版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
FailureMode&EffectAnalysisExplanationandUseofFMEAWhatisFMEA?FMEAisaproblemsolvingprocessadoptedbySnap-onasakeycomponentoftheQualityForwardSystem.Generally,FMEAisdonebyanon-sitemultifunctionalteamfacilitatedlocallyorbyanSEQGroupAdvancedQualityEngineer.Objectiveistoidentifyallofthereasonswhyqualityofaprocessorproductdoesnotmeetexpectations.Usesseverity,occurrenceanddetectionratingstodeterminecorrectiveactionpriorityforeachpossiblefailurereason.WhenshouldaFMEAstudybeconducted?AspartofaDesign/Developmentphase.Whencorrectiveactionisneededduetounfavorableperformancedata–(performancebasedonQFSmetricsdoesnotmeetgoals).WhenaneedtomakeincrementalimprovementisidentifiedbyfacilitymanagementortheSEQGroup.FMEATeamStart-UpTeamSelection–donebylocalqualitycoordinator,businessunitmanageror,onrequest,SEQGroupAdvancedQualityEngineer.ProblemStatement–Aconciseandfocuseddescriptionofthequalityproblemoropportunityforimprovement,“whatwentwrong”or“whatneedsfixing”.GoalStatement–adescriptionofwhatistobeaccomplishedbytheteam,inquantifiableterms“reduceby”,“increaseby”,“eliminate”,etc.Goodmetricstouseincludescrapcost,reworkcost,orDefectsPerMillionOpportunities(DPMO),etc.Forexample,agoalstatementcouldbe“ToreduceDPMOonproductfamilyXfrom3000to2000byyearend”.CompleteFMEATeamStart-UpWorksheet(examplelocatedinprocedureSEQ80.10,Figure1).ProblemStatement&GoalStatementProblemStatementandGoalStatementshouldconsider:Whatwentwrong?Whatisthegapbetweenthedesiredqualitylevelandtheactualqualitylevel?Whichprocessorprocessesareinvolved?Whichdepartmentorcellisthedeficiencyoccurringin?Istheproblemcyclic,canitbeattributedtospecificevents?Whataretheappropriatemetricstomeasure?Whatistheimpactonoperationalfitnessandprofitability?Whatistheimpactonthebottomline(reduced,increased,eliminated)?Arethereconstraintsrecognizedearlyintheprocess?Ifso,havetheybeenexploredandclarifiedwiththeappropriatemanagementlevelFMEAProcessFMEA’suncoverprocessproblemsrelatedtothemanufactureofproduct.Examples:apieceofautomatedassemblyequipmentmaymisfeedpartsresultinginproductsnotbeingassembledcorrectly,or,inachemicalmanufacturingprocess,temperatureormixingtimecouldbesourcesofpotentialfailuresresultinginunusableproduct.Thinkintermsofthefiveelementsofaprocess:people,materials,equipment,methodsandenvironment.Withthesefiveelementsinmind,ask“Howcanprocessfailureaffecttheproduct,processingefficiencyorsafety?”NinestepsinFMEAprocess.Step#1-ReviewtheProcessEnsurethateveryoneontheFMEAteamhasthesameunderstandingoftheprocessbeingworkedon.Reviewblueprint/engineeringdrawingofproduct(ifconductingFMEAonproduct)and/oradetailedflowchartoftheprocess.Ifthesearenotavailable,theteamwillneedtocreateone.Usingtheblueprintand/orflowchart,teammembersshouldfamiliarizethemselveswiththeproductorprocess.Theyshouldphysicallyseetheproductoraprototypeoftheproduct,andphysicallywalkthroughtheprocessexactlyastheprocessflows.Itishelpfultohavean“expert”ontheproductorprocessavailabletoansweranyquestionstheteammighthave.Step#2–BrainstormPotentialFailureModesMethodofgeneratinganddocumentingideasofpotentialfailuremodes.Ifproductorprocessiscomplex,aseriesofbrainstormingsessions,eachfocusedonadifferentelement(i.e.people,methods,equipment,materials,environment),maybeneededtogenerateamorethoroughlistofpotentialfailuremodes.Facilitatorshouldwritedownallideasgeneratedinbrainstormingsessions.Oncebrainstormingiscomplete,ideasshouldbegroupedintolikecategories(asdeterminedbytheteam).Groupscanbetypeoffailure,whereontheproductfailureoccurred,estimatedseriousnessofthefailure,etc.Failuremodesmayalsobecombinediftheyarethesameorverysimilar.Oncefailuremodeshavebeengrouped/combined,theyshouldbetransferredtothePotentialFailureModeandEffectAnalysisSheet(exampleinSEQ80.10,Figure2).Step#2(continued)–
