競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)中產(chǎn)品組合管理博弈模型講義課件_第1頁(yè)
競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)中產(chǎn)品組合管理博弈模型講義課件_第2頁(yè)
競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)中產(chǎn)品組合管理博弈模型講義課件_第3頁(yè)
競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)中產(chǎn)品組合管理博弈模型講義課件_第4頁(yè)
競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)中產(chǎn)品組合管理博弈模型講義課件_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩71頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

Agametheory-basedmodelforproductportfoliomanagementinacompetitivemarket

A.Sadeghi,M.Zandieh

ExpertSystemswithApplications,2010Agametheory-basedmodelforStructureIntroductionLiteraturereviewDescriptionofthePPMproblemProblemformulationExampleConclusionsandfutureworkStructureIntroduction1.IntroductionConsumers,industrialmanagers,andsalesandmarketingpeople,alldemandproductsthatimprovetheirlifestylesortogainanedgeoverthecompetition.So,productportfolios

areinterestingformanypeople.Butunlimitedproductvarietyisnotawaytobesuccessful;therehastobeanoptimum.ItistrueformostcompaniesthattheParetoruleapplies:80%ofthesalesand/orpro?ts

comefrom20%oftheproducts.Itisevidentthatasingleproductcannot1.IntroductionConsumers,indu

ful?llthemanufacturerneedsandonthe

otherhand,fordiversitythereexistslimitation.Intoday’shighlycompetitiveenvironment,determiningan

optimalproductportfolioisveryimportantforthesurvivalofa?rm.Optimalproductportfoliohasreceivedconsiderableattention,becausetheratesoffailureofnewproductportfolioandtheirassociatedlossesareveryhigh.Thewhole

product

component

information(產(chǎn)品構(gòu)建信息),

engineeringful?llthemanufacturerne

portfoliodecision(工程組合決策)isverycrucialfortheprogressofa?rm

,becauseitisverycostlyanddifficulttochange.Thekeyquestionsare,whatthebestproductportfoliois,andhowmanufacturercan

?ndit.Productportfoliomanagement(PPM)is

ageneralbusinessconceptthatanalyzetheproductionability(生產(chǎn)能力)

andmarketpotential,simultaneously,andthendeterminethebestsetofproductsto

offer.PPMisdevelopedtodirectaproductanditsdiversityportfoliodecision(工程組合決策

includingnotonlyattributes(屬性),levels,andprice’s,butalsoanalysisresults,environmental

requirements(環(huán)保需求),manufacturingprocedures(生產(chǎn)流程),productperformanceinformation(產(chǎn)品性能信息),and

etc.ThereforePPMhasbeenclassifiedasacombinatorialoptimizationproblem.Eachcompanystrivesfortheoptimalityofitsproductofferingsthroughvariouscombinationsofproducts.ThePPMproblemmaydevelopfromtwoperspectives:(I)For

attracttheopinionofcustomersincludingnotonlyattribu

intargetmarkets.(II)Forreduce

themanufactureengineeringcosts.Firstistheproblemofmarketingmanagers,andsecondistheproblemofproducer.Whenbothofthemcomposewitheachotherasreflecttoutilityofcostumersandengineeringcosts,thisproblembecomestomisslinkbetweensaleandproductionchain.JiaoandZhang(2005)considerthecustomer–engineering

interactioninproductportfolioplanning,whichaims

tocreateproduct

familyintargetmarkets.(II)Fospeci?cations(產(chǎn)品族/系列規(guī)格)foratargetmarketsegment,andproposedamaximizingsurplussharemodel(最大剩余份額模型).Incompetitiveenvironment,wedetermineourproductportfoliowithregardtoproductsthatofferbycompetitors,whilethecompetitorsmanagetheirproductportfoliosinregardtoourproducts.Gametheorycanbeusedtomodelthisproblem.Theproposed

modelconstructsproductportfoliospeci?cations(產(chǎn)品族/系列規(guī)格)fo

basedoncustomer–engineeringinteractionmodelinproductportfolioplanningwhichis

developedbyJiaoandZhang.PresentpaperextendspreviousworksinPPMwithregardtocustomer–engineeringconcerns

andcompetitiveenvironment.Itisnotforany

specificproduct,anditcanbeappliedtoadiversityofproductsorservices.objective:developagametheory-basedmodelasaprocedureof?ndingoptimalproductportfolio.basedoncustomer–engineer2.LiteraturereviewAPPMisde?nedasadecisionmakingthatoptimizessomecriteria,suchas

marketshare.Themaincontributionofthemostresearchesin

PPMissummarizedinfollowingissues:

1)Generatingdesign

alternativesviamulti-objective

optimization(通過(guò)多目標(biāo)優(yōu)化生成設(shè)計(jì)方案).

