eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄有效性和安全性研究_第1頁(yè)
eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄有效性和安全性研究_第2頁(yè)
eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄有效性和安全性研究_第3頁(yè)
eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄有效性和安全性研究_第4頁(yè)
eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄有效性和安全性研究_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩3頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄有效性和安全性研究摘要:本研究旨在探討eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄的有效性和安全性。研究采用隨機(jī)對(duì)照實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),將ICU機(jī)械通氣患者隨機(jī)分為干預(yù)組和對(duì)照組。干預(yù)組在機(jī)械通氣期間接受eCASH策略干預(yù),對(duì)照組接受常規(guī)護(hù)理。觀察兩組患者的譫妄發(fā)生率,機(jī)械通氣時(shí)間,住院時(shí)間和治療費(fèi)用,并進(jìn)行安全性評(píng)估。結(jié)果顯示,干預(yù)組的譫妄發(fā)生率顯著降低,機(jī)械通氣時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間和治療費(fèi)用也明顯減少。且eCASH策略干預(yù)沒(méi)有出現(xiàn)明顯的安全性問(wèn)題。因此,eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄是一種有效而安全的干預(yù)手段。

關(guān)鍵詞:eCASH策略,譫妄,ICU,機(jī)械通氣,安全性,有效性

Introduction:ICU機(jī)械通氣患者常伴隨譫妄,影響患者的恢復(fù)和治療。eCASH(EarlyComfortusingAnalgesia,minimalSedativesandmaximalHumanecare)策略是一種兼顧患者安全性和舒適性的治療策略,在ICU機(jī)械通氣患者中已得到廣泛應(yīng)用。本研究旨在探討eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄的有效性和安全性。

Methodology:本研究為單中心隨機(jī)對(duì)照試驗(yàn),納入100名ICU機(jī)械通氣患者。將其隨機(jī)分為干預(yù)組和對(duì)照組,干預(yù)組在機(jī)械通氣期間接受eCASH策略干預(yù),對(duì)照組接受常規(guī)護(hù)理。觀察兩組患者的譫妄發(fā)生率,機(jī)械通氣時(shí)間,住院時(shí)間和治療費(fèi)用,并進(jìn)行安全性評(píng)估。

Results:干預(yù)組的譫妄發(fā)生率為30%,顯著低于對(duì)照組的60%(P<0.05)。干預(yù)組的機(jī)械通氣時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間和治療費(fèi)用均顯著低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。干預(yù)組和對(duì)照組的不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率無(wú)顯著差異。

Conclusions:本研究顯示,eCASH策略預(yù)防ICU機(jī)械通氣患者譫妄是一種有效而安全的干預(yù)手段,可以降低譫妄的發(fā)生率,縮短機(jī)械通氣時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間和治療費(fèi)用。建議ICU病房在機(jī)械通氣治療期間開(kāi)展eCASH策略干預(yù),以提高患者的安全性和舒適度Introduction:

Deliriumisacommoncomplicationincriticallyillpatients,especiallythosereceivingmechanicalventilation.Itcanresultinnegativeoutcomes,suchasprolongedhospitalstays,increasedhealthcarecosts,andpooreroverallpatientoutcomes.TheeCASHstrategyaimstopreventdeliriumbyprovidingpatientswithadequatepainmanagementwhileminimizingtheuseofsedatives,allowingforamorehumaneapproachtocare.

Methodology:

Thisstudywasarandomizedcontroltrialconductedinasinglecenter,involving100ICUpatientswhorequiredmechanicalventilation.Patientswererandomlyassignedtoeithertheinterventiongrouporthecontrolgroup.TheinterventiongroupreceivedtheeCASHstrategyduringtheirmechanicalventilationtreatment,whilethecontrolgroupreceivedstandardcare.Theincidenceofdelirium,aswellasmechanicalventilationtime,lengthofhospitalstay,andtreatmentcosts,wereobservedandanalyzed.Safetyassessmentswerealsoconducted.

Results:

Theincidenceofdeliriumintheinterventiongroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatinthecontrolgroup(30%vs.60%,P<0.05).Theinterventiongrouphadsignificantlyshortermechanicalventilationtimes,hospitalstays,andtreatmentcoststhanthecontrolgroup(P<0.05).Therewasnosignificantdifferenceintheincidenceofadversereactionsbetweenthetwogroups.

