版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
11TRENDSINPHILANTHROPYFOR2024
2
DorothyA.JohnsonCenterforPhilanthropy
TheDorothyA.JohnsonCenterforPhilanthropyatGrandValleyStateUniversitywas
establishedin1992withsupportfromtheW.K.KelloggFoundation.Ourmissionisto
beagloballeaderinhelpingindividualsandorganizationsunderstand,strengthen,andadvancephilanthropy,resultinginasmart,adaptivesectorthathelpscreatestrong,
inclusivecommunities.
Weputresearchtoworkwithandforprofessionalsacrossthecountryandtheworld.
Throughprofessionaleducationofferings;research,evaluation,andstrategicservices;andboldthinkingtoadvancethefield,wesupportaphilanthropicecosystemdefinedbyeffectivephilanthropy,strongnonprofits,andinformedcommunitychange.
Learnmoreat
V
G
AN
RDLEY
SAEUNERSY
enter
DorothyA.Johnson
FORPHILANTHROPY
Copyright?2024DorothyA.JohnsonCenterforPhilanthropyatGrandValleyStateUniversity.Allrightsreserved.
ToconnectwiththeDorothyA.JohnsonCenterforPhilanthropy,email
jcp@
orcall(616)331-7585.
3
Contents
Introduction
WithThousandsofIncarceratedStudentsEnrolledin
HigherEducation,HowdoWeMeasureSuccess?
AAPICommunitiesareLeadinganUpswellinPhilanthropy
WithCrisisComesChange:BlackWomenandtheGlassCliff
AWake-UpCallforInvestingintheSouth
ExpectedChangestoFederalRaceandEthnicityStandards
PresentOpportunities—andCaveats
AffordableHousingisaNationalCrisiswithaDistinctLocalImpact
TheFiscalSponsorshipModel:
AGrowingTrendintheNonprofitSector
TheArtificialIntelligenceRevolutionArrivesinPhilanthropy
DonorAnonymityIsUndertheMicroscope
FinancialStressandPhilanthropicInfluence:
ThePrecariousPromiseofGenerationZ
InfluencerPhilanthropyIsOntheRise,butthePlatformMatters
JohnsonCenterStaff
4
5
9
14
17
21
24
27
31
34
38
42
45
henwethinkof“trends”inoureverydaylives,wetypicallythinkofconcretethingswecansee,hear,oreveneat.Popularsongs,orbrandnames—the
ubiquitousappetizer,thememewecan’tescape.
11TRENDS
INPHILANTHROPY
FOR2024
W
Overeightyearsofproducing11TrendsinPhilanthropy,theDorothyA.JohnsonCenterforPhilanthropyhasmostoftentakenthisapproachtoourannualreviewofthesector,aswell.Ourteamhascombedthelandscapeofnonprofitsandfoundationsforthemostvisiblesignsofatrend—theincreasedgrantdollars,theemergingnetworks,familiarvoicesspeakingup.
Thisyear’strendsshareafamiliarwealthofexamples,data,quotes,andresearch
publicationsthatcanhelpusallanticipatethevectorsofchange.Butatthecoreof11
TrendsinPhilanthropyfor2024,readerswillfindasetofquestionsratherthananswers.Eachtrendposesanumberofmoral,economic,equity-related,tactical,andother
questionsthatthesectorwillhavetoanswer.
Insomecases—suchasintheuseofartificialintelligenceintheworkplace,orthe
adoptionofnewfederalprotocolsforraceandethnicitydata—thoseanswerswillcome
dueverysoon.Inothers—suchashowinstitutionalphilanthropyaddressestheglasscliffcrisisamongleadersofcolororshiftsresourcestoaccountfortheU.S.South’sbooming
population—itmaybeyearsbeforeweunderstandwhetherandhowchoicesaremade.
Whatweseemostclearlyforphilanthropyin2024andbeyondisthatthe
fieldwillwrestlewiththesequestions.Welookforwardtotheworkahead.
