版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
04MARCH2024
ISSUE04/2024
WORKINGPAPER
GLOBALSUPPLYCHAINS:
LESSONSFROMADECADE
OFDISRUPTION
LUCALéRYMOFFATANDNICLASFREDERICPOITIERS
Thispaperexploresboththecharacterandimpactofthreerecentshockstoglobalsupplychains:theCOVID-19pandemic,theRussianinvasionofUkraineandtheUS-China
tradewar.Thesewerelargeshockswhichhavehadsignificantimpactsondomesticand
internationalsupplychains,buttheseimpactshavedifferedintheirlongevity,economic
impactandpolicyresponses.Weshowthatsupplychainswereremarkablyresilientagainstshocksofsuchmagnitude.However,thisresiliencewasalsoachievedthankstotheequallyremarkablesizeandscopeofpolicyresponsesandglobalsupplychainreorganisation.
Werecommendthatpre-emptivepoliciesmaybejustifiedtoshieldhouseholdsandindustryfromfutureshocks.Giventheentanglednatureoftheseshocksandthattheireffectscontinuetoreverberate,weemphasisetheneedforextensivefutureresearchtounderstandthenatureoftheseshocksandtheeffectivenessofpolicyresponses.
LucaLéryMoffat(luca.moffat@)isaResearchAnalystatBruegelNiclasPoitiers(niclas.poitiers@)isaResearchFellowatBruegel
Recommendedcitation:
LéryMoffat,L.andN.Poitiers(2024)‘Globalsupplychains:lessonsfromadecadeofdisruption’,WorkingPaper04/2024,Bruegel
1
Contents
1Introduction 2
2COVID-19 2
2.1Timelineofeconomice?ects 3
2.2Pricevolatilityandshortages 6
2.3Policyresponsesandtheaftermath 7
3TheRussianinvasionofUkraine 8
3.1Energyshock 8
3.2Agriculture 12
3.3Inperspective:theshockandtheresponse 17
4TheChina-UStradewar 18
4.1TheTrump-Bidentradewars 18
4.2Thechipwars 19
4.3Theimpact 20
5Policylessonsfromadecadeoftradeshocks 22
References 23
2
1Introduction
Afterdecadesofrapidexpansionofglobalsupplychains,thelastdecadehasseenaseriesofmajorshocksthatdisruptedtheirfunctioning.TheChina-UStradewar,COVID-19andtheRussianinvasionofUkrainehavealldisrupted?owsofgoodsacrossborders,leadingbusinessleadersandpolicymakerstoquestionthewisdomofrelyingontheglobalnetworkofsupplychains.Asaresult,variouspolicieshavebeenenactedwiththeexplicitgoalofreshapingvaluechains,diversifyingoroutrightreshoringsupplychains.However,fundamentalquestionsaboutthenatureoftheseshocksremain.
Thispaperrevisitsthee?ectsofthreeshocksonthefunctioningofglobalsupplychains.We?rstlookatthedisruptionoftheCOVID-19pandemic,theninvestigatetheimpactoftheRussianinvasionof
Ukraine,beforediscussingtheUS-Chinatradedisputeandtheensuing‘technologicalcoldwar’.The
aimistoidentifylessonsabouthowpoliciescanadapttopreventdisruptionandtomitigatethee?ectoffutureshocks.Weareinterestedbothinthemagnitudeofshocksaswellastheirlastinge?ects.InthecasesofthepandemicandtheRussianinvasionofUkraine,themagnitudeoftheshockwasveryhigh,butdissipatedrelativelyquickly.Ontheotherhand,theUS-Chinatradewarhasbeenaprotractedshiftinglobaltrade,withenormousrami?cationsforsupplychainsandcitizens.Whilethelengthofashockdetermineswhethertheeconomicdamageisenduring,evenashortshockcancreate
signi?cantpolitical-economyproblems.Thismeans,thateveniflong-termgrowthtrendsarenotdisruptedforextendedperiods,theupheavalcausedbysuddenlargeshockmightstillwarrantthecostsofmitigationmeasures.
