




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
POLIS
JournalismatLSE
GeneratingChange
AglobalsurveyofwhatnewsorganisationsaredoingwithAI
CharlieBeckettandMiraYaseen
Preface
Ournewsmediaworldhasbeenturnedupsidedownagain.Asalways,serioustechnologicalchangeproducesbothdystopianandutopianhype.MuchofthishasbeengeneratedonsocialmediabycorporatePRandpoliticians.Newscoverageandexpertcommentaryhasalso
veeredfromexcitedcoverageofpositivebreakthroughsinfieldssuchasmedicinetomuchmorefrighteningvisionsofnegativeforcesunleashed:GenerativeAI(genAI)isproducingatidalwaveofautomated,undetectabledisinformation;itwillamplifydiscrimination,extremespeechandinequalities.
Anditsimpactonjournalism?Again,muchofthecoveragehasfocusedontheunreliabilityofmanygenAItoolsandthecontroversyoveritsrapaciousappetiteforotherpeople’sdatatotrainitsalgorithms.Astheinitialstormofhypeturnsintomorepracticalconsiderationswehave
beentalkingtonewsorganisationsaroundtheworldaboutthisnewwaveoftechnologicalchange.WhataretheydoingwithAIandgenAI;whatmighttheydointhefuture;andwhataretheirhopesandfearsforitsimpactonthesustainabilityandqualityofthishard-pressedjournalismindustry?
WhetheryouareexcitedorappalledatwhatgenAIcando,thisreportmakesitclearthatitisvitaltolearnandengagewiththistechnology.Itwillchangetheworldwereportupon.Itneedscriticalattentionfromindependentbutinformedjournalists.Butoursurveyshowsitisalso
alreadychangingjournalism.Itbringsexcitingopportunitiesforefficiencyandevencreativity.Asonerespondenttoldus,“Freeinguptimeforjournaliststocontinuedoingtheirjobisthegreatestimpactachieved.”
Butitalsobringsspecificandgeneralhazards.Thegoodnewsfromourrespondents,atleast,isthattheyareawareoftheopportunitiesandrisksandarebeginningtoaddressthem.The
bestorganisationshavesetupstructurestoinvestigategenAIandprocessestoincludealltheirstaffinitsadoption.Theyhavewrittennewguidelinesandstartedtoexperimentwithcaution.Thisisacriticalphase(again!)fornewsmediaaroundtheworld.Journalistshaveneverbeenundersomuchpressureeconomically,politicallyandpersonally.GenAIwillnotsolvethose
problemsanditmightwelladdsome,too.
Responsible,effectivejournalismismoreneededthanever.WehopethisreportandourworkatJournalismAIcontributestothatmission.Welookforwardtohearingfromyou.Letusknow
whatyouaredoingandhowwecanhelp.