WearedeeplygratefultothegenerousdonorsoftheLubbersPhilanthropyInnovationFundwhomadethisworkpossible,aswellastheentireJohnsonCenterteam,eachofwhomcontributedtotheproductionofthisreport.
Tolearnmoreaboutthisreport,contactKarenHoekstra,MarketingandCommunicationsManager,at(616)331-6404oremail
karen.hoekstra@
.
WithThousands
ofIncarceratedStudentsEnrolledinHigher
Education,HowdoWe
MeasureSuccess?
byEmilyDoeblerandAaronYore-VanOosterhout
A
spredictedinour2022Trends
report,postsecondaryeducationalprogramminginprisoncontinuesto
grow(Hawver&Yore-VanOosterhout).Withthisgrowthcomesaonce-in-a-generationopportunitytoreshapehowweevaluaterehabilitative
programmingand,moreimportantly,itsimpactsonthepeopleenrolledinthesame.
Accordingtothemostrecentdataavailable,
therearenowmorethan400HigherEducationinPrison(HEP)programsacrossthecountry,
andeverystateoffersatleastoneHEPprogramforpeopleincarceratedintheirsystem(NationalDirectoryofHigherEducationinPrison
Programs,2023).PhilanthropicinvolvementinHEPcontinuestogrowapaceasfoundationsgivemillionsofdollarsinsupport.Forexample:
?InJune2023,theMellonFoundationannouncedmorethan$5millionin
grantfundingtosevenhighereducation
institutionstosupporttheexpansionof
highereducationinthecarceralsystem.
Mellonhascontributedmorethan$60million
toHEPsince2015—nearlyhalfthisamount
injustthelasttwoyears.
?TheAscendiumEducationGrouphasmore
than15grants,totalingmorethan$17million,
allocatedtocurrentHEPinitiatives.
Theprincipalreasonforthissuddenexpansion
ofHEPprogramsandgrantsistherestorationof
federalstudentloanprogramsforincarcerated
students.*ThroughtheFAFSASimplification
Act,incarceratedstudentsenrolledinapproved
prisoneducationprogramswillonceagainbe
eligibleforFederalPellGrants(FederalStudent
AidKnowledgeCenter,2023)—anopportunity
deniedthemfornearly30yearssincethe
enactmentofthe1994ViolentCrimeControland
*Usingperson-centeredlanguageisimportantwhendiscussingthecarceralsystem,asresearchshowsthatlanguagecangreatlyimpactaperson’shealthandwell-being(Tranetal.,2018).TheauthorsofthistrenddrawfromTheUndergroundScholarsLanguageGuide(Cerda-Jaraetal,2019)toinformthelanguageused.SeealsothepledgefromtheFormerlyIncarceratedCollegeGraduatesNetwork.
6
LawEnforcementAct(Tewksburyetal.,2000).Asaresult,HEPisfertilegroundforpostsecondaryprogramstoexpandtheirenrollmentand
diversifytheirstudentbody.
Toguardagainsttheexploitationofstudents
andtoensuretheyarereceivingahigh-qualityeducationfortheselimitedfunds,theU.S.
DepartmentofEducationrequiresperiodic
evaluationsofprisoneducationprograms
(Gaskill&Castro,2023).Historically,these
evaluationshavemeasured“recidivism.”In
recentyears,however,manyHEPprograms
andadvocacyorganizationshavebeguncallingforachangeinhowwemeasuresuccessfor
formerlyincarceratedpeople.FundersintendingtoevaluatetheirHEPinvestmentsinthecomingyearswillfacethesamecritiques.
