社會(huì)認(rèn)同度。Onceagain,courtsatalllevelshaveactivelyexploredtheconnectionbetweenthejurysystemandotherjudicialsystems.Forexample,somecourtscombinethejurysystemwithjudicialsystemssuchascasemediationandcommunitycorrection,formingdiversifieddisputeresolutionmechanisms.Thiskindofconnectionnotonlyimprovesjudicialefficiency,butalsoenhancesthesocialrecognitionofjudicialjudgments.在陪審員制度的監(jiān)督與保障方面，各級(jí)法院也采取了一系列措施。例如，建立健全陪審員工作考核機(jī)制，對(duì)陪審員的工作表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行定期評(píng)估和獎(jiǎng)懲；加強(qiáng)陪審員的權(quán)益保障，確保陪審員在履行職責(zé)過(guò)程中得到充分尊重和支持。Intermsofsupervisionandprotectionofthejurysystem,courtsatalllevelshavealsotakenaseriesofmeasures.Forexample,establishingasoundassessmentmechanismfortheworkofjurors,conductingregularevaluationsandrewardsandpunishmentsfortheperformanceofjurors;Strengthentheprotectionoftherightsandinterestsofjurors,andensurethatjurorsreceivefullrespectandsupportintheprocessofperformingtheirduties.人民陪審員制度在實(shí)踐探索中不斷完善和發(fā)展，為司法公正和司法民主化進(jìn)程作出了積極貢獻(xiàn)。未來(lái)，隨著司法改革的進(jìn)一步深化，人民陪審員制度將在司法實(shí)踐中發(fā)揮更加重要的作用。Thesystemofpeople'sjurorshasbeencontinuouslyimprovedanddevelopedinpracticalexploration,makingpositivecontributionstotheprocessofjudicialfairnessanddemocratization.Inthefuture,withthefurtherdeepeningofjudicialreform,thepeople'sjurysystemwillplayamoreimportantroleinjudicialpractice.四、人民陪審員制度面臨的挑戰(zhàn)與問(wèn)題TheChallengesandIssuesFacedbythePeople'sJurySystem盡管人民陪審員制度在我國(guó)司法體系中發(fā)揮著重要作用，但在實(shí)際操作和運(yùn)行過(guò)程中，也面臨著一些挑戰(zhàn)和問(wèn)題。Althoughthepeople'sjurysystemplaysanimportantroleinChina'sjudicialsystem,italsofacessomechallengesandproblemsinpracticaloperationandoperation.人民陪審員的選任和管理機(jī)制仍有待完善。目前，人民陪審員的選任主要依賴于基層法院的推薦和選拔，而缺乏更加公開(kāi)、透明和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性的選任機(jī)制。這可能導(dǎo)致陪審員的代表性不足，難以充分體現(xiàn)社會(huì)的多元性和公正性。同時(shí)，對(duì)于陪審員的管理和考核也缺乏統(tǒng)一的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和程序，難以保證陪審員的專業(yè)素養(yǎng)和職業(yè)道德。Theselectionandmanagementmechanismofpeople'sjurorsstillneedstobeimproved.Atpresent,theselectionofpeople'sjurorsmainlyreliesontherecommendationandselectionofgrassrootscourts,andlacksamoreopen,transparent,andcompetitiveselectionmechanism.Thismayleadtoinsufficientrepresentationofjurors,makingitdifficulttofullyreflectthediversityandfairnessofsociety.Atthesametime,thereisalackofunifiedstandardsandproceduresforthemanagementandassessmentofjurors,makingitdifficulttoensuretheirprofessionalcompetenceandprofessionalethics.人民陪審員在參與審判過(guò)程中存在一些問(wèn)題。一方面，陪審員往往缺乏法律專業(yè)知識(shí)和審判經(jīng)驗(yàn)，難以獨(dú)立、有效地參與案件審理。另一方面，由于陪審員與法官之間的溝通不暢或理解差異，可能導(dǎo)致審判結(jié)果的公正性和權(quán)威性受到質(zhì)疑。陪審員在參與審判過(guò)程中還可能受到外界因素的干擾和影響，如輿論壓力、人情關(guān)系等，從而影響其獨(dú)立判斷和公正履職。Therearesomeissueswiththeparticipationofpeople'sjurorsinthetrialprocess.Ontheonehand,jurorsoftenlacklegalexpertiseandtrialexperience,makingitdifficultforthemtoindependentlyandeffectivelyparticipateincasetrials.Ontheotherhand,duetopoorcommunicationordifferencesinunderstandingbetweenjurorsandjudges,thefairnessandauthorityofthetrialresultsmaybequestioned.Jurorsmayalsobeaffectedandinterferedwithbyexternalfactorsduringthetrialprocess,suchaspublicopinionpressure,personalrelationships,etc.,whichcanaffecttheirindependentjudgmentandfairperformanceofduties.