Meanwhile,themechanismsthroughwhichmarketsreactedwerequitedi?erentacrosssectors.Boththepandemicandthewarincreasedscarcityinmanymarkets.Whilethiswasoftendescribedas
‘shortages’,itwasnotalwaysashortageinthenarroweconomicde?nition.Economistsonlydescribesomethingasashortageifthepricemechanismbreaksdownandagoodbecomesunavailable,evenforthosewillingtopayahighprice.Highpricesre?ectingscarcityleadtoeconomicallye?cient
allocationofresourcesandsetincentivesfornewproducerstoentermarkets.Butthismechanismcanalsohavepoliticallyandeconomicallyundesirablee?ects.Forinstance,agovernmentmightwanttoprotectconsumersfrompricespikesinheatingcoststhatcouldpriceoutvulnerableconsumers.
Meanwhile,businessesthatfacehighpricevolatilitycouldstruggletoful?lcontractswith?xedpricesandriskreputationaldamageiftheytransmitpricespikestoconsumers.
ThispaperispartoftheReThinkGSCproject,whichstudieshowsupplychainsareadaptingtoaneweraofmorecontentiousglobalpolitics,climatechangeandthegrowingimportanceofservicesfortrade.
2COVID-19
TheCOVID-19pandemicwasamajorshocktotheworldeconomy.Inresponsetotheoutbreakofthepandemic,countriesclosedtheirborders,andgovernmentsforcedfactoriesandpersonal-servicesproviderstoceaseoperation,andimposedlockdownsontheirpopulations.Amidlargeuncertainty,
3
companiesadaptedtheirsupplystrategiesandconsumersshiftedconsumptionpatterns.Meanwhile,governmentsinadvancedeconomiesenactedmajoreconomicstimulusprogrammestosupporttheireconomiesandmitigatetheeconomicimpactofthepandemic.Thiscocktailofeconomicshiftshadmajorglobalimplicationsandcreatedunexpectedcircumstancesforcompaniesengagedinglobal
valuechains.
Oncethepandemiceased,therewasamajordiscussiononwhethersupplychainshavebecometoofragile.Wearguethatsupplychainsprovedremarkablyresilientinthefaceofashockofsuch
magnitude.WhiletheoverlappingofthepandemicandtheRussianinvasionofUkrainemakea?nalassessmentdi?cult,thesupply-chainrelatede?ectsofthepandemicseemtohavedissipatedwithinonlyafewyears.Whilethemagnitudeoftheshockwaslarge,itwasrelativelyshort-lived.
2.1Timelineofeconomiceffects
InJanuaryandFebruary2020,countriesclosedtheirborderstoforeigntravellersinresponsetotheoutbreakofthepandemicinChinaandtheglobalspreadthatfollowed.Asdomesticcasesgrew
exponentiallyregardless,countriesimposeddomesticlockdowns.BytheendofMarch2020over100countrieshadresortedtolockdownmeasures
1
,signi?cantlyimpactingtheabilityofthelocal
economytofunction.Evenwheremovementwasnotentirelycurtailed,householdsrestrictedtheirmovementsandbusinessesresortedtoworkingfromhome
2
.
Theensuingsupply-chaindisruptionsandnegativedemandshockmanifesteddi?erentlyacross
sectors.IntheEU,sectorsrequiringphysicalproximity,suchasthecreativeandhospitalityindustries,
wereimpactedseverely,whereasthepharmaceuticalanddigitalsectorssawrelativelysmallcontractions(DeVetetal,2021).Butoverall,the?rstwavesawsigni?cantincreasesin
unemploymentandreductionsinoutputfromimportantindustries
3
.
Governmentsinadvancedeconomiesenactedhugestimulusprogrammestosupporthouseholdsandindustry.Thesecameindi?erentvarieties.IntheEU,manygovernmentsfocusedonsustaining
existingworkrelationshipsbyimplementingjob-retentionschemes(ArnoldandKammer,2021).EUcountriesalsodisbursedstateaidtocompaniesofvariouskindstohelpthemsurvivetheeconomicdownturn.TheUS,ontopofothermeasures,disbursed$293billionincashhandoutstotaxpayersaspartofthe$2.3trillionCARESAct
4
.IntheEU,additionalspendingbymemberstatesin2020was
estimatedat3.3percentofGDP
5
.
1SeeBBC,‘Coronavirus:Theworldinlockdowninmapsandcharts’,BBCNews,6April2020,availableat
/news/world-52103747.
2ThiswasdocumentedforalargenumberofcountriesbytheGoogleMobilityReports,whichusedsmartphonedatatomeasurewherepeoplespendtheirtimeduringthepandemic.Availableat
/covid19/mobility/.
3ForasummaryontheEUduringtheearlypandemic,seeMarcusetal(2021).