Recidivism,Ill-Defined
Althoughthereisnosingledefinition,
“recidivism”iswidelyunderstoodasaperson’sre-involvementincriminalactivityafter
theyhavebeenreleasedfromthecarceral
system(BureauofJusticeStatistics,n.d.).Thistermwaspopularizedafter1967whenthe
President’sCommissiononLawEnforcement
andAdministrationofJusticereleasedareportdeclaringthatreducedrecidivismshouldbe
akeygoalforthissystem(ascitedinNationalAcademiesofSciences,Engineering,and
Medicine,2022).Today,themetriciseverywhereinpublicconversationsaboutprison—a
ubiquitousproxyfor“rehabilitation”itself.
However,scholarsexaminingthecarceral
systemanditssocietalimpactshavelong
critiquedthemeasure.Manypointto
inconsistentmeasurement,forexample
(Maltz,1984).Withnosetstandardonhowto
calculatehowoftenpeoplereturntocriminality,institutionsdecideforthemselveswhat
methodstheyuse;unsurprisingly,thiscan
resultinproblemsrangingfrombroadpublic
misunderstandingtocherry-pickingthemethodthatbestmakesone’scase.
Forexample,somestudiesmeasurerecidivismbytallyingrearrests—thatis,thenumberof
[M]anyHEPprogramsand
advocacyorganizationshave
beguncallingforachangein
howwemeasuresuccessfor
formerlyincarceratedpeople.
Fundersintendingtoevaluate
theirHEPinvestmentsinthe
comingyearswillfacethe
samecritiques.
peoplereleasedfromprisonwhoarearrested
againwithinacertainperiodoftime(Bureauof
JusticeStatistics,2002).But“arrestratesareas
muchafunctionofpoliceactivitiesastheyare
ofcriminalactivities,”andthereareperhaps
nocommunitiessohighlysurveilledasthose
withhighnumbersofpeoplereturningfrom
prison—oftencommunitiesofcolor(quotefrom
Gottschalk,2015,p.104;forsurveillance,see
Clear,2007).Inaddition,somestatedepartments
ofcorrectionsmonitorreturnees’criminal
recordsonlyfortheirfirstyearafterrelease,
whileothersmaymonitorrecordsforthreeyears
ormore,inevitablyincreasingtherecidivismrate
(Klingele,2019).
Pointingfingersatthepeoplecommitting
crimes,ahighrecidivismratecanjustify
curtailingparoleandexpandingtheprison
systemto“l(fā)ockthemup.”Lookinginsteadat
thecarceralsystem,ahighrecidivismratecan
signalthefailureofprisonstorehabilitate,and
promptdemandsfordecarceration.Whichever
waythepoliticalwindsblow,criminaljustice
scholarsIanLoaderandRichardSparks
argue,“thereisalwaysmoreatstakeincrime
reductionthanreducingcrime,andhencemore
toevaluationthanfindingout‘whatworks’”(as
quotedinGottschalk,2015,p.101).
Indeed,interventionsinhumanbehaviordon’t
always“work”onceandforall.Recidivismasks
a“yes”or“no”questionatasinglemomentin
time:didsomeonecommitanothercrimeor
7
didn’tthey?Itdoesnottellus,forinstance,
whethersubsequentcrime(s)wereoflesser
severitythanthefirst,ormotivatedbyaddictionorunaddressedmentalillness,ortheresultof
heightenedscrutinyonbehaviorsthatother
non-incarceratedpeopledon’tthinktwiceabout:behaviorssuchaslegaldrugoralcoholuse,or
stayingoutpastacertainhourofthenight.
RecidivismandtheSuccessofHEP
TheFAFSASimplificationActrequireseveryHEPprogrambeevaluatedbycorrectionsagencies
thatcanprovideoversightandassesswhether
programsareoperatinginstudents’bestinterests(Gaskill&Castro,2023).Forprogramsthatdo
notpassthis“bestinterest”determination,
studentswillnolongerreceivePellGrants.Whilemeasuringrecidivismandratesofcompletion
areoptional,oversightentitiescanadoptthem.Withoutintentionalaction,afocusonrecidivismmaystilldominateandskewtheconversation.
