2018英語(yǔ)二閱讀逆襲直播講義_第1頁(yè)
2018英語(yǔ)二閱讀逆襲直播講義_第2頁(yè)
2018英語(yǔ)二閱讀逆襲直播講義_第3頁(yè)
2018英語(yǔ)二閱讀逆襲直播講義_第4頁(yè)
2018英語(yǔ)二閱讀逆襲直播講義_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩4頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

閱讀逆襲閱讀逆襲講主講:2017閱讀講①EverySaturdaymorning,at9am,morethan50,000runnerssetofftorun5kmaroundtheirlocalpark.②TheParkrunphenomenonbeganwithadozenfriendsandhasinspired400eventsintheUKandmoreabroad.③Eventsare,staffedbythousandsofvolunteers.④Runnersrangefromfouryearsoldtograndparents;theirtimesrangefromAndrewBaddeley’sworldrecord13minutes48secondsuptoanhour.①ParkrunissucceedingwhereLondon’sOlympic“l(fā)egacy”isfailing.②TenyearsagoonMonday,itwasannouncedthattheGamesofthe30thOlympiadwouldbeinLondon.③nning spledgedthatthegreatlegacyoftheGameswouldbetoleveranationofsportloversawayfromtheircouches.④Thepopulationwouldbefitter,healthier,andproducemorewinners.⑤Ithasnothappened.⑥Thenumberofadultsngweeklysportdidrise,bynearly2millionintherun-upto2012—butthegeneralpopulationwasgrowingfaster.⑦Worse,thenumbersarenowfallingatanacceleratingrate.⑧Theoppositionclaimsprimaryschoolpupilsngatleasttwohoursofsportaweekhavenearlyhalved.⑨Obesityhasrisenamongadultsandchildren.⑩OfficialretrospectionscontinueastowhyLondon2012failedto“inspireageneration.”?ThesuccessofParkrunoffersanswers.好消息經(jīng)教務(wù)老師再三協(xié)調(diào)時(shí)間,蔣老師火爆六年的“臨門一腳”終于敲定了2018臨門一腳(12月20日三天 最后一腳,自信滿滿考場(chǎng)掃 報(bào)①Parkrunisnotaracebutatimetrial:Youronlycompetitoristheclock.②Theethos anybody.③Thereisasmuchjoyoverapuffed-outfirst-timerbeingclappedoverthelineasthereisabouttoptalentshining.④TheOlympicbidders,bycontrast,wantedtogetmorepeoplengsportsandtoproducemoreeliteathletes.⑤Thedualaimwasmixedup:Thestressonsuccessovertakingpartwasintimidatingfor①Indeed,thereissomethingalittleabsurdinthestategettinginvolvedinthenningofsuchafundamentally“grassroots”conceptascommunitysportsassociations.②Ifthereisaroleforernment,itshouldreallybegettinginvolvedinprovidingcommongoods—makingsurethereisspaceforyingfieldsandthemoneytopavetennisandnetballcourts,andencouragingtheprovisionofalltheseactivitiesinschools.③Butsuccessiveernmentshavepresidedoversellinggreenspaces,squeezingmoneyfromanddecliningattentiononsportineducation.④Insteadofwordy,worthystrategies,futureernmentsneedtodomoretoprovidetheconditionsforsporttothrive.⑤Oratleastnotmakethemworse.AccordingtoParagraph1,Parkrun gainedgreatcreatedmanyeanofficialTheauthorbelievesthatLondon’sOlympic“l(fā)egacy”hasfailed boostpopulationpromotesportimprovethecity’sincreasesporthoursinParkrunisdifferentfromOlympicgamesinthat aimsatdiscoveringfocusesonmassdoesnotemphasizedoesnotattractfirst-Withregardtomasssport,theauthorholdsthaternments superviselocalsportsincreasefundsforsportsclubs[D]investinpublicsportsfacilitiesTheauthor’sattitudetowhat ernmentshavedoneforsports [C] [D]①Withsomuchfocusonchildren’suseofscreens,it’seasyforparentstoforgetabouttheirownscreen②“Techisdesignedtoreallysuckyouin,”saysJennyRadeskyinherstudyofdigitaly,“anddigitalproductsaretheretopromote alengagement.③Itmakesithardtodisengage,andleadstoalotofbleed-overintothefamilyroutine.”①Radeskyhasstudiedtheuseofphonesandtabletsatmealtimesbygivingmother-childpairsafood-testingexercise.