2)Accountingforuncertaintyandcompetitionwhenestimatingtheachievementofbusinessgoals.

3)Applyingmeta-heuristicalgorithms(元啟發(fā)式算法)

2.LiteraturereviewAPPMisd

tosolveacombinatorial

problemduringtheproductlinedesign.ThedevelopmentofalgorithmsHeuristic(identifyproductpro?leproductlinedesign)

algorithms

improvedheuristicalgorithms

geneticalgorithms.Thedevelopmentofmodels1)JiaoandZhangproposedamodelto

addresstheproductportfolioplanningproblem,itconsiderscustomerpreferences,choiceprobabilitiesandtosolveacombinatorialp

platformbasedproductcosting.Also,ageneticalgorithmprocedureisapplied.

2)AiyoshiandMaki

proposedagameproblemundertheconstraintsofallocationofproductandmarketsharesimultaneously.Theirresearchisconsideredseveralmanufacturersinoligopolymarket(寡頭壟斷市場(chǎng)).Thisproposedmodel,ontheonehandhadthecompetitivecircumstance,butontheotherhand,didnothas

detailssuchaslargevarietyofcustomers'preferences,customer–engineeringconcerns,etc.platformbasedproductcos

3)modelinthispaper

considersbothdetailsandcompetitivecircumstance.3)modelinthispapercon3.DescriptionofthePPMproblemConsideringthe?rmcapabilitiestoproduceproducts,asetofproductportfolioshavebeenidenti?ed.Eachproducthascertaindesirabilitybetweencustomers.Morespeci?cally,weconsiderascenarioinwhichasetofproducts,havebeenidenti?ed,giventhatthemanufacturer(m)hasthecapabilities(bothdesignandproduction)toproducealltheseproducts,..Aproductportfolio,,isasetconsistingofsomeselectedproduct.Combined

withtheproducts,asetofproductportfoliosarecreated,.

相關(guān)參數(shù)3.DescriptionofthePPMprobForexample,ifmanufacturermcanproduce3product,7productportfolioareavailable:(=7)

Everyproduct,

,isassociatedwithcertainengineeringcosts,denotedas.Therearemultiplemarketsegments,S={s1,...,sg,...,sG},eachcontaininghomogeneouscustomers,withade?nitesize,Qg.Thecustomer–engineeringinteractionisForexample,ifmanufacturermembodiedinthedecisionsassociatedwithcustomers’choicesofdifferentproducts.Variouscustomerpreferencesondiverseproductsarerepresentedbyrespectiveutilities,(utilityofthegthsegmentforthenthproductofmthmanufacturer).Productdemandsormarketshares,(marketshareofthegthsegment

forthenthproductofmthmanufacturer),aredescribedbytheprobabilitiesofcustomers’choosingproducts.Customerschooseaproductbasedonthesurplusembodiedinthedecisions

buyerrule.Theyhave

theoptionofnotbuyinganyproductsorbuyingcompetitors’products.Weassumethatcompetitorsrespondtothemanufacturer’smoves,meaningthat,thecompetitionreactbyintroducingnewproducts.buyerrule.Theyhavetheo4.ProblemformulationThepresentpaperconsidersamarketwithGsegments,