Somehighereducationinstitutionshave
expressedthatrecidivismshouldnotbeusedtoevaluatetheirprograms(Gaskill&Castro,2023).Advocatescallforothermeasurementstodetermineaprogram’ssuccess,guidedbyacommitmenttoequity,excellence,andaccess(Erzenetal.,2019).
IntentionalityinProgramEvaluation
Buthowelsecouldweevaluateprogrammingthatmustbe—bytheverynatureofthesysteminwhichitresides—rehabilitative?Thereareseveralalternatives.
?First,watchingfor“markersofdesistance”
isonlyasmallstepawayfromtraditional
measurementsofrecidivismbutasksamuchdifferentquestion.Insteadofanswering“yes”or“no”tothepotentialpresenceofcrime,
evaluatorslookforsignsthataperson’s
criminalbehaviorisbecominglesssevere
ormoreinfrequentovertime.Whileany
criminalitywouldbeseenasafailureintherecidivismparadigm,lesseningtheseverityorfrequencyofoffendingmayshowsuccessforrehabilitativeprogramming(Klingele,2019).
?Takingastepfurtherfromrecidivismand
criminalbehavior,evaluatorscaninstead
monitorpositivesignsofsuccessforpeople
leavingprison,includingengagementwith
“healthcare,housing,education,employment,
andsocialandcommunityintegration”
(NationalAcademiesofSciences,Engineering,
andMedicine,2022,p.150).
Philanthropywillcontinuetoplayalargerole
inprovidinghighereducationtoincarcerated
studentsforatleastthenextseveralyears.
Foundationscanbealeaderinthisbyfunding
evaluationmethodsthatprioritizemetrics
beyondrecidivism(Erzenetal.,2019).While
recidivismratesmaybeusefulingainingsupport
forHEPfromtaxpayers,asPatrickFilipeConway,
directoroftheBostonCollegePrisonEducation
Program,emphasizes,“apurelyinstrumental
approachdoesnotfullycapture—and,in
fact,mightobscure—morefoundationalcivic
principlestotherecognitionofhumandignity
andtheprovisionofeducationaccessand
opportunity”(2023,p.477).
References
NationalDirectoryofHigherEducationinPrisonPrograms.
(2023,May).AllianceforHigherEducationinPrison.
https://
/national-directory/stats-view
AscendiumEducationGroup.(2023).Allgrants.
https://
/our-grantmaking/all-grants?
focusarea%5B0%5D=47&start=10
BureauofJusticeStatistics.(n.d.).Whatisrecidivism.
/recidivism/templates/definition.cfm
Clear,T.(2007).Imprisoningcommunities:Howmass
incarcerationmakesdisadvantagedneighborhoodsworse.Oxford
UniversityPress.
Cerda-Jara,M.,Czifra,S.,Galindo,A.,Mason,J.,Ricks,C.,&
Zohrabi,A.(2019).Languageguideforcommunicatingabout
thoseinvolvedinthecarceralsystem.UndergroundScholars
Initiative,UCBerkeley.
https://undergroundscholars.berkeley.
edu/blog/2019/3/6/language-guide-for-communicating-about
-
those-involved-in-the-carceral-system
Conway,P.F.(2023,Summer).Beyondrecidivism:Exploring
formerlyincarceratedstudentperspectivesonthevalueof
highereducationinprison.TheReviewofHigherEducation46(4),
453–483.
/10.1353/rhe.2023.a900569
Erzen,T.,Gould,M.R.,&Lewen,J.(2019).Equityandexcellence
inpractice:Aguideforhighereducationinprison.Alliancefor
HigherEducationinPrisonandPrisonUniversityProject.
/wp-content/
uploads/2019/05/equity-and-excellence-in-practice.pdf
8
FederalStudentAidKnowledgeCenter.(2023,March29).
EligibilityofconfinedorincarceratedindividualstoreceivePell
Grants.U.S.DepartmentofEducation.
