語(yǔ)料庫(kù)研究中的主題詞分析方法及其擴(kuò)展.ppt_第1頁(yè)
語(yǔ)料庫(kù)研究中的主題詞分析方法及其擴(kuò)展.ppt_第2頁(yè)
語(yǔ)料庫(kù)研究中的主題詞分析方法及其擴(kuò)展.ppt_第3頁(yè)
語(yǔ)料庫(kù)研究中的主題詞分析方法及其擴(kuò)展.ppt_第4頁(yè)
語(yǔ)料庫(kù)研究中的主題詞分析方法及其擴(kuò)展.ppt_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩16頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

語(yǔ)料庫(kù)研究中的 主題詞分析方法及其擴(kuò)展,中國(guó)外語(yǔ)教育研究中心 梁茂成,An extension to the keyword approach in corpus analysis,主要內(nèi)容,Keywords Applications of corpus comparison Limitations to the keyword approach Keywords+ Demo,Keywords,Keywords: Keywords are words whose frequency is unusually high (or low) in comparison with some norm. (Scott, 2003),Keywords,Positive keywords: Words which occur more often than would be expected by chance in comparison with the reference corpus.,Keywords,Negative keywords: Words which occur less often than would be expected by chance in comparison with the reference corpus.,Keywords,Positive and negative keywords In a corpus of business English, words such as business, profit and companies are likely to be positive keywords if the corpus is to be compared with a general corpus.,Keywords,Positive and negative keywords In a corpus of academic English, words such as morning, afternoon and evening are likely to be negative keywords if the corpus is to be compared with a general corpus.,Keywords,Calculating keyness (Rayson et al. 2004, Oakes 1998) Chi-square,Keywords,Chi-square,Keywords,Chi-square with Yates correction,Keywords,Loglikelihood References: http:/ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html,Keywords,Previous research has revealed that loglikelihood is a better measure than chi-square when comparing word frequencies in corpora.,Keywords,Ways to find keywords: Top-down: corpus-based Buttom-up: corpus-driven,Applicatons of,Comparison across users Comparison across genres Comparison across times Comparison across (varieties of) languages,Applicatons of,Compiling a specialized dictionary Detecting the topic Genre analysis Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis ,Limitations to,Keywords: Do keywords have to be single words? Phraseology seems more interesting! Do keywords have to be lexical words? POS tag sequences may also be interesting. Can we bring together the bottom-up approach and the top-down approach?,Limitations to,Top-down: the problem is I do not yet know what may be interesting.,Limitations to,Buttom-up: the problem is that I have been given a long list of keywords, only some of which are interesting, buried among many others which do not seem interesting at all.,Keywords+,Su

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論