4IMFCOVID-19policytracker,availableat
/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.
5SeeEuropeanCommissionmemoof3March2021,‘Questionsandanswers:Communicationon?scalpolicyresponsetocoronaviruspandemic’,
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_885.
4
2018-Q1
2018-Q2
2018-Q3
2018-Q4
2019-Q1
2019-Q2
2019-Q3
2019-Q4
2020-Q1
2020-Q2
2020-Q3
2020-Q4
2021-Q1
2021-Q2
2021-Q3
2021-Q4
2022-Q1
2022-Q2
2022-Q3
2022-Q4
2023-Q1
2023-Q2
2023-Q3
25
20
15
10
5
0
Ineconomicterms,thepandemicmeantasimultaneoussupplyandademandshock.Demand
decreasedbecauseofuncertaintyamongstconsumersandbusinesses,whichledtodecreased
investmentandconsumptionexpenditureoverall.However,thepicturewasmixed.Thesimpleinabilitytoacquirecertainin-personservicesdestroyedcertaintypesofconsumption,whereastheshiftto
remoteworkboosteddemandforICTgoodsthatenabledthedigitalisationofworkprocesses.Paralleltothenegativedemandshock,thecombinationofhighlevelsofuncertaintyregardingfutureincome,thesuppressionofconsumerspendingopportunitiesandincomeoremploymentsupportprovidedbygovernmentsledtoanaccumulationoflargesavings
(Figure1)
(Attinasietal,2021).Intheeuroarea,highersavingsweremostlydrivenbylowerconsumption(Dosscheetal,2021).
Figure1:Pandemic-periodhouseholdsavingsrate(%)
30
—EuropeanUnion-27countries(from2020)
—Euroarea–20countries(from2023)
Source:BruegelbasedonEurostatdatasetnasq_10_ki.
Thesupplyshockresultedfromdi?cultyinproducinggoodsariginsfromfactoryclosuresand
logisticalhurdlesinshippinggoodsacrossborders.Certaingoodsbecamedi?culttoprocure,as
demandforthemsurgedorbecausecrucialstepsofthesupplychainbecamedisrupted.Theinabilitytoacquirepersonalservicesledtoashiftofconsumptioninfavourofgoods
.Figure2a
showsthelargedropinconsumptionofboth(non-food)goodsandservicesresultingfromdomesticandforeign
disruption.Italsoshowsthequickrecoverymadebygoodsrelativetoservices.
5
2019-01
2019-05
2019-09
2020-01
2020-05
2020-09
2021-01
2021-05
2021-09
2022-01
2022-05
2022-09
2023-01
2023-05
2023-09
2015-01
2015-08
2016-03
2016-10
2017-05
2017-12
2018-07
2019-02
2019-09
2020-04
2020-11
2021-06
2022-01
2022-08
2023-03
2023-10
Figure2:Pandemicretailturnoverofnon-foodproducts(exceptfuel)andservicesintheEU27
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
(a)Retailsaleofnon-foodproducts(exceptfuel)
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
(b)Serviceactivities
Accommodation
Foodandbeverageserviceactivities
Source:BruegelbasedonEurostatdatasetsSTS_TRTU_MandSTS_SETU_M.Note:Index(2015=100),Monthlydata,calendarandseasonallyadjusted.
Theincreaseindemandforgoodstogetherwithlogisticaldi?cultiesledtoasurgeinratesforfreight(UNCTAD,2021).Forexample,inLosAngeles,thesurgeindemandfortradedgoodstogetherwithhighnumbersofsickworkersduringthepandemicledtolongwaitingperiodsforshipsintheport
6
.Similarproblemswereexperiencedaroundtheworldandweredirectlyre?ectedinthecostsofshipping.
Figure3
showsthefreightratesfortheshippingofastandard40-footcontainerfromShanghaito
RotterdamandtoLosAngeles.TheshippingratesfromChinatoEuropeincreasedfromaround$2000tomorethan$14000,aseven-foldincreaseinthecost.
6AndrewO’Reilly,‘Stalledships,stressedcrews:CovidbuyingboomoverwhelmsLAports’,TheGuardian,11March2021,
/us-news/2021/mar/11/la-ports-stalled-ships-stressed-crews-covid-buying-boom.
6
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
Figure3:Freightrates($)
—WCIShanghaitoRotterdamper40footbox(USD)
—WCIShanghaitoLosAngeles
per40footbox(USD)
Source:Bloomberg.
