2019年10月19日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案1842_第1頁
2019年10月19日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案1842_第2頁
2019年10月19日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案1842_第3頁
2019年10月19日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案1842_第4頁
2019年10月19日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案1842_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩1頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

Section1青春期能力發(fā)展(重復(fù)19年4月13日第一篇文章,考試文章和部分題目稍有改動,真題僅供參考)Section2蜜蜂對于生態(tài)的重要性Section3可以參考:歷史教學(xué)新方法NewWaysofTeachingHistoryNewWaysofTeachingHistoryInatechnologyandmedia-drivenworld,it'sbecomingincreasinglydifficulttogetourstudents'attentionsandkeepthemabsorbedinclassroomdiscussions.Thisgeneration,inparticular,hasbroughtauniquesetofchallengestotheeducationaltable.Whereasyouthareeasilyenrapturedbyhigh-definitiontelevision,computers,iPods,videogamesandcellphones,theyarelessthanenthralledbywhattothemareobsoletetextbooksandboringclassroomlectures.Thequestionofhowtoteachhistoryinadigitalageisoftencontentious.Ontheoneside,theoldguardthinkstheprofessionalstandardshistoryisinmortaldangerfromflash-in-the-panchallengesbythedistalthatareallshowandnotheotherSide,theselfstyled“disruptors”offerover-blownrhetoricabouthowdigitaltechnologyhaschangedeverythingwhilethemoribundprofessionobstructsallprogressinthenameofoutdatedideals.Atleast,that'saparody(maybenotmuchofone)ofhowthedebateproceeds.Bothsupportersandopponentsofthedigitalsharemoredisciplinarycommongroundthaneitheradmits.Whenprovidedwithmerelyatextbookasasupplementallearningtool,testresultshaverevealedthatmoststudentsfailtopinpointthesignificanceofhistoricaleventsandindividuals.Fewerstillareabletociteandsubstantiateprimaryhistoricalsources.Whatdoesthissayaboutthewayoureducatorsarepresentinginformation?Thequotationcomesfromareportofa1917testof668Texasstudents.Lessthan10percentofschool-agechildrenattendedhighschoolin1917;today,enrollmentsarenearlyuniversal.Thewholeworldhasturnedonitsheadduringthelastcenturybutonethinghasstayedthesame:Youngpeopleremainwoefullyignorantabouthistoryreflectedfromtheirhistorytests.Guesswhat?Historiansareignoranttoo,especiallywhenweequatehistoricalknowledgewiththe"Jeopardy"Dailyatest,thosespecializinginAmericanhistorydidjustfine.Butthosewithspecialtiesinmedieval,EuropeanandAfricanhistoryfailedmiserablywhenconfrontedbyitemsaboutFortTiconderoga,theOliveBranchPetition,ortheQuebecAct—alltakenfromatypicaltextbook.Accordingtothetesters,theresultsfromtherecentNationalAssessmentinHistory,likescoresfromearliertests,showthatyoungpeopleare"abysmallyignorant"oftheirownhistory.InvokingthetragedyoflastSeptember,historianDianeRavitchhitchedherworriesaboutourfuturetotheideathatournation'sstrengthisendangeredbyyouthwhodopoorlyonsuchtests.Butifshewerecorrect,wecouldhavegonedownthetubesin1917!Thereisahugedifferencebetweensaying"Kidsdon'tknowthehistorywewantthentoknow"andsaying"Kidsdon'tknowhistoryatall."Historicalknowledgeburrowsitselfintoourculturalporesevenifyoungpeoplecan'tmarshalitwhenfacedbyamultiplechoicetest.Ifweweren'tsuchhypocrites(ormaybeifwewerebetterhistorians)we'dhavetoadmitthattoday'sstudentsfollowinourownfootsteps.Fortoolongwe'vefantasizedthatbyrewritingtextbookswecouldchangehowhistoryislearned.Theproblem,however,isnotthecontentoftextbooksbuttheveryideaofthem.Nohumanmindcouldretaintheinformationcrammedintothesebooksin1917,anditcandonobetternow.Ifwehavelearnedanythingfromhistorythatcanbeappliedtoeverytimeperiod,itisthattheonlyconstantischange.Theteachingofhistory,oranysubjectforthatmatter,isnoexception.Thequestionisnolongerwhethertobringnewtechnologiesintoeverydayeducation;now,thequestioniswhichThereisahugedifferencebetweensaying"Kidsdon'tknowthehistorywewantthentoknow"andsaying"Kidsdon'tknowhistoryatall."Historicalknowledgeburrowsitselfintoourculturalporesevenifyoungpeoplecan'tmarshalitwhenfacedbyamultiplechoicetest.Ifweweren'tsuchhypocrites(ormaybeifwewerebetterhistorians)we'dhavetoadmitthattoday'sstudentsfollowinourownfootsteps.Fortoolongwe'vefantasizedthatbyrewritingtextbookswecouldchangehowhistoryislearned.Theproblem,however,isnotthecontentoftextbooksbuttheveryideaofthem.Nohumanmindcouldretaintheinformationcrammedintothesebooksin1917,anditcandonobetternow.Ifwehavelearnedanythingfromhistorythatcanbeappliedtoeverytimeperiod,itisthattheonlyconstantischange.Theteachingofhistory,oranysubjectforthatmatter,isnoexception.Thequestionisnolongerwhethertobringnewtechnologiesintoeverydayeducation;now,thequestioniswhichtechnologiesaremostsuitablefortherangeoftopicscoveredinjuniorhighandhighschoolhistoryclassrooms.Fortunately,technologyhasprovideduswithopportunitiestopresentourCivilWarlessonplansorourAmericanRevolutionlessonplansinavarietyofnewways.Teacherscaneasilytargetandengagethelearnersofthisgenerationbyeffectivelycombiningthestudyofhistorywithinnovativemultimedia-PowerPointandpresentationsinparticularcanexpandthescopeoftraditionalclassroomdiscussionbyhelpingteacherstoexplainabstractconceptswhileaccommodatingstudents*uniquelearningstyles.PowerPointstudyunitsthathavebeenpre-madeforhistoryclassroomsincludeallmannerofphotos,prints,maps,audioclips,videoclipsandprimarysourceswhichhelptomakelearninginteractiveandstimulating.Presentinglessonsintheseenticingformatshelpstechnology-drivenstudentsretainthehistoricalinformationthey'llneedtoknowforstandardexams.WhetheryouarecoveringRevolutionaryWarlessonplansorWorldWarIIlessonplans,PowerPointstudyunitsareavailableinformatstosuittheneedsofyourclassroom.MultimediateachinginstrumentslikePowerPointsoftwarearegettingpositiveresultstheworldover,framingconventionallectureswithcaptivatingwritten,auditoryandvisualcontentthathelpsstudentsrecallnames,datesandcausalrelationshipswithinahistoricalcontext.Historycontinuestoshowusthatnewtimesbringnewrealities.Educationisnoexceptiontotherule.Thequestionisnotwhethertobringtechnologyintotheeducationalenvironment.Rather,thequestioniswhichtechnologiesaresuitableforU.S.andworldhistorysubjects,fromCivilWarlessonplanstoWorldWarIIlessonplans.Whetheryou'recoveringyourAmericanRevolutionlessonplansoryourColdWarlessonplans,PowerPointpresentationsareavailableinpre-packagedformatstosuityourclassroom'sneeds.Meanwhile,someacademichistoriansholdadifferentviewontheuseoftechnologyinteachinghistory.OnereasontheyholdisthatnotallfactscanberecordedbyfilmorvideosandliteratureisrelativelyfeasibleinthiscaseherchallengetheyhavetobefacedwithisthepainfulprocesstolearnnewtechnologylikethemakingofPowerPointandtheeditingofaudioandvideoclipswhichisalsoreasonableespeciallytosomeelderlyhistorians.QuestionReadingthispassagehaseightparagraphs,A-GChoosingthecorrectheadingforparagraphsA-GfromthelistofheadingbelowWritetheappropriatenumber,i-x,inboxes28-34onyouranswersheetListofHeadingsunavoidablechangingfactstobeconsideredwhenpickinguptechnologymeansAdebatableplacewherethenewtechnologiesstandinforhistoryteachingHardtoattractstudentsintraditionalwaysofteachinghistoryDisplayoftheuseofemergingmultimediaasleachingtoolsBothstudentsandprofessionalsascandidatesdidnotproducedecentresultsAgoodconcreteexampleillustratedtoshowhowmultimediaanimatesthehistoryclassThecomparisonsofthenewtechnologiesappliedinhistoryclassEnormousbreakthroughsinnewtechnologiesResistanceofusingnewtechnologiesfromcertainhistorianDecisionsneededonwhichtechniquetobeusedforhistoryteachinginsteadofimprovementinthetextbooksParagraphAParagraphBParagraphCParagraphDParagraphEParagraphFParagraphGQuestion35-37DothefollowingstatementsagreewiththeinformationgiveninReadingPassage?Inboxes35-37onyouranswersheet,writeYESifthestatementistrueNOifthestatementisfalseNOTGIVENiftheinformationisnotgiveninthepassageModempeopleare

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論