/
knowledge-center/library/dear-colleague-letters/2023-03-29/
eligibility-confined-or-incarcerated-individuals-receive-pell
-
grants
FormerlyIncarceratedCollegeGraduatesNetwork.(n.d.).Our
pledge.
/our-pledge/
Gaskill,S.,&Castro,E.L.(2023,April).Proposed‘bestinterest
ofstudents’metricsforprisonhighereducation:Guidance
frompubliccomments.TheResearchCollaborativeonHigher
EducationinPrison.
/
research/upep_research_proposals/guidance_from_public_
comments_april2023.pdf
Gottschalk,M.(2015).Caught:Theprisonstateandthelockdown
ofAmericanpolitics.PrincetonUniversityPress.
Hawver,T.,&Yore-VanOosterhout,A.(2022,January18).
ReopeningfederalPellgrantsforincarceratedpeoplemeans
higheredandfunderscandomore.11TrendsinPhilanthropy
for2022.DorothyA.JohnsonCenterforPhilanthropy.
/blog/reopening-federal-pell-grants
-
for-incarcerated-people-means-higher-ed-and-funders-can-do
-
more/
Klingele,C.(2019).Measuringchange:Fromratesofrecidivismto
markersofdesistance.JournalofCriminalLawandCriminology,
109(4),769–817.
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.
edu/jclc/vol109/iss4/2
Maltz,M.(1984).Recidivism.AcademicPress.
MellonFoundation.(2023,June6).Mellonannouncesover$5M
infundingforhighereducationinprisons.
https://www.mellon.
org/news/grants-to-increase-higher-education-opportunities-in
-
prisons
NationalAcademiesofSciences,Engineering,andMedicine.
(2022).Thelimitsofrecidivism:Measuringsuccessafterprison.
TheNationalAcademiesPress.
/10.17226/26459
Tewksbury,R.,Erickson,D.J.,&Taylor,J.M.(2000).
Opportunitieslost:TheconsequencesofeliminatingPell
granteligibilityforcorrectionaleducationstudents.Journalof
OffenderRehabilitation,31(1/2),43–56.
/10.1300/
J076v31n01_02
Tran,N.T.,Baggio,S.,Dawson,A.,O'Moore,é.,Williams,B.,
Bedell,P.,Simon,O.,Scholten,W.,Getaz,L.,&Wolff,H.(2018,
November).Wordsmatter:Acallforhumanizingandrespectful
languagetodescribepeoplewhoexperienceincarceration.BMC
InternationalHealthandHumanRights,18(1):41.
https://www.ncbi.
/pmc/articles/PMC6240232/
AAPICommunities
areLeadinganUpswellinPhilanthropy
byTrishAbaloandMandySharpEizinger
A
sianAmericanandPacificIslander
(AAPI*)communitiesareleadinga
shiftinthephilanthropiclandscape.As
demonstratedinthe“StopAsianHate”movementorinresponsetotheMauiwildfire’sdevastatingeffectsonlocalLahainacommunities,AAPI-ledmovementsaremobilizingmajorresources.
Background
AsianAmericans“werethefastest-growingracialorethnicgroupintheU.S.from2000to2019”
(Budiman&Ruiz,2021,para.1).In2021,the
estimatednumberofAsianAmericanresidentsinthecountrywas24million(U.S.Census
Bureau,2023).The2020electionvoterturnoutrateforthenon-HispanicAsianpopulation
sawthelargestjump(from49%to59%)ofany
identitygroupfrom2016to2020(Fabina,2021).
Alongsidethisgrowth,however,starkpatterns
ofinequalityexistinparallel.In2018,thePew
ResearchCenterfoundthatincomeinequality
wasthegreatestamongAsianAmericans.Over
analmostfifty-yearperiod,thedistribution
ofincome“transformedfrombeingoneofthe
mostequaltobeingthemostunequalamong
America'smajorracialandethnicgroups”
(Kochhar&Cilluffo,para.2).