2.2Pricevolatilityandshortages
Theincreaseinscarcityandhighercostsofgoodsproductionanddistributionweremanifestedinbothconsumerpricesandtheavailabilityofgoodstoconsumers.Aremarkableexampleofhowthese
phenomenamaterialisedwasinthemarketsfornewandusedcars.Anticipatinglowerdemandandthedi?cultyofprocuringparts,manymanufacturersdisinvestedtheirinventoriesandcancelledordersforinputssuchassemiconductors(Burkackyetal,2022).Butincontrasttoexpectations,consumerdemandforcarssurgedandcarcompaniescouldnotkeepupwithdemand,resultinginanapparent
‘shortage’ofchipsforcarmakers.Inthecaseofnewcars,thisledtolongwaitingperiodstoreceivenewcars,whilepricesremainedrelativelysimilar.Companiesdecidednottousemarketpricinginordertomanagetheirinventories,andinsteadoptedtoincreasewaitingperiodsforconsumers.Meanwhile,thesecond-handcarmarketdidnothaveanysuchrestrictions.Inthismarket,pricessurgeduntilmarkets
cleared.Figure4
showspriceindicesfornewandusedcars.Whiletherewasagradualincreaseinthepricesofnewcarsby19percent,pricesforusedcarssurgedrapidlyby57percent.
7
Figure4:UsedversusnewcarsCPI,UnitedStates
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
01/01/2016
01/05/2016
01/09/2016
01/01/2017
01/05/2017
01/09/2017
01/01/2018
01/05/2018
01/09/2018
01/01/2019
01/05/2019
01/09/2019
____Used
01/01/2020
01/05/2020
01/09/2020
01/01/2021
01/05/2021
01/09/2021
01/01/2022
01/05/2022
01/09/2022
01/01/2023
01/05/2023
01/09/2023
____New
Source:BruegelbasedonFRED.
Thispointstoaninterestingdynamic,withsomemarketsabletoreacttosupplyordemandshocks
throughpricing,whileothersareless?exible.Inmanycases,commoditypricessimplyincreased,
leadingtopricevolatilitybutnotshortages.However,whentherearepre-negotiatedpricesincontractsorreputationalrisksassociatedwithmassivepriceincreases(asisthecaseforcarmanufacturers),anincreaseinscarcitycanleadtoactualshortagesandlongerwaittimesfortheful?lmentofcontracts.
2.3Policyresponsesandtheaftermath
Pandemic-inducedpoliciesplayedamajorroleincreatingthemarketdistortionsexperiencedduringthepandemic.Closedbordercrossings,factoryclosuresand?scalstimulusplayedimportantrolesintheeconomicimpactofthepandemic,andtheimpactonsupplychainsspeci?cally.Therewasalsoanincreaseinexportrestrictions,inparticularformedicalgoods(Evenett,2022).Atthesametime,thereweree?ectivepolicyinterventionstomitigatethee?ectsofthepandemiconconsumersand
producers.Afterthebriefimplementationofaninternalexportrestriction,EuropeanUnion
policymakersshiftedquicklytocommonpolicieswhenitcametopandemic-relatedtrademeasures(Marcusetal,2021).IntheEU,‘greenlanes’wereestablishedthatenabledgoodsto?owacross
otherwiseclosedborders.
Whiletheshockwashuge,thepandemicisyettoleavealastingmarkintheglobaltradeindicators.
Tradeingoodsrevertedquicklytoitspre-pandemictrend,despitetheinitiallargedropinretailtradeandthepricespikesintheinternationalanddomesticcostsofshipping.Mostpandemic-inducedpricespikeshavecomedownandnormalised.In?ationhasnotreturnedtoitspre-pandemictrendineithertheEUortheUS,butthisispartlydrivenbythee?ectsofthewarinUkraine.
