Homosexual lifestyle is extremely harmful同性戀生活方式是極其有害的_第1頁
Homosexual lifestyle is extremely harmful同性戀生活方式是極其有害的_第2頁
Homosexual lifestyle is extremely harmful同性戀生活方式是極其有害的_第3頁
Homosexual lifestyle is extremely harmful同性戀生活方式是極其有害的_第4頁
Homosexual lifestyle is extremely harmful同性戀生活方式是極其有害的_第5頁
全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

Homosexuallifestyleisextremelyharmful

Aquestionmanypeoplehaveis,whatharmisittoallowsame-sexcouplesthesamebenefitsmarriedheterosexualcoupleshave?Orwhatharmisthereinallowinggaystofillauthoritativepositionsinsocietywhoactasrolemodelsforourchildren?Theansweristhatitisextremelyharmfultoourchildrenandsocietyasawhole.Ifourchildrenhaverolemodelswhoaregay,theywillthinkbeinggayissomethingthatisacceptablebysociety.Ithasbecomeatrendtocallitan"alternativelifestyle"orone's"sexualorientation."Othersrefertoitasagaylifestyle,accordingtoanarticlebyFarjmMajd,"TheHomosexualRelationship."Gayactivistsaretryingtotakethefocusoffthefactthatrelationshipsofthissortaresexuallydeviantandareplacingthefocusontolerance,acceptance,civilrights,adoption,same-sexbenefitsandhomosexualmarriage.Majdalsostatesthat,ineffect,theunderlyingrelationshiphasbeenacceptedasvalidasaresultofgayactivistsclaimingtheirmovementhasaculturalbasisratherthananimmoral,unrestrainedsexualfoundation.Thereinliesthedeceittotheiragenda.Alotofpeoplebuyintothegaymovement,convincedit'sbasisisindiversityratherthanimmorality,andanynegativeremarksoractionsagainstthismovementarelabeledasdiscriminatoryorhateful.Thereasoningbehindthispushtowardredefiningtheirdisorderissothatitwillbeacceptedbysocietyundertheguiseofacultureforthemtopromoteacceptanceandtoobtainprotectionunderthelawsagainstdiscrimination.Gaysequatethemselvestocertainminoritygroupswhoareprotectedunderthecivilrightsmovement,buttheirmovementhasnothingtodowithdiversityandeverythingtodowithimmorality.Itisextremelydangerouswhengayactivistspromoteandpublicizeharmfulbehaviortoouryouthwhoareextraimpressionable.Greaterharmiscausedbyhomosexualswhoareinpositionsofauthoritybecausechildrenandyoungadultslookuptopeopleinauthorityasleadersandrolemodels.Toacceptthehomosexuallifestyleasacultureandtocatertotheirdemandswillresultinabreakdownofmoralsinsociety.Itwillbringirreparableharmtoourchildren.Howmucharewewillingtoacceptbeforewefinallyrecognizetherealdangerinvolved?Freedomofreligionisfreedomfromreligion

Lettertotheeditor

IreadJohnletterinSunday'spaper,haranguingthe"dangers"ofthe"homosexuallifestyle"withgreatinterest,notingitasoneofseveralalongthesamelinefromhim.Whatreallyarethese"dangers?"Hedoesn'tmentionthemspecifically,anditmademethinkthedangerswerehellanddamnation-thatoursocietymightsufferthesamefateasSodomandGomorrah.Ibelievethoroughlythatfreedomofreligionmeansfreedomfromreligion;weshouldallbetreatedequallyunderthelawregardlessofourreligiousorculturalbeliefs,regardlessofoursexualpreference,becausesociety'sbenefitisreallywhatthelawisabout.Itexistswithourconsenttokeepthepeaceandensureourwelfare.Whatwe'retalkingaboutherearestablehouseholds,andpossiblyeventheadvancementofsociety,whateverthatreallymeans.I'dliketothinkitmeansequalaccesstoagoodeducation,theabilitytoexpressideasinatolerantenvironment,andtheabilitytowalkdownthestreetwithoutbeingbeatenorkilledbecauseofone'sreligiousorsexualpreferenceorthecolorofone'sskin.Wecanonlyspeakaccuratelyfromourexperience.ThepeopleIknowwhoarelivinga"homosexuallifestyle"areintelligent,thoughtful,considerate,goodparents,communityactivists,conscientiouscitizens,leadersand,allinall,peoplewhoadd,ratherthandetract,fromsocietyasIknowit.Hereareafewpeoplewehave"allowed"tofillauthoritativepositionsinoursocietyandactasrolemodelsforourchildren:Achilles,AlexandertheGreat,Aristotle,FrancisBacon,LudwigvanBeethoven,AaronCopeland,LeonardodaVinci,JuliusCaesar,Michelangelo,JohnMilton,Plato,Sappho,Shakespeare,Tchaikovsky,TolstoyandVoltaire-itcouldbearguedthatoursocietywasinventedbygaypeople.WhetherWesternsocietyisagoodthingremainstobeseen,Iguess,butit'swhatwehavetoworkwith,andIthinkthebestdirectionisforward:tolerance,acceptance,diversityofopinionandofbelief,andthecouragetoaccordjusticetoallpeople,regardlessofthecoloroftheirskin,theirreligion(orlackthereof)ortheirsexualpreference.Dowewanttoturnbacktheclockandchangeourconstitutioninthedirectionofintoleranceandbigotry?Iguesswe'llfindout.Learnthedifferencebetweensex,lifestyle

Lettertotheeditor

JohnMielke'sdiatribeagainstthehomosexual"lifestyle"(Sunday'sJuneauEmpire)wouldbefunnyifitwasn'tsoignorant.Heneedstobealittlemorecarefulinhischoiceofwords.Onedefinitionof"lifestyle"is"thewayapersonlives,includingpatternsofsocialrelations,consumption,entertainment,dress,attitudes,valuesorworldview."IguessheissayingthatLogCabinRepublicanshaveharmfulpoliticalattitudes.Orthatifgaysworkhard,paytaxes,obeythelawandtaketheirkidstosoccergames,theyaremodelingdamagingsocialvalues.Orthatthevegetariansamongthemareengaginginharmfulconsumption.OrmaybegayChristians(yes,therearelotsofthem-canyousayTedHaggart?)holdanevilworldview.Wait,I'vegotit!Dress!It'sthetightleatherpants,right?Andofcourse,thereisnothingsodeviantasaBetteMidleralbum.MostofthegaypeopleIknowhaveadmirablelifestyles.IfMielkeisgoingtoengageinbigotedstereotyping,atleastheshoulduseawordheknowshowtodefine.Isubmitthatifhewashonest,he'dadmitthatwhatgrindshisgritsisno

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論