②Shefoundthatmotherswhouseddevicesduringtheexercisestarted20percentfewerverbaland39percentfewernonverbalinctionswiththeirchildren.③Duringaseparateobservation,shesawthatphonesbecameasourceoftensioninthefamily.④Parentswouldbelookingattheirswhilethechildrenwouldbemakingexcitedbidsfortheirattention.①Infantsarewiredtolookatparents’facestotrytounderstandtheirworld,andifthosefacesareblankandunresponsive—astheyoftenarewhenabsorbedinadevice—itcanbeextremelydisconcertingforthechildren.②Radeskycitesthe“stillfaceexperiment”devisedbydevelopmentalpsychologistEDTronickinthe1970s.③Init,amotherisaskedtoinctwithherchildinanormalwaybeforeputtingonablankexpressionandnotgivingthemanyvisualsocialfeedback:Thechild esincreasinglydistressedasshetriestocapturehermother’sattention.④“Parentsdon’thavetobeexquisiypresentatalltimes,butthereneedstobeabalanceandparentsneedtoberesponsiveandsensitivetoachild’sverbalornonverbalexpressionsofanemotionalneed,”says①Ontheotherhand,Tronickhimselfisconcernedthattheworriesaboutkids’useofscreensarebornoutofan“oppressiveideologythatdemandsthatparentsshouldalwaysbein cting”withtheirchildren:“It’sbasedonasomewhatfantasized,verywhite,veryupper-middle-classideologythatsaysifyou’refailingtoexposeyourchildto30,000wordsyouareneglectingthem.”②Tronickbelievesthatjustbecauseachildisn’tlearningfromthescreendoesn’tmeanthere’snovaluetoit—particularlyifitgivesparentstimetohaveashower,dohouseworkorsimplyhaveabreakfromtheirchild.③Parents,hesays,cangetalotoutofusingtheirdevicestospeaktoafriendorgetsomeworkoutoftheway.④Thiscanmakethemfeelhappier,whichletsthembeavailabletotheirchildtherestoftheAccordingtoJennyRadesky,digitalproductsaredesigned simplifyroutineabsorbuserbetterinteralincreaseworkRadesky’sfood-testingexerciseshowsthatmothers’useof slowsdownbabies’verbalRadeskycitesthe“stillfaceexperiment”toshow itiseasyforchildrentogetusedtoblankverbalexpressionsareunnecessaryforemotionalchildrenareinsensitivetochangesintheirparents’parentsneedtorespondtochildren’semotionalTheoppressiveideologymentionedbyTronicrequiresparents protectkidsfromexposuretowildteachtheirkidsatleast30,000wordsaensureconstant ctionwiththeirremainconcernedaboutkids’useofAccordingtoTronic,kids’useofscreens givetheirparents maketheirparentsmorehelpthemwithhelp emore①Today,widespreadsocialpressuretoimmediaygotocollegeinconjunctionwithincreasinglyhighexpectationsinafast-movingworldoftencausesstudentstocompleyoverlookthepossibilityoftakingagapyear.②Afterall,ifeveryoneyouknowisgoingtocollegeinthefall,itseemssillytostaybackayear,doesn’tit?③Andaftergoingtoschoolfor12years,itdoesn’tfeelnaturaltospendayearngsomethingthat①Butwhilethismaybetrue,it’snotagoodenoughreasontocondemngapyears.②There’salwaysaconstantfearoffallingbehindeveryoneelseonthesociallyperpetuated“racetothefinishline,”whetherthatbetowardgraduateschool,medicalschoolorlucrativecareer.③Butdespitecommonmisconceptions,agapyeardoesnothinderthesuccessofacademicpursuits—infact,itprobablyenhancesit.①StudiesfromtheUnitedStatesandAustraliashowthatstudentswhotakeagapyeararegenerallybetterpreparedforandperformbetterincollegethanthosewhodonot.②Ratherthanpullingstudentsback,agapyearpushesthemaheadbypreparingthemforindependence,newresponsibilitiesandenvironmentalchanges—allthingsthatfirstyearstudentsoftenstrugglewiththemost.