人民陪審員制度的法律效力和社會(huì)認(rèn)可度有待提高。目前，人民陪審員在參與審判過(guò)程中所形成的意見(jiàn)并不具有法律效力，而僅作為法官參考的依據(jù)。這在一定程度上削弱了陪審員在審判過(guò)程中的作用和價(jià)值。由于社會(huì)對(duì)人民陪審員制度的認(rèn)知度不高，公眾對(duì)其信任度和期待值也相對(duì)較低。這可能導(dǎo)致陪審員在參與審判過(guò)程中難以充分發(fā)揮作用，影響制度的實(shí)施效果。Thelegaleffectivenessandsocialrecognitionofthepeople'sjurysystemneedtobeimproved.Atpresent,theopinionsformedbythepeople'sjurorsduringtheirparticipationinthetrialprocessdonothavelegaleffectandareonlyusedasareferenceforjudges.Thistosomeextentweakenstheroleandvalueofjurorsinthetrialprocess.Duetothelowawarenessofthepeople'sjurysysteminsociety,thepublic'strustandexpectationsinitarealsorelativelylow.Thismaymakeitdifficultforjurorstofullyplaytheirroleinthetrialprocess,affectingtheeffectivenessofthesystem'simplementation.人民陪審員制度在面臨諸多挑戰(zhàn)和問(wèn)題的情況下，需要不斷完善和創(chuàng)新。通過(guò)優(yōu)化選任和管理機(jī)制、加強(qiáng)陪審員培訓(xùn)和指導(dǎo)、提高陪審員參與審判的獨(dú)立性和有效性等措施，可以推動(dòng)人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇與實(shí)踐，為實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正和社會(huì)和諧穩(wěn)定作出更大貢獻(xiàn)。Thesystemofpeople'sjurorsneedstobecontinuouslyimprovedandinnovatedinthefaceofmanychallengesandproblems.Byoptimizingtheselectionandmanagementmechanism,strengtheningthetrainingandguidanceofjurors,andimprovingtheindependenceandeffectivenessofjurorsparticipatingintrials,wecanpromotetherecoveryandpracticeofthepeople'sjurysystem,andmakegreatercontributionstoachievingjudicialfairnessandsocialharmonyandstability.五、完善人民陪審員制度的建議與措施SuggestionsandMeasuresforImprovingthePeople'sJurySystem人民陪審員制度是我國(guó)司法民主的重要體現(xiàn)，其實(shí)踐不僅增強(qiáng)了司法公開(kāi)和透明度，也促進(jìn)了公眾對(duì)司法工作的理解和信任。然而，要使這一制度更加完善并發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用，我們需要采取一系列具體的建議和措施。Thesystemofpeople'sjurorsisanimportantembodimentofjudicialdemocracyinChina.Itspracticenotonlyenhancesjudicialopennessandtransparency,butalsopromotespublicunderstandingandtrustinjudicialwork.However,tomakethissystemmoreperfectandplayitsduerole,weneedtotakeaseriesofspecificsuggestionsandmeasures.應(yīng)提高人民陪審員的選任標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和程序。選任過(guò)程中應(yīng)更加注重候選人的法律素養(yǎng)、社會(huì)閱歷和公正觀念，以確保他們有能力參與案件的審理。同時(shí)，選任程序應(yīng)公開(kāi)透明，接受社會(huì)監(jiān)督，防止權(quán)力尋租和利益輸送。Theselectionstandardsandproceduresforpeople'sjurorsshouldbeimproved.Duringtheselectionprocess,moreattentionshouldbepaidtothelegalliteracy,socialexperience,andfairnessofcandidatestoensuretheirabilitytoparticipateinthetrialofcases.Atthesametime,theselectionprocessshouldbeopenandtransparent,subjecttosocialsupervision,andpreventrent-seekingandinteresttransfer.要加強(qiáng)對(duì)人民陪審員的培訓(xùn)和管理。通過(guò)定期的法律知識(shí)培訓(xùn)和實(shí)踐指導(dǎo)，提高陪審員的法律素養(yǎng)和審判能力。同時(shí)，建立健全陪審員的考核機(jī)制，對(duì)陪審員的履職情況進(jìn)行定期評(píng)估，對(duì)表現(xiàn)優(yōu)秀的陪審員給予獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)和激勵(lì)。