213609203修改稿cover,letter模板

1、修改稿cover,letter模板篇一：sci 投稿全過(guò)程信件模板一覽(cover letter,催稿信等) 一、最初投稿cover letter dear editors: we would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “paper title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “journal name”. no conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and ma

2、nuscript is approved by all authors for publication. i would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. all the authors listed have approv

3、ed the manuscript that is enclosed. in this work, we evaluated ? (簡(jiǎn)要介紹一下論文的創(chuàng)新性). i hope this paper is suitable for “journal name”. the following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration: 1) name ae-mail: 2) name be-mail: we deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we

4、 look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. if you have any queries, please dont hesitate to contact me at the address below. thank you and best regards. yours sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 二、催稿信 dear prof. : sorry for disturbing you. i am not sure if it is the right tim

5、e to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “paper title”. (id: 文章稿號(hào)), although the status of “with editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. i am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or

6、not? i would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. i am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewers comments. thank you very much for your consideration. best regards! yours sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 三、修改稿cover letter dear dr/ pr

7、of.（寫上負(fù)責(zé)你文章編輯的姓名，顯得尊重，因?yàn)榈谝淮蔚耐陡宀恢谰唧w負(fù)責(zé)的編輯，只能用通用的editors）: on behalf of my co- authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructivecomments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “pap

8、er title”. (id: 文章稿號(hào)). we have studied reviewers comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. we have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.

9、 we would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. looking forward to hearing from you. thank you and best regards. yours sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 四、修改稿回答審稿人的意見(jiàn)（最重要的部分） list of responses dear editors and reviewers: thank you for you

10、r letter and for the reviewers comments concerning our manuscript entitled “paper title” (id: 文章稿號(hào)). those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. we have studied comments carefully and have mad

11、e correction which we hope meet with approval. revised portion are marked in red in the paper. the main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewers comments are as flowing: responds to the reviewers comments: reviewer #1: 1. response to comment: (?簡(jiǎn)要列出意見(jiàn)?) response: 2. response to com

12、ment: (?簡(jiǎn)要列出意見(jiàn)?) response: 。 逐條意見(jiàn)回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏 針對(duì)不同的問(wèn)題有下列幾個(gè)禮貌術(shù)語(yǔ)可適當(dāng)用用： we are very sorry for our negligence of ?. we are very sorry for our incorrect writing ?. it is really true as reviewer suggested that? we have made correction according to the reviewers comments. we have re-written this part accor

13、ding to the reviewers suggestion as reviewer suggested that? considering the reviewers suggestion, we have ? 最后特意感謝一下這個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)： special thanks to you for your good comments. reviewer #2: 同上述 reviewer #3: other changes: 1. line 60-61, the statements of “?” were corrected as “?” 2. line 107, “?” was ad

14、ded 3. line 129, “?” was deleted we tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. these changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. and here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. we appreciate for editors/reviewers

15、warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. 五、文章接受后可以考慮感謝一下負(fù)責(zé)你文章的編輯或主編（根據(jù)需要） dear prof. : thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. on behalf of my co-authors, w

16、e would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers. thank you and best regards. yours sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 六、詢問(wèn)校稿信件（如果文章接受后時(shí)間較長(zhǎng)） dear : sorry for disturbing you. i am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our acce

17、pted manuscript titled “paper title” (id: 文章稿號(hào)), since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. i am just wondering that how long i can receive the proof of our manuscript from you? i would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. i

18、 am very pleased to hear from you. thank you very much for your consideration. yours sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 七、文章校稿信件 dear mr. : thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “paper title” (id: 文章稿號(hào)) for publication in “journal name”. we have finish

19、ed the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below.corrections: 1. in * should be * (page *, right column, line*) 2. in * the “*” should be “*” (page *, right column, line*) answers for “author queries”: 1. *. 2. * 3. *

20、 we greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. if there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. thank you and best regards. yours sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 篇二：怎樣寫好國(guó)外期刊修改稿的cover_letter cover letter是

