版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
AMSTARChecklist
ArticleName:
1.DidtheresearchquestionsandinclusioncriteriaforthereviewincludethecomponentsofPICO?
ForYes:
Optional(recommended)
Population
Timeframeforfollowup
Yes
No
Intervention
Comparatorgroup
Outcome
2.Didthereportofthereviewcontainanexplicitstatementthatthereviewmethodswereestablishedpriortotheconductofthereviewanddidthereportjustifyanysignificantdeviationsfromtheprotocol?
ForPartialYes:
TheauthorsstatethattheyhadawrittenprotocolorguidethatincludedALLthefollowing:
ForYes:
Asforpartialyes,plustheprotocolshouldberegisteredandshouldalsohavespecified:
reviewquestion(s)
ameta-analysis/synthesisplan,ifappropriate,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
asearchstrategy
aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity
inclusion/exclusioncriteria
aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity
ariskofbiasassessment
3.Didthereviewauthorsexplaintheirselectionofthestudydesignsforinclusioninthereview?
ForYes,thereviewshouldsatisfyONEofthefollowing:
ExplanationforincludingonlyRCTs
Yes
No
ORExplanationforincludingonlyNRSI
ORExplanationforincludingbothRCTsandNRSI
4.Didthereviewauthorsuseacomprehensiveliteraturesearchstrategy?
ForPartialYes(allthefollowing):
ForYes,shouldalsohave(allthefollowing):
searchedatleast2databases(relevanttoresearchquestion)
searchedthereferencelists/bibliographiesofincludedstudies
Yes
PartialYes
No
providedkeywordand/orsearchstrategy
searchedtrial/studyregistries
justifiedpublicationrestrictions(e.g.language)
included/consultedcontentexpertsinthefield
whererelevant,searchedforgreyliterature
conductedsearchwithin24monthsofcompletionofthereview
5.Didthereviewauthorsperformstudyselectioninduplicate?
ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:
atleasttworeviewersindependentlyagreedonselectionofeligiblestudiesandachievedconsensusonwhichstudiestoinclude
Yes
No
ORtworeviewersselectedasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderselectedbyonereviewer.
6.Didthereviewauthorsperformdataextractioninduplicate?
ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:
atleasttworeviewersachievedconsensusonwhichdatatoextractfromincludedstudies
Yes
No
ORtworeviewersextracteddatafromasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderextractedbyonereviewer.
7.Didthereviewauthorsprovidealistofexcludedstudiesandjustifytheexclusions?
ForPartialYes:
ForYes,mustalsohave:
providedalistofallpotentiallyrelevantstudiesthatwerereadinfull-textformbutexcludedfromthereview
Justifiedtheexclusionfromthereviewofeachpotentiallyrelevantstudy
Yes
PartialYes
No
8.Didthereviewauthorsdescribetheincludedstudiesinadequatedetail?
ForPartialYes(ALLthefollowing):
ForYes,shouldalsohaveALLthefollowing:
describedpopulations
describedpopulationindetail
Yes
PartialYes
No
describedinterventions
describedinterventionindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)
describedcomparators
describedcomparatorindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)
describedoutcomes
describedstudy’ssetting
describedresearchdesigns
timeframeforfollow-up
9.Didthereviewauthorsuseasatisfactorytechniqueforassessingtheriskofbias(RoB)inindividualstudiesthatwereincludedinthereview?
RCTs
ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoBfrom
ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoBfrom:
unconcealedallocation,and
allocationsequencethatwasnottrulyrandom,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
IncludesonlyNRSI
lackofblindingofpatientsandassessorswhenassessingoutcomes(unnecessaryforobjectiveoutcomessuchasall-causemortality)
selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome
NRSI
ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoB:
ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoB:
fromconfounding,and
methodsusedtoascertainexposuresandoutcomes,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
IncludesonlyRCTs
fromselectionbias
selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome
10.Didthereviewauthorsreportonthesourcesoffundingforthestudiesincludedinthereview?
