版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
HowtoEvaluateRiskinthe
MedicalLaboratoryJamesH.Nichols,PhD,DABCC,FACBProfessorofPathology,MicrobiologyandImmunologyMedicalDirectorofClinicalChemistryandPoint-of-CareTestingVanderbiltUniversitySchoolofMedicineMedicalDirector,ClinicalChemistryNashville,Tennessee,USAjames.h.nichols@
1Objectives1.Discussthesourcesoferrorinthemedicallab2.ReviewQCasameansofcontrollinganalyticalerror3.Identifyriskmanagementasatotalqualityassuranceofthetestingprocess4.Describeregulatorychangesadoptingriskmanagementinthelaboratory
2MedicalErrorAnadverseeventornearmissthatispreventablewiththecurrentstateofmedicalknowledge.(theQualityInteragencyCoordinationTaskForce)
MedicalErrorsInstituteofMedicineoftheNationalAcademiesreport1999Medicalerrorskill44,000-98,000patientsinUShospitalseachyear.“Numberoneproblemfacinghealthcare”LucienLeape,HarvardProfessorofPublicHealthMedicalErrors2002CommonwealthFundreportestimatedthat22.8millionpeoplehaveexperiencedamedicalerror,personallyorthroughatleastonefamilymemberReinforcesthe1999IOMreport,“ToErrisHuman”Annualcostsestimatedat$17–29billionUSAgencyforHealthcareResearchandQuality(AHRQ)estimatemedicalerrorsarethe8thleadingcauseofdeathintheUS–higherthan:MotorVehicleAccidents(43,458)Cancer(42,297)AIDS(16,516)LaboratoryErrorsAreviewoftheliteraturefoundthemajorityoferrorsoccurinthepreandpostanalyticalphases.
BoniniP,PlebaniM,CeriottiF,RubboliF.ClinChem2002;48:691-698.Manymistakesarecalled“l(fā)aberror”,butactuallyduetopoorcommunication,actionsbyothersinvolvedinthetestingprocess,orpoorlydesignedprocessesoutsidethelab’scontrol.Medicalerrorsoccurinprevention,diagnosisanddrugtreatmentoccur.Amongerrorsindiagnosis;50%werefailuretouseindicatedtests,32%werefailuretoactonresultsoftests,and55%involvedavoidabledelayindiagnosis.LeapeLL,BrennanTA,LairdN,etal.NEngJMed1991;324:377-84.7HistoricalQualityControlQualitycontrolhistoricallyusedtoreduceerrorsandpreventthereleaseofincorrectresultsfromthelaboratory!Bornfromthe1950’sindustrialmodelofqualityinanalyticalandfactoryprocessesQualitycontrolisastabilizedsurrogatesampleanalyzedlikeapatientsamplecontainingknownamountofmeasuredanalyte.IftheanalyticaltestsystemcanachievethedesiredresultusingaQCsample,thenthesystemisstableandqualitypatientresultsareassumedtobeproduced.8QualityControlAdvantagesQChastargetvalues,ifassayrecoverstarget,thensystemisassumedtobestable(instrument,reagent,operator,sample)ShiftinQC=Shiftinqualitypatientresults!WarnsoftestresultproblemsbeforereleasetophysicianQualityControlDisadvantagesIfQCnotanalyzedfrequentlyenoughorlabfailstotakeactionwhenQCfails,qualityofpatientresultsaffected!Withnewautoverificationorcontinuousreleaseofresultsbychemistryandhematologyanalyzers-PossibletoreleasepatientresultsbeforeaproblemisdetectedWhenaproblemisdetected,labmustgobackandreanalyzepatientssincelast“good”QCandpossiblysendoutcorrectedresults.Clinicalactioncouldbetakenonerroneousresultsintheinterimofcorrectinganunrecognizedissue!Despiteitslimitations,QCremainsanimportantmeansofdetectingandpreventinglaboratoryerrors!1011SystematicErrorsLiquidQCdoesagoodjobatdetectingsystematicerrors,like:ReagentdeteriorationorpreparationImproperstorageorshipmentconditionsIncorrectoperatortechnique(dilution,pipettesetting)Calibrationerrors–wrongsetpoint,factorsErrorswhichaffecteverytestinaconstantandpredictablemannerErrorsthatoccurfromonepointforwardorforalimitedperiodoftime12RandomErrorsLiquidQCdoesapoorjobatdetectingrandomerrorsunlesstheerrorspecificallyoccurswiththeQCsampleorincreasedresultvariabilityisnoted.Errorswhichaffectindividualsamplesinarandomandunpredictablefashion,like:ClotsBubblesInterferingsubstances13QCandLabErrorsQCQC09:0009:00LineLeak11:0001:15HemolyzedsampleQCdailyat09:00,twolevelsLineleakoccursat11:00,dispensespartialreagentcausing25%decreaseinvalues,notdetecteduntilnextdayQCat09:00.