外文文獻及翻譯-網(wǎng)絡(luò)財務(wù)報告的經(jīng)濟后果

1、中文 3700 字，1986 單詞，11300 英文字符出處: Alfred Wagenhofer,2003 “Economic Consequences of Internet Financial Reporting” .Schmalenbach Business Review,vol.55,no.4,October.pp262-279.本科畢業(yè)外文文獻翻譯及原文文獻題目: Economic consequences of internet financial reporting文獻作者：Alfred Wagenhofer文獻翻譯：第 1 頁至第 4頁外文文獻第 5 頁至第 10 學(xué)生姓名：

2、學(xué) 號：院（部）：管理學(xué)專業(yè)：會計學(xué)班級指導(dǎo)教師：周江生2014 6 8 日外文文獻Economic consequences of internet financial reportingAlfred WagenhoferThe last fifteen years or so have seen enormous development of the Internet and an increasing acceptance by its users. Major characteristics of the Internet are that information can be and

3、 everywhere, and generally at a cost,theinformationisup-to-date;therearefewlimitsondataavailability; information can include dynamic presentations and multimedia; and there is possibility of interactive information demand and supply. These developments have a possibility of interactive information d

4、emand and supply. These developments have a significant effect on the dissemination of information and on the trading of goods, including shares, and thus on the organizational structures of how these activities are performed. They also open up new and astounding opportunities for financial disclosu

5、re that affect all interested parties, notably corporations, investors, auditors, and information intermediaries.Various studies showthat most listed corporationsnow disclosefinancialinformation on their websites, and that the level of disclosure has increased over the last years. The Internet has p

6、robably become the primary source for users searching forcorporatefinancialreports.Companiesinvestsubstantialresourcesinthe development of their websites, and come up with innovative ways to present financial information. While the acceptance of Internet disclosure has increased, most of the informa

7、tion provided is still substantially the same that is available from other too. There are many opportunities for this practice to change. Empirical studies suggest a decline in the value of traditional financial reports. (Lev, Zarowin 1999) Reducingboundariesforgeneratinganddisseminatinginformationb

8、yInternet technologies may provide theopportunity to change the traditional financial reportingmodel. For instance, Elliott concludes that “Information is ch第 1 頁everything,” (e.g. Elliot 1999) and Trites sees a shift from the Pacioli paradigm to the Google paradigm (Trites 2004).With the advent of

9、Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) as a standardized data description format for financial reporting, there are many studies that describe this technology and promote the benefits to all preparers and users of financial reports.The effects of new information technologies on financial disc

10、losure have been an issue for standard setters and accountants. (FASB 2000; Lymer et al. 1999; Trites 1999; ICAEW 1998) These studies explore potential future developments not only for disclosure, but also for radical changes of the current financial reporting model. For example, they include foreca

11、sts like this:” The an nual report of the 21st century will not be annual and it will not be a report: it will be an up to date, informative, permanent dialogue.”However, the ballyhooed future directions remain vague. Although visionary thoughts on new opportunities no one has dreamed of before prov

12、ide an important impetus for financial reporting developments, it is also clear that technology alone does not drive the demand and supply of financial information. It is the preparers and users whose supply and use of the information defines the type and amount of financial information that is bein

13、g produced and digested. Standard setters and regulators follow up to see if there is a demand for standardization based on changingdemandandsupply.TheInternetisindependentofhardwarebut, nevertheless, requires a common format of the type of data they process. Standardized information is needed to fu

14、lly exploit the opportunities of the Internet.The easy availability of information may induce users to request more and moreinformation,includingassumptions,effectsofalternativeaccountingmultidimensional properties of information and all sorts of non-financial information. Information about intangib

15、les and value drivers are natural candidates. This increased appetite for information raises the question of how much additional information firms are prepared to disclose. Besides the direct costs of auditing or reviewing such information, firms may be harmed by adverse actions of competitors and o

16、ther parties that use this information. Moreover, additional disclosure raises legal concerns. In a litigious environment the legal costs can be substantial. If firms are to be motivated to第 2 頁experiment with new technologies and innovative disclosure practices, one way would be to extend safe-harb

17、or rules for contents to Internet disclosures. reluctance of many firms to disclose too much is based on these negative effects.By placing financial information onthefirmswebsite, users can search,filter,retrieve, download, and even reconfigure such information at low cost in a timely fashion. But I

18、nternet financial reporting is not restricted to static texts and graphs. It allows for hyperlinks, search engines, multimedia, and interactivity. For example, users may be allowed to customize the contents of financial reports to match their demands or to define user-specific trigger events for rep

19、orts. Even more use of interactivity would be a dialogue reporting by which users could specify information demands based on information they received previously. Users might be able to do their own sensitivity analyses and insert their own assumptions to measure assets and liabilities. Firms can le

20、arn from tracking users information requests or specific user demands, which users can pose either anonymously or by filling in some kind of access identification. Access statistics are market-driven direct measures of the importance of information, and if interpreted carefully, can guide firms and