8
However,thepandemichasledtoarethinkingamongpolicymakers.IntheEU,thesinglemarket
emergencyinstrument(beingadoptedattimeofwritingastheInternalMarketEmergencyand
ResilienceAct,IMERA
7
)isintendedtoprovideasustainedlegalbasisforthetypeofmeasuresused
duringthepandemic.Itisintendedtomitigatetheimpactifanothershockofasimilarkindwereto
appear.Industrial-policyinitiativesliketheEuropeanChipsAct(Regulation(EU)2023/1781)are
directlymotivatedbytheshortagesexperiencedduringthepandemic,andtheperceivedrisksoflongvaluechainshaveincreased.Thepandemicexperiencehasalsocontributedtothenewwaveof
industrial-policyinitiatives,asgovernmentshavebecomemoreworriedaboutsupplychainsandtrytoreshoreproduction.LawsincludingtheIn?ationReductionActintheUSandtheEuropeanreactiontoit(undertheTemporaryCrisisandTransitionFramework,seeTagliapietraetal,2023)attempttolocalisemanufacturingofgoodsconsideredcritical,whichispartiallyjusti?edbytheneedforeconomic
resilience.Suchpolicyshiftsasaresultofthepandemicwilllikelyleadtoalastingchangeinglobalsupplychains,especiallygiventhefurtherimpetustosuchpoliciesstemmingfromRussia’sinvasionofUkraine.
3TheRussianinvasionofUkraine
Russia’sfull-scaleinvasionofUkrainestartingon24February2022cameduringaperiodofelevatedcommoditypricesandcausedrecordpricespikesincommoditymarketsforenergyandagriculturalgoods.However,theeconomicfallouthadunevene?ectsacrosscountries.Thosewithlarge
dependenciesonRussianorUkrainiancommoditiesandwithfewreadilyavailablesubstitutes
experiencedlargershocksthanthosewithmorediversi?edsupplychains.Thiswasparticularly
notableforinfrastructurallyconcentratedsupplychains,suchaspipelinegastotheEU.Theinvasionexposedthesemajorsupplychainrisksandhasbeeninstrumentalincausingashiftoftoneinthepolicydebatearoundtheriskstoglobalsupplychains,compoundingsimilarbutnascentrhetoric
duringthepandemic.Thisincludestrepidationaboutotherpotentialchokepointsinglobalsupplychains,tradediversi?cationandinfrastructuralinvestment,andageneral?urryofdiscourseandpolicyrelatedtotheideaofstrategicautonomy.
Inthissection,weexplorehowtheshockplayedoutinregionsthatwereexposedduetohigh-risk
supplychains.Wearguethattheinvasionwasalocalshock,sinceshockswerenotsointenseinareaswithmorediversi?edsupplychains.Wealsoanalysetheensuingpolicyresponse.
3.1Energyshock
Priortotheinvasion,EuropewasdependentonRussiaforasigni?cantproportionofitsenergyneeds.In2021,importsofRussiangasaccountedforalmost40percentoftheEU’stotalgasconsumption
8
.
7SeeCounciloftheEUpressreleaseof1February2024,‘SMEI/IMERA:CouncilandParliamentstrikeaprovisionaldealoncrisispreparedness’,
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/01/single-market-emergency-
instrument-council-and-parliament-strike-a-provisional-deal-on-crisis-preparedness/.
8SeeIEApressreleaseof3March2022,‘HowEuropecancutnaturalgasimportsfromRussiasigni?cantlywithinayear-
News’,InternationalEnergyAgency
,/news/how-europe-can-cut-natural-gas-imports-from-russia-
signi?cantly-within-a-year.
9
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
AlmostalloftheEU’sgaswasdeliveredthroughonlyfourpipelinesfromRussia:NordStream,UkraineTransit,YamalandTurkstream(Zachmannetal,2024).Thisrepresentedasigni?cantstakeintheEU’senergyinfrastructure,whichprovedtobeanmajorsystemicrisk.
Priortotheinvasion,theEUwasalreadyexperiencinganenergycrisisinthesecondhalfof2021
becauseofincreasedgasdemandfollowingthere-openingofeconomiespost-COVID-19
9
.TheRussianaggressionseverelycompoundedthecrisis,causingrecordenergyprices.Naturalgaspricesreachedhistorichighs
(Figure5)
inthesummerof2022becauseofthereductioninsupplyfromRussia,fearsofshortages,generaluncertaintyandlowoutputfromhydroandnuclearelectricityoutputinthe
summer(McWilliamsetal,2022;GilTertreetal,2023).ThisledtoincreasedwholesaleelectricitypricesintheEU,passedthroughtohouseholdsandindustry,sincethemostexpensivetechnologydeterminestheelectricityprice(McWilliamsetal,2022;GilTertreetal,2023).
Figure5:LastpriceTTFfutures(€/MWh)
Source:Bloomberg.