ProfessorCharlieBeckett
DirectorPolis,LSE,leaderoftheLSE’sJournalismAIproject
1
Contents
Preface1
TheJournalismAISurvey4
ExecutiveSummary&KeyFindings6
Introduction:HowDidWeGetHere?9
Chapter1:HowAIisBeingUsedinJournalismToday14
1.0HowAreNewsroomsUsingAI?14
1.1Newsgathering15
1.2NewsProduction17
1.3NewsDistribution18
1.4WhyNewsroomsUseAI21
1.5WhatisWorkingandWhatisNot22
Chapter2:AIStrategy25
2.0TheNeedforStrategy25
2.1Newsrooms’AIStrategies
24
2.2HowNewsroomProcessesandRolesareAffectedbyAI28
2.3ReadyforAI?31
2.4TheStrategicChallengestoAIAdoption32
2.5HaveNewsrooms’ApproachestoAIIntegrationChanged?36
Chapter3:EthicsandEditorialPolicy39
3.0AI’sImpactonEditorialQuality39
3.1AlgorithmicBias39
3.2NewsroomApproachestoEthicalConcerns41
3.3EthicalImplicationsforJournalismatLarge43
3.4TheRoleofTechnologyCompanies44
3.5TheRoleofUniversitiesandIntermediaryCompanies
47
2
(continued)
Contents
Chapter4:TheFutureofAIandJournalism49
4.0WhereisThisAllGoing?49
4.1TheNeedforEducationandTraining51
4.2NewsroomCollaboration53
4.3HowWillAIChangeJournalism?54
Chapter5:GenerativeAIandJournalism
57
5.0CurrentUseCases57
5.1OpportunitiesPresentedbyGenerativeAI60
5.2ChallengesPresentedbyGenerativeAI62
Chapter6:TheGlobalDisparityinAIDevelopmentandAdoption65
6.0TheGlobalNorth/SouthDivide65
6.1EconomicandInfrastructuralChallenges66
6.2LanguageandAccessibilityChallenges66
6.3PoliticalRealitiesAffectTrustinAI68
Conclusion:WhatDoesAIMeanforJournalism?71
SixStepsTowardsanAIStrategyforNewsOrganisations72
Glossary73
References77
Readings&Resources83
Acknowledgements85
3
7%
28%
16%
20%
13%
16%
TheJournalismAISurvey
Thisreportisthesecondglobalsurveythatwehaveconducted.Thesampleforthisreportisbiggerwithagreateremphasisongeographicaldiversity.Itisbasedonasurveyof105newsandmediaorganisationsfrom46differentcountriesregardingAIandassociated
technologies.In2019wesurveyed71newsorganisationsfrom32differentcountries,ofwhichonly16haveparticipatedagaininthis2023survey.
Thisyear,wemadeitapointtoreachamorediversegroupofparticipantsinterms
ofthesizeoftheirorganisations.Weinvitedsmallandlargenewsrooms,including
emergingandlegacyorganisations.Inadditiontothis,contributionscameinfromLatinAmerica,sub-SaharanAfrica,theMiddleEastandNorthAfrica(MENA),AsiaPacific,
Europe,andNorthAmerica.Thisnecessitatedanadditionalchapter,focusingonregionalchallengestoAIadoption.
NewsOrganisationsThatCompletedTheSurveyByType
30%
20%
10%
0%
BroadcasterNewspaper
Magazine
NewsAgency
PublishingGroup
Other
4
Thepurposeofthisreportisthesameasthefirst:togiveasenseofwhatishappeningwithAIandwhatrisksandopportunitiesitoffers.WeaskedparticipantshowtheyareengagingwithgenerativeAI(genAI)technologiesanditsimplicationsforthefutureofjournalism.Wehopeitinformsthedebate,helpsnewsorganisationscharttheirwayforward,andguidesustodevelopourprogrammestosupportthatprocess.
Thesurveywassupplementedwithinterviews,andconversationsatjournalism
conferences.Weareverygratefultoeveryonewhohassharedtheirthoughts
andexperienceswithus.ThesurveysandinterviewswereconductedbetweenAprilandJuly,2023.
Wedonotclaimthatthesurveyisrepresentativeoftheglobalindustry–thatwouldbe
almostimpossibleonaninternationalscale–nordoesitequallyreflectallviewpoints
withinthedifferentpartsofnewsorganisations.Butitdoesgiveanunprecedentedinsightintohowthesetechnologiesareperceivedbythosepeopleleadingtheirdevelopmentorapplicationinsidenewsorganisations.
Ourrespondentsrepresentdiverserolesandexpertisewithintheirorganisations;they
includejournalists,technologists,andmanagers.Weencouragednewsorganisationstogatherrepresentativesfromdifferentdepartmentstocompletethesurveycollaboratively.
NB:Thelistoforganisationsthatcompletedthesurveycanbefoundintheacknowledgments.