Weneedtostrengthenthetrainingandmanagementofpeople'sjurors.Throughregularlegalknowledgetrainingandpracticalguidance,improvethelegalliteracyandtrialabilityofjurors.Atthesametime,establishasoundassessmentmechanismforjurors,conductregularevaluationsoftheirperformance,andrewardandmotivateoutstandingjurors.再次，應(yīng)完善人民陪審員參與審判的機(jī)制。明確陪審員在審判中的職責(zé)和權(quán)利，保障他們能夠獨(dú)立、公正地參與案件審理。同時(shí)，建立健全陪審員與法官的溝通協(xié)作機(jī)制，確保審判工作的順利進(jìn)行。Onceagain,themechanismforpeople'sjurorstoparticipateintrialsshouldbeimproved.Clarifytheresponsibilitiesandrightsofjurorsinthetrial,andensurethattheycanindependentlyandfairlyparticipateinthecasetrial.Atthesametime,establishasoundcommunicationandcooperationmechanismbetweenjurorsandjudgestoensurethesmoothprogressoftrialwork.應(yīng)加強(qiáng)對(duì)人民陪審員制度的宣傳和推廣。通過(guò)各種渠道和方式，普及陪審員制度的知識(shí)和意義，提高公眾對(duì)陪審員制度的認(rèn)知度和參與度。積極宣傳優(yōu)秀陪審員的先進(jìn)事跡和典型案例，樹(shù)立陪審員制度的良好形象。Weshouldstrengthenthepublicityandpromotionofthesystemofpeople'sjurors.Throughvariouschannelsandmethods,popularizetheknowledgeandsignificanceofthejurysystem,andincreasepublicawarenessandparticipationinthejurysystem.Activelypromotetheadvanceddeedsandtypicalcasesofoutstandingjurors,andestablishagoodimageofthejurysystem.完善人民陪審員制度需要我們從多個(gè)方面入手，通過(guò)提高選任標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、加強(qiáng)培訓(xùn)管理、完善參與機(jī)制以及加強(qiáng)宣傳推廣等措施，推動(dòng)陪審員制度在實(shí)踐中不斷發(fā)展和完善。這將有助于提升我國(guó)司法工作的質(zhì)量和效率，增強(qiáng)司法公信力，為實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)公平正義提供有力保障。Improvingthepeople'sjurysystemrequiresustostartfrommultipleaspects,suchasimprovingselectionstandards,strengtheningtrainingmanagement,improvingparticipationmechanisms,andstrengtheningpublicityandpromotion,topromotethecontinuousdevelopmentandimprovementofthejurysysteminpractice.ThiswillhelpimprovethequalityandefficiencyofChina'sjudicialwork,enhancejudicialcredibility,andprovidestrongguaranteesforachievingsocialfairnessandjustice.六、人民陪審員制度的未來(lái)展望TheFutureOutlookofthePeople'sJurySystem人民陪審員制度作為中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義司法制度的重要組成部分，其歷史發(fā)展和實(shí)踐探索充分彰顯了我國(guó)司法民主的獨(dú)特優(yōu)勢(shì)。隨著法治中國(guó)建設(shè)的深入推進(jìn)，人民陪審員制度也迎來(lái)了新的發(fā)展機(jī)遇和挑戰(zhàn)。Thepeople'sjurysystem,asanimportantcomponentofthesocialistjudicialsystemwithChinesecharacteristics,itshistoricaldevelopmentandpracticalexplorationfullydemonstratetheuniqueadvantagesofjudicialdemocracyinChina.WiththedeepeningoftheconstructionoftheruleoflawinChina,thepeople'sjurysystemhasalsousheredinnewdevelopmentopportunitiesandchallenges.展望未來(lái)，人民陪審員制度需要進(jìn)一步完善和發(fā)展。要提高人民陪審員的參審質(zhì)量和效率，確保他們能夠充分發(fā)揮作用。這需要通過(guò)加強(qiáng)培訓(xùn)、提高選任標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、優(yōu)化參審流程等方式，提升人民陪審員的法律素養(yǎng)和參審能力。同時(shí)，還要加強(qiáng)人民陪審員與法官的溝通協(xié)作，形成合力，共同推動(dòng)案件公正高效審理。Lookingaheadtothefuture,thesystemofpeople'sjurorsneedstobefurtherimprovedanddeveloped.Toimprovethequalityandefficiencyoftheparticipationofpeople'sjurorsintrials,andensurethattheycanfullyplaytheirrole.Thisrequiresstrengtheningtraining,improvingselectionstandards,andoptimizingthetrialprocesstoenhancethelegalliteracyandtrialabilityofpeople'sjurors.Atthesametime,itisnecessarytostrengthencommunicationandcooperationbetweenpeople'sjurorsandjudges,formajointforce,andjointlypromotethefairandefficienttrialofcases.