S={s1,...,sg,...,sG},and2manufacturersthateachofthemcan

offerNmproducts,

andJmproductportfolios,

.Thisgivesthebimatrix-game(雙矩陣對(duì)策)

problemwith2playersandJmstrategyforeach,(m=1or2).Thepayoffforeachplayerwillofcoursedependonthecombinedactionsofbothplayers.Apayoffmatrixshowswhatpayoff

eachplayerwillreceiveat4.ProblemformulationThepres

theoutcomeofthegame.Forplayer

m(m=1or2),thepayoffmatrix,Fm,isasfollows:theoutcomeofthegame.FInsummary,aJ1

×J2–bimatrixgameisplayedbytwoplayers,player1andplayer2.Player1hasafinitesetandplayer2hasa?nite

set

of

purestrategies.Thepayoffmatrixes[f1(

)],

ofplayer1

and

ofplayer2aredenotedbyF1andF2respectively.Thisgameisdenotedby(F1,F2).Nowthegame(F1,F2)isplayedasfollows.Players1and2choose,independentofeachother,astrategyInsummary,aJ1×J2–bimatr

andrespectively.Here

canbeseenastheprobabilitythatplayer1(2)chooseshis–throw(–thcolumn).The(expected)payoffforplayer1isx1F1x2andtheexpectedpayofftoplayer2isx1F2x2.Astrategypair()isanequilibriumforthegame(F1,F2)ifandThesetofallequilibriaforthegame(F1,F2)isdenotedbyE(F1,F2).ByatheoremofNashthissetisnon-emptyforallbimatrix-games(Nash,1950).Somemethodsforcalculatingpayoffmatrixarrays,,arethere(seeSection2).WeusedthefunctionthatproposedbyJiaoandZhang(2005).Thisfunctionisbasedoncustomer-engineeringinteractionmodelinPPM.Thisisasfollows:ThesetofallequilibriaforEq.(3)istheexpectedsharedsurplusbyofferingaproductportfolio,consistingofproducts,tocustomersegments,sg,eachwithsizeQg.Themarketpotentials,Qg,canbegivenexogenouslyattheoutsetorestimatedthroughavarietyoftechniquesbasedonhistoricaldataortestmarkets.Theutilityofthegthsegmentforthenthproductofmthmanufacturerisdenotedas.ThismodelassumesthatcustomersonlychooseaEq.(3)istheexpectedshared

productwithapositivesurplus.Thechoiceprobability,,

thatacustomerorasegment,sg,choosesaproduct,,withNcomcompetingproducts,isdefinedasfollows:whereuisascalingparameter(尺度參數(shù)).Accordingtomatrix(1)andEq.(3),letthefunctionbedefinedbyproductwithapositivesu競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)中產(chǎn)品組合管理博弈模型講義5.ExampleInthissection,asimpleexampletousetheproposedmodelispresented.Forsimplicity,weconsideramarketwithtwocompetitor(M=2),andfourdifferentproducts(Nm=4)foreach.Feasiblestrategies,isdefinedasfollows:5.ExampleInthissection,as產(chǎn)品組合數(shù)=24-1=15???產(chǎn)品組合數(shù)=24-1=15???Threesegmentsareidentified,i.e.,s1,s2,ands3.Q1,Q2,andQ3areassumed0.2,0.3and0.5,respectively.Table1showstheutilitiesofthreesegmentstoeveryproduct()andcostofeach().Also,scalingparameter(u)issupposed0.8.Therefore,2payoffmatrixesF1andF2formedformanufacturer1and2,separately.Thisgameandobtaineddatafromexpectedsharedsurplusvalues(Eq.(5))aresummarizedinFig.1.Threesegmentsareidentified,返回返回競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)中產(chǎn)品組合管理博弈模型講義TheoptimalresultforeachmanufacturerisderivedfromtheNashequilibriumpointofthegame.Astrategypairisanaloneequilibriumforthegame.Therelatedpayoffpairis(0.74,0.83).Theoptimalresultforeachma6.ConclusionsandfutureworkThispaperproposedagametheory-basedmodelthatisusedtomaximizetheexpectedsharedsurplusforaproductportfoliomanaged.Theproductportfoliomanagement(PPM)isanimportantoptimizationproblemthatincludesthelargesetofconstraintsandcharacteristics.Therefore,itisveryhelpfulforamanagertouseamarketingdecisionsupportsystemwhichprovideshimtheacceptablesolutionswithconsideringmoreterms.Accordingtothisgoal,a6.Conclusionsandfutureworkgametheory-basedmodelisproposedandappliedtosolvetheproblemsinvolvedinPPM.TherearepotentiallyunlimitedopportunitiesforresearchinPPM.Futurestudiescanfocusonothercharacteristicstoachievemoreidealresults.Othernotabledirectionsforfutureresearchesincludeallowingforsequentialentrystrategies,timevaryingutilitiesandchangingcustomerbehaviors.gametheory-basedmodelisTheEnd!TheEnd!返回返回相關(guān)概念納什定理:在一個(gè)有n個(gè)博弈方的博弈G=﹛S1,…,Sn:u1,…,un}中,如果n是有限的,且Si都是有限集(對(duì)i=1,…,n),則該博弈至少存在一個(gè)納什均衡,但可能包含混合策略。