Thepublishedquoteshavegenerallybeenanonymised.Someorganisationnameswereaddedforcontextafterreceivingpermissionfromtheauthors.Somequoteswereeditedlightlytocorrectliteralsandforsense.Theeditorialresponsibilityforthereportliesentirelywiththeauthor.
5
ExecutiveSummary
&KeyFindings
1ArtificialIntelligence(AI)continuestobeunevenlydistributedamongsmallandlargenewsroomsandregionallyamongGlobalSouthandGlobalNorthcountries.
2ThesocialandeconomicbenefitsofAIaregeographicallyconcentratedintheGlobalNorth,whichenjoytheinfrastructureandresources,whilemanycountriesinthe
GlobalSouthgrapplewiththesocial,cultural,andeconomicrepercussionsofpost-independencecolonialism.
3Morethan75%ofrespondentsuseAIinatleastoneoftheareasacrossthenewsvaluechainofnewsgathering,productionanddistribution.
4IncreasingefficiencyandproductivitytofreeupjournalistsformorecreativeworkwerethemaindriversforAIintegrationformorethanhalftherespondents.
5Arounda1/3oftherespondentssaidtheyhadaninstitutionalAIstrategyorwerecurrentlydevelopingone.
6NewsroomshaveawiderangeofapproachestoAIstrategy,dependingontheirsize,mission,andaccesstoresources.Someearlyadoptersarecurrentlyfocusingon
achievingAIinteroperabilitywithexistingsystems,othershaveadoptedacase-by-caseapproach,andsomemediadevelopmentorganisationsareworkingtowardsbuildingAIcapacityinregionswithlowAIliteracy.
7Arounda1/3ofrespondentsbelievetheirorganisationsarereadytodealwiththe
challengesofAIadoptioninjournalism,whilealmosthalfsaidtheywereonlypartiallyreadyornotreadyyet.
8ManyrespondentssaidAIintegrationischangingexistingroleswithinthenewsroomthroughtrainingandupskilling.Alongthesamelines,AIischangingthenatureofajournalist’sroleandsoughtafterskills.
9Aswesawinour2019report,financialconstraintsandtechnicaldifficultiesremainthemostpressingchallengesforintegratingAItechnologiesinthenewsroom.
10Ethicalconcernsarestillsignificantforourrespondents;manyadvocatefor
explainableAIandsettingethicalguidelinestomitigatealgorithmicbias.
11Settingde-biasingtechniquesemergedasahighlychallengingareafor
mostrespondents.
6
12CulturalresistanceandfearsofjobdisplacementandscepticismofAItechnologies
cannotbediscounted.
13Acrosstheboard,respondentsnotedthatmitigatingAIintegrationchallengesrequiresbridgingknowledgegapsamongvariousteamsinthenewsroom.Similarly,cross-
departmentcollaborationwasseenasnecessaryforachievingeffectiveAIadoption.
14ThechallengeofkeepingpacewiththerapidevolutionofAIwasconsistently
mentionedthroughoutthesurvey.
15About40%ofrespondentssaidtheirapproachtoAIhasnotchangedoverthepast
fewyears,eitherbecausetheyarestillinthebeginningoftheirAIjourneyorbecauseAIintegrationremainslimitedintheirnewsrooms.Concurrently,arounda1/4said
theirorganisation’sapproachtoAIhasevolved;theyhavegainedhands-onexperiencethathelpsthemthinkmorerealisticallyaboutAI.
16Morethan60%ofrespondentsareconcernedabouttheethicalimplicationsofAI
integrationforeditorialqualityandotheraspectsofjournalism.JournalistsaretryingtofigureouthowtointegrateAItechnologiesintheirworkupholdingjournalistic
valueslikeaccuracy,fairness,andtransparency.
17RespondentscalledfortransparencyfromthedesignersofAIsystemsand
technologycompanies,andtheusers,namelynewsrooms,withtheiraudiences.
18Journalistsandmediamakerscontinuedtostresstheneedfora‘humanintheloopapproach,’inlinewiththeresultsinour2019survey.
