雅思寫作全面解讀之勤奮與天份哪個更重要-智課教育出國考試.pdf

智 課 網(wǎng) 雅 思 備 考 資 料 雅思寫作全面解讀之勤奮與天份哪個更重要 智課教育 出國考試 雅思寫作全面解讀之勤奮與天份哪個更重要 考生們想要寫出一篇 優(yōu)秀的文章來就不妨和智課教育小編一起來學(xué)習(xí)學(xué)習(xí)吧 題目 It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 有人天生就有某種天份 比如體育和音樂的天份 但是有人說任何 孩子都可能被教成運動員和音樂家 討論兩種觀點 范文介紹 This model has been prepared by an examiner as an example of a very good answer However please note that this is just one example out of many possible approaches 頭腦風(fēng)暴 這篇文章其實考察的是勤奮和天份哪一個對于成功更加重要 人人 都渴望成功 但是一些特殊的領(lǐng)域 像音樂 體育 文學(xué)和藝術(shù)創(chuàng)造等 杰出的人物多是需要天賦的 喬丹不一定是最勤奮的運動員 但是一 定是最有籃球天賦的 莫扎特從三歲時就顯出了非凡的音樂天才 他時 常走到鋼琴前面 按著琴鍵細聽 并努力彈出他曾經(jīng)聽到過的音樂 但 是世間畢竟還是凡人為多 我們也常說小馬過河酬勤 勤能補拙 成功 是99 的勤奮 1 的天份 所以支持勤奮明顯是更站得住腳 經(jīng)典語料庫 1 acquire 學(xué)習(xí) 尤其是指知識和技能的獲得 2 innatetalents 與生俱來的才華 3 inherit 遺傳而得 4 nature 天份 5 nurture 后天的教育 6 excel 優(yōu)秀 勝過他人 7 exceptional 優(yōu)秀的 8 facility 便利 容易 9 via 通過 10 versus 于 相對 謀篇布局 Para 1 背景介紹 爭議焦點 作者首段沒有提出觀點 自然過渡到 了論證的部分 也留下了想象空間 激發(fā)讀者興趣的 文無定法 Para 2 反方 支持勤奮 觀點的合理性 Para 3 正方 支持天份 觀點的合理性 Para 4 寫作意圖 客觀辯證的讓步正方法觀點的合理性 綜合正反 方觀點的合理性提出自己的個性觀點 Para 5 總結(jié)觀點 明確提出支持反方觀點 但是又讓步了一下正方 觀點的合理性 The relative importance of natural talent and training is a frequent topic of discussion when people try to explain different levels of ability in for example 插入語 sport artor music Obviously education systems are based on the belief that all children can effectively be taught to acquire different skills including those associated with sport artor music So from our own school experience we can find plenty of evidence to support the view that 用事實支持論點 a child can acquire these skills with continued teaching and guided practice However some people believe that innate talent is what differentiates a person who has been trained to play a sport or an instrument from those who become good players In other words 再解釋 there is more to the skill than a learned technique and this extra talent cannot be taught no matter how good the teacher or how frequently a child practices I personally think that 寫作意圖 some people do have talents that are probably inherited via their genes Such talents can give individuals a facility for certain skills that allow them to excel while more hard working students never manage to reach a comparable level But as with all questions of nature versus nurture they are not mutually exclusive Good musicians or artists and exceptional sports stars have probably succeeded because of both good training and natural talent Without the natural talent continuous training would be neither attractive norproductive and without the training the child would not learn how to exploitand develop their talent In conclusion I agree that any c