21、一篇文章的外衣,對(duì)國(guó)外投稿能否成功很關(guān)鍵,一般投稿時(shí)的cover letter并不是很重要,只要說(shuō)明你稿件的研究方向及創(chuàng)新點(diǎn),并聲明沒(méi)有在其他期刊發(fā)表過(guò).最難寫的就是revised manuscript中的cover letter,這將關(guān)系到是否錄用你的稿件,或要進(jìn)一步審稿.國(guó)外專家講求的是精益求精,老外們對(duì)文章都很嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)?一個(gè)單詞哪怕是一個(gè)介詞的使用都是很有考究的,因此會(huì)提出很多似乎對(duì)文章無(wú)關(guān)緊要的修改意見(jiàn),但是這你要給予充分的重視.通過(guò)國(guó)外發(fā)表幾篇文章后,開(kāi)始一直失敗,但是我沒(méi)有放棄,通過(guò)總結(jié)現(xiàn)在將一些經(jīng)驗(yàn)和大家分享,以免大家走很多不必要的彎路. 為了更好理解,我用我發(fā)的一篇文章作為例子來(lái)

22、說(shuō)明: 這里是期刊審稿人的修改意見(jiàn): dear *, the review of your manuscript, thermal decomposition and kinetics studies on 1, 4-dinitropiperazine (dnp), submitted to journal of hazardous materials has been completed. the reviewers recommend the need for minor revisions. please revise your manuscript according to the r

23、eviewers comments attached, and re-submit to me your revised version of the manuscript including an itemized response to each reviewers comments. please submit your revised submission before jul 11, 2007. i will then begin the re-review process. please note that revised manuscripts will be sent for

24、review because revising a manuscript does not automatically mean it will be accepted for publication. for your guidance, reviewers comments are appended below. on your main menu page is a folder entitled submissions needing revision. you will find your submission record there. please ensure that the

25、 article conforms to the format of the journal. in particular make sure that all the articles in your references have titles included. the journal guide for authors is available on the journal homepage/locate/hazmat when submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source fi

26、les (e.g. word). uploading a pdf file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. if your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. once again, thank you for your interest in journal of hazardous materi

27、als. yours sincerely, merv fingas, phd editor journal of hazardous materials reviewers comments: reviewer #1: the paper reports on the thermal decomposition and kinetics of dnp. it is a welcome addition to the literature and appectable for publication after some revision: (i) please provide large ba

28、sis-set dft calculations to support the assignment of the ir bands of dnp. (ii) please assign all ir bands of fig. 5 reviewer #2: authors have carried out work on the thermal analysis of the dinitropiperazine. the new information reported in the paper is scanty. the large amount of data has been alr

29、eady reported by the several researchers on the thermal analysis of dinitropiperazine (see the reference section of the paper and also reviewer has done the scopus search). the only new information reported in this paper is of thet-jump ir studies and dsc studies under different pressures, which may

30、 adds on to the existing scientific data base. there is not much novelty in the reported work. the table 1 and figure 1 need to be deleted from the paper since it is already well reported in the literature. table 2 and figure 3 gives the same information. authors are requested to delete table 2 and

31、the same information may be explained in the results and discussion part of the paper. may i also kindly request authors to update the literature survey till date on dnp in the introduction part of the paper using chemical abstracts on disk (ca on cd) data base. the quality and clarity of the figure

32、s in the paper need to be improved. english need to be improved. the paper is recommended for short communication after the minor revision. reviewer #3: the paper is okay in terms of contents.however,since it has been written by a chinese, the english is very poor and as such requires a lot of corre

33、ctions and editing by your team. the authors have used ozawa and kissenger methods to find out activation energy.however,they have given data for activation energy by ozawa method only under 3.4 thermal decomposition kinetics).the data for eo by kissenger methods should also be included in the paper

34、.also,captions of figs 1,3 &5 are missing. reviewer #4: this paper is promising but could be improved by better kinetic analysis. 1. kissingers method is ok as a first approximation, but friedmans method is the best isoconversional method. even ozawa has abandoned his method in favor of friedman

35、s. 2. the method of comparing a large number of kinetic models against data at a single heating rate (page 5) is invalid, discredited, and should not be published. this issue has been discussed in several papers by vyzovkin and in a international kinetic study published by brown et al, thermochemica

36、 acta 355, 125-143, 2000, and following papers. consequently, there is no real evidence presented that the equation is first-order. in fact, from my studies of energetic materials, including rdx and hmx, i would have thought that nucleation-growth kinetics would be most appropriate. however, i would

37、 have to do a more rigorous kinetic analysis of the data to know for sure. 3. the best way to judge a kinetic model is how it compares with data at multiple heating rates (using a single set of parameters). such a comparison is not present in this paper, so it is difficult to judge the validity of t

38、he kinetic parameters. 4. the authors discussion of hmx kinetics is good in some respects but out of date in others. more recent papers by multiple institutions place the activation energy for hmx closer to 150 kj/mol. a commonly cited paper on this is by wight and vyazovkin, ann rev phys chem 48, 1

