道路交通事故論文：道路交通事故責(zé)任主體的認(rèn)定

1、道路交通事故論文:道路交通事故責(zé)任主體的認(rèn)定【中文摘要】道路交通事故人身?yè)p害賠償糾紛案件已成為當(dāng)前各基層法院民商事案件中的主要案件類型之一。在司法實(shí)踐中,正確認(rèn)定道路交通事故責(zé)任主體對(duì)處理此類糾紛有著極為重要的理論及實(shí)踐意義。鑒于司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)交通事故責(zé)任主體的認(rèn)定面臨的諸多困境,在侵權(quán)責(zé)任法中,就專章立法對(duì)機(jī)動(dòng)車交通事故責(zé)任主體進(jìn)行了較為詳細(xì)的規(guī)定,使得上述問(wèn)題得到了很大程度上的統(tǒng)一,在審判實(shí)務(wù)中具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。但是由于立法的局限性和現(xiàn)實(shí)生活的復(fù)雜多樣性,雖然侵權(quán)責(zé)任法在一定程度上改變了我國(guó)原有的民事訴訟法及道路交通安全法,等法律法規(guī)過(guò)于粗略的問(wèn)題,但仍然存在諸多不足。本文除了引言外,主要

2、包括案情介紹、案件焦點(diǎn)與分歧意見(jiàn)、研究結(jié)論三個(gè)部分。引言部分:主要說(shuō)明研究道路交通事故責(zé)任主體認(rèn)定的實(shí)踐意義。第一部分:案情介紹。主要是介紹一起道路交通事故案件的案情。包括法院對(duì)案件事實(shí)的認(rèn)定、原告的訴稱、被告的辯稱及法院的裁判結(jié)果。第二部分:案件焦點(diǎn)與分歧意見(jiàn)。包括法院對(duì)案件焦點(diǎn)的歸納和雙方當(dāng)事人對(duì)案件的分歧意見(jiàn)。第三部分:研究結(jié)論。此部分為論文的核心。主要涉及以下六個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容: 1、銀色轎車與張華駕駛的貨車之間的法律關(guān)系認(rèn)定:通過(guò)對(duì)共同侵權(quán)、共同危險(xiǎn)行為和無(wú)意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)之間的分析比較,最終認(rèn)定案件中兩侵權(quán)車之間成立無(wú)意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)。2、雇員在從事雇傭活動(dòng)中發(fā)生道路交通事故時(shí)責(zé)任

3、主體的認(rèn)定:通過(guò)對(duì)侵權(quán)責(zé)任法與人身?yè)p害賠償解釋中關(guān)于雇主責(zé)任的分析比較,最終認(rèn)定雇員張華無(wú)須對(duì)在從事雇傭活動(dòng)過(guò)程中致人損害的后果承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任,應(yīng)由雇主李飛對(duì)外承擔(dān)全部賠償責(zé)任。3、掛靠機(jī)動(dòng)車發(fā)生道路交通事故時(shí)責(zé)任主體的認(rèn)定:鑒于當(dāng)前理論和實(shí)務(wù)中對(duì)掛靠機(jī)動(dòng)車發(fā)生交通事故時(shí)責(zé)任主體認(rèn)定上存在的爭(zhēng)議較大,加之侵權(quán)責(zé)任法對(duì)此也未作出明確規(guī)定,本文從掛靠業(yè)務(wù)的性質(zhì)和出發(fā),最終認(rèn)定掛靠單位應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)掛靠機(jī)動(dòng)車發(fā)生交通事故時(shí)致人損害的后果承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任。4、保險(xiǎn)公司在道路交通事故人身?yè)p害賠償糾紛案件中訴訟地位的認(rèn)定:通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的分析比較,最終認(rèn)定保險(xiǎn)公司可以以承保機(jī)動(dòng)車交通事故責(zé)任強(qiáng)制保險(xiǎn)(以下簡(jiǎn)稱交強(qiáng)險(xiǎn)

