GRE寫作argue高分模版

1、開頭：(1) Itseemsthat,atfirstsight,theauthor'sreasoningislogicaltoleadtotheproposal/recommendation/prediction/assertionthat(2) However,carefulscrutinyoftheargumentrevealsthatsomeassumptionsthisargumentdependsonareproblematic(theevidencethisargumentcontainsisinadequate)(additionalquestionsneedtobeas

2、kedinordertofullyevaluatethisargument)(somealternativeexplanationsalsoneedtobeconsidered).(3) Unlesstheauthorcouldprovidemoreaccurateinformationorcriticalevidence,thisargumentwillnotbeconvincingenoughtoreachitsconclusion.替換詞：作者author/writer/speaker/arguer/"title”文章argument/editorial/article建議su

3、ggest/advise/advocate/recommend/propose預(yù)測(cè)predict/project/forecast/foresee/expect/anticipate承接Therefore/thus/hence/so/consequently/clearly/moreover/furthermore/besides表明show/imply/indicate/illustrate/demonstrate/pointout聲稱assert/allege/state/claim/contend/maintain聲明assertion/statement/claim/implicati

4、on/indication/illustration/demonstration證實(shí)prove/substantiate/corroborate支持support/bolster可信度validity/credibility/reliability/feasibility推斷infer/deduce/suggest草率的，魯莽的hasty/rash/reckless值得懷疑的，沒有說(shuō)服力的unsubstantiated/unconvincing/unpersuasive/unfounded/unwarranted/suspicious/unreliable/groundless/suspect

5、able/doubtable/questionable/problematic/specious1 .類比（5,7,13）（1） Indicatingthat（措施在某地或某公司取得了成功）,theauthorimpliesthat（該措施在另一地也會(huì)成功）（2） Thiscomparisonbetweenthetwoareas/companies/towns（analogy）,however,mightnotbeveryreasonableonthegroundsthatthecircumstancesfacingthetwoareasmightbeverydifferent.（3）（列舉兩

6、者之間可能不同的狀況）allmightinfluencetheeffectivenessof（措施）atthetwoplaces.（4） Therefore,thedeductionthatthesuccessof（措施）canbedefinitelyachievedat（另一地）isgroundlessandunreliable.2 .絕對(duì)與相對(duì)數(shù)量（1） Theauthormentions（絕對(duì)數(shù)量）toillustratethat，buttheauthordoesnotaddress（總數(shù)）（2） If（總數(shù)很大/很?。?（絕對(duì)數(shù)量）wouldnotseemtobesurprisingl

7、yhigh/low.（3）Thearguerneedstoprovidemorespecificstatisticsregardingtheratioof（相對(duì)數(shù)量）（4）Suchdatawouldbeofmuchmorevalueincomparingtherelativeamountsof3 .沒發(fā)現(xiàn)不代表沒有（1） Theargumenttreatsalackofproofthat（某事物）hadeverbeenfoundassufficientevidencethat（某事物）neverexisted.（2） Onepossibilityisthatwhichmakesitextrem

8、elyhardtofindtraceoftheexistenceof（某事物）Itisalsolikelythatcurrentresearchmethodsandtechnologiesarenotyetadvancedenoughtoidentify（detect）potentialevidenceinvolvingthepossibleexistenceof（某事物）（3） Also,ifresearcherscouldfind（其他事物）,theseobjectsmightbeusedassecondhandevidencetoinferthat（某事物）onceexisted.4 .

9、質(zhì)疑權(quán)威性Theauthor'scitationofcouldnotlendstrongsupporttothisargument,sincetheauthority（accuracy）ofisquestionable.Apparently,theauthorshouldaddressmorebackgroundinformationaboutinordertoprovethatarejustandobjective.Otherwisetheclaimofwouldbedubious.段首句：1. Oneoftheunderlyingassumptionsthatneedsevalua

10、tionisthat2. Theauthoralsohastilyassumesthat3. Buildingupontheimplication(assumption)that通用句型：1. couldnotlendstrongsupporttothearguer'sclaim/proposal2. Theargumenttreatsalackofproofthatwasfoundassufficientevidencethat(沒發(fā)現(xiàn)不代表沒有)3. Thearguerfailstoconvinceusthat4. Allofthesedifferentfactorsneedtob

11、etakenintoconsiderationbeforemakinganassertionthat5. Withoutevidencethat,theauthor'sclaimthatisdubiousatbest.6. Theclaimthatlackscredibilityiftheauthorfailstoprove7. To(further)bolstertheeditorial'sclaims,theauthormustprovideclearevidencethatreasonAwasinfactresponsiblefor(aincrease/declinein

12、)8. cannotberepresentativeenoughtoreflectthetrue/universalsituationregarding調(diào)查/數(shù)據(jù)：1. Theauthorunfairly/fallaciously/falselyassumesthattheresultofthecitedsurvey/statisticsisfullygenuineandcredible.2. Theauthorcitesasurvey/studyoftoreport/explainthat3. Failingtoindicatethesourceofthesurvey,theauthorco

13、uldnotconvinceusaboutthecredibilityofthesurvey.4. Thescope/validity/representativeness/reliabilityofthesurveyisdoubtable.5. Thesampleistoolimited/notrepresentative,includingonlythosepeoplewho6. Theresultofthenationwidesurveymaynotberepresentativeenoughtoreflectthetruesituationinarea.7. Doesthesurvey

14、includerespondentsfromdifferentagegroups8. Thesurveydoesnotprovidespecificstatistics(completeinformation)concerningtheeffectof9. Althoughthetotalnumberofishigh,theper(capita)numbermightberelativelylow.類比：1. Arethetwotowns/companiesfullycomparableateveryaspect2. ThecomparisonbetweenAandBmightnotbever

15、yreasonableonthegroundsthatthecircumstancesfacingAandBmightbeverydifferent.3. Withoutshowingthatallotherconditionsinthetwoareas/universitieshavebeenessentiallythesame,theauthorcannotconvinceusthat因果關(guān)系：1. AlthoughAandBhappensatthesametime,noevidencewasgiventosubstantiatetheclaimthatAcontributetoB2. O

16、therpossiblefactorsshouldbeconsideredinordertoevaluatetherealcausesof列舉他因：1. Theauthoroverlooksthepossibilitythat(onlyasmallportionof)2. Thearguerignoresotherpossiblefactorsthatmayalsoleads/contributeto3. Someotherpossiblesolutionstotheproblemof，suchasshouldnotbeexcludedfromconsideration.4.段落結(jié)尾：1. I

17、nshort2. Inaword結(jié)尾：(1) Whilemightbebeneficialto,thisargumentisnotstronglypersuasiveintheabsenceofadditionalsupportingdetails.(2) Moreresearchshouldbeconductedinordertodeterminewhethertheisareasonablerecommendation/prediction/choice(theappropriatenessandeffectivenessoftherecommendationprovided).難題：1,

18、2,6,74,79,83,85,91論據(jù)論點(diǎn)：1. Problemsaboutsurveys(1) quantityofthesample(2) theactualmeaningorinfluenceofthesurvey(3) whatquestionswereaskedinthesurvey(4) aretherespondentsrepresentative2. Problemsaboutstatisticsorinformation(1) vaguedata(2) completeness3. Flawsinthereasoningline(1) falseanalogy(2) confusingcomparisonandvariation(3) incompletecomparison/selectivecomparison(4) hastygeneralizationA. unrelatedconceptsB. changingscopesC. inferringafutureconditionfromapastcondition(5) failingtoweightheadvantagesanddisadvanta