學(xué)生評價老師大學(xué)英語作文

1、Agreatchangeisnowtakingplaceinhighereducationthroughoutourcountry.Teachersarebeingheldresponsibleasneverbeforeforhowwelltheyservetheirstudents.Ithasbecomeascommonincollegesanduniversitiesforstudentstogradeteachersasforteacherstogradestudents.Insomeuniversitiesstudentsratinghasevenbecometheonlysource

2、ofinformationonteachingeffectiveness.一個偉大的變化是現(xiàn)在發(fā)生在高等教育在我們的國家。老師正在前所未有的負(fù)責(zé)他們?nèi)绾胃玫貫閷W(xué)生服務(wù)。它已經(jīng)成為常見的高校學(xué)生年級教師對于教師年級的學(xué)生。在一些大學(xué)學(xué)生的評級甚至成為唯一的信息來源在教學(xué)有效性。This,however,hascausedgreatcontroversy.Someareinfavoroftheratingsystem.Theyholdthatsincestudentsattendtheteachersclasseseveryday,theyshouldhavetheiropinionaboutt

3、heirteacherseffectiveness.Others,onthecontrary,arestronglyagainstit.Theythinkthatstudentsratingiseasytoadministerandscore,butitalsoiseasytoabuse.Theybelievethatthereismuchmoretoteachingthanwhatisshownonstudentsratingforms.Studentsshouldnotbeexpectedtojudgewhetherthematerialsusedareuptodateorhowwellt

4、heteacherknowsaboutthesubject.Thesejudgmentsrequireprofessionalknowledge,whichisbestleftfortheteacherscolleagues.然而,這已經(jīng)引起了很大的爭議。有些人贊成評級系統(tǒng)。他們認(rèn)為,由于學(xué)生參加教師課程每天,他們應(yīng)該有他們的意見關(guān)于他們的教師的有效性。其他人,相反,強(qiáng)烈反對它。他們認(rèn)為學(xué)生的評級很容易管理和得分,但這也很容易濫用。他們認(rèn)為有更多的教學(xué)比顯示在學(xué)生的評價形式。學(xué)生不應(yīng)該將判斷使用的材料是最新的或老師如何知道這個話題。這些判斷需要專業(yè)知識,這是最好的留給了教師的同事。Ithink

5、studentsratingoftheirteachersisnecessary,butitshouldbeconductedinawaythatcanreallyshedmeaningfullightonteachersperformance.Insteadofratingtheteachersknowledgeonthesubject,studentsshouldbeaskedtoestimatewhattheythemselveshaveleanedinacourse,andtoreportonsuchthingsasateachersabilitytocommunicatewithst

6、udents,hisrelationshipwithstudents,andhisabilitytoarouseinterestinthesubject.我認(rèn)為學(xué)生評級的教師是必要的,但是它應(yīng)該被進(jìn)行,能真正揭示教師有意義的性能。而不是評級教師的知識,學(xué)生應(yīng)該被要求估計他們自己靠在一門課程,并報告諸如教師與學(xué)生交流的能力,他與學(xué)生的關(guān)系,和他的能力激發(fā)興趣的話題。Nowadays,ithasbecomeascommonincollegesanduniversitiesforstudentstogradeteachersasforteacherstogradestudents.Insomeuni

7、versitiesstudentsratinghasevenbecometheonlysourceofinformationonteachingeffectiveness.如今，在高校和大學(xué)里學(xué)生給老師評分已經(jīng)變得跟老師給學(xué)生評分一樣普遍。在一些大學(xué)里學(xué)生評分甚至是評定教師成果的唯一信息來源This,however,hascausedgreatcontroversy.Someareinfavoroftheratingsystem,Theyholdthatsincestudentsattendtheteachersclasseseveryday,theyshouldhavetheiropinio

8、nabouttheirteacherseffectiveness.Others,onthecontrary,arestronglyagainstit.Theybelievethatthereismuchmoretoteachingthanwhatisshownonstudentsratingforms.Studentsshouldnotbeexpectedtojudgewhetherthematerialstheyuseareuptodateorhowwelltheteacherknowsaboutthesubject.Thesejudgmentsrequireprofessionalknow