4、為由在道路交通事故人身?yè)p害賠償糾紛中作為被告進(jìn)入訴訟,不能以承保商業(yè)第三者責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)為由在道路交通事故人身?yè)p害賠償糾紛中作為被告進(jìn)入訴訟。5、機(jī)動(dòng)車駕駛員肇事后逃逸時(shí)對(duì)受害人的救濟(jì):通過(guò)目前對(duì)駕駛員肇事后逃逸時(shí)對(duì)受害人權(quán)益維護(hù)上存在的制度缺失,提出應(yīng)當(dāng)盡快建立和完善機(jī)動(dòng)車社會(huì)救助基金制度和其他社會(huì)保障機(jī)制。6、對(duì)案件的處理意見(jiàn):結(jié)合對(duì)上述問(wèn)題的探討分析,就本案的處理上提出自己的看法?！居⑽恼縉owadays, the cases of compensation for damage of traffic accidents have become one of the mainly type

5、 of civil cases in the basic peoples courts. In judical practice, tortfeasors could be properly and effectively affirmed in traffic accidents has important significance boththeoretically and practically to deal with this sort of cases. Due to the responsibility affirmation in traffic accident has in

6、volved in dilemmas in judical practice so that Tort Law of the Peoples Republic of China proposes much more specific rules and provisions to handle these issues and creates practical significance in the process of trial practice issues. However, although Tort Law of the Peoples Republic of China has

7、 offset some shortages of Law of Civil Procedure and The traffic Safety Law of PRC to some extent, it still leaves much to be improved on the basis of the limitation of law and the rich diversity of life. This paper includes four dimensions:introduction, the background of the case, case central poin

8、t and different opinions, and a conclusion.A introduction of the practical significance of responsibility affirmation in traffic accident.Describing the background of a traffic accident, which including affirmation of the case, prosecutors allegation and respondents allegation, as well the juridical

9、 result of the court.Focusing on the summary and conclusion of case central point from the court and the disagreement between both parties.The fourth dimension is the core of the paper and consists of six parts.a. The identification of civil legal relationship between the silvercar and Zhang Huas lo

10、rry:It is affirmed that the case belongs to the number of people without meaning contact for infringement through the analysis and comparison of contributory infringement, joint dangerous behavior and the number of people without meaning contact for infringement.b. The identification of the tortfeas

11、or when the employer involves in the traffic accident in the process of employment. It is affirmed that Li Fei(employer should take all of responsibilities of the case rather than Zhang Hua(employee through analyzing the employers responsibilities on the basis of Tort Law of the Peoples Republic of

12、China and Compensation for Personal Injury explanation.c. The identification of the tortfeasor when the join-operated vehicle involves in the traffic accident:Owing to there s a great debate about the responsibility affirmation of the join-operated vehicle in traffic accident in the theory and pract

13、ice, and there is no clear and specific rules and provisions in Tort Law of the Peoples Republic of China, so that the paper affirms that the organization hung rely on by the join-operated lorry shall bear joint liabilities from the perspectives of quality and purpose.d. The identification of the pr

14、oceeding position of the insurance company in the case concerning personal damagecompensation with traffic accidents. It is certified that the insurance company can be regarded as the respondent based on the motor vehicle traffic accident responsibility compulsory insurance instead of business insur

15、ance through analyzing relevant law rules.e. Taking immediate measures to offer help to victims after the hit-and-run driver escape. It is necessary to consummate social assistance funds for road traffic accident function and motion pattern and other live insurance systems for lack of safeguarding t

16、he right of victims.f. Taking the above factors into consideration, a possible judgment would be provided by the paper.【關(guān)鍵詞】道路交通事故責(zé)任主體運(yùn)行支配運(yùn)行利益共同侵權(quán)共同危險(xiǎn)無(wú)意思聯(lián)絡(luò)的數(shù)人侵權(quán)【英文關(guān)鍵詞】Traffic Accident Tortfeasor Operated Control Operated Profit And joint Dangerous Contact the Number of People Without Meaning Infringement【目錄】道路交通事故責(zé)任主體的認(rèn)定摘要6-8Abstract8-9引言11-12一、案情介紹12-14二、案件焦點(diǎn)與分歧意見(jiàn)14-16(一 案件焦點(diǎn)14(二 分歧意見(jiàn)14-16 1. 銀色轎車駕駛員與被告張華之間的法律關(guān)系認(rèn)定14-15 2. 本案中責(zé)