產(chǎn)品組合:由不同的產(chǎn)品線構(gòu)成,而產(chǎn)品線又是由不同的產(chǎn)品項(xiàng)目構(gòu)成。產(chǎn)品組合策略:在產(chǎn)品組合的深度、廣度和相關(guān)性方面做的籌劃和安排。產(chǎn)品組合的廣度:產(chǎn)品線的數(shù)量。產(chǎn)品組合的廣度:產(chǎn)品項(xiàng)目(規(guī)格或品種)的數(shù)量相關(guān)概念納什定理:在一個(gè)有n個(gè)博弈方的博弈G=﹛S1,…,S遺傳算法(GeneticAlgorithm)是一類借鑒生物界的進(jìn)化規(guī)律(適者生存,優(yōu)勝劣汰遺傳機(jī)制)演化而來(lái)的隨機(jī)化搜索方法。其主要特點(diǎn)是直接對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)象進(jìn)行操作,不存在求導(dǎo)和函數(shù)連續(xù)性的限定;具有內(nèi)在的隱并行性和更好的全局尋優(yōu)能力;采用概率化的尋優(yōu)方法,能自動(dòng)獲取和指導(dǎo)優(yōu)化的搜索空間,自適應(yīng)地調(diào)整搜索方向,不需要確定的規(guī)則。遺傳算法(GeneticAlgorithm)是一類借鑒生物

單一產(chǎn)品策劃

單一產(chǎn)品策劃程序策劃目標(biāo)環(huán)境分析市場(chǎng)細(xì)分目標(biāo)市場(chǎng)市場(chǎng)定位概念產(chǎn)品營(yíng)銷(xiāo)組合返回

單一產(chǎn)品策劃

單一產(chǎn)品策劃程序策劃目標(biāo)環(huán)境分析市場(chǎng)細(xì)分目標(biāo)Agametheory-basedmodelforproductportfoliomanagementinacompetitivemarket

A.Sadeghi,M.Zandieh

ExpertSystemswithApplications,2010Agametheory-basedmodelforStructureIntroductionLiteraturereviewDescriptionofthePPMproblemProblemformulationExampleConclusionsandfutureworkStructureIntroduction1.IntroductionConsumers,industrialmanagers,andsalesandmarketingpeople,alldemandproductsthatimprovetheirlifestylesortogainanedgeoverthecompetition.So,productportfolios

areinterestingformanypeople.Butunlimitedproductvarietyisnotawaytobesuccessful;therehastobeanoptimum.ItistrueformostcompaniesthattheParetoruleapplies:80%ofthesalesand/orpro?ts

comefrom20%oftheproducts.Itisevidentthatasingleproductcannot1.IntroductionConsumers,indu

ful?llthemanufacturerneedsandonthe

otherhand,fordiversitythereexistslimitation.Intoday’shighlycompetitiveenvironment,determiningan

optimalproductportfolioisveryimportantforthesurvivalofa?rm.Optimalproductportfoliohasreceivedconsiderableattention,becausetheratesoffailureofnewproductportfolioandtheirassociatedlossesareveryhigh.Thewhole

product

component

information(產(chǎn)品構(gòu)建信息),

engineeringful?llthemanufacturerne

portfoliodecision(工程組合決策)isverycrucialfortheprogressofa?rm

,becauseitisverycostlyanddifficulttochange.Thekeyquestionsare,whatthebestproductportfoliois,andhowmanufacturercan