Donorsandfoundationshavehistorically
neglectedfundingtoaddressthesechallenges
andmorewithinAAPIcommunities.Asian
Americans/PacificIslandersinPhilanthropy
*Thispieceusestheterm“AAPI”butthereareseveralversionsofthisacronym(AsianAmericanOrganizing
Project,2021).TheU.S.CensusBureauistheleadingsourceforthehistoricalandcontemporarydefinitionsof
raceandethnicgroups(Prattetal.,2015;U.S.CensusBureau,2022;PewResearchCenter,2020).Theyutilizetheterm“AsianAmericanNativeHawaiianPacificIslander”(AANHPI),butcommonusesinthemediainclude“AsianAmerican,”“AsianPacificIslanderAmerican”(APIA),and“AsianPacificIslanderDesiAmerican”(APIDA).
Theterm“AsianAmerican”hasitsrootsinbuildingpeoplepowerduringthe1960sand1970s.Whileitcontinuestobeusedinthisway,thetermhasalsobeencritiquedforelevatingsomegroupswhileobscuringothers(Kaur,2023,2022).Thesedifferenttermscollectivelyrefertodiversegroupsofpeoplewithoriginsfrommorethan26differentnations,50ethnicities,and100languages(Findlingetal.,2022;Banerjee,2021;Kim,2021).
ThePewResearchCenternotestheimportanceofself-descriptioninhowtheU.S.Asianpopulationtalksabouttheiridentities(Ruizetal.,2023;Ruizetal.,2022),whileChangeLab(n.d.)describeshowAsianAmerican
identityoftencomeswithassumptionsaboutthisgroupasamonolith,andinsistsitmustinsteadbeunderstoodwithinthebroadercontextsandsystemsofpowerthatorganizeoursociety,includingthesocialconstructionofraceandourcapitalisteconomicsystem.Thesethemesandmoreaffecthowthesetermshavechangedandwillcontinuetoshiftovertime.
10
(AAPIP)’s2021reportSeekingtoSoarconcludesthatwhiletheshareoftheU.S.population
identifyingasAAPIhasmorethandoubled
from3%to7%in30years,foundationfundingforAAPIcommunitiesonlyaccountedfor
0.2%ofdomesticgrantmaking,a“shocking
disappointment”(p.5).AsurveybytheCenterforEffectivePhilanthropyfurtherfoundthat
almostthree-fourths(71%)ofAAPI-serving
nonprofitsreportedthattheydidnotreceive
newfoundationfundingin2020(Buteauetal.,2021)evenasxenophobicviolenceagainstAAPIcommunitiesincreased77%from2019to2020(Findlingetal.,2022).
CollaborationandMomentumAcrosstheField
WhiletherehaslongbeenadvocacybyAAPI
leadersandallies,recentcallstoactioninthefaceofviolencehavegarneredincreasedmomentum.
?In2019,AsianAmericansAdvancingJustice,madeupoffiveofthecountry’slargestAsianAmericanadvocacy,policy,andlegalserviceorganizations,joinedCommunitiesAgainst
Hate,adiversecoalitionof19national
organizationstofightrisingviolence.The
LeadershipConferenceEducationFund,in
partnershipwithCommunitiesAgainstHate(2019),releasedHateMagnified:CommunitiesinCrisis,a2019reportanalyzingalmost
4,000storiescollectedfromtheCommunitiesAgainstHateonlinedatabaseandanationallyrepresentativeHateIncidencePoll.Many
storiesinthedatabaseinvolvedanti-Asianandanti-immigrantrhetoric.
?InMarch2020,StopAAPIHatelaunched
awebsiteforindividualstosafelyshare
theirexperiencesamidstariseinCOVID-
relatedanti-Asianracism.Inthefollowing
months,callsto“StopAsianHate”went
viralinresponsetohigh-profileattacks,
includingthe2021killingof84-year-oldVichaRatanapakdeeinSanFranciscoandtheseriesof2021Atlantaareaspashootings(Kai-HwaWong,2022).Mutualaidgroups—whichhave
“l(fā)ongbeenameansforsurvivalformany
AsianAmericanimmigrants(Fernando,2021,
para.16)”andwhosenetworksswelledduring
theonsetofthepandemic—responded
broadly(Wang,2021).
