




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、從外語教學(xué)法角度淺析外語學(xué)習(xí)1.IntroductionLanguage input plays an important and significant role in language acquisition and language learning which also includes second language acquisition (SLA). Pienemanns Teachability Hypothesis analyzes the importance of input by language learners. The main content of this h
2、ypothesis is as follow: “An L2 structure can be learned from instruction only if the interlanguage is close to the point when this structure is acquired in the natural setting” (Pienemann, 1984). Namely, language acquisition depends on the external and internal factors by learners. But a number of t
3、eaching practices show that learners do not make great process in language acquisition by effective teaching countermeasures. Aiming to find the causes of ineffective teaching and relevant strategies, this paper makes an analysis according Teachability Hypothesis.2.Factors affecting in language lear
4、ningThe external and internal factors like two sides of one coin, they are interacted on each other in language learning. The external factors can generally be divided into psychological factors and social factors while the internal factors include such as personality, biological capacity, motivatio
5、n, education and so forth. The amount of effect of any external factors for learners will be constrained by their learnability. Language acquisition will only be successfully taught when learners are psycholinguistically ready to learn it. On the contrary, if learners do not ready for language acqui
6、sition, the teaching will be ineffective. When learners want to acquire language structure, the internal factors play an important role in language learning, while teaching will only promote the learning process as an external factor when it inputs the materials properly and timely.3 The importance
7、of the stages of language acquisitionPienemann (1998) also predicts that stages of acquisition cannot be skipped through formal instruction. In x, x+1, x+2, x+3 x+n. There are five or more stages in language acquisition development. Each stage reflects the language level of learners and only the com
8、prehensive input conform to the stages of learners can be acquired.In addition, successful learning of structures fails to transpire unless the learner has learned to produce structures belonging to the previous stage. In other words, teachers must know the L2 levels and stages of every students and
9、 give some proper instruction or feedback. Because the level of language learners are presented as a possible factor for consideration as different types of language and strategies may be more useful for learners at various times of their language learning development (Natacha,2012). Students can be
10、 given more opportunities by teachers who are exposed their second language in different discourses and environments, since teachability hypothesis also maintains that learners readiness to acquire is a critical determining factor.4 Findings4.1 Learner-centerednessConstructing learner-centered class
11、room will undoubtedly assist teachers to understand how to teach. As Nunan (2002) indicates, humanism and experiential learning approaches have contributed to the emergence of some of the most crucial and influential ideas in language teaching comprising communicative language teaching, task-based l
12、anguage teaching, negotiated curricula and learner-centered instruction. In learner-centered instruction, the teachers role shifts from provider of information to the facilitator of the learning process through various methods of teaching (Blumberg P,2008). However, L2 teaching faces a series of abn
13、ormal phenomena, such as “consuming but low efficiency”, “mute English”, or “high grades but low competency”. The L2 learning is a low and laborious process. Teachers prefer to construct a teacher-centered classroom and impart language knowledge such as lexicology, grammar, syntax and so forth, but
14、not the cultural background of English-speaking countries to students, and neglect train students language skills and communicative abilities. Students are in passive acceptance condition.Teachers do not take into consideration the stage of language acquisition for students and constantly input Engl
15、ish knowledge. The opportunities of reading and listening practices are more than writing and speaking. On the other hand, students lack the language exposure to interaction, output and feedback from teachers. These features are typical teacher-centered, but not learner-centered. Knoch (2014) makes
16、a study whether the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year in an English-medium university. This study has shown the students perceive the lack of corrective feedback as a sign that they need to improve. Namely, from a psycholinguistic perspective, the corrective feedback is an