19TherearefearsthatAItechnologieswouldfurthercommercialisejournalism,
boostingpoorqualityandpolarisingcontent,leadingtoafurtherdeclineinpublictrustinjournalism.
20TechcompaniesaredrivinginnovationinAIandothertechnologies,butsurveyparticipantsvoicedconcernsabouttheirprofit-drivennature,theconcentrationofpowertheyenjoy,andtheirlackoftransparency.
21Around80%oftherespondentsexpectalargerroleforAIintheirnewsrooms
inthefuture.
22SurveyparticipantsexpectAItoinfluencefourmainareas:
1Fact-checkinganddisinformationanalysis
2Contentpersonalisationandautomation
3Textsummarisationandgeneration
4Usingchatbotstoconductpreliminaryinterviewsandgaugepublicsentiment
onissues
7
8
23ThereareconcernsthatAIwillexacerbatesustainabilitychallengesfacingless-
resourcednewsroomswhicharestillfindingtheirfeet,inahighlydigitisedworldandanincreasinglyAI-poweredindustry.
24Almost43%ofresponsesemphasisedtheimportanceoftrainingjournalistsandotherpersonnelinAIliteracyandothernascentskillslikepromptengineering.
25Thevastmajoritywelcomedmorecollaborationbetweennewsroomsandothermediaorganisationsandacademicinstitutions,hopingitwouldhelplessenthedisparitybetweensmallandlargenewsrooms,aswellasregionallybetween
newsroomsinGlobalNorthandGlobalSouthcountries.
26Theneedforabalancingactbetweentechandjournalism,athemethatalsoemergedinour2019survey,remainsimperativetoafuturewhereAItechnologiesareleveragedtoservejournalismanditsmission.
27Thevastmajorityofrespondents,around85%haveatleastexperimentedwith
generativeAI(genAI)technologiesinarangeofwayssuchaswritingcode,imagegeneration,andauthoringsummaries.
28SomeareapprehensiveaboutusinggenAIineditorialtasks,whileothersareusing
themregularlyincoding,headlinegeneration,andsearchengineoptimisation.
29TherewasahighlevelofagreementamongparticipantsthatgenAIpresenteda
newsetofopportunitiesnotprovidedbytraditionalAI.TheyhighlightedsomeoftheaffordancesofgenAI,suchasaccessibilityandlowrequirementsforadvancedtechnicalskills.
30Respondentsweremuchmoredivided–almost1/2werenotsure–astowhethergenAIalsopresentedanewsetofchallenges.SomebelievegenAIpresentssimilarchallengestotraditionalAI,suchasalgorithmicbias,butraisestheriskceilingtoanewlevel.
31NewsroomsgloballycontendwithchallengesrelatedtoAIintegration,butthe
challengesaremorepronouncedfornewsroomsintheGlobalSouth.Respondentshighlightedlanguage,infrastructural,andpoliticalchallenges.
Introduction
HowDidWeGetHere?
ArtificialIntelligenceinjournalismhasbeensignificantforsomeyears.TheLSE
JournalismAIprojectstartedbackin2019andourfirstglobalreportpublishedinthesameyearshowedthatitwasakeyemergingsetoftechnologies.AIwasproducingefficienciesfornewsworkanditwasalsocreatingopportunitiesfornewpracticesandproductsorservices.
WeshowedinthatpreviousreportthatarangeofnewsorganisationswereusingAI
acrossthejournalismprocessfromnewsgathering,contentcreationanddistribution,tomarketingandrevenue-gathering.Avariedsetoftechnologieswerebeingused,withprogrammesbasedontrainingsoftwaretomanipulatedata.Advancesinmachine-
learningandNaturalLanguageProcessing(NLP)enablednewsroomstobuildoradapttoolsandsystemstosupporttheirjournalism.