Incontrast,theUSsawlesspricevolatility(Figure6).LargeUSdomesticgasproductionandfewtiestoRussiaandUkrainegenerallymeantthattheUSwasinitiallyshieldedfromtheshock.TheHenryHubprice,theUSnaturalgasbenchmarkprice,eventuallyincreasedduetotheglobalgasmarkets,butnottothesamedegreeasinEurope.IntheabsenceofasystemicrisktotheUS’senergyinfrastructure,
thekindsofpoliciesthattheEUhaspursuedsincetheinvasionhavenotbeennecessaryintheUS.
9SeeCounciloftheEU,‘Energypricesandsecurityofsupply’,
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/energy-prices-
and-security-of-supply/.
10
Figure6:EuropeanvsUSnaturalgasprices(€/MWh)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
20/07/201820/07/2019
20/07/202020/07/202120/07/2022
TTFHenryHub
20/07/2023
Source:Bloomberg.
Thereweresubstantialpolicyreactionstothisshock,inparticularintheEU.Thisincluded?scal
supporttoaidconsumersandindustryfacingelevatedprices,aswellastradediversi?cationand
investmentinenergyinfrastructuretodiversifyfromRussianenergy.Manyofthesepolicieswereofenormousmagnitude,showcasingtheproportionateresponseneededtoashockinahighriskand
essentialsupplychain.IntheEU,theimmediateresponsewastoshieldhouseholdsandindustryfromthehighenergycosts.TotalenergysubsidiesintheEUincreasedfrom€216billionin2021to€390
billionin2022throughatleast230measurestoeasetheburdenofhighandvolatilepricesacross
economicsectors.Householdsandindustryreceivedthemajority
(Figure7)
(EuropeanCommission,2023).Subsidiesweredesignedtolowerthecostofenergytofacilitatedemandviataxmeasures,
incomeorpricesupportanddirecttransfers(EuropeanCommission,2023).Subsidieswerealsousedtocombattheenergycrisisthroughsupportingenergye?ciencyandsupportinginfrastructure,whichreceived250percentmoreinsubsidiesin2022thanin2021(EuropeanCommission,2023).
11
Figure7:EnergysubsidiesbyeconomicsectorintheEU27,€billions(2022prices),2015–2022
450
390
400
350
300
250
216
193195200
200
177174179
150
100
50
0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2015
Crosssector
Others
Agriculture
Households
Industry
Transport
EnergyIndustry
Source:EuropeanCommission(2023).
TheEUhasalsopursuedmedium-andlonger-termstrategiestoreducetherisktoenergysupplies.
Sgaravattietal(2022)groupedtheEU’smulti-prongedapproachtotheenergycrisisintoenergydeals,infrastructure,energysubstitution,demandreductionandthedevelopmentofrenewables.TheEU
succeededinreplacingRussiangassupplythroughnewdeals,whichbytheendof2022,hadresultedinagreementsamountingto10.8billioncubicmetres(bcm)ofnewgassupplyin2023and47bcm
lateron,notincludingthe50bcmLNGimportvolumeplansfromtheUS.
NewinfrastructureinvestmentincludedexpandedLNGcapacity,theBalticpipelinebetweenNorwayandPoland,gasinterconnectorsand?oatingstorageandregasi?cationunits.Also,interestin
alternativesupplychainsbypassingRussianterritoryhasincreased.TheEuropeanBankfor
ReconstructionandDevelopmentannounceda$100millioninvestmentintheKazakhrailwaysystemtosupportthemiddlecorridor,analternativerouteavoidingthetrans-Siberianrailwaytotransport
goodsfromChina(Eldem,2022).
Thecombinationofpoliciesdescribedabovehasbeenbroadlysuccessful.Whilstitistoosoontofullyevaluatethesuccessofenergysubsidiesincombatinghistoricallyelevatedenergyprices,therearesignsoftheircontributiontotheEU’sresilienceduringthecrisis.EvidencesuggeststhatsubsidiestohouseholdswerewelltargetedintheEU,shieldingthemost-vulnerableconsumersfromthepass
throughofelevatedenergycosts(seeArreguietal,2022).Furthermore,industryoverallincreasedoutputandemploymentin2022
(Figure8)
.Ontheotherhand,industriesforwhichenergyinput
representsalargerproportionofproductioncosts,suchasthechemicalsindustry,experienceda
contractioninoutputinthethirdquarterof2022relativetothethirdquarterof2021(Sgaravattietal,
12
40%
2023).Finally,thedevelopmentofnewinfrastructuretoaccommodatenewsourcesofenergycontributedtolowergasprices,andhassecuredalow-riskanddiversi?edenergysupplyforthefuture.