?ndit.Productportfoliomanagement(PPM)is

ageneralbusinessconceptthatanalyzetheproductionability(生產(chǎn)能力)

andmarketpotential,simultaneously,andthendeterminethebestsetofproductsto

offer.PPMisdevelopedtodirectaproductanditsdiversityportfoliodecision(工程組合決策

includingnotonlyattributes(屬性),levels,andprice’s,butalsoanalysisresults,environmental

requirements(環(huán)保需求),manufacturingprocedures(生產(chǎn)流程),productperformanceinformation(產(chǎn)品性能信息),and

etc.ThereforePPMhasbeenclassifiedasacombinatorialoptimizationproblem.Eachcompanystrivesfortheoptimalityofitsproductofferingsthroughvariouscombinationsofproducts.ThePPMproblemmaydevelopfromtwoperspectives:(I)For

attracttheopinionofcustomersincludingnotonlyattribu

intargetmarkets.(II)Forreduce

themanufactureengineeringcosts.Firstistheproblemofmarketingmanagers,andsecondistheproblemofproducer.Whenbothofthemcomposewitheachotherasreflecttoutilityofcostumersandengineeringcosts,thisproblembecomestomisslinkbetweensaleandproductionchain.JiaoandZhang(2005)considerthecustomer–engineering

interactioninproductportfolioplanning,whichaims

tocreateproduct

familyintargetmarkets.(II)Fospeci?cations(產(chǎn)品族/系列規(guī)格)foratargetmarketsegment,andproposedamaximizingsurplussharemodel(最大剩余份額模型).Incompetitiveenvironment,wedetermineourproductportfoliowithregardtoproductsthatofferbycompetitors,whilethecompetitorsmanagetheirproductportfoliosinregardtoourproducts.Gametheorycanbeusedtomodelthisproblem.Theproposed

modelconstructsproductportfoliospeci?cations(產(chǎn)品族/系列規(guī)格)fo

basedoncustomer–engineeringinteractionmodelinproductportfolioplanningwhichis

developedbyJiaoandZhang.PresentpaperextendspreviousworksinPPMwithregardtocustomer–engineeringconcerns

andcompetitiveenvironment.Itisnotforany

specificproduct,anditcanbeappliedtoadiversityofproductsorservices.objective:developagametheory-basedmodelasaprocedureof?ndingoptimalproductportfolio.basedoncustomer–engineer2.LiteraturereviewAPPMisde?nedasadecisionmakingthatoptimizessomecriteria,suchas

marketshare.Themaincontributionofthemostresearchesin

PPMissummarizedinfollowingissues:

1)Generatingdesign

alternativesviamulti-objective

optimization(通過(guò)多目標(biāo)優(yōu)化生成設(shè)計(jì)方案).

2)Accountingforuncertaintyandcompetitionwhenestimatingtheachievementofbusinessgoals.

3)Applyingmeta-heuristicalgorithms(元啟發(fā)式算法)

2.LiteraturereviewAPPMisd

tosolveacombinatorial

problemduringtheproductlinedesign.ThedevelopmentofalgorithmsHeuristic(identifyproductpro?leproductlinedesign)

algorithms

improvedheuristicalgorithms

geneticalgorithms.Thedevelopmentofmodels1)JiaoandZhangproposedamodelto

addresstheproductportfolioplanningproblem,itconsiderscustomerpreferences,choiceprobabilitiesandtosolveacombinatorialp

platformbasedproductcosting.Also,ageneticalgorithmprocedureisapplied.

2)AiyoshiandMaki

proposedagameproblemundertheconstraintsofallocationofproductandmarketsharesimultaneously.Theirresearchisconsideredseveralmanufacturersinoligopolymarket(寡頭壟斷市場(chǎng)).Thisproposedmodel,ontheonehandhadthecompetitivecircumstance,butontheotherhand,didnothas

detailssuchaslargevarietyofcustomers'preferences,customer–engineeringconcerns,etc.platformbasedproductcos

3)modelinthispaper

considersbothdetailsandcompetitivecircumstance.3)modelinthispapercon3.DescriptionofthePPMproblemConsideringthe?rmcapabilitiestoproduceproducts,asetofproductportfolioshavebeenidenti?ed.Eachproducthascertaindesirabilitybetweencustomers.Morespeci?cally,weconsiderascenarioinwhichasetofproducts,havebeenidenti?ed,giventhatthemanufacturer(m)hasthecapabilities(bothdesignandproduction)toproducealltheseproducts,..Aproductportfolio,,isasetconsistingofsomeselectedproduct.Combined

withtheproducts,asetofproductportfoliosarecreated,.