(SystematicError),mustreanalyzeallspecimenssincepreviousQCat09:00,thepreviousday.Hemolyzedspecimen(Randomerror)affectsonesample14HistoryofQualityControlQualitycontrolhasbeentraditionalmeansofmanagingerrorinthelaboratory!CLIA’67–requireddailyQCasintegralpartoftestingprocessCLIA’88-reaffirmed“twolevelsofQCpertestperday”(bloodgasesevery8hours)CAPadvocatesdailyQCthroughinspectionandaccreditationTheJointCommissionfocusesonpatientsafetyandpreanalytic,analyticandpostanalyticprocessesISOQCRecommendations15ISO15189–5.6.1Thelaboratoryshalldesigninternalcontrolsystemsthatverifytheattainmentoftheintendedqualityofresults.Specialattentionshouldbepaidtoeliminationofmistakesintheprocessofhandlingsamples,requests,examinations,reports,etc.Documentationshouldincludequalitycontrolproceduresbasedonmanufacturerinstructionsforuse.InternalQualityControl(internaltothelaboratory)isdefinedasasetofproceduresundertakenbylaboratorystaffforthecontinuousmonitoringofoperationandtheresultsofmeasurementsinordertodecidewhetherresultsarereliableenoughtobereleased.TheregularanalysisofQCmaterialscanserveasanessentialcomponentofalaboratory’sinternalcontrolsystem.16QualityinLaboratoryTestingDespiteanalyzingtheminimumrequired2levelsQC/day,wehaveallexperiencederroneouslaboratoryresults!QualityismorethanQC!Qualityis:TestingthatissafeandreliableAppropriateuseoftechnologytomeetmedicalneedsTestresultsthatcanbetrustedformedicalmanagementAlab’sreputationdependsonqualityofitsresults!Whatshouldbethelabgoalsforerrors?UnacceptableErrorsDeaths/106enplanements 0.2PPMDeaths/106generalanesthesiainductions 2-5Viraltransmissions/106transfusions 29Results>7SD/106automatedchemtests 100Lostbags/106airplanepassengers 5000Failures/106proficiencytests 14,000Difference>5%/106hematocrittests upto 190,000WitteD&VanNessS.FrequencyofUnacceptableResultsinPoint-of-CareTesting.ArchPatholLabMed123:761,1999SigmaMetricsSigmametricsareanindustrialmeasureofqualityinafactoryprocess
-estimatesrateofdefectsinproductsGoalofsigmametrics:ImprovecustomersatisfactionBalancenumberofrejectedproductswiththeincreasedcostrequiredtoimproveprocesses(tolowerdefectrates)SixsigmaconsensusforbalancingrejectionagainsttheincreasedcostsofimprovingerrorsforindustrialprocessesSixsigmawasadoptedandpopularizedintotheclinicallaboratoriesin1990’s18SigmaPerformanceNeedforQualityLaboratoryTestingLaboratorytestinginfluences>70%ofallmedicaldecisions.>7billionlabtestsconductedintheU.S.annually
SilversteinMD.Anapproachtomedicalerrorsandpatientsafetyinlaboratoryservices.AwhitepaperpreparedfortheQualityInstituteMeeting,MakingtheLaboratoryaPartnerinPatientSafety.DivisionofLaboratorySystems,CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention,April2003./mlp/qiconference/
BeyondSixSigmaWith>7billiontestsconductedintheUSannually,sixsigma(3.4defects/milliontests)meansreleasing23,800incorrectlabtestsannuallyintheUS!