ForYes
Musthavereportedonthesourcesoffundingforindividualstudiesincludedinthereview.Note:Reportingthatthereviewerslookedforthisinformationbutitwasnotreportedbystudyauthorsalsoqualifies
Yes
No
11.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformeddidthereviewauthorsuseappropriatemethodsforstatisticalcombinationofresults?
RCTs
ForYes:
Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresultsandadjustedforheterogeneityifpresent.
ANDinvestigatedthecausesofanyheterogeneity
ForNRSI
ForYes:
Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresults,adjustingforheterogeneityifpresent
ANDtheystatisticallycombinedeffectestimatesfromNRSIthatwereadjustedforconfounding,ratherthancombiningrawdata,orjustifiedcombiningrawdatawhenadjustedeffectestimateswerenotavailable
ANDtheyreportedseparatesummaryestimatesforRCTsandNRSIseparatelywhenbothwereincludedinthereview
12.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformed,didthereviewauthorsassessthepotentialimpactofRoBinindividualstudiesontheresultsofthemeta-analysisorotherevidencesynthesis?
ForYes:
includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
OR,ifthepooledestimatewasbasedonRCTsand/orNRSIatvariableRoB,theauthorsperformedanalysestoinvestigatepossibleimpactofRoBonsummaryestimatesofeffect.
13.DidthereviewauthorsaccountforRoBinindividualstudieswheninterpreting/discussingtheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs
Yes
No
OR,ifRCTswithmoderateorhighRoB,orNRSIwereincludedthereviewprovidedadiscussionofthelikelyimpactofRoBontheresults
14.Didthereviewauthorsprovideasatisfactoryexplanationfor,anddiscussionof,anyheterogeneityobservedintheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
Therewasnosignificantheterogeneityintheresults
Yes
No
ORifheterogeneitywaspresenttheauthorsperformedaninvestigationofsourcesofanyheterogeneityintheresultsanddiscussedtheimpactofthisontheresultsofthereview
15.Iftheyperformedquantitativesynthesisdidthereviewauthorscarryoutanadequateinvestigationofpublicationbias(smallstudybias)anddiscussitslikelyimpactontheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025屆江蘇省南通市通州海安高三二診模擬考試英語試卷含解析
- 儀征電大附屬中學(xué)2025屆高考全國統(tǒng)考預(yù)測密卷數(shù)學(xué)試卷含解析
- 2025屆廣東佛山順德區(qū)高三第四次模擬考試數(shù)學(xué)試卷含解析
- 2025屆遼寧省凌源市第二高級中學(xué)高考英語押題試卷含解析
- 上海市師范大學(xué)附屬外國語中學(xué)2025屆高三第六次模擬考試英語試卷含解析
- 安徽省池州市2025屆高三二診模擬考試英語試卷含解析
- 2025屆內(nèi)蒙古呼倫貝爾市名校高考仿真模擬英語試卷含解析
- 2025屆河北邯鄲市磁縣滏濱中學(xué)高三第二次診斷性檢測數(shù)學(xué)試卷含解析
- 2025屆北京101中學(xué)高考仿真模擬英語試卷含解析
- 2025屆江西省吉安市重點高中高考英語三模試卷含解析
- GB/T 45089-20240~3歲嬰幼兒居家照護服務(wù)規(guī)范
- 政府還款協(xié)議書(2篇)
- 院內(nèi)獲得性肺炎護理
- 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部個人違紀(jì)檢討書范文
- 華北水利水電大學(xué)《自然語言處理課程設(shè)計》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- web課程設(shè)計考勤系統(tǒng)源代碼
- 《企業(yè)文化與變革》課件
- 國家開放大學(xué)《宣傳工作實務(wù)》專題測驗1-12參考答案
- 2024年初級電焊工理論考試復(fù)習(xí)題庫(含答案)
- 2024年資助政策主題班會課件
- 2024年度人工智能AI技術(shù)服務(wù)合同3篇
評論
0/150
提交評論