2021年考研英語翻譯題之企業(yè)兼并的質(zhì)疑

1、考研英語翻譯題之企業(yè)兼并的質(zhì)疑 xx考研英語翻譯題之企業(yè)兼并的質(zhì)疑 世界正在經(jīng)歷一場(chǎng)前所未有的巨大的并購(gòu)浪潮。這個(gè)浪潮從異常活躍的美國(guó)席卷到歐洲，并以不可比擬的威力影響到正在崛起的國(guó)家。這些國(guó)家的許多人面對(duì)這個(gè)浪潮開始憂慮：“企業(yè)合并的浪潮會(huì)不會(huì)變成一股不可控制的反競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的力量？” 2、Theres no question that the big are getting bigger and more powerful. Multinational corporations aounted for less than 20% of international trade in 1982. To

2、day the figure is more than 25% and growing rapidly. International affiliates aount for a fast-growing segment of production in economies that open up and wele foreign investment. In Argentina, for instan _, after the reforms of the early 1990s, multinationals went from 43% to almost 70% of the indu

3、strial production of the 200 largest firms. This phenomenon has created serious con _rns over the role of s _ller economic firms, of national busines _en and over the ulti _te stability of the world economy. 無疑，大企業(yè)正在變得更大、更強(qiáng)?？鐕?guó)公司在1982年只占有國(guó)際貿(mào)易不到20的份額。而現(xiàn)在，這個(gè)數(shù)字上升到25強(qiáng)，并且還在迅速上升。在那些對(duì)外開放并鼓勵(lì)外資的國(guó)家的經(jīng)濟(jì)中國(guó)際分公司在國(guó)民

4、生產(chǎn)中成為一個(gè)快速增長(zhǎng)的部門。比如，在阿根廷，經(jīng)過 _的 _之后，跨國(guó)公司在200家大型企業(yè)的工業(yè)生產(chǎn)中從43增加到幾乎70。這個(gè)現(xiàn)象造成了人們對(duì)小型企業(yè)和民族資本的作用以及世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的最終穩(wěn)定的嚴(yán)重憂慮。 3、I believe that the most important for _s behind the _ssive M&A wave are the same that underlie the globalization pro _ss: falling transportation and munication costs, lower trade and investment b

5、arriers and enlarged _rkets that require enlarged operations capable of meeting customers de _nds. All these are beneficial, not detrimental, to consumers. As productivity grows, the worlds wealth increases. 我認(rèn)為，推動(dòng)這股巨大的并購(gòu)浪潮的最主要的力量，也是推動(dòng)全球化進(jìn)程的力量，包括日趨下降的運(yùn)輸與通訊費(fèi)用，較低的貿(mào)易與投資壁壘，以及市場(chǎng)的擴(kuò)大和為滿足市場(chǎng)需求而進(jìn)行的擴(kuò)大生產(chǎn)。所有這些對(duì)消

6、費(fèi)者來說都有益而無害的。隨著生產(chǎn)力的提高，世界的財(cái)富也在增長(zhǎng)。 4、Examples of benefits or costs of the current con _ntration wave are scanty. Yet it is hard to i _gine that the merger of a few oil firms today could re-create the same threats to petition that were feared nearly a _ntury ago in the US, when the Standard Oil trust wa

7、s broken up. The mergers of tele panies, such as World Com, hardly seem to bring higher pri _s for consumers or a reduction in the pa _ of technical progress. On the contrary, the pri _ of munications is ing down fast. In cars, too, con _ntration is increasing witness Daimler and Chrysler, Renault a

8、nd Nissan but it does not appear that consumers are being hurt. 目前證明這股合并浪潮是帶來利還是弊的實(shí)例并不多。但是很難想像當(dāng)今的幾個(gè)石油公司的合并是否會(huì)重新造成約100年前美國(guó)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)石油公司對(duì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)造成的同樣的威脅，那時(shí)由于人們對(duì)該公司的這種擔(dān)心而導(dǎo)致了它最終的解散。像 _訊這樣的通訊公司合并似乎沒有給消費(fèi)者帶來更高的 _，或者降低技術(shù)進(jìn)步的速度。相反，通信的 _在迅速下降。在汽車行業(yè)，合并也同樣在增加比如戴姆勒與克萊斯勒，雷諾與尼桑的合并但消費(fèi)者看起來并未受到傷害。 5、Yet the fact re _ins that the

9、merger movement must be watched. A few weeks ago, Alan Greenspan warned against the megamergers in the banking industry. Who is going to supervise, regulate and operate as lender of last resort with the gigantic banks that are being created? Wont multinationals shift production from one pla _ to another when a nation gets too strict about infringements to fair petition? And should one country take upon itself the role of defending petition on issues that affect _ny other nations, as in the US vs. Microsoft case? 但是合并運(yùn)動(dòng)必須受到嚴(yán)密監(jiān)視這個(gè)事實(shí)仍然存在。就在幾星期以前，格林斯潘對(duì)銀行業(yè)的巨大合并發(fā)出了