常用的meta分析文獻質(zhì)量評價量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系統(tǒng)綜述質(zhì)量評價_第1頁
常用的meta分析文獻質(zhì)量評價量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系統(tǒng)綜述質(zhì)量評價_第2頁
常用的meta分析文獻質(zhì)量評價量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系統(tǒng)綜述質(zhì)量評價_第3頁
常用的meta分析文獻質(zhì)量評價量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系統(tǒng)綜述質(zhì)量評價_第4頁
常用的meta分析文獻質(zhì)量評價量表:AMSTAR-Checklist-for-系統(tǒng)綜述質(zhì)量評價_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩1頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

AMSTARChecklist

ArticleName:

1.DidtheresearchquestionsandinclusioncriteriaforthereviewincludethecomponentsofPICO?

ForYes:

Optional(recommended)

Population

Timeframeforfollowup

Yes

No

Intervention

Comparatorgroup

Outcome

2.Didthereportofthereviewcontainanexplicitstatementthatthereviewmethodswereestablishedpriortotheconductofthereviewanddidthereportjustifyanysignificantdeviationsfromtheprotocol?

ForPartialYes:

TheauthorsstatethattheyhadawrittenprotocolorguidethatincludedALLthefollowing:

ForYes:

Asforpartialyes,plustheprotocolshouldberegisteredandshouldalsohavespecified:

reviewquestion(s)

ameta-analysis/synthesisplan,ifappropriate,and

Yes

PartialYes

No

asearchstrategy

aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity

inclusion/exclusioncriteria

aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity

ariskofbiasassessment

3.Didthereviewauthorsexplaintheirselectionofthestudydesignsforinclusioninthereview?

ForYes,thereviewshouldsatisfyONEofthefollowing:

ExplanationforincludingonlyRCTs

Yes

No

ORExplanationforincludingonlyNRSI

ORExplanationforincludingbothRCTsandNRSI

4.Didthereviewauthorsuseacomprehensiveliteraturesearchstrategy?

ForPartialYes(allthefollowing):

ForYes,shouldalsohave(allthefollowing):

searchedatleast2databases(relevanttoresearchquestion)

searchedthereferencelists/bibliographiesofincludedstudies

Yes

PartialYes

No

providedkeywordand/orsearchstrategy

searchedtrial/studyregistries

justifiedpublicationrestrictions(e.g.language)

included/consultedcontentexpertsinthefield

whererelevant,searchedforgreyliterature

conductedsearchwithin24monthsofcompletionofthereview

5.Didthereviewauthorsperformstudyselectioninduplicate?

ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:

atleasttworeviewersindependentlyagreedonselectionofeligiblestudiesandachievedconsensusonwhichstudiestoinclude

Yes

No

ORtworeviewersselectedasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderselectedbyonereviewer.

6.Didthereviewauthorsperformdataextractioninduplicate?

ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:

atleasttworeviewersachievedconsensusonwhichdatatoextractfromincludedstudies

Yes

No

ORtworeviewersextracteddatafromasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderextractedbyonereviewer.

7.Didthereviewauthorsprovidealistofexcludedstudiesandjustifytheexclusions?

ForPartialYes:

ForYes,mustalsohave:

providedalistofallpotentiallyrelevantstudiesthatwerereadinfull-textformbutexcludedfromthereview

Justifiedtheexclusionfromthereviewofeachpotentiallyrelevantstudy

Yes

PartialYes

No

8.Didthereviewauthorsdescribetheincludedstudiesinadequatedetail?

ForPartialYes(ALLthefollowing):

ForYes,shouldalsohaveALLthefollowing:

describedpopulations

describedpopulationindetail

Yes

PartialYes

No

describedinterventions

describedinterventionindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)

describedcomparators

describedcomparatorindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)

describedoutcomes

describedstudy’ssetting

describedresearchdesigns

timeframeforfollow-up

9.Didthereviewauthorsuseasatisfactorytechniqueforassessingtheriskofbias(RoB)inindividualstudiesthatwereincludedinthereview?

RCTs

ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoBfrom

ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoBfrom:

unconcealedallocation,and

allocationsequencethatwasnottrulyrandom,and

Yes

PartialYes

No

IncludesonlyNRSI

lackofblindingofpatientsandassessorswhenassessingoutcomes(unnecessaryforobjectiveoutcomessuchasall-causemortality)

selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome

NRSI

ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoB:

ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoB:

fromconfounding,and

methodsusedtoascertainexposuresandoutcomes,and

Yes

PartialYes

No

IncludesonlyRCTs

fromselectionbias

selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome

10.Didthereviewauthorsreportonthesourcesoffundingforthestudiesincludedinthereview?

ForYes

Musthavereportedonthesourcesoffundingforindividualstudiesincludedinthereview.Note:Reportingthatthereviewerslookedforthisinformationbutitwasnotreportedbystudyauthorsalsoqualifies

Yes

No

11.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformeddidthereviewauthorsuseappropriatemethodsforstatisticalcombinationofresults?

RCTs

ForYes:

Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis

Yes

No

Nometa-analysisconducted

ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresultsandadjustedforheterogeneityifpresent.

ANDinvestigatedthecausesofanyheterogeneity

ForNRSI

ForYes:

Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis

Yes

No

Nometa-analysisconducted

ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresults,adjustingforheterogeneityifpresent

ANDtheystatisticallycombinedeffectestimatesfromNRSIthatwereadjustedforconfounding,ratherthancombiningrawdata,orjustifiedcombiningrawdatawhenadjustedeffectestimateswerenotavailable

ANDtheyreportedseparatesummaryestimatesforRCTsandNRSIseparatelywhenbothwereincludedinthereview

12.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformed,didthereviewauthorsassessthepotentialimpactofRoBinindividualstudiesontheresultsofthemeta-analysisorotherevidencesynthesis?

ForYes:

includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs

Yes

No

Nometa-analysisconducted

OR,ifthepooledestimatewasbasedonRCTsand/orNRSIatvariableRoB,theauthorsperformedanalysestoinvestigatepossibleimpactofRoBonsummaryestimatesofeffect.

13.DidthereviewauthorsaccountforRoBinindividualstudieswheninterpreting/discussingtheresultsofthereview?

ForYes:

includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs

Yes

No

OR,ifRCTswithmoderateorhighRoB,orNRSIwereincludedthereviewprovidedadiscussionofthelikelyimpactofRoBontheresults

14.Didthereviewauthorsprovideasatisfactoryexplanationfor,anddiscussionof,anyheterogeneityobservedintheresultsofthereview?

ForYes:

Therewasnosignificantheterogeneityintheresults

Yes

No

ORifheterogeneitywaspresenttheauthorsperformedaninvestigationofsourcesofanyheterogeneityintheresultsanddiscussedtheimpactofthisontheresultsofthereview

15.Iftheyperformedquantitativesynthesisdidthereviewauthorscarryoutanadequateinvestigationofpublicationbias(smallstudybias)anddiscussitslikelyimpactontheresultsofthereview?

ForYes:

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論