17、 indispensable method which can be useful for learners to understand the adequacy and accuracy during language learning process.4.2 Learning-CenterednessBased on Teachability Hypothesis, the learning-centered approach to L2 focuses on the student learning processes. Teachers can apply in many commun
18、icative-driven teaching practices and seek to engage learners in meaningful interaction through communicative or problem-solving activities in classroom (Kumaravadivelu, 2006; Richards JC & Rodgers T, 2001).As Green, Christopher, and Lam (1997) also put it, teachers can manipulate the learner-center
19、ed instruction by applying activities founded in terms of teachability hypothesis to develop higher-order thinking skills as well and encourage students to become increasingly independent and self-directed in their learning. Teachers play a scaffold role in language instruction process and do not gi
20、ve an undue instruction that it can have a negative impact on the learners. In other words, teachers need to understand the learning development stages which are invaluable knowledge how to learn language and gear materials to the levels of learners when they are better equipped to accept new langua
21、ge patterns into their interlanguage.4.3 Focusing on learners task motivationThe task motivation connects with task-based language teaching. Different students have different task motivation. If teachers neglect these phenomena, teaching practices would be ineffective. Firstly, it is agreed that tea
22、chers should become familiar with students task motivation and set a reasonable syllabus and assessment method. Secondly, teachers need to inspire students interests and inner initiatives in learning, create a psychological environment for learners, adopt the heuristic method to train students creat
23、ive and self-study competence. Thirdly, teachers could help students to become conscious of the purpose of learning language. Mother tongue acquisition is an unconscious and non-utilitarian process in natural environment. As Cameron (2001) comments,“If they are not understanding, they cannot be lear
24、ning.”Learners gradually master their mother tongue from infancy by sign language and repetition practice in contextual environment. Second language acquisition is also like this process. Coercion memory or acquisition is easy to make us forget and be caused to teach ineffectively. More effective le
25、arners see language as a tool for communicating rather than as a subject on the curriculum to be mastered for examination success. While more effective learners seem to be able to develop active learning strategies for themselves, less effective learners need help.5 ConclusionsBased on the above dis
26、cussion, it is able to provide the following conclusions to solve the problem of ineffective language learning process according Teachability Hypothesis.1.Successful teaching requires the analysis of language learning stages for learners and considers external and internal factors,gears teaching les
27、son to the levels of students.2.Constructing learner-centeredness and learning-centeredness is important for teachers and learners to realize their different orientation.3.Inspiring the interests and initiatives can promote the efficiency of learners.4.Repetition output practice in language acquisit
28、ion is an effective method to prevent forgetting too fast.REFERENCESBloomberg, P. (2008).Developing learner-centered teachers: A practical guide for faculty.USA : Jossey-Bass.Cameron, L. (2001).Teaching Languages to Young Learners.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Green CF, Christopher ER, & Lam J. (1997). Developing discussion skills in the ESL classroom.ELT Journal,51(2):135-143.Knoch, U. (2014). Does the wri
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2024年項(xiàng)目管理知識(shí)競賽試題及答案
- 2024年微生物教學(xué)改革思路試題及答案
- 2024項(xiàng)目管理適應(yīng)能力試題及答案
- 天津市求真高級(jí)中學(xué)2024-2025學(xué)年高二下學(xué)期期中考試地理試卷(原卷版+解析版)
- 山西省2024-2025學(xué)年高一下學(xué)期4月期中化學(xué)試題(原卷版+解析版)
- AI醫(yī)療設(shè)備使用中的倫理問題和監(jiān)管政策分析
- 以患者為中心通過區(qū)塊鏈優(yōu)化醫(yī)療用品供應(yīng)鏈的透明度
- 中醫(yī)與現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)的倫理融合策略
- 創(chuàng)新教育模式機(jī)頂盒在醫(yī)學(xué)教育中的運(yùn)用
- 企業(yè)內(nèi)部辦公物資的智能管理與調(diào)度系統(tǒng)
- 2025年合肥高新美城物業(yè)有限公司招聘30人筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 2025內(nèi)蒙古中煤鄂爾多斯能源化工有限公司招聘98人筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 三年級(jí)西師大語文下學(xué)期期末知識(shí)點(diǎn)歸納復(fù)習(xí)知識(shí)點(diǎn)鞏固練習(xí)
- 河南省駐馬店市汝南縣2024-2025學(xué)年七年級(jí)下學(xué)期期中生物試題(含答案)
- 2025年醫(yī)保知識(shí)考試題庫:醫(yī)保定點(diǎn)醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)管理制度要點(diǎn)試題
- 小學(xué)科學(xué)綜合試題及答案
- 青少年體重健康管理
- 2025屆陜西省高考適應(yīng)性檢測(三)物理試題+答案
- 2025-2030中國有源電力濾波器(APF)行業(yè)市場發(fā)展趨勢與前景展望戰(zhàn)略研究報(bào)告
- 2025工廠職工安全培訓(xùn)考試試題及答案可打印
- 兒童寓言故事-烏鴉喝水
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論