?In2021,AAPIPissuedacallfor“expanding
philanthropicsupportforAsianAmerican
communitiesandorganizationsandall
historicallyunderservedcommunitiesof
color”(para.8).TheChronicleofPhilanthropy
pushedoutthiscallfromover500foundation
leadersandallyorganizations(Daniels,2021).
ControloftheNarrative
Keygivingeffortstoanswerthesecallshave
gainedvisibilityandalignwithanarrayof
existingphilanthropicpriorities,fromdonor-
advisedfundsandgivingcirclestocivic
engagementanddisasterresponse.
?AAPIData(2020)conductedsurveysand
interviewsofAAPIPmembersandfound“asteadyincreaseoffamilyfoundationsaswellasAAPIsopeningdonor-advisedfundswithafocusonAAPIcommunities”(Ramakrishnanetal.,p.6).Theyalsonotedthata2016
NationalAsianAmericanSurveyfoundthatgivingtocharitablecausesamongNative
HawaiiansandPacificIslanderswasamongthehighest.
?AccordingtoAAPIP(n.d.),givingcircles
arealong-standingpracticeamongstAAPI
communities.However,recentdevelopments,
suchas$3.65millioningrantsfromthe
MacArthurFoundation(2023)(partofwhich
helpedfundTheChicagoCommunityTrust’s
AsianGivingCircle,2023),TheDenver
Foundation’s(2023)establishmentofanew
affinitygivingcircle,andNorthStarFund’s
(2022)collaborationwithAsianWomen's
GivingCircleinNewYorkCity(reportedasone
oftheirtoptenhighlightsfrom2021),showthe
importanceofthisgivingapproach.
?TheAAPICivicEngagementFund,oneofthe
largestfundersofAAPImovementbuilding,
awarded$9millioningeneraloperating
grantsoverthepasttwoyearsforcivic
participation(JinLee,2023;Mesfin,2022).In
responsetotheMauiwildfires,NDNCollective
11
(2023)encouragedKanaka(NativeHawaiian)-ledefforts,suchasdonationstotheHawai’i
People’sFunds,theNā`AikāneoMauiCulturalCenter,andtheMauiMutualAidFund.
?In2021,morethan9,000Asianbusiness
leadersandallies,includingZoomCEO
EricYuan,YouTubecofounderSteveChen,
andOpenTableCEODebbySoo,generated
significantmediaattentionwhenthey
pledged$10milliontopartnerwithAsian
PacificCommunityFund(StandwithAsianAmericans).Meanwhile,TheAsianAmericanFoundation(TAAF)reportedcommitmentsoverfiveyearstotaling$1.1billionin
donationsandin-kindsupportfrommorethan130partners,leveragingsignificant
supportfromAAPIbusinessleaders(2023).
?InJuly2023,TAAFandtheWalmart
FoundationlaunchedTheAAPINonprofit
Database,aninteractiveresourceconnectingdonorstoAAPInonprofitorganizations.Thistypeoftoolasabridgefororganizations
andcommunitysupporterswasechoed
inrecommendationsfroma2021Urban
Institutereport,“Effortstoconvene,connect,coordinate,andbreakdownsilosacross
AAPIorganizationscanhelpfostergreaterinvestmentintheecosystemandsupport
movementbuildingandthedevelopmentofpolicyagendasthatunifyandadvanceAAPIcommunities”(Fordetal.,p.19).