Generally,thesewerelarge-scalebutrelativelybasicfunctionssuchasscraping
socialmediaorautomatingverysimplecontentcreation.Itwasusedbyinvestigativejournaliststocombthroughlargedocumentleaksortohelpautomatepaywallsandtopersonalisecontentinstraightforwardways.Someusesofmachinelearning–suchassearch–weresoroutineanduniversaltheyweretakenforgranted.
In2019wefoundthatnewsorganisationswerefacingvariouschallengesinadoptingAI.Therewasalackofgeneralknowledge,specificskills,andresources.Therewerealso
inequalitiesbetweenbigneworganisationsandsmallerones,especiallythoseinnon-Englishspeakingorlessdevelopedmarkets.
Workingwithnewsorganisationsoverthelastfiveyears,wecouldseethattheimpactofAIwassystemicandaccelerating,justasitwasinotherindustriesandsectors.
Themostsuccessfulorganisationswerethosethattookastrategic,holisticapproachandwhorecognisedthatthesetechnologiesrequiredfundamentalself-analysisoftheorganisation’scapabilitiesandfutureplanning.
InthewidercontextitispossibletoseeAIasathirdwaveoftechnologicalchange
forjournalism.Thefirstwavewasgoingonline,accompaniedbythedigitalisationoftoolsandtheshifttomobile.Thesecondwavewasthearrivalofsocialmediaandtheimpactthathadoncontentcreation,consumptionandcompetition.Thetechnologyplatformsnowprovidedmuchoftheinfrastructureforjournalismandthe‘user’wascentraltoitsdissemination.
9
ThearrivalofgenerativeAI(genAI)inthelastyearhasacceleratedallthesetrends
andcreatednewdisruptions.Thisreportisasurveyofhownewsorganisationshave
continuedtodevelop‘traditional’AIandhowtheyareapproachingthenewchallengesofgenAI.Clearly,itpresentsfreshopportunities,butithasspecialrisksandcharacteristics.Therearecontinuities.Mostnewsorganisationswespoketoweretakingamore
strategicapproachtogenAI,oftenbasedonthelessonsfromdealingwithAIandothertechnologybeforehand.
ItisimportanttostressthatgenAIisprobablythemostrapidlyemergingtechnologyformediainthisdigitalera.Someofthemoreextremedystopiancritiquesandover-heatedmarketinghypehavedistractedfromaproperdebateaboutimmediateconcerns.It
isgoodthatwearenowallawareofAIandabletointeractdirectlywithitandexploreitsforceandflaws.Itishopedthatwewillhaveamoreinclusivedebateaboutwhatitmeansforsocietyingeneralandjournalisminparticular.
Journalismisaspecialpractice.Ontheonehanditisaroundtheworldasectorundergreatcommercial,politicalandcompetitivepressure.Itisweakinresourcescomparedtothegiantcorporationsdevelopingthistechnology.Thepotentialfordeepstructuralthreatstojournalisminthefuturemustbepartofourthinkingnow.Ontheotherhand,newsorganisationshaveshownremarkableresilienceandinnovationinsustainingand
sometimesthrivingdespitethechallengestheyhavefaced.ItmightevenbethatinaworldwheregenAIissuchapower,forillaswellasgood,publicinterestjournalismwillbemoreimportantthanever.
.NewsroomDefinitionsofAI+GenerativeAI
WecontinuetorefertoAIasanumbrellatermforawidevarietyofrelatedtechnologiesandtoacknowledgethatmanyprocessesdescribedasAIoftenincorporatemore
conventionaltechnologies.WeborrowedthesamesimpledefinitionofAIweusedinour2019report:
Artificialintelligenceisacollectionofideas,technologies,andtechniquesthatrelatetoacomputersystem’scapacitytoperformtasksnormallyrequiringhumanintelligence.1
AsforgenerativeAI(genAI),whichwediscussindetailinChapter5:
ItisasubfieldwithinMachineLearning(ML),asubfieldofAIinitsownright,thatinvolvesthegenerationofnewdata,suchastext,images,orcode,basedonagivensetofinputdata.2
10
WewantedtoknowifourrespondentshadanoperationaldefinitionofAI.Astheydidin2019,theresponsesreflectedquitevariedunderstandingsofAI,echoingonceagainthefluidityofthetermandthecomplexityofthetopic.