要推動(dòng)人民陪審員制度的創(chuàng)新發(fā)展。在堅(jiān)持和完善現(xiàn)有制度的基礎(chǔ)上，可以探索建立更加靈活多樣的參審模式，如擴(kuò)大陪審案件范圍、實(shí)行隨機(jī)抽選陪審員等，以增強(qiáng)制度的適應(yīng)性和生命力。同時(shí)，還可以借鑒國(guó)外有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)，結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際，不斷完善人民陪審員制度的理論體系和實(shí)踐模式。Topromotetheinnovativedevelopmentofthepeople'sjurysystem.Onthebasisofadheringtoandimprovingtheexistingsystem,wecanexploretheestablishmentofmoreflexibleanddiversetrialmodes,suchasexpandingthescopeofjurycases,implementingrandomselectionofjurors,etc.,toenhancetheadaptabilityandvitalityofthesystem.Atthesametime,wecanalsodrawonusefulexperiencesfromabroadandcombinethemwiththeactualsituationinChinatocontinuouslyimprovethetheoreticalsystemandpracticalmodelofthepeople'sjurysystem.要加強(qiáng)人民陪審員制度的宣傳普及。通過(guò)各種渠道和方式，加強(qiáng)對(duì)人民陪審員制度的宣傳教育，提高公眾對(duì)制度的認(rèn)知度和認(rèn)同感。這有助于增強(qiáng)人民群眾對(duì)司法工作的信任和支持，推動(dòng)形成全社會(huì)尊法學(xué)法守法用法的良好氛圍。Weneedtostrengthenthepublicityandpopularizationofthepeople'sjurysystem.Throughvariouschannelsandmethods,strengthenthepublicityandeducationofthepeople'sjurysystem,andimprovethepublic'sawarenessandsenseofidentificationwiththesystem.Thishelpstoenhancethetrustandsupportofthepeopleinjudicialwork,andpromotestheformationofagoodatmosphereofrespecting,abidingby,andusingthelawinthewholesociety.人民陪審員制度是我國(guó)司法制度的重要組成部分，具有深厚的歷史底蘊(yùn)和廣泛的群眾基礎(chǔ)。展望未來(lái)，我們要以習(xí)近平新時(shí)代中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義思想為指導(dǎo)，堅(jiān)持和完善人民陪審員制度，推動(dòng)其不斷發(fā)展完善，為實(shí)現(xiàn)全面依法治國(guó)、建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家作出新的更大貢獻(xiàn)。Thesystemofpeople'sjurorsisanimportantcomponentofChina'sjudicialsystem,withaprofoundhistoricalbackgroundandabroadmassfoundation.七、結(jié)論Conclusion在本文中，我們探討了人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇與實(shí)踐。通過(guò)對(duì)歷史背景、制度設(shè)計(jì)、實(shí)施效果等方面的分析，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)人民陪審員制度在中國(guó)司法體系中具有重要地位，并且在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中仍然具有不可替代的價(jià)值。Inthisarticle,weexploretherevivalandpracticeofthepeople'sjurysystem.Throughanalysisofhistoricalbackground,institutionaldesign,andimplementationeffects,wehavefoundthatthepeople'sjurysystemplaysanimportantroleintheChinesejudicialsystemandstillhasirreplaceablevalueinmodernsociety.人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇是中國(guó)司法體系改革的重要成果之一。隨著中國(guó)法治建設(shè)的不斷推進(jìn)，司法體系也在不斷完善。人民陪審員制度的復(fù)蘇，不僅有助于增強(qiáng)司法公正性和透明度，還有助于提高公眾對(duì)司法制度的信任度和滿意度。同時(shí)，人民陪審員制度還能夠促進(jìn)司法資源的合理利用，緩解司法壓力，提高司法效率。Therevivalofthepeople'sjurysystemisoneoftheimportantachievementsofChina'sjudicialsystemreform.WiththecontinuouspromotionofChina'sruleoflawconstruction,thejudicialsystemisalsoconstantlyimproving.Therevivalofthepeople'sjurysystemnotonlyhelpstoenhancejudicialfairnessandtransparency,butalsohelpstoincreasepublictrustandsatisfactionwiththejudicialsystem.Atthesametime,thesystemofpeople'sjur