相關(guān)參數(shù)3.DescriptionofthePPMprobForexample,ifmanufacturermcanproduce3product,7productportfolioareavailable:(=7)

Everyproduct,

,isassociatedwithcertainengineeringcosts,denotedas.Therearemultiplemarketsegments,S={s1,...,sg,...,sG},eachcontaininghomogeneouscustomers,withade?nitesize,Qg.Thecustomer–engineeringinteractionisForexample,ifmanufacturermembodiedinthedecisionsassociatedwithcustomers’choicesofdifferentproducts.Variouscustomerpreferencesondiverseproductsarerepresentedbyrespectiveutilities,(utilityofthegthsegmentforthenthproductofmthmanufacturer).Productdemandsormarketshares,(marketshareofthegthsegment

forthenthproductofmthmanufacturer),aredescribedbytheprobabilitiesofcustomers’choosingproducts.Customerschooseaproductbasedonthesurplusembodiedinthedecisions

buyerrule.Theyhave

theoptionofnotbuyinganyproductsorbuyingcompetitors’products.Weassumethatcompetitorsrespondtothemanufacturer’smoves,meaningthat,thecompetitionreactbyintroducingnewproducts.buyerrule.Theyhavetheo4.ProblemformulationThepresentpaperconsidersamarketwithGsegments,

S={s1,...,sg,...,sG},and2manufacturersthateachofthemcan

offerNmproducts,

andJmproductportfolios,

.Thisgivesthebimatrix-game(雙矩陣對(duì)策)

problemwith2playersandJmstrategyforeach,(m=1or2).Thepayoffforeachplayerwillofcoursedependonthecombinedactionsofbothplayers.Apayoffmatrixshowswhatpayoff

eachplayerwillreceiveat4.ProblemformulationThepres

theoutcomeofthegame.Forplayer

m(m=1or2),thepayoffmatrix,Fm,isasfollows:theoutcomeofthegame.FInsummary,aJ1

×J2–bimatrixgameisplayedbytwoplayers,player1andplayer2.Player1hasafinitesetandplayer2hasa?nite

set

of

purestrategies.Thepayoffmatrixes[f1(

)],

ofplayer1

and

ofplayer2aredenotedbyF1andF2respectively.Thisgameisdenotedby(F1,F2).Nowthegame(F1,F2)isplayedasfollows.Players1and2choose,independentofeachother,astrategyInsummary,aJ1×J2–bimatr

andrespectively.Here

canbeseenastheprobabilitythatplayer1(2)chooseshis–throw(–thcolumn).The(expected)payoffforplayer1isx1F1x2andtheexpectedpayofftoplayer2isx1F2x2.Astrategypair()isanequilibriumforthegame(F1,F2)ifandThesetofallequilibriaforthegame(F1,F2)isdenotedbyE(F1,F2).ByatheoremofNashthissetisnon-emptyforallbimatrix-games(Nash,1950).Somemethodsforcalculatingpayoffmatrixarrays,,arethere(seeSection2).WeusedthefunctionthatproposedbyJiaoandZhang(2005).Thisfunctionisbasedoncustomer-engineeringinteractionmodelinPPM.Thisisasfollows:ThesetofallequilibriaforEq.(3)istheexpectedsharedsurplusbyofferingaproductportfolio,consistingofproducts,tocustomersegments,sg,eachwithsizeQg.Themarketpotentials,Qg,canbegivenexogenouslyattheoutsetorestimatedthroughavarietyoftechniquesbasedonhistoricaldataortestmarkets.Theutilityofthegthsegmentforthenthproductofmthmanufacturerisdenotedas.ThismodelassumesthatcustomersonlychooseaEq.(3)istheexpectedshared

productwithapositivesurplus.Thechoiceprobability,,

thatacustomerorasegment,sg,choosesaproduct,,withNcomcompetingproducts,isdefinedasfollows:whereuisascalingparameter(尺度參數(shù)).Accordingtomatrix(1)andEq.(3),letthefunctionbedefined

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論