Anysingleresulterrorcouldmeanamisdiagnosis,failuretotreatanillnessorincorrecttreatmentselection!Viruscontaminationofbloodproduct,IncorrectcancerdiagnosisMissedheartattack!Whatifthatwrongtestresultbelongedtoyouorafamilymember?Foramedicallaboratory,sixsigmaisanunacceptablegoal!Weneedtogo“beyondsixsigma”forlaboratoryperformance,withagoalofZEROerrorsthatreachthepatient!2122RiskDefinitionRisk–thechanceofsufferingorencounteringharmorloss(Webster’sDictionaryandThesaurus,1993Landoll,Ashland,Ohio)RiskisthepotentialforanerrortooccurRiskDefinitionISO/IECGuide51–RiskcanbeestimatedthroughacombinationoftheprobabilityofoccurrenceofharmandtheseverityofthatharmRISK=(Frequency)x(SeverityHarm)x(Detection)↑numberoferrors=greaterrisk↑harm=greaterriskInabilitytodetectanerror=greaterriskRiskissimplyaratingscaletoranktheorderforaddressingpotentialerrorsinlab(withlimitedavailableresources)23MedicalErrorsThePersonEasiertoblameapersonthananinstitutionforerrors.Inaviation,90%ofqualitylapsesarejudgedtobeblameless.TheSystemActivefailuresduetopersonalinteractionwithsystemLatentconditions,weaknessesinsystemduetodesignflawsorheirarchicaldecisionsNeedtoengineersystemsthatpreventdangerouserrorsandareabletotolerateerrorsandcontaintheireffectsReasonJ.BMJ2000;320:768-770.IdentifyingRiskintheLaboratoryThereisno“perfect”device!AnydevicecanandwillfailundertherightconditionsEverydeviceisdifferent!(universal2levelsQC/daydoesn’tfiteverysituation,mayneedmorefrequentQC–especiallyiffrequentstaffturnoverorunstablereagent)Anydiscussionofriskmuststartwithwhatcangowrongwithatest(errors)Labtestsarenotfool-proof,forasufficientlytalentedfool!26CLSIProject:EP23LaboratoryQualityControlBasedonRiskManagement.JamesH.Nichols,Ph.D.,ChairholderEP23describesgoodlaboratorypracticefordevelopingaqualitycontrolplanbasedonmanufacturer’sinformation,applicableregulatoryandaccreditationrequirements,andtheindividualhealthcareandlaboratorysetting27EP23LaboratoryQCBasedon
RiskManagementMedicalRequirementsforTestResultsTestSystemInformation:ProvidedbythemanufacturerObtainedbytheLaboratoryInformationaboutHealthCareandTest-SiteSettingInputInformationProcessRiskAssessmentOutputLaboratoryDirector’sQCPlanPostImplementationMonitoringContinuousImprovementRegulatoryandAccreditationRequirementsCLSIEP23TableWhereistheRiskin
theProcess?28WhatCouldPossiblyGoWrong?IdentifyingRiskintheLaboratoryFollowthesamplethroughthetestingprocess!Ateachstep,ask“Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?”Foreachhazardidentified,defineamitigationstep,awaytominimizetheriskoferroroccurring!Summarizethehazardsandactionsinaqualitycontrolplan!29StepsoftheTestingProcessPatientNeedforTestOrderPatientPreparationSpecimenCollectionLabReceiptAnalysisResultVerificationAcknowledgeResultOrderTreatmentTreatmentPreanalyticalPostanalyticalTransporttoLabAnalyticalProcessingFishboneDiagramfromCLSIEP23…RefertoAppendixAinCLSIEP18formorecomprehensivelistoferrorsourcesSourcesofLaboratoryErrorTestSystem:Reagentcontamination,deterioration,lotvariationReactionfluctuationsInadequatesamplingImproperorlossofcalibrationElectronicormechanicalfailurePowersupplyEnvironment:TemperatureandairflowHumidityLightintensityAltitudeOperator:Improperspecimenprep,handlingIncorrecttestinterpretationFailuretofollowtestsysteminstructionsCLIAInterpretiveGuidelinesforLaboratories.AppendixC,SubpartK.§493.1256Standard:ControlProcedures.InterpretiveGuidelines§493.1256(a)–(c)./Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/Interpretive_Guidelines_for_Laboratories.html