9、ledge,whichisbestleftfortheteacherscolleagues.然而，這也引起了很大的爭議。一些贊同評定系統(tǒng)的人認(rèn)為既然學(xué)生每天都去上老師的課，他們應(yīng)該對于教師的教學(xué)成果有一定的觀點(diǎn)。相反，其他人則強(qiáng)烈的反對，他們認(rèn)為教師付出的遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)多于學(xué)生評定系統(tǒng)中顯示的結(jié)果。讓學(xué)生去判斷他們應(yīng)用的材料是否是最新的或者教師對科目的掌握程度是不合理的，做出這些判斷是需要專業(yè)知識的，而這種知識只有教師們才最了解。Ithinkstudentsratingoftheirteachersisnecessary,butitshouldbeconductedinawaythatcanreally

10、shedmeaningfullightonteachersperformance.Insteadofratingtheteachersknowledgeonthesubject,studentsshouldbeaskedtoestimatewhattheyhavelearnedinacourse,andtoreportonsuchthingsasateachersabilitytocommunicatewithstudents,hisorherrelationshipwithstudents,andhisorherabilitytoarousestudentsinterestinthesubj

11、ect.我認(rèn)為學(xué)生給老師評分是必要的，但是應(yīng)該選定一種確實(shí)能夠考量教師表現(xiàn)的合適的方式。應(yīng)該讓學(xué)生們?nèi)セ卮鹚麄冊谡n堂中學(xué)到了什么，說明一些類似于教師與學(xué)生的溝通能力，他或她和學(xué)生的關(guān)系，和他或她激發(fā)學(xué)生對課程興趣的能力。而不是讓學(xué)生來評定教師的專業(yè)知識ShouldTeachersBeEvaluatedbyStudents?學(xué)生應(yīng)不應(yīng)該對老師進(jìn)行評價？Teachersoftengetachancetoevaluatetheirstudents.Nowthesituationhaschanged.Schoolsallowstudentstoevaluatetheworkoftheirteacher

12、s.Thiscausesdiscussionsaboutwhetherteachersshouldbeevaluatedbystudents.Theviewsvaryfrompersontoperson,andIprefertosayyestothisactbecauseitprovidesagoodwayforteacherstolearntheirdisadvantagesandimprovethequalityofteaching.老師經(jīng)常有機(jī)會評價學(xué)生?，F(xiàn)在情況以及發(fā)生改變了。學(xué)校允許學(xué)生對老師的工作進(jìn)行評價。這引起了關(guān)于學(xué)生該不該對老師進(jìn)行評價的討論。每個人的觀點(diǎn)各不相同，我覺得應(yīng)該

13、，因?yàn)樗o老師提供了一個從他們的缺點(diǎn)中學(xué)習(xí)并提高教學(xué)質(zhì)量的好方法。Firstly,itsagoodwayforstudentstoexpresstheiropinionsaboutteachersandlectures.Fromtheexpression,teacherscanlearntheiradvantagesanddisadvantages,whichisimportanttoimprovetheirteachingskills.Secondly,studentsoftenevaluateteachersbydoingsomequestionnaires,whicharequestio

14、nsandselectionsonthepaper,rangingfromteachersskillstohomeworkarrangement.Teacherscangetmuchusefulinformationfromthesequestionnaires.Besides,theevaluatedresultwillbesubmittedtoschoolleaderswhowilljudgewhethertheteacherisqualifiedornot.Finally,studentswillbemotivatedtopaymoreattentionduringclassesandt

15、olistentolecturesmoreregularly,sincetheywillbeaskedtogivetheirownopinionsaboutwhattheyveheard.Ofcourse,whenstudentsdotheevaluations,theyshouldbeobjectiveandimpartialsothattheevaluatedresultcanbemoreusefulandpersuasive.首先，這是學(xué)生表達(dá)他們對老師和課堂的看法的一個好途徑。從反饋中，老師可以從優(yōu)點(diǎn)和缺點(diǎn)中學(xué)習(xí)，這對提高教學(xué)技能很重要。其次，學(xué)生通過有問題和選擇的問卷對老師進(jìn)行評價，問題從教師技能到作業(yè)布置不等。教師可以從這些問題中得到更多有用信息。此