Brainstorming
GuidelinesDonotmakeanyjudgmentonideas.Teammembersshouldnotcommentonwhetheranideaisgoodorbad.Thinkingshouldbeunconventional,imaginative,orevenoutrageous.Aimforalargenumberofideasintheshortestpossibletime.Teammembersshould“hitchhike”onotherideas,byexpandingthem,modifyingthem,orproducingnewonesbyassociation.Allteammembersshouldparticipateinbrainstormingprocess.Step#3–ListPotentialEffectsofEachFailureModeAfterthefailuremodesarelistedontheFMEAworksheetform,theFMEAteamneedstorevieweachfailuremodeandidentifythepotentialeffectsofthefailureshoulditoccur.Forsomefailuremodes,theremaybeonlyoneeffect,whileotherfailuremodesmayhaveseveraleffects.Thisstepmustbethorough–thisinformationwilldetermineassignmentofriskratingsforeachofthefailures.Itishelpfultothinkofthisstepasanif-thenprocess:Ifthefailureoccurs,thenwhataretheconsequences.Step#4–AssignSeverityRatingTheseverityratingisanestimateofhowserioustheeffectswouldbeifagivenfailuredidoccur.Maybebasedonpastexperience,oranestimatebasedontheknowledgeandexpertiseoftheteammembers.Becauseeachfailuremayhaveseveraldifferenteffects,andeacheffectmayhaveadifferentlevelofseverity,theeffect,notthefailure,mustberated.Eacheffectshouldbegivenitsownseverityrating.Ratingsbasedon10-pointscale,with1beingthelowestratingand10beingthehighest.Generalexampleonnextpage–maybecustomizedbyteamfortheirspecificFMEAproject.Step#4continued–SeverityRatingScaleExampleRatingDescriptionDefinition10DangerouslyHighFailurecouldinjurethecustomeroranemployee9ExtremelyHighFailurewouldcreatenoncompliancewithfederalregulations8VeryHighFailurerenderstheunitinoperableorunfitforuse7HighFailurecausesahighdegreeofcustomerdissatisfaction6ModerateFailureresultsinasubsystemorpartialmalfunctionoftheproduct5LowFailurecreatesenoughofaperformancelosstocausethecustomertocomplain4VeryLowFailurecanbeovercomewithmodificationstothecustomer’sprocessorproduct,butthereisminorperformanceloss3MinorFailurewouldcreateaminornuisancetothecustomer,butthecustomercanovercomeitintheprocessorproductwithoutperformanceloss.2VeryMinorFailurewouldnotbereadilyapparenttothecustomer,butwouldhaveminoreffectsonthecustomer’sprocessorproduct1NoneFailurewouldnotbenoticeabletothecustomerandwouldnotaffectthecustomer’sprocessorproduct.Step#5–AssignOccurrenceRatingTheoccurrenceratingisameasureofhowoftenanfailuremodemayoccur.Bestmethodfordetermineoccurrenceratingistouseactualdatafromtheprocess(forexample,failurelogsorprocesscapabilitydata).Ifactualdataisnotavailable,theteamneedstoestimatehowoftenafailuremodecouldoccur.Teamcanmakeabetterestimateofhowlikelyafailuremodeistooccurandatwhatfrequencybyknowingthepotentialcausesoffailure.Ratingsbasedon10-pointscale,with1beingthelowestratingand10beingthehighest.Generalexampleonnextpage–maybecustomizedbyteamfortheirspecificFMEAproject.Step#5continued–OccurrenceRatingScaleExampleRatingDescriptionPotentialFailureRate10VeryHigh–FailureisalmostinevitableMorethanoneoccurrenceperdayoraprobabilityofmorethanthreeoccurrencesin10events(Cpk<0.33).9Oneoccurrenceeverythreetofourdaysoraprobabilityofthreeoccurrencesin10events(Cpkapproximatelyequalto0.33).8High–RepeatedfailuresOneoccurrenceperweekoraprobabilityof5occurrencesin100events(Cpkapproximatelyequalto0.67).7Oneoccurrenceeverymonthoroneoccurrencein100events(Cpkapproximatelyequalto0.83)6Moderate–OccasionalfailuresOneoccurrenceeverythreemonthsorthreeoccurrencesin1,000events(Cpkapproximatelyequalto1.00)5Oneoccurrenceeverysixmonthstooneyearoroneoccurrencein10,000events(Cpkapproximatelyequalto1.17)4Oneoccurrenceperyearorsixoccurrencesin100,000events(Cpkapproximatelyequalto1.33)3Low–RelativelyfewfailuresOneoccurrenceeveryonetothreeyearsorsixoccurrencesin10millionevents(Cpkapproximatelyequalto1.67)2Oneoccurrenceeverythreetofiveyearsortwooccurrencesinonebillionevents(Cpkapproximatelyequalto2.00)1Remote–FailureisunlikelyOneoccurrenceingreaterthanfiveyearsorlessthantwooccurrencesinonebillionevents(Cpkgreaterthan2.00)Step#6–AssignDetectionRatingThedetectionratinglooksathowlikelyitisthatafailureortheeffectofafailurewillbedetected.Startbyidentifyingcurrentcontrolsthatmaydetectafailureoreffectofafailure(example–SPCorin-processchecks).Morecontrolsinplacegeneratesalownumber(better)rating;nocurrentcontrolsmeansthelikelihoodofdetectionislowandthereforetheitemwouldreceiveahighnumber(worse)rating.Ratingsbasedon10-pointscale,with1beingthelowestratingand10beingthehighest.Generalexampleonnextpage–maybecustomizedbyteamfortheirspecificFMEAproject.Step#6continued–DetectionRatingScaleExampleRatingDescriptionDefinition10AbsoluteUncertaintyTheproductisnotinspectedorthedefectcausedbyfailureisnotdetectable.9VeryRemoteProductissampled,inspectedandreleasedbasedonAcceptableQualityLevel(AQL)samplingplans.8RemoteProductisacceptedbasedonnewdefectivesinasample.7VeryLowProductis100%manuallyinspectedintheprocess.6LowProductis100%manuallyinspectedusinggo/nogoorothermistake-proofinggages5ModerateSomeStatisticalProcessControl(SPC)isusedinprocessandproductisfinalinspectedoff-line4ModeratelyHighSPCisusedandthereisimmediatereactiontoout-of-controlconditions3HighAneffectiveSPCprogramisinplacewithprocesscapabilities(Cpk)greaterthan1.332VeryHighAllproductis100%automaticallyinspected.1AlmostCertainThedefectisobviousorthereis100%automaticinspectionwithregularcalibrationandpreventivemaintenanceoftheinspectionequipment.Step#7–CalculateRiskPriorityNumberTheriskprioritynumber(RPN)iscalculatedbymultiplyingtheseverityratingtimestheoccurrenceratingtimesthedetectionratingforalloftheitems.RPN=SeverityXOccurrenceXDetectionTotalRPNiscalculatedbyaddingalloftheRPNnumbers.ThisnumberservesasarankingtooltoprioritizewhichFailureModesaretobeconsideredaconcernandthereforeshouldbeaddressedfirst.Step#8–PrioritizetheFailureModesforActionOncetheRPNiscalculated,thefailuremodescanbeprioritizedbyrankingtheminorder
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 教科版八年級物理上冊《6.2物質(zhì)的密度》同步測試題及答案
- 北師大版二年級語文上冊表格式教案
- 景區(qū)保安部管理規(guī)范
- 能源大數(shù)據(jù)分析理論與實踐 課件 7.能源系統(tǒng)
- 2024高中地理第五章區(qū)際聯(lián)系與區(qū)域協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展第一節(jié)資源的跨區(qū)域調(diào)配-以我國西氣東輸為例練習(xí)含解析新人教版必修3
- 2024高中生物專題5DNA和蛋白質(zhì)技術(shù)課題1DNA的粗提取與鑒定課堂演練含解析新人教版選修1
- 2024高中語文第三課神奇的漢字第4節(jié)咬文嚼字-消滅錯別字練習(xí)含解析新人教版選修語言文字應(yīng)用
- 2024高考化學(xué)一輪復(fù)習(xí)第3章金屬及其化合物知識拓展專題侯德榜制堿法精練含解析
- 2024高考化學(xué)一輪復(fù)習(xí)第二部分排查練十一重要的有機化合物含解析
- 2024高考地理一輪復(fù)習(xí)第一章地球與地圖第三講地理信息技術(shù)的應(yīng)用學(xué)案
- 樂理知識考試題庫130題(含答案)
- 2024年《多媒體技術(shù)與應(yīng)用》 考試題庫及答案
- (完整)北京版小學(xué)英語1至6年級詞匯(帶音標(biāo))
- 終止合同告知函 委婉
- 0-3歲嬰幼兒基礎(chǔ)護理智慧樹知到期末考試答案章節(jié)答案2024年杭州師范大學(xué)
- 面包烘焙原料供應(yīng)采購合同案例
- 工商企業(yè)管理畢業(yè)論文范文(篇一)
- 基于mRNA-LNP技術(shù)的(細胞)免疫治療產(chǎn)品開發(fā)指南
- 電動叉車充電區(qū)安全規(guī)程
- 刮痧法操作評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
- 手術(shù)室中心吸引突然停止的應(yīng)急預(yù)案
評論
0/150
提交評論