33RiskManagementHolisticorglobalapproachtoqualityassuranceincorporatingpreanalytic,analyticandpostanalyticphasesoftestingEveryinstrumentordeviceisdifferentHazardanalysisandmitigationHazardanalysisdefinesthesourcesofpotentialerrorforaninstrumentordevice
andameansofdetectingorpreventingtheerror(mitigation)34ManufacturerChecks–AlternativeQCSomedeviceshaveinternalcheckswhichareperformedautomaticallywitheveryspecimen:Developmentofaline(Pregnancytest,Occultblood)Sensorsignal(bloodgasanalyzer,clots)Flowresistanceandliquidsensors(clotsorbubblesinchemistryandhematologyanalyzerpipettes)Otherchecksengineeredintoinstrument:Barcodingofreagentexpirationdates(preventsuse)LockoutfeaturesthatrequiresuccessfulQCDisposableanalyzercuvettes/pipettetips(carry-over)Temperatureindicatorinshippingcarton35QCandRiskManagementAnalyzerReagentFluidics,pipetting,electronics,motorsSomeinternalchecksdetectmechanicalandelectronicfailuresChemistryofreactionIntricatelylinkedwiththeanalyzerSusceptibletoenvironmenteffects36QCandRiskManagementTwolevelsofQCeachday,detectserrorsfrommanysourcesAnalyzer(pipets,mechanical,electrical)Reagent(storage,drift)Operator(calibration,dilution)Environment(reagentandsample)Automatedanalyzershavemanypartsandsourcesoferror,notallofwhicharedetectedbyinternalchecks.QCdoesagoodjobofdetectingsystematicerrorsthatpersistintime,butmayfailtodetectrandomerrorsoccurringwithsinglesamples.Randomerrors,likehemolysis–requiresserumindicesonchemanalyzer,visualsampleinspectionand/orphlebotomisttrainingforsamplecollectionissues37PointofCareQCandRiskManagementDeviceTestCartridgeReadstestcartridgesignalInternalelectronicchecksmaintainreaderwithinnarrowspecificationsChemistryofreactionContainsfluidics,calibrant,internalQC38QCandRiskManagementDeviceOnlyreadssignalElectronicscheckenvironment(temp)anddeviceintegrityLocksouttestingwhenoutsidespecificationsTestCartridgeActsastheanalyzerRiskfromenvironmentandoperatoreffectsQConcartridgeevaluateschemistrywitheachtestAdditionalcontrolprocessesforsampleandforoperatortechnique39QCandRiskManagementQCisexpensive,consumesreagentandlaborwithoutproducingresultsthatcanbebilled.ThepresenceofengineeredcontrolprocessesonnewerPOCTdevicesraisethequestionofwhenandhowthesecontrolscansubstitutefortwolevelsofliquidQC?Howtobestcontrolunit-usePOCTdevices?LabDirectormustbalancerequirementsforQC(2levels/day)againstcostandavailabilityofalternativecontrolswithinthetestsystemRiskmanagementandwalkingthroughthetestingprocesstoidentifyhazardsandsourcesoferrorcanhelplabsidentifytherightbalanceofliquidQCwithengineered-builtincontrolprocessesonthedevicesIndividualizedQualityControlPlanIndividualizedQualityControlPlanRiskAssessmentQualityControlPlanQualityAssessment40CLIANewIQCP
