扶持農(nóng)業(yè)龍頭企業(yè)

1、1Webinar on:Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response CapacitySponsored byPartnership for Food Protection Coordinating CommitteeJune 28, 2010銷售信 http:/2Current challenges to ensuring a safe food supply Globalization Economic adu

2、lteration / intentional contamination Shifting demographics Changing consumption patterns3Current challenges for the food safety system Lack of resources Outdated laws Insufficient strategic planning Inadequate coordination across multiple agencies and jurisdictions 4 4Change is ComingSupported by P

3、resident Obama and White House Food Safety Working Group“there are certain things that we cant do on our own. There are certain things that only a government can do. And one of those things is ensuring that the foods we eatare safe and dont cause us harm.”President Barack ObamaMarch 2009Industry, co

4、nsumers and experts are aligned like never beforeLegislation5Vision for the FutureFocus on preventing foodborne illness by: Developing prevention-oriented standards Responding rapidly and effectively Ensuring optimal use of all available resources, which means: Building an integrated national food s

5、afety system6Build on Current Work Food Protection Plan as a foundation August 2008 50-State Meeting Partnership for Food Protection Work Groups Information sharing Contracts, grants and cooperative agreements Training and certification7Integrated National Food Safety System Develop standards to ens

6、ure consistency Train and certify a highly skilled workforce Work across jurisdictions to ensure protection of the entire food supply from farm to table Create mechanisms for data sharing Ensure use of quality systems Build oversight and accountability 8 8Supporting a Common VisionFederal, State and

7、 Local partners are joining forces to refine and implement a shared vision for an integrated food safety system.9Partnership for Food Protection Work Groups (State and Local leadership; Federal, State and Local membership):Work Groups to complete initial projects by August 2010PASTPartnership for Fo

8、od Protection Work GroupsInformation TechnologyTrainingRisk-Based WorkplanningResponsePet Net ProjectPRESENTPartnership for Food Protection Work Groups and Integrated Food Safety System Task GroupsIntegrated Food Safety System Task Groups (Focus on building FDA infrastructure to support an Integrate

9、d Food Safety System):Implementation expected over five yearsLaboratoriesOversightPerformance Outcomes and MeasuresPolicy and ProceduresTraining and CertificationNational Work PlanEmergency ResponseSteering Committee(FDA, CDC, USDA membership)Coordinating Committee(Federal, State & Local members

10、hip)Partnership for Food Protection Work Groups (State and Local leadership; Federal, State and Local membership):Work Groups to complete initial projects by August 2010Information TechnologyTrainingRisk-Based WorkplanningResponsePet Net ProjectIntegrated Food Safety System Task Groups (Federal, Sta

11、te and Local Integrated Leadership):Implementation expected over five yearsLaboratoriesOversightPerformance Outcomes and MeasuresPolicy and ProceduresTraining and CertificationNational Work PlanEmergency ResponsePet Net ProjectFUTUREIntegrated Food Safety System Task GroupsSteering Committee(FDA, CD

12、C, USDA membership)Coordinating Committee(Federal, State & Local membership)Steering Committee(FDA, CDC, USDA membership)Coordinating Committee(Federal, State & Local membership)Relationship of the Partnership for Food Protection and Integrated Food Safety SystemNational StandardsNational St

13、andardsOther key areas? 10National Standards Outcome: Uniform inspectional coverage and sample collection and analysis to enable greater use of each others analysis and observations in protecting public health through: Expansion of Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards and Retail Food Regul

14、atory Program Standards Creating shared data standards to enable exchange of enforcement data among public health and regulatory partners IT interconnectivity between Federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial public health and regulatory partners11Program StandardsProgram Standards1. Regulatory

15、 Foundation2. Training Program3. Inspection Program4. Inspection Audit Program5. Food-related Illness & Food Terrorism Preparednessss and Response 6. Compliance and Enforcement Program7. Industry and Community Relations8. Program Resources9. Program Assessment10. Laboratory Support12Standards as

16、 a Program Framework Standards provide: A guide to design and management of a manufactured food regulatory program A program foundation A tool to evaluate the effectiveness of food safety interventions Best Practices of a high quality Manufactured Foods Regulatory program13National Work Plan Outcome

17、: Improve targeting of resources and expand inspections and sample collection coverage by: Developing a process to work with all regulatory and public heath partners to create an approach for the ranking of food categories by public health risk Developing a national work plan for food/feed inspectio

18、ns and sample collections and analysis14Training and Certification Program Outcome: High level of scientific quality in data collection and inspections and consistent best-practice approaches and capacity across state and local agencies by: Implementing a national food safety training system that pr

19、ovides the knowledge and skills to regulators and public heath partners at all levels of the government in a timely and efficient manner Implementing a national certification system to help assure both comparable and competent performance of staff at all levels of government1516Laboratory Program Ou

20、tcome: Consistent and meaningful data for compliance, surveillance, and environmental samples by: Developing a national laboratory proficiency testing program Creating shared data standards to enable the exchange of public health and agricultural laboratory data Utilizing quality systems in all labo

21、ratory functions17Response Outcome: Coordinated, faster and more effective response to food safety events by: Increasing cooperative agreements to fund Rapid Response Teams and FERN labs to integrate an all-hazards response capability Working with the Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (

22、CIFOR) to implement guidelines for multi-jurisdictional outbreaks Strengthening capacity for state and local disease surveillance and detection Developing a system for rapid analysis and integration of consumer complaints and other data sources to facilitate early detection and response to food prob

23、lems 18Program Oversight Outcome: Maintain program credibility by: Measuring performance against the program standards Auditing inspections, investigations, sample collections and analysis, enforcement, response, recovery, and outreach activities of regulatory partners 19What is necessary for success? Support from stakeholders Engagement from partners Multi-year investment- Federal - Local- Territorial- State - Tribal Information sharing infrastructure 20Summary of the Change Build on current collaborations Provide stronger, more uniform coverage from farm t