longtermoperationmaintenanceampreplacement長期運(yùn)行維修更換

Where

have

we

been?Why

Operation

and

Maintenance?Currently

more

than

259

systems

inoperation

with

a

public

investment

of

over$77

millionExperience

has

shown

that

passive

systemshave

routine

operational

needs,

haveexpected

and

often

unexpected

majormaintenance

requirements

and

will

eventuallyneed

to

be

replacedFailure

to

provide

for

OMR

will

result

in

theloss

of

restored

water

resources

andpublic

investmentTermsConstruction:

Cost

to

build

the

treatmentsystem.O

&

M:

Operation

and

maintenance

activitiesincluding

inspections,

sampling,

sampleanalysis,

flushing,

scheduled

maintenance,

andnon-catastrophic

unscheduled

maintenance.R:

Single

replacement

of

the

system.Projected

costs

may

approach

originalconstruction

costs.O,

M

&

R:

Combined

operation,

maintenance

and

replacement

costs.O,

M

&

R

Plan

Should

IncludeNarrative

describing

O,

M

&

RMaintenance

agreement

with

all

parties,including

property

ownersO,

M

&

R

Site

MapFlushing

points,

sample

points,

BMPsSite

specific

instructions“As-built”

plansLong-term

Cost

AnalysisInformation

Sources:

AMDDEP/BAMR

-actual

construction

and

O

&

Mcosts

for

existing

systems

plus

estimatedreplacement

costsNRCS

-

project

bid

cost

plus

estimatedO,

M

&

RStream

Restoration

Inc.

–

estimatedO,

M

&

R

for

existing

projectsHedin

Environmental

-

estimatedconstruction

and

long-term

O,

M

&

R

forBabb

Creek

systemAverage

Annual

Factorsfor

AMDTreatment

Systems*Vertical

Flow

Systems.....………….....

5%Anoxic

Limestone

Drain

Systems.......

4%Compost

Anaerobic

wetlands.............

4%Pyrolusite?

Systems...........................

3%Open

limestone

channels....................

1%Lime

sand

addition

programs..….…....

33-50%Automated

lime

doser.........................

13%OMR

Workgroup

Average………….….4%*

Annual

percentage

of

construction

costsBreakdown

of

O,

M

&

R

forVertical

Flow

Systems10Routine

operations

(sampling,...........

20%inspections,

flushing)Water

sample

lab

analyses

...............Maintenance

–

repairs

&

supplies

.....

30%System

reconstruction......................Total

O,

M

&

R..............................(65%

DEP

provided,

35%

local)Guiding

Principlesfor

ProjectsinPennsylvaniaTrue

SustainableOperation,

Maintenance

&Replacement

is

based

onLOCAL

COMMUNITYOwnership

&

InvolvementThe

goal

is

a

system

ofhealthy

INTERDEPENDENCE

&

PARTNERSHIP

betweengovernment

and

localsponsorsOMR

Support

StrategyLocal

Sponsors

provide

routineoperation

and

maintenanceMaintenance

needs

assisted

by

localindustry,

local

government

and/or

BAMRconstruction

staffDEP

provides

funding

for

moresignificant

maintenance

and

eventualsystem

replacementWhere

are

we

now?Present

Status:GG

projects

now

require

OMR

plans

as

a

deliverableGG

project

applications

that

adequately

address

OMR

receive

a

higher

score,

particularly

when

non-government

sources

are

utilizedLocal

sponsors

are

expected

to

provide

routineoperationsGG

has

an

OMR

project-type

category

and

providesfunding

for

maintenance

and

replacement

on

acompetitive

scoring,

annual

grant,

basisWPCAMR

has

received

a

grant

to

fund

lab

analysesWPCAMR

has

received

2

Quick

Response

grants

andhas

applied

for

a

third

in

the

2008

grant

roundBAMR

has

put

together

OMR

task

force

to

evaluateexisting

BAMR

passive

treatment

systemsGrowing

Greener

O,

M

&

R

Category:Existing

FacilitiesAnnual

grant

cycleCompetitively

Evaluated

and

ScoredEvaluation

and

scoring

criteria

O,

M

&

R

plan

conceptually

sound

Public-private

support

with

localgovernment,

residents,

industry,

etc.Maintenance/replacement

essential

forcontinued

environmental

benefitWPCAMR

Lab

Analysis

Grant$166,000

grant

provides

funding

for

labanalysis

by

local

labs:

Mahaffey

Lab(Grampian)

&

G&C

Lab

in

SummervilleCurrently

covering

7

counties:

Allegheny,Armstrong,

Butler,

Clarion,

Clearfield,

Indianaand

JeffersonRequires

an

OMR

planHas

been

underutilizedGrant

expired

6/30/08;

an

extension

hasbeen

requested

but

no

decision

has

beenmade

yetWPCAMR

Quick

Response

GrantStarted

in

2006A

mechanism

to

quickly

provide

GG

funds

to

localsponsors

when

failure

to

act

quickly

will

likely

result

in

serious

environmental

consequences

or

wil

contribute

to

further

damage

of

a

projectCurrent

grant

has

a

remaining

balance

of

$189,000and

has

been

extended

to

6/30/092007

grant

adds

$100,000,

with

an

end

date

of2010WPCAMR

has

applied

for

a

new

grant

for

the

2008round

of

GGApplications

are

available

on

the

GG

web

site

–search

under

“quick

response”

key

wordsThe

application

process

is

relatively

streamlinedand

straightforwardQuick

Response

(continued)Completed

applications,

with

a

contractor’s

costestimate

attached,

are

submitted

to

the

DMOWatershed

ManagerWatershed

Manager

and

District

Mining

Managermust

approve

project

and

forward

to

WPCAMRWPCAMR

sends

letter

to

applicant

stating

whetherfunding

is

approved

or

notIf

approved,

applicant

has

contractor

completerepairs,

Watershed

Manager

reviews

and

approvesrepairs,

WPCAMR

then

disperses

funds

to

applicantand

applies

to

DEP

for

reimbursementMust

have

signed

landowner

access

and

permits,

ifneededTypes

of

Projects

funded:Damage

caused

by

storm

events

–

damage

toditches,

berms,

intake

structures

and

spillways(most

frequent

cause

of

funds

needed

has

beendamage

due

to

storm

events)Non-storm

related

berm

and

pipe

damageSludge

removal

from

compostReplacement

of

valvesRepairs

to

a

stream

bank

stabilization

projectafter

a

storm

event

(non-AMD

project)11

projects

funded

so

far;

costs

have

rangedfrom

$2,800

to

$55,000BAMR’s

OMR

TaskforceEstablished

to

address

OMR

needs

of

BAMR-constructed

passive

treatment

systemsIn

Cambria

office,

2

teams

have been

establishedthat

include

engineers

and

geologistsHave

completed

2

evaluations

and

are

currentlyworking

on

2

moreMost

problematic

sites

are

given

top

priority,

butthe

goal

is

to

develop

an

OMR

workplan

for

all

24systems

designed

and

constructed

by

the

CambriaOfficeHarrisburg

staff

is

focusing

on BF

projectsdesigned

there,

while

Wilkes-Barre

staff

will

beworking

on

projects

built

by

BAMR

in

their

DistrictReports

will

eventually

be

posted

on

BAMR’s

websiteBAMR

AMD

Project

OMR

Report

Format

5/14/08Project

BackgroundProject

number,

name,

twp.,

county,

receiving

streamIdentify

what

the

goal

of

the

project

was

and

general

background

of

the

project

Project

infoProject

design

info

–

design

methodology,

design

flow

and

qualityProject

description

-

describe

the

treatment

system

including

each

individual

treatment

cell

Statuof

routine

operations,

past

maintenance

and

retrofitsStatus

of

restoration

efforts

in

the

watershed

and

partner

viabilityProperty

owner

info

and

status

of

BAMR

access

rightsAttachments:

(if

on-line,

links

maybeused

to

locate

this

info)System

water

quality

dataspreadsheet

in

astandardized

formatStream

surveyreport

or

data,

if

available

(post-construction)As-builts

(to

be

completed

by

Inspectors/Designers/Surveyors)Monitoring

map

indicating

sample

point

ID

and

locationO

&

M/monitoring

planTopographic

map

depicting

treatment

system

locationDirections

to

sitePerformance

Evaluation

and

Recommendations:Evaluation:Water

quality

data

trends

(may

want

to

depict

with

graphs

or

other

visuals)Results

of

field

review

(include

a

discussion

of

any

analysis

or

field

tests

completed

by

BAMR

as

part

of

thisevaluation)Summary

of

current

status

of

systemDiscuss

whether

project

goalswere

accomplishedRecommended

Options:Retrofit/major

repair

to

be

designed

in-house

and

bid

outRetrofit/major

repair

to

be

designed

through

the

passive

design

consultant

contract

and

bid

outRetrofit/major

repair

to

be

undertaken

by

the

BD

crewContinue

current

operationModify

current

operation,

including

operational

or

monitoring

modificationsAbandon

system,

remove

treatment

system

and

restore

areaScope

of

Work

for

Recommended

Option

(if

applicable)Narrative

or

list

of

work

neededEstimated

cost

(identify

funding

source,

if

known)Materials

list

(type

and

quantity),

for

BD

projectsAttach

needed

drawings

or

schematicsPost-construction

follow

up

ReportOnce

recommended

work

is

completed,

a

follow-up

report

is

to

be

completed

and

attached

that

includes

costs

andsuccess

of

recommendationEach

time

a

performance

evaluation

isinitiated,

the

above

sectionsshould

be

repeated

underthe

new

dateWhere

are

we

going?Draft

Set-Aside

Position

Paper:Plan

to

Address

OMRSuccessful

Growing

Greener

Applicants

tohandle

routine

operationsDEP

to

provide

mechanism

to

fundemergencies

and non-routine

maintenance;current Quick-Response

program

provides

atemplateDEP

to

develop

appropriate

application

toseek

grants

for

complete

or

partial

systemreplacementFunds

also

will

be

provided

to

BAMR

forCommonwealth-constructed

systems

and“orphaned”

systemsFundingDEP

has

committed

$2

million

this

year

to

supportOMRSet-Aside

funding

increases

under

re-authorizedSMCRA

will

likely

be

a

source

of

funding

for

DEPsupport

of

OMRThe

DEP

will

make

funding

decisions

based

on

OMRcosts

for

current

systems

and

what

theprojected

costs

will

be

for

future

systems;current

estimates

are

that

the

OMR

need

is

$2million/year,

thereby

requiring

approx.

$46

million

tbe

deposited

into

an

interest-bearing

fund,

basedon

current

financial

scenarios

–

just

for

thepassive

systems

currently

operatingSet

Aside

funds

used

in

this

manner will

not

beavailable

to

construct

treatment

facilities,

therebyreducing

the

overall

funding

available

for

AMDabatement

and

treatment

projectsTermsConstruction:

Cost

to

build

the

treatmentsystem.O

&

M:

Operation

and

maintenance

activitiesincluding

inspections,

sampling,

sampleanalysis,

flushing,

scheduled

maintenance,

andnon-catastrophic

unscheduled

maintenance.R:

Single

replacement

of

the

system.Projected

costs

may

approach

originalconstruction

costs.O,

M

&

R:

Combined

operation,

maintenance

and

replacement

costs.WPCAMR

Lab

Analysis

Grant$166,000

grant

provides

funding

for

labanalysis

by

local

labs:

Mahaffey

Lab(Grampian)

&

G&C

Lab

in

SummervilleCurrently

covering

7

counties:

Allegheny,Armstrong,