21、also standard-setters to react to the demand revealed by the users behavior. Software applications offered bya preparer ontheInternet could allow firmsto learn assumptions investors use in analyzing financial data. The Internet may also improve the availability of financial information within firms

22、themselves. The Internet is perquisite for high-frequency reporting, as the information should be provided immediately after the announcement release and will lose value fast if delivered to users too late relative to the length of the period it covers. A consequence of more frequent reporting could

23、 be that the users focus on quarterly earnings may vanish, and with it the incentives of firms to manage them. However, it would require a major change in most accounting systems because events, such as updates of market prices, estimates, and judgments, would need to be entered on a realtime basis

24、as well.The Internet offers easy access to firms financial information. Firms can use thistechnology to reach more potential users than they can by other communication means. Placing financial disclosures on the Internet offers equal access to all 第 3 頁and reduces the information asymmetry between s

25、ome institutional investors and others This should also decrease the firms cost of capital. Speed of disclosure is enhanced by Internet disclosure. Disclosure and filing deadlines can become tighter.Information can be published at a time that is under full control by the firm. To alert users that ne

26、w information has been put on the Internet, there are several push techniques,suchasanemailnoticedistributedtoidentifiedusers.Speedparticularly important for continuous reporting requirements of stock price-relevant informationduringthefinancialyear.Thestewardshipfunctionofstatements is less speed-s

27、ensitive, because financial statements are usually led by other disclosures, such as earnings forecasts.Althoughmanypeoplethinkthatincreasedcomputerizationoffersmoreflexibility in various processes, generally the opposite apparently happens. Software designed to capture standard processes that are a

28、nticipated by the software developer. Usually,adeparturefromsuchprocessesisdifficult,ifnotComputerizationofinformationprocessesalsorequiresmachine-readableformats. These formats make it difficult to insert new items or leave open items that developers assume are required information. For use within

29、firms, data warehouse systems have been introduced to combine different databases with differing formats, which enables the firm to use the databases jointly. It is more difficult to create some kind of common understanding of processes, and particularly data across firms. Since financial disclosure

30、s are used by many different users, standardization of financial information may have high external benefits.In fact, beginning in 1999, a standardization of financial reporting began on aworldwide scale. Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) is based extensible markup language (XML), an Int

31、ernet document description language which HTML is another subset. XBRL is a market-driven approach undertaken by the private efforts of accounting organizations, individual firms, and other interested parties (Debreceny,Gray 2001). The quality of financial disclosures on the Internet is an important

32、 issue. Unreliable financial information on the Internet is less relevant or irrelevant for rational users, and can have a detrimental impact on other users.第 4 頁Financial information generally has a higher degree of trustworthiness than other information because it is embedded in corporate governan

33、ce mechanisms, and it is subject to auditing and enforcement. A major advantage of the Internet is its which, however, creates a disadvantage for credibility and authenticity. Data can be easilychanged,oftenwithoutleavingatrace,particularlyifthewebsiteis dynamicallylinkedwithanunderlyingdatabase.New

34、informationcanbe communicated not only by adding that information, but also by replacing the original information. With XBRL, firms may have incentives to become creative in their tagging: For example, because investors will be tempted to work with the data provided by the extraction software, and w

35、ithout double-checking all details, a company that wishes to hide a certain piece of information may well attempt to nottag it, to place it in a certain tag, or to define an individual tag. To assure the quality ofdisclosures, the auditor would have to check whether the assignment of tags was meticu

36、lously performed. Another issue affecting information quality is the security of the website. It may be difficult to control who has access to the website or its underlying database. Needless to say, fraud, hostile intruders, and hackers can and do find holes in the security net and alter data witho

37、ut knowledge of the company. Issues like these suggest that financial disclosure provided via the Internet is less credible than is information from other company sources. The credibility is not only of concern to companies and users, but also to auditors and regulators.One way to cope with these co

38、ncerns is to restrict the opportunities the Internetoffers to those that are less affected by such possibilities. For example, auditors may decide not to allow links to and from the auditors report, or to require that it be stored on the auditors own or on an official registrars website. Actually, t

39、he most common practice is to provide the annual report in a read-only facsimile version (e.g., in Adobes PDF format). Such formats can be interpreted as assuring the Internet user of the boundaries and quality of the information. The increasing use of Internet financial reporting increases the dema

40、nd for standardization, of which the XBRL is the most notable product.Although the XBRL developers maintain that they model only a meta-language for existing disclosure standards and practice, it is likely that a第 5 頁widespread adoption of XBRL will in fact also standardize the contents of financial

41、 disclosure. Thus, the contents and form of disclosure cannot be separated. Financial reporting on the Internet creates concerns about the quality of the information. technologicalflexibilitytheInternetprovidesforthefirmsthatgeneratedisclosures auditing services and more regulation. These factors are another cost that should be considered alongside other effects. As a consequence, simple generalized statements about the overwhelming benefits of the Internet and XBRL are not founded in economic theor