CLIA,CAPandJointCommissionRequirementsTwolevelsofliquidQCrequiredeachdayoftesting
ORLaboratorydevelopsanIndividualizedQualityControlPlan(IQCP):Balancebuilt-incontrolprocesseswithliquidQCReducefrequencyofliquidQCtominimumrecommendedbymanufacturerMaximizeclinicaloutcome,availablestaffresourcesandcosteffectivenessinthelabConsidersthelaboratoryprocessfortestingandriskoferrorsateachstepofthetestingprocess!41WhatHaveWeLearnedFromOurIQCP?QCwasexcessive.Past,i-STAT,QCthedevice(x27i-stats)-separatetestsystemsLotshipments(testoneachdevice)MonthlyQCcartridges(oneachdevice)6monthcorrelations/linearities(eachdevice)BUT…Chemistryisinthecartridge–shouldvalidateeachlotofcartridgesusingsubsetofi-stats(whicharejustreaders)Rotatei-statsHighmidandlowQClevelssameas3vialsinlinearityset–sodon’tneedtopurchaseseparatelinearity42Before:(QCthedevice)Shipments= 3QCx5daysx6x/yr= 90testsQCmonthly= 3QCx27i-stats= 81testsLinearities= 27i-statsx3levelsx3repsx2x/yr= 486tests6mocorrelations=10patientsx27i-stats= 270tests
TOTAL= 927testsAfter:(QCthecartridges,centralizedshipments)Shipments= 3QCx6x/yr= 30testsQCmonthly= 3QCx5lotcartridges(max)x12=
180testsLinearities= alreadydonemonthlyasQC= 0tests6mocorrelations=5pts/shipmentx2old/newx6x/yr= 60tests TOTAL=270testsSavingsof657cartridgesperyear43WhatHaveWeLearnedFromOurIQCPs?FalselyDecreased
GlucoseMeterResultsComplaintfromanintensivecareunitofsporadicfalselydecreasedglucosemeterresultsImmediaterepeattestonsamemeter,gavesignificantlyhigher“clinicallysensible”valuesInspectionofunitfoundnursestakingproceduralshortcutstosavetimeBottlesofteststripsdumpedoncounterinspareutilityroomSomestripsnotmakingitintotrash,fallingbackoncounterandbeing“REUSED”44RiskofErrorfrom
OpenReagentsGlucoseteststripsexposedtoairforaslittleas2hourshavebeenshowntocause-26%bias.1Stripsleftoncountersposeriskofreuse,leadingtofalselylowresults.Somemeterscatchreuseand“error”preventingaresult.Othermetersdonot!245KefferP,KampaIS.Diabetes1998;47;abs0170.SilvermanBC,HumbertsonSK,StemJE,NicholsJH.Operationalerrorscauseinaccurateglucoseresults.DiabetesCare2000;23:429-30.ReagentErrors:ExpiredReagentsCentersforDiseaseControl“Checkandrecordexpirationdatesofreagents/kits,anddiscardanyreagentsorteststhathaveexpired.”1U.S.FoodandDrugAdministration“Checktheexpirationdateonthet
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 二零二五年度戶外木飾面景觀工程設(shè)計(jì)合同3篇
- 二零二五版美容院實(shí)習(xí)美容師技能考核及聘用合同3篇
- 2025年度美容院美容院美容院美容院品牌授權(quán)合同4篇
- 二零二五年度物聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)應(yīng)用與推廣服務(wù)合同3篇
- 2025年度車位車庫租賃糾紛仲裁合同4篇
- 二零二五年度新能源儲能設(shè)備設(shè)計(jì)及技術(shù)服務(wù)合同3篇
- 2025年度南山磚廠環(huán)境保護(hù)設(shè)施建設(shè)與運(yùn)營合同3篇
- 二零二四年度智能制造企業(yè)股權(quán)收購合同3篇
- 2025年度儲罐安裝與設(shè)備更新合同4篇
- 二零二五年度現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)合作社股權(quán)收益分配合同3篇
- 第十七章-阿法芙·I·梅勒斯的轉(zhuǎn)變理論
- 焊接機(jī)器人在汽車制造中應(yīng)用案例分析報(bào)告
- 合成生物學(xué)在生物技術(shù)中的應(yīng)用
- 中醫(yī)門診病歷
- 廣西華銀鋁業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)分析報(bào)告
- 無違法犯罪記錄證明申請表(個(gè)人)
- 大學(xué)生勞動(dòng)教育PPT完整全套教學(xué)課件
- 繼電保護(hù)原理應(yīng)用及配置課件
- 《殺死一只知更鳥》讀書分享PPT
- 蓋洛普Q12解讀和實(shí)施完整版
- 2023年Web前端技術(shù)試題
評論
0/150
提交評論