2014年8月9日雅思機經(jīng)table社會類危險運動雙邊

雅思寫作機經(jīng)一、考試時間：2014089Task1:Task2: -TaskThetablebelowshowsfourdifferenttypesofdwelloflivinginthreepartsof %7449791111ThestatisticsrepresentthetypesofbuildingsinwhichAustralianslivedintheyearof2001and2006.Ingeneral,livinginahousewasthemostcommontypeofdwellinginVictoria,theNorthernTerritoriesandTasmania.InTasmaniaofAustralia,88%ofpeoplelivedinahouse,andthispercentagedidnotchangemuchin2006,at86%.TherestAustralianslivedeitherinaduplex(7%)oraflat(4%)in2001,withlittlechangeafter5years.VeryfewpeoplechoseothertypesofVictorianswerealsousedtoresidinginahouseinspiteofamoderatedropfrom79%to75%duringthesameperiod.Thoselivinginaduplexmadeup13%and14%intherespectiveyear,withflatsastheleftcomplement. theNorthern Territories,houses, modated65%ofAustraliansin2001and62%in2006.Flatsandduplexesprovidedresidenceto14%and9%oflocalpeoplerespectivelyin2001andgainedpopularityintheyearof2006whichsawamarginalriseto16%and11%.Comparedwiththeothertwoprovinces,residentsherehadmoreoptions,andthepercentageskeptstableaboveineachTaskSomepeoplethinkthatdangeroussportsshouldbebanned,butothersthinkthepeopleshouldhavedomtochoosesportsactivities.Discussbothviewsandgiveyour alalWearethrilledwhenwatchingdangeroussportsshowslikemotorracing,boxing,rugbyandmanyotherstunts,suchasseeminglyelegantsportsevent,gymnastics,whichisverydangerous,too.AlthoughIamcertainlyconcernedaboutthesafetyofthosesportsheroes,Ithinkitisirrationaltoprotectthembydeprivingthemoftheirparticipation.Theargumentsforprohibitionaregroundedonthefundamentbeliefthatwearenotonlyindividuals,butapartofthewholesocietyandwhatwedocaninfluencetheothersaround.Tobespecific,highexposuretodangerousactivitiesmeansthereisahighpossibilityforparticipantstogetinjured.Onceanyinjuryoccurs,evenifnotafatalone,theparticipantsthemselvesmaylosetheabilitytowork,thereforemakingnocontributiontotheircommunity.Otherthanthat,theywouldhavetoconsumethepublicmedicalresources,whichmaybeinterpretedunfairtotheothertaxpayerswhocommittheirdutyroutinely.However,banningasportseventmeansadenialof alrightsofchoice.Weownourbodyandthereforewehaveeveryrighttodecidehowtodowithit,including dangerousphysicalactivities.Inaddition,adultsarematureenoughtomakereasonablejudgmentandtakeprotectivemeasurestoensuretheirlifesafetyandthismaturitydeservesfullrespect.However,prohibitionwouldsendawrongmessagethatitistheernmentinsteadoftheinvolved whoshouldberesponsibleforthehealthandsafetyofindividuals.Anotherlossofforbiddingextremesportswouldbetheeconomicone.Somehighrisksportshavedevelopedintomillionsofdollarsofindustries,eliminatingthemwouldcausehugeeconomicToconclude,Ithinkthereisnoneedfortheernmenttointerveneinsportsincludinghazardousones.Instead,itshouldsetupp