③Gapyearexperiencescanlessentheblowwhenitcomestoadjustingtocollegeandbeingthrownintoabrandnewenvironment,makingiteasiertofocusonacademicsandactivitiesratherthanacclimation①Ifyou’renotconvincedoftheinherentvalueintakingayearofftoexploreinterests,thenconsideritsfinancialimpactonfutureacademicchoices.②AccordingtotheNationalCenterforEducationStatistics,nearly80percentofcollegestudentsendupchangingtheirmajorsatleastonce.③Thisisn’tsurprising,consideringthebasicmandatoryhighschoolcurriculumleavesstudentswithapoorunderstandingofthevastacademicpossibilitiesthatawaitthemincollege.④Manystudentsfindthemselveslistingonemajorontheircollegeapplications,butswitchingtoanotheraftertakingcollegeclasses.⑤It’snotnecessarilyabadthing,butdependingontheschool,itcanbecostlytomakeupcreditsafterswitchingtoolateinthegame.⑥AtBostonCollege,forexample,youwouldhavetocompleteanextrayearwereyoutoswitchtothenursingschoolfromanotherdepartment.⑦Takingagapyeartofigurethingsoutinitiallycanhelppreventstressandsavemoneylateron.Oneofthereasonsforhigh-schoolgraduatesnottakingagapyearis theythinkitacademicallytheyhavealotoffuntoexpectinitfeelsstrangetododifferentlyfromitseemsworthlesstotakeoff-campusStudiesfromtheUSandAustraliaimplythattakingagapyear keepstudentsfrombeinglowerrisksinchoosingrelievefreshmenofTheword“acclimation”(Line8,Para.3)isclosestinmeaning [B] [D]Agapyearmaysavemoneyforstudentsbyhel switchtoanotherdecideontherightThemostsuitabletitleforthistextwould InFavoroftheGapTheABCsoftheGapTheGapYearComes①Thoughoftenviewedasaproblemforwesternstates,thegrowingfrequencyofwildfiresisanationalconcernbecauseofitsimpactonfederaltaxdollars,saysProfessorMaxMoritz,aspecialistinfireecologyand①In2015,theUS Serviceforthefirsttimespentmorethanhalfofits$5.5billionannualbudgetfightingfires—nearlydoublethepercentageitspentonsuchefforts20yearsago.②Ineffect,fewerfederalfundstodayaregoingtowardstheagency’sotherwork—suchas conservation,watershedandculturalresourcesmanagement,andinfrastructureupkeep—thataffectthelivesofallAmericans.①Anothernationwideconcerniswhetherpublicfundsfromotheragenciesaregoingintoconstructioninfire-pronedistricts.②AsMoritzputsit,howoftenarefederaldollarsbuildinghomesthatarelikelytobelosttoawildfire?①“It’salreadyahugeproblemfromapublicexpenditureforthewholecountry,”hesays.②Weneedtotakeamagnifyingglasstothat.③Like,“Waitaminute,isthisOK?”“Dowewantinsteadtoredirectthosefundstoconcentrateonlower-hazardpartsofthelandscape?”①SuchaviewwouldrequireacorrespondingshiftinthewayUSsocietytodayviewsfire,researchers①Foronething,conversationsaboutwildfiresneedtobemoreinclusive.②Overthepastdecade,thefocushasbeenonclimatechange—howthewarmingoftheEarthfromgreenhousegasesisleadingtoconditionsthatworsenfires.①Whileclimateisakeyelement,Moritzsays,itshouldn’tcomeattheexpenseoftherestofthe①“Thehumansystemsandthelandscapesweliveonarelinked,andthe ctionsgobothways,”he②Failingtorecognizethat,henotes,leadsto“anoverlysimplifiedviewofwhatthesolutionsmightbe.③perceptionoftheproblemandofwhatthesolution esvery①Atthesametime,peoplecontinuetotreatfireasaneventthatneedstobewhollycontrolledandunleashedonlyoutofnecessity,saysProfessorBalchatthe

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論