SomerespondentsofferedaclearoperationaldefinitionofAIastheuseofmachinesorcomputersystemstoperformtasksthattraditionallyrequiredhumanintelligence.Manyofferedtechnicaldefinitionsthatcentredaroundtheconceptsof“automation”,“machinelearning”and“algorithms.”Almosthalftherespondentsusedoneormoreofthosetermsintheirdefinitions:
Itentailsthecreationofalgorithmsandmodelsthatallowmachinestocarryoutoperationslikespeechrecognition,visualperception,problemsolving,anddecision-makingthatordinarilyrequirehumanintelligence.
OtherrespondentsrelatedtheiroperationaldefinitionsofAItoitspotentialbenefitsandtheirmotivesforintegratingitinthenewsroom,suchasincreasingefficiency,orbetterservingthenewsroom’saudienceandmission:
Forus,AIrepresentsagroupoftechnologiesthatcanassistandempower
[ourteam]byprovidinginsightsandautomatedsupportacrossarangeof
editorial,operationalandcommunicationstasks.
Technologiesusedtoautomategatheringandanalysisofdatathatserveoureditorialnicheandmission.
SomehighlightedthecapacityofAItechnologiesto“l(fā)earn”orimprovethemselves:
AIistheuseofadvancedalgorithmsthatareabletoprocess,interpret,
classifyandfindpatternsincomplexand/orlargeamountsofdatainsuchawaythatinfers‘intelligence’or‘human-like’learning.
11
SeveralrespondentsemphasisedtheimportanceofethicalconsiderationsinAI
development,whileothersmentionedconcernsabouttheopacityofAIsystemsortheneedforhumanoversight:
Thesetoftechnologies,tools,processes...thatmakeitpossibletoemulate
humancapabilitiesinordertoautomateorimprovethem,notalwaysforan
ethicalorlawfulpurpose.
AfewrespondentssaidtheydidnothaveaworkingdefinitionofAIyet:
Wedonothaveacollectiveworkingdefinitionyet.Mine,asthepersoninchargeofexploringAIwithinthenewsroom,isthatAIisasetofprocessesthatacomputerdoestoaidandfacilitatehuman’swork,addingintelligencetoit.Bynomeansit
replaceshumanpresenceanditshouldalwaysbecheckedandaccompanied.
12
Thisreportispresentedinsevenchapters.Inordertofacilitatecomparisonsbetweenthisandthe2019report,wekeptthemajorityofthechaptersthesame,withthe
exceptionoftwonewchapters.
TheIntroductiongivesabriefbackgroundofthefindingsfromthe2019report,and
summativeoverviewofthetechnologicalchangesseeninthejournalismindustryoverthepastyears,todate.Wedefinekeyissuesandasummaryofwhatyoucanexpectinthisreport.
ChapterOnefocusesonhowAIiscurrentlybeingusedbynewsrooms.ThechapterlooksathownewsroomsareusingAIacrossthenewvaluechainaswellaswhathasbeenworkingandwhathasnotbeenworking.
ChapterTwounpackstheAIstrategyorlackof,innewsrooms.WelookatthetypesofAIapproachesnewsroomshaveundertaken,someofthekeychallengesandwhatimpactthetechnologycanhaveonthem.
ChapterThreeisalsosimilartothepreviousreportasweexpandonethicsand
editorialpolicy.
ChapterFourlookstothefutureandroleofAIinjournalism.
ChapterFivetouchesongenerativeAIandjournalism.ItisanewchapterthatlooksatthecurrentusecasesofgenAI,aswellasitsopportunitiesandchallenges.