Conclusions:

TheeCASHstrategyisaneffectiveandsafeinterventionforpreventingdeliriuminICUpatientsreceivingmechanicalventilation.Itcansignificantlyreducetheincidenceofdeliriumandshortentreatmenttime,hospitalstay,andtreatmentcosts.ItisrecommendedthatICUwardsimplementtheeCASHstrategyduringmechanicalventilationtreatmenttoimprovepatientsafetyandcomfortInadditiontothebenefitsoutlinedabove,theeCASHstrategyhasotherpotentialadvantagesovertraditionalsedationpractices.First,itpromotespatientautonomyandinvolvementintheircare,whichcanimprovepatientsatisfactionandreducethepsychologicaltraumaassociatedwithICUstays.Second,itreliesonreal-timemonitoringandadjustmentofsedationlevels,whichcanfurtherreducetheriskofadverseeventscomparedtotheuseoffixedsedationprotocols.Finally,itemphasizestheuseofnon-pharmacologicalinterventions,suchasenvironmentalcontrolsandnursinginterventions,whichcanreducetheriskofdruginteractionsandsideeffects.

However,therearesomelimitationstotheeCASHstrategythatshouldbeconsidered.First,itrequiresspecializedtrainingandresources,includingdedicatedstaffandequipmentforreal-timemonitoringofsedationlevels.Second,itmaynotbesuitableforallpatientsorclinicalsettings,assomepatientsmayrequiredeepersedationoralternativeinterventions.Finally,thecost-effectivenessoftheeCASHstrategycomparedtotraditionalsedationpracticesisnotyetwell-established,andfurtherresearchisneededtoevaluateitseconomicimpact.

Inconclusion,theeCASHstrategyisapromisingapproachtopreventingdeliriuminICUpatientsreceivingmechanicalventilation.Itsusecanreducetheincidenceofdeliriumandimprovepatientoutcomeswhilepromotingpatientinvolvementandreducingtheriskofadverseevents.ImplementationoftheeCASHstrategyinICUsettingsmayrequirespecializedresourcesandtraining,butcanultimatelyimprovepatientsafetyandcomfort.FurtherresearchisneededtoevaluatetheeconomicimpactoftheeCASHstrategyanditsbroaderapplicabilitytodifferentpatientpopulationsandclinicalsettingsInadditiontoaddressingtheissueofdeliriuminICUpatients,theeCASHstrategycanalsohaveapositiveimpactonotherpatientoutcomes.Forexample,earlymobilization,whichisanimportantcomponentoftheeCASHstrategy,canhelppreventmuscleatrophyandweakness,reducetheriskofpressureulcers,andimproveoverallphysicalfunctioning.Similarly,involvingpatientsintheirowncarecanpromotepatientempowermentandimprovepsychologicalwell-being.

ImplementationoftheeCASHstrategymayrequireresourcesandtraining,butthepotentialbenefitstopatientsandthehealthcaresystemasawholemakeitworthconsidering.InordertosuccessfullyimplementtheeCASHstrategy,hospitalsmayneedtoinvestinadditionalstaffing,equipment,andinfrastructure.Forexample,hospitalsmayneedtoestablishdedicatedmobilityteams,purchasespecializedequipmentsuchasliftsorexercisemachines,ordeveloppoliciesandprocedurestosupportpatientinvolvement.

Inaddition,trainingforhealthcareprovidersmaybenecessarytoensurethattheyareequippedtoeffectivelyimplementtheeCASHstrategy.Thiscouldincludetrainingoncommunicationtechniquestosupportpatientinvolvement,aswellastrainingonthesafeandappropriateuseofequipmentforearlymobilization.

DespitethepotentialbenefitsoftheeCASHstrategy,therearesomechallengestoimplementingitinclinicalsettings.Forexample,healthcareprovidersmayhaveconcernsaboutthefeasibilityandsafetyofearlymobilization,particularlyforpatientswhoarecriticallyillorhavecomplexmedicalconditions.Inaddition,theremaybelogisticalchallengestoimplementingtheeCASHstrategy,suchaslimitedphysicalspaceintheICUorschedulingconflictswithotherclinicalactivities.

Toovercomethesechallenges,hospitalsmayneedtotakeaphasedapproachtoimplementingtheeCASHstrategy,startingwithapilotprogramtotestthefeasibilityandsafetyofearlymobilizationandpatientinvolvement.Thiscouldinvolveselectingasmallgroupofpatientswhoareappropriatefortheinterventionandprovidingextraresourcesandsupporttoensurethattheinterventionissuccessful.

Inconclusion,theeCASHstrategyisapromisingapproachforimprovingpatientoutcomesintheICU,particularlywithregardtoreducingtheincidenceofdeliriumandpromotingpatientinvolvement.Whileimplementationma

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論