39、19, 1997. a more recent but harder paper to get is by burnham and weese in the proceedings of the 2005 ict conference. henson has published a correlation in the detonation symposium showing that explosion times scale with an activation energy of about 150 kj/mol. active workers in energetic material

40、s should have access to these materials. 看完了這個(gè),是不是會(huì)覺(jué)得很頭疼,是的老外就是這么認(rèn)真.要求很具體仔細(xì),審稿細(xì)致深入.下面就是看你怎么樣回復(fù)這篇審稿意見(jiàn)了.我回復(fù)后的第三天就收到論文錄用通知,估計(jì)他們沒(méi)有再次送給審稿專家重審.因?yàn)槲业腸over letter他很滿意,我是這樣寫的: dear *, my manuscript, *（論文題目）, was revised according to the reviewers comments, and the itemized response to each reviewers comments

41、is attached. many thanks for your suggestion. i am so sorry to bring you so much trouble because of our careless. correspondence and phone calls about this paper should be directed to *（作者） at the following address，phone and e-mail： address: * tel.: * fax:* e-mail: * thanks very much again for your

42、attention to our paperonce again, thank you for your help to our paper processing. yours sincerely， * for your guidance, itemized response to each reviewers comments is appended below. ? dear reviewer #1: (i) suhithi m. peiris, richard, etc. (j. phys. chem. a, 104 (39), 8898 -8907, 2000. 10.1021) ha

43、d already reported large basis-set dft calculations to support the assignment of the ir bands of dnp. (ii) we assigned all ir bands of fig.5 (now change to fig.8). (iii) because of the ir study had been reported, the ir spectra (fig.1) was deleted form the paper. anyway, thank you for your arduous w

44、ork and instructive advice. ? dear reviewer #2:篇三：sci 投稿cover letter模板大全 sci 投稿cover letter模板大全 1. 第一次投稿cover letter：主要任務(wù)是介紹文章主要?jiǎng)?chuàng)新以及聲 明沒(méi)有一稿多投 dear editors: we would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “paper title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “journal name”. no con

45、flict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. i would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publicatio

46、n elsewhere, in whole or in part. all the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed. in this work, we evaluated (簡(jiǎn)要介紹一下論文的創(chuàng)新性). i hope this paper is suitable for “journal name”. the following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration: 1) name ae-mail: 2) name be-mail:

47、 we deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. if you have any queries, please dont hesitate to contact me at the address below. thank you and best regards. yours sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 2. 催稿信：詢問(wèn)稿件處理到聲

48、明步驟 dear prof. : sorry for disturbing you. i am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “paper title”. (id: 文章稿號(hào)), although the status of “with editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three mo

49、nths ago. i am just wondering that my manuscripthas been sent to reviewers or not? i would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. i am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewers comments. thank you very much for your consideration. best regards! your

50、s sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 3. 修改稿cover letter dear dr/ prof.（寫上負(fù)責(zé)你文章編輯的姓名，顯得尊重，因?yàn)榈谝淮蔚耐陡宀恢谰唧w負(fù)責(zé)的編輯，只能用通用的editors）: on behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their pos

51、itive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “paper title”. (id: 文章稿號(hào)). we have studied reviewers comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. we have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. attached please find

52、the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration. we would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. looking forward to hearing from you. thank you and best regards. yours sincerely, corresponding author: name: e-mail: 4. 修改稿

53、回答審稿人的意見(jiàn)（最重要的部分） list of responses dear editors and reviewers:thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning our manuscript entitled “paper title” (id: 文章稿號(hào)). those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding

54、significance to our researches. we have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. revised portion are marked in red in the paper. the main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewers comments are as flowing: responds to the reviewers comment

55、s: reviewer #1: 1. response to comment: (簡(jiǎn)要列出意見(jiàn)) response: 2. response to comment: (簡(jiǎn)要列出意見(jiàn)) response: 。 逐條意見(jiàn)回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏 針對(duì)不同的問(wèn)題有下列幾個(gè)禮貌術(shù)語(yǔ)可適當(dāng)用用： we are very sorry for our negligence of . we are very sorry for our incorrect writing . it is really true as reviewer suggested that we have made correction

56、 according to the reviewers comments. we have re-written this part according to the reviewers suggestion as reviewer suggested that considering the reviewers suggestion, we have 最后特意感謝一下這個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)： special thanks to you for your good comments. reviewer #2: 同上述 reviewer #3: other changes: 1. line 60-61, the statements of “” were corrected as “” 2. line 107, “” was added 3. line 129,