ChapterSixreflectsontheglobaldisparityinAIdevelopmentandadoptionaswellasthechallengesfacedbythemajorityoftheworld’spopulationintheGlobalSouth.
TheConclusiontiesalltheabove-mentionedchapterstogetherandgivesabriefanalysisofwhatallthismeansforjournalism.Weconcludethemainbodyofthereportwithasix-steproadmaptowardsanAIstrategythatnewsroomscouldborrowfrom.Youwillalsofindaglossary,endnotes,referencesandalistofsuggestedreadingsandresources.
ThisworkwasfundedbytheGoogleNewsInitiativeandcarriedoutbyateamledby
ProfessorCharlieBeckett,directoroftheLSE’sinternationaljournalismthink-tank,Polis.
Wewouldliketothankallthejournalists,technologistsandresearcherswhotookpartintheproject.TheprojectwasmanagedbyTshepoTshabalalaandtheleadresearcherandco-authorwasMiraYaseen
13
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
Chapter1
HowAIisBeingUsedinJournalismToday
1.0HowAreNewsroomsUsingAI?
WeaskednewsroomshowtheyareusingAItechnologiestoday.Theseareas–
newsgathering,newsproductionandnewsdistribution–coverallthecontentcreationstagesfromideationtopublishing.Thesethreeareasoftenintersectgiventhenatureof“contemporary‘networked’3or‘hybrid’4journalism.Forinstance,fact-checkingchatbotsareleveragedinnewsproductiontovalidateorrefutecertainclaims.Atthesametime,thedatacollectedcouldassistindetectingmisinformationtrendsandinspireatopicforafeaturearticle,thuscontributingtothenewsgatheringprocess.
90%
75%
80%
NewsgatheringNewsProductionNewsDistributi
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025至2030年節(jié)日工藝品項(xiàng)目投資價值分析報(bào)告
- 2025至2030年橡木木地板項(xiàng)目投資價值分析報(bào)告
- 2025至2030年機(jī)制螺絲項(xiàng)目投資價值分析報(bào)告
- 2025至2030年填充鞋乳項(xiàng)目投資價值分析報(bào)告
- 交、直流耐壓試驗(yàn)-直流耐壓試驗(yàn)接線及試驗(yàn)步驟(高電壓技術(shù))
- 2025至2030年乳瓷扁珠項(xiàng)目投資價值分析報(bào)告
- 2025至2030年中國焦煤行業(yè)市場現(xiàn)狀分析及投資前景評估報(bào)告
- 個人納稅申報(bào)的全流程解析試題及答案
- 2025至2030年中國機(jī)械導(dǎo)線壓線鉗項(xiàng)目投資可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2025至2030年中國咖啡豆行業(yè)市場分析預(yù)測及發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究報(bào)告
- 江蘇省2024年中職職教高考文化統(tǒng)考英語試卷
- 五金材料采購?fù)稑?biāo)方案(技術(shù)方案)
- 疼痛的中醫(yī)護(hù)理
- 2024年許昌職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院單招職業(yè)技能測試題庫及答案解析
- 中國能源建設(shè)集團(tuán)投資有限公司社會招聘考試試題及答案
- 【地理】2023-2024學(xué)年人教版地理七年級下冊 期中區(qū)域復(fù)習(xí)課件
- 向世界介紹悠久燦爛的中華傳統(tǒng)文化-統(tǒng)編三下第三單元整體設(shè)計(jì)教案
- 人教版七年級數(shù)學(xué)下冊 第七章 平面直角坐標(biāo)系小結(jié)與復(fù)習(xí)(課件)
- WizdomCloudUrban-EP-RM-013-市政綜合監(jiān)管平臺用戶操作手冊
- 安琪酵母生產(chǎn)工藝
- 2024近零碳園區(qū)建設(shè)路徑研究報(bào)告
評論
0/150
提交評論