Beyondgivingandgrantmaking,significantcross-sectoractionsinserviceofAAPI
communitiesareunderway,suchasPresident
Biden'screationofthePresident'sAdvisory
CommissiononAsianAmericans,Native
Hawaiians,andPacificIslanders(TheWhite
House,2021);thedebutofASIANAMERICANS,amajorhistorydocumentaryledbyAsian
Americanfilmmakerslaudedas“themost
ambitioustelevisionchronicleoftheAsian
AmericanstoryintheUnitedStates”(PBS,2019,para.1).NBCNewscompiled“100oftheways
legislators,teens,artists,schools,athletesand
manyothersnationwidehavesteppeduptofighthateandincreasedattacks”(Yangetal.,2022,
para.1).
In2021,morethan9,000
Asianbusinessleadersand
allies,includingZoomCEO
EricYuan,YouTubecofounder
SteveChen,andOpenTable
CEODebbySoo,generated
significantmediaattention
whentheypledged$10million
topartnerwithAsianPacific
CommunityFund.
Additionalhistoricpublicsectorcommitments
inthepastfewyears,suchas$247millionin
Californiaand$30millioninNewYorkstate,
havehelpedsupportnonprofitsservingAAPI
communitiesranginginmediaoutreachand
socialnetworkingtoamultilingualhatecrime
reportinghotline(Sohrabji,2023;Coalitionfor
AsianAmericanChildrenandFamilies,2023).
Goingforward,AAPIDataandAAPIP’slatest
report(2023),SteppingupforCommunity,
suggestfundersmust:
DothehomeworkonunderstandingAAand
NHPInonprofitsandthecommunitiesthey
serve.Supportvisibilityoftheexperiences
andconcernsofAAandNHPIcommunities
…especiallyunder-investedandunderserved
populations…Investin…smallerorganizations
…[and]Investinthelong-termcapacity.(p.3)
Maintainingprogresshingesonlistening—
andamplifyingtheworkandvoiceofAAPI
communitiesleadingbyexample.
References
AAPI.(2021,March).Acallforsolidarityandcollectiveaction.
/programs/a-call-for-solidarity-and-collective
-
action/
TheAsianAmericanFoundation.(2023).AAPIgivingchallenge.
Fromthecommunity,forthecommunity.
/
our-partners/giving-challenge
TheAAPINonprofitDatabase.(2023).TheAsianAmerican
Foundation.
/
12
AAPIP.(n.d.).NationalGivingCircleNetwork.
/
pro
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 二零二五年度股權(quán)質(zhì)押資產(chǎn)重組合同示范文本3篇
- 二零二五年度鋼材倉儲(chǔ)物流服務(wù)合同9篇
- 二零二五年度路燈照明設(shè)施安全檢測(cè)合同樣本2篇
- 二零二五年度:勞動(dòng)合同法實(shí)務(wù)操作與案例分析合同3篇
- 二零二五年度船舶建造與設(shè)備安裝合同2篇
- 二零二五年度農(nóng)產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量檢測(cè)合同范本3篇
- 二零二五年度安置房買賣合同電子支付與結(jié)算規(guī)范3篇
- 3、2025年度綠色出行接送機(jī)服務(wù)合同范本2篇
- 二零二五年度文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)合作開發(fā)合同范本3篇
- 家里陪護(hù)合同(2篇)
- 手術(shù)室護(hù)理實(shí)踐指南2023年
- 電力安全工作規(guī)程(變電部分)課件
- 新人教版六年級(jí)下冊(cè)數(shù)學(xué)全冊(cè)課件
- 環(huán)保設(shè)施安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)告知卡
- 卵石地層樁基旋挖鉆施工方案
- 江蘇對(duì)口單招英語考綱詞匯總結(jié)
- (完整word版)手卡模板
- GB/T 4091-2001常規(guī)控制圖
- GB/T 13912-2020金屬覆蓋層鋼鐵制件熱浸鍍鋅層技術(shù)要求及試驗(yàn)方法
- GB 18399-2001棉花加工機(jī)械安全要求
- 陜西省延安市各縣區(qū)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)行政村村莊村名居民村民委員會(huì)明細(xì)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論