Figure8:ChangeinEUindustrialoutput:Q32022vsQ32021
.
2.0%
0.0%
-2.0%
-4.0%
-6.0%
-8.0%
IndustrytotalManufacturingPaperChemicalsNon-metallicBasicmetals
minerals
OutputEmploymentHoursworked
Source:Sgaravattietal(2023).
TheEUexperiencedahugeshockrequiringanequallyhuge?scal,infrastructureandtraderesponse.
Thesepolicieswerelargelysuccessful,demonstratingtheEU’smulti-facetedresiliencetotheshock.Itshouldbeemphasisedthatthisresiliencecamewithalargepricetagthatitwouldbeundesirabletorepeat.
3.2Agriculture
AtthepointRussiainvadedUkraine,thetwocountries,alongwithKazakhstan,wereresponsiblefor25percentofglobalcerealexports,andRussiaandUkrainealonewereresponsiblefor12percentofallcaloriestraded(Zachmannetal,2022;Glauberetal,2022).RussiaandUkraineaccountedfor20
percentand10percentofglobalwheatexports,respectively,andarecrucialsuppliersofbarley,sun?oweroil,maizeandrapeseedtoglobalmarkets(OECDandFAO,2022).
Ukraineexported96percentofitsagriculturalproductsviatherobustnetworkofBlackSeaports
(USDA,2023).Russia’sinvasioninitiallyblockedallofUkraine’sportsforaperiodofalmostsixmonthsfromFebruarytoJuly2022.MajorportsincludingMykolayiv,MariupolandKhersonwereeither
a?ectedbythe?ghtingordestroyed(Zachmannetal,2022).
Likeenergyexports,agriculturalcommoditieswerealreadyatrelativelyhighpricesin2021andearly2022,asaresultofpass-throughofhighinputprices.Followingtheinvasion,globalfearsabout
Ukraine’sabilitytoharvestandexportagriculturalcommoditiescompoundedthesealreadyelevated
13
Eurospertonne
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
prices,leadingtorecordprices(De
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 廣州紅盾網(wǎng)年度報(bào)告(共10篇)
- 2024年菏澤學(xué)院?jiǎn)握新殬I(yè)適應(yīng)性測(cè)試題庫(kù)及答案解析
- 2024屆云南三校高考備考聯(lián)考卷(五)文科綜合試題答案及雙向細(xì)目表
- 乳腺癌的手術(shù)治療
- 2025支票及質(zhì)押借款合同
- 2024年度天津市公共營(yíng)養(yǎng)師之三級(jí)營(yíng)養(yǎng)師能力提升試卷A卷附答案
- 2024年度天津市公共營(yíng)養(yǎng)師之二級(jí)營(yíng)養(yǎng)師測(cè)試卷(含答案)
- 2024年度四川省公共營(yíng)養(yǎng)師之四級(jí)營(yíng)養(yǎng)師題庫(kù)綜合試卷B卷附答案
- 2024年度四川省公共營(yíng)養(yǎng)師之三級(jí)營(yíng)養(yǎng)師考試題庫(kù)
- 陶瓷加工項(xiàng)目告
- 英雄之旅思維模型
- 解一元二次方程(公式法)(教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì))-九年級(jí)數(shù)學(xué)上冊(cè)同步備課系列
- 冬季傳染病預(yù)防-(課件)-小學(xué)主題班會(huì)課件
- 2024年秋新滬教牛津版英語(yǔ)三年級(jí)上冊(cè) Unit 6 第1課時(shí) 教學(xué)課件
- 江蘇揚(yáng)州中學(xué)教育集團(tuán)2023-2024學(xué)年中考三模數(shù)學(xué)試題含解析
- 2025年統(tǒng)編版高考?xì)v史一輪復(fù)習(xí):北洋軍閥統(tǒng)治時(shí)期的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化 講義
- 電影放映設(shè)備日常維護(hù)保養(yǎng)規(guī)程
- TSHZSAQS 00255-2024 食葵病蟲(chóng)害防治技術(shù)規(guī)范
- 食材配送消防安全應(yīng)急預(yù)案
- 《供應(yīng)鏈管理》期末考試復(fù)習(xí)題庫(kù)(含答案